iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Verizon Data Cap: Wireless Carrier Kills Off Unlimited Plan

Verizon Data Cap

By RACHEL METZ   07/ 6/11 07:14 PM ET   AP

SAN FRANCISCO -- When Verizon Wireless kills off its unlimited data plan for new smartphone customers on Thursday, it will mark another blow for endless Web surfing and video streaming.

The move by the nation's largest wireless carrier has long been anticipated. More people are switching to smartphones and using an increasing amount of data for all manner of wireless activities. The shift could help wireless carriers ensure that they can handle the traffic flowing over the new higher-speed "4G," or fourth-generation, data networks they're rolling out.

AT&T Inc. and T-Mobile USA, the second- and fourth-largest U.S. carriers, respectively, have already set limits on monthly data usage. AT&T uses tiered data plans like the one Verizon is rolling out, while T-Mobile slows data speeds for unlimited data plan customers who use up their monthly allotment. Sprint Nextel Corp., the country's third-largest carrier, still offers an unlimited plan.

The death of unlimited wireless data is happening as service providers see an explosion in data usage, due mainly to an ever-growing number of smartphone users. According to market researcher comScore Inc., 77 million people in the U.S. had smartphones in the first three months of the year – up 11 percent from a year earlier. And according to a Nielsen study, smartphone users' average data growth climbed 89 percent to 435 megabytes in the same time frame.

Simply put, there's more profit to be made with capped data plans. Steve Clement, a Pacific Crest Securities analyst, said this growth just won't work with a fixed-pricing model over time, so to make money from the surging traffic the carriers have to try something else.

By moving away from unlimited plans, the carriers can profit more from the heaviest data users. And, as RBC analyst Jonathan Atkin pointed out, by offering low-level data packages – such as the 200 megabyte plans that T-Mobile and AT&T offer – they can bring in more smartphone users.

Part of the move to capped data is to get consumers accustomed to the idea that data isn't a limitless resource. If carriers didn't move to usage-based data plans while rolling out newer speedy data networks, the networks would get abused, Zachary Investment Research analyst Patrick Comack said. And while the pricing of Verizon's network is higher than AT&T's, its service is speedier, so it can charge a premium for now.

Verizon Wireless' current unlimited plan costs existing users $30 per month. With the new plans, smartphone users will choose between paying $30 for 2 gigabytes, $50 for 5 gigabytes or $80 for 10 gigabytes of monthly data usage. Customers who use more than their allotment will be charged $10 more for each additional gigabyte.

AT&T, meanwhile, charges $25 per month for 2 gigabytes of data and $45 for 4 gigabytes. The over-allotment fee is the same.

Verizon and AT&T say much of the move away from unlimited data plans has to do with making users pay for the data they really use.

"If you drive a car, you drive 50 miles, you pay for gas for 50 miles," Verizon Wireless spokeswoman Brenda Raney said.

AT&T Inc. spokesman Mark Siegel said customers told the company that they wanted a choice instead of just having one unlimited plan for $30.

How are customers likely to react to the new plans? It depends.

Current Verizon smartphone users will not be affected, regardless of whether or not they have a long-term contract with the company.

And given that 95 percent of the company's current smartphone users use less than 2 gigabytes per month, chances are that most of the newcomers – which includes new customers and existing ones trading up to a smartphone – won't be affected by the change.

At AT&T Inc. the picture is similar: Siegel said 98 percent of smartphone customers use less than 2 gigabytes in a month.

Neil Strother, an analyst at ABI Research, believes caps on data usage will make things more confusing for consumers. Carriers will have to be increasingly transparent about what data caps mean and help them keep tabs on how much data they use. The carriers do offer online data calculators and alerts that customers can use to learn about how they use data.

"I think the issue for most people is they just don't want to have that surprise bill," Strother said.

The most recent changes don't mean that data plans will always look this way, though. Some analysts suggest that carriers might eventually offer different speed tiers, perhaps charging more to always use a 4G network, or having customers start off using their 4G network and then switching to the slower 3G network after hitting a monthly data-usage allotment. T-Mobile's existing unlimited data plan flirts with this idea already.

Strother expects to see some experimentation, saying the carriers will likely try different pricing models in order to keep themselves and consumers happy.

