iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Holds Debt Ceiling Press Conference (VIDEO)

BEN FELLER and ANDREW TAYLOR   07/11/11 10:33 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama and congressional leaders on Monday emerged still deeply divided over how to slash the nation's debt, with reality sinking in that even a middle-ground proposal was not big enough to succeed and would not get through Congress anyway.

As time runs perilously short for action, Obama challenged top lawmakers to return to the White House on Tuesday with fresh ideas for a debt-reduction plan that could pass the House and Senate. All sides are scrambling to reach a deal as part of a tradeoff in which Congress would agree to extend the nation's debt limit by Aug. 2 to prevent a catastrophic government default on its bills.

Turning up the pressure, Obama declared that he would reject any stopgap extension of the nation's borrowing limit, imploring lawmakers once again to reach one of the most sizable debt-reduction deals in years.

He refused to even entertain a backup plan if that doesn't happen.

"We are going to get this done," Obama insisted in a news conference.

In a 90-minute closed meeting, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor spelled out potential spending cuts that had been identified in talks led for weeks by Vice President Joe Biden. But Democratic lawmakers in the room made clear such a cutting-only approach without tax hikes on wealthier Americans would never pass the Democratic-led Senate or the House, where Democratic votes would be needed, too.

It did not appear, either, that such a plan would meet the House Republicans' own standard of a debt-cutting package. They want cuts that would exceed the size of the increase in the debt limit, which could be about $2.4 trillion to get the country through 2012 and next year's elections.

Republicans won't support a package that raises any taxes.

As the stalemate continues, the pressure increases. A government default could trigger another enormous economic swoon.

Democratic officials familiar with the White House position in the private talks insist that leaders of the House and Senate will not let that happen, and that Republicans ultimately would vote to raise the debt limit even if a deficit-cutting package does not come together in time.

Yet Republicans say otherwise. House Speaker John Boehner insists the House can't pass such a bill.

"I agree with the president that the national debt limit must be raised, and I'm glad that he made the case for it today," Boehner told reporters. "But the American people will not accept - and the House cannot pass - a bill that raises taxes on job creators."

Obama renewed his case for a package that would put a historic dent in the country's deficits by blending politically poisonous elements for both parties: tax hikes for the wealthy and big corporations opposed by Republicans and social service cuts that Democrats decry

He implored both political parties to give ground and show the American people that Washington can actually work.

"If not now, when?" Obama said.

By all accounts, Obama's third meeting with House and Senate leaders in under a week produced little movement.

Cantor did most of the talking for Republicans, aides said, outlining up to $2.3 trillion in spending cuts over the upcoming decade, with $1.3 trillion coming from squeezing the day-to-day budgets of Cabinet agencies including the Pentagon.

Cantor erred on the high end of the savings range in virtually every instance. The White House countered that the cuts really added up to more like $1.7 trillion, which would leave negotiators $700 billion short of the $2.4 trillion being sought and no bipartisan way to make up the gap.

Democrats suggested that most spending cuts be concentrated in the later years of a deal, but a Republican aide said GOP lawmakers took issue with that suggestion and want the cuts to begin right away.

Obama spent most of his time encouraging lawmakers to reconsider a bigger deal, on the order of some $4 trillion in spending cuts and tax hikes over 10 years. Democrats familiar with the talks said the meeting produced a clearer recognition that the leaders were going to have to go back and think again about how to find a compromise.

Obama has offered to entertain raising the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67 years if Republicans make compromises, including letting tax cuts for wealthy Americans expire at the end of 2012, according to a Democratic congressional aide.

Yet the path to an accord remained hard to see. Cantor told reporters earlier in the day: "We are not going to raise taxes. That's all."

All the officials familiar with the talks spoke on condition of anonymity to disclose details of the private discussions.

Obama told reporters he would meet with the lawmakers every day until an agreement is reached. They have two weeks or less to do so in order to get any deal through Congress in time. He asked lawmakers to return to the White House on Tuesday at 3:45 p.m. EDT.