"Frankly no carrier wants a block of their customers to say, `I don't like this, I'm moving to the other guy.' They want to keep you," Strother said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

SAN FRANCISCO -- When Verizon Wireless kills off its unlimited data plan for new smartphone customers on Thursday, it will mark another blow for endless Web surfing and video streaming. The move by t...
SAN FRANCISCO -- When Verizon Wireless kills off its unlimited data plan for new smartphone customers on Thursday, it will mark another blow for endless Web surfing and video streaming. The move by t...
Filed by Alana Horowitz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 81
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
Sky Tripp
34 yo gay married hippy dude
10:49 AM on 07/08/2011
this is a simple idea of the people have to much information at there finger tips lets reduce the amount and at the same time charge more. I believe what another person named bofo said on here:
"All telephone and internet providers should be considered utilities and regulated as such."
no regulation means more profit AND this is just another way that Europe and Asia is kicking our asses in everything tech.............
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GameGuru59
BA in Poli-Sci., more qualified than Glenn Beck
11:42 AM on 07/08/2011
I believe I said that lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fgbouman
Curmudgeon & Designer
10:40 AM on 07/08/2011
Right now the telecoms are taking advantage of a government subsidy to empty our pockets. When DIDO shows up on the scene perhaps we'll have a chance to get our airwaves back.
09:16 AM on 07/08/2011
you can see how much the major carriers are overcharging when a company like virgin mobile, owned by sprint, can charge on $25 and give you unlimited data and text plus some minutes
08:15 AM on 07/08/2011
I dream that some day we will collectively decide that there are certain services that benefit most if not all americans that should be provided without someone having to make a profit from them. Unfortunately, as for most dreams...
photo
BoFo
Like, you talkin' to me?
10:06 PM on 07/07/2011
All cellular services in the US are ridiculously overpriced and the prices are totally unrelated to the actual cost of providing those services.

All telephone and internet providers should be considered utilities and regulated as such.
07:46 PM on 07/07/2011
Seems to me that before we wasted a freakin' TRILLION dollars on a stimulus plan that didn't work -- and that DIDN'T really create any new jobs -- that we would have been FAR better off taking that money and turning to the telecommunications companies and saying "Look, the digital age is here and America CANNOT lag behind in ANY way. In fact, we need to be LEADING in EVERY way possible."

At which point this nation...right now...should be putting all sorts of people to work (blue collar to do the construction or installation work, white collar workers to man tech centers) by creating THE greatest information network on the planet, where this whole notion of "data plans" would be pointless since we'd have the widest and fastest Net traffic lanes in the WORLD.

But of course its not like any of the Yahoos in Congress -- on either side of the aisle -- will be thinking AHEAD as usual !!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carmen Madonna Campos
dude! it's me!!!
10:27 PM on 07/07/2011
i like your jobs creation plan - much better than any that the "Yahoos in Congress" have proposed - oh wait, they haven't proposed any.
You got my vote!
F&F
12:51 AM on 07/08/2011
LOL thanks for the nice words and "vote", Carmen.
What spurred me on was the simple fact that...

1) I'm a total Internet loving nerd, so the idea of capping data plans actually offends me since I think -- in the digital age -- people should have access to MORE things and not less...

2) The whole idea of "shovel ready jobs" that Congress pushed was totally lost on me. I mean, honestly, other than throwing money or work towards unionized labor, what was the point? As an Independent voter, I'm not pro-union nor am I anti-union. But with so many white collar workers desperate for jobs TOO, what were they supposed to do? What, I'm an unemployed white collar worker and now my new job aspiration is to wear an orange reflective vest and hold up a stop sign for some work crew??? Wow! That's real career advancement!

Bottom line -- if I were President, I'd be thinking BIG. Like Kennedy in the Sixties with the space program and tossing down the "challenge glove" about getting to the moon first. As a nation, we need to think BIG and do things that benefit EVERYONE long term. At least then if you spend a trillion dollars, you're actually going to get BACK a worthy return on the investment...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PizzaGuy1
Konnichiwa. Hajimemashite. Karasu desu.
04:03 PM on 07/08/2011
Well put, and agree!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valar84
06:06 PM on 07/07/2011
Boohoo, cry me a river. I'm in Canada, it's been years since the major telecoms have last offered a truly unlimited plan... and I am including home internet. Cable, DSL, fiber optics, don't matter, they're all capped and they will be happy to charge you 1,50$ or even 5$ for each gig above a given limit.

For mobile internet, most plans start at 30$ per month... for 500 megabytes, 5 cents per additional meg. Forget about Youtube or streaming content, you might even want to tell your browser not to download images automatically, just to be safe.

The excuses to charge for consumption are wrong for anyone who knows anything about how the system works. The amount of data downloaded is not really limited. It's the total amount of data transferred at a given time that is limited, so why charge for data downloaded during times when the network is under-used instead of throttling the download speed of big users during peak hours? We all know the answer, because it's an easy way to make more money.

It's like roads, you see, no road is congested 24 hours a day. Congestion happens when too many people want to use them at the same time. Capacity that is not used is lost, not saved. It's not because there are few people on the road at night that peak hour traffic is made easier.

Oh well, could be worse, could be Australia *shudder*.
05:47 PM on 07/07/2011
If people don't like this they should take their business to Sprint and their unlimited message plans. The problem is that they'll have to get new phones when they get a new carrier, all of which is a disincentive to switching.

What the FCC should do is require all phones to work on all services. You can't tell me this can't be done. They put guys on the moon. They can do this. This way when you switch carriers you can take your phone, with your contacts and bookmarks and calendars and messages, with you.

Who's the FCC working for anyway, the people of the telephone companies?
05:42 PM on 07/07/2011
I have unlimited. My carrier is not threatening to shut it down. I have Sprint. I've had it for over 10 years and I have zero complaints. And when you call them they're nice. Imagine that.
08:29 PM on 07/07/2011
I have Sprint and while I LOVE their service (rarely drop calls and have coverage everywhere I am) I absolutely HATE calling them. And I won't buy phones from them. I go to wirefly or letstalk. Everytime I've tried to upgrade a phone it has been a cluster...mess up.

That having been said...I'm glad they still offer the unlimited data. And I hope they keep offering it. I don't think I've ever used enough for it tobe an issue, but I like knowing it's there and I can't hit some arbitrary cap.

MsLily
02:55 PM on 07/07/2011
I love the people who call themselves the "voice of reason" because they think that using a handheld device for more than making calls is silly. That to watch a movie - or to download a book - or to stream music - or to video chat, etc... is more than should be expected from a "phone."
These are the same people who said... "A cellular phone? - why would I need to carry a phone everywhere I go? People with phones are only looking for attention!" Well, I must say times have changed. I feel naked if I leave the house without my phone. Times will continue to change - and there will always be "sensible" folk who see no reason to advance.
I'm sure there must have been a time when the idea of a toilet INSIDE a house was considered a bridge too far - I mean, think of the smell! I, myself, welcome these advances and will look to integrate as many new technologies as I can afford. Some will be crap. Some won't. This argument will seem silly in a decade.
07:27 AM on 07/08/2011
Absolutely. Mobile phones have evolved to become computers that happen to be able to be used as a phone.

Those "reasonable" people who think that a device should somehow only have one use will somehow figure things out eventually. I guess they only use their computers at home for one thing only also.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigshotprof
Pre-moderated for your protection
02:42 PM on 07/07/2011
This isn't the end of unlimited data plans. The end of unlimited data plans came way back when the FCC looked the other way while a few big companies were forming a virtual oligopoly of ownership of the internet. This is just the denoument.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
media4me2
01:55 PM on 07/07/2011
Stop the whining.
Use the phone as a phone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bradley Greene
Better DEAD than red...
01:53 PM on 07/07/2011
And this my friends is why I have a regular cel-phone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gtoya1331
I can't understand it FOR you
01:35 PM on 07/07/2011
imagine what will happen if verizon is allowed to buy tmobile....have mercy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigshotprof
Pre-moderated for your protection
02:42 PM on 07/07/2011
I think you mean sprint, but you are completely right!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lupernikes
British/Irish transplant in New Mexico
04:36 PM on 07/07/2011
I think you both mean AT&T surely? Lol, the corrector is in turn corrected! Such hilarity! lol
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]