Obama tried to alter the debate by saying in his news conference that any potential tax increases on wealthier people would not take effect until 2013. Notably, that would fall after the next election.

The president said he would refuse to accept stopgap legislation of a few months to keep the nation from defaulting. "It's not going to get easier; it's going to get harder," Obama said. "So we might as well do it now. Pull off the Band-Aid. Eat our peas."

More broadly, Obama sought to position himself as the pragmatist seeking a compromise in a divided town.

To Republicans, he said they have long pushed deficit reduction as the way to create desperately needed jobs and now won't take yes for an answer. "Where are they?" he said.

And to Democrats eager to protect entitlements, Obama said doing nothing is not tenable.

"So, yeah, we're going to have a sales job," he conceded. "This is not pleasant."

Obama made clear Monday that any changes to Social Security would be designed to ensure money is available for beneficiaries years from now – as opposed to trimming costs to reduce the deficit. One possibility would lower cost-of-living increases for recipients.

Many Democrats deeply oppose that idea. As to why that would be included in debt talks, Obama said it all came back to politics.

"If you're going to take a bunch of tough votes," he said, "You might as well do it now."

___

Associated Press writers Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Erica Werner, Julie Pace contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama and congressional leaders on Monday emerged still deeply divided over how to slash the nation's debt, with reality sinking in that even a middle-ground propos...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama and congressional leaders on Monday emerged still deeply divided over how to slash the nation's debt, with reality sinking in that even a middle-ground propos...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25,836
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (398 total)
photo
G R
Ad astra per aspera
11:57 AM on 07/23/2011
I'd like to hear someone ask Boehner where are the jobs that over a decade of tax breaks for the wealthy and super-wealthy (the so called "job creators") were supposed to create ? That anyone cannot see through the Republican veneer of 'fiscal responsibility' is a sad statement on the inability of Americans to understand even the simplest economic principles. Eight years of Ronald Reagan and his so called "trickle down" economic policy (forever referred to as "Voodo Economics") is clearly too subtle for Americans to grasp. Boehner and his party clearly intend to resurrect a failed economic policy which we know doesn't work. It's almost like arguing that 2 + 2 doesn't equal 4 if your'e a Republican. It equals whatever the Republicans want it too.
11:22 AM on 07/22/2011
I do like what Obama says, it is talk but it is simple and it sounds honest talk. He talks about working people and there money he does want to save us money. and that it is not all the responsibilit of the mddle class to pay all the bill. everyone did us this way some were more responsible but thats the way it goes more security when things happen, oh well thats the way it is but dont keep stealing from the poor jus tto keep ya in that nice air conditining big house it is WE in the Country NOT I alone
05:21 AM on 07/19/2011
Cheap Authentic Nike Shoes UK Online Shop, Nike Shoes Online Sale, Speed Delivery
http://nikeukshop.com/
http://www.italynikescrape.com/
10:42 AM on 07/16/2011
Obama is dying to reactivate the Alien and Sedition Act so he can make it illegal to criticize him or disagree with his policies. Now he wants to engineer the polls to show what he wants. Eat your peas Obama, our wannabe Emperor.
Harpo1129
You can't spell Progressive without Progress
02:41 PM on 07/14/2011
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Jenkins Virtual Equinologist 30 Fans Become a fan Unfan
2 hours ago (12:51 PM) I am not the rabbit, I am the cheshire cat..

Everyone pays taxes. The taxes Buffet does pay are higher than you can afford.

Raising revenue in time of a stable economy, I understand­.

Confiscati­ng wealth during a recession reveals a dark agenda.
________________________________________________________

I see you have a reading comprehention probem. I said that Warren Buffet pays a lower tax PRCENTAGE on his income than his secratary does. PERSENTAGE.

And in a stable economy the need to raise revenue is not as dire.

Raising revenue during a recession is a perfrctly reasnable response to tha resession. You have it exactly backwards. But all of your ideas are backwards. You seem to care more about the wealthy than you care about the poor and middle class. That is a very selfish attitude. You are what is wrong with America today. As long as you get yours, everyone else can go to heII. I am sad for you.
09:06 AM on 07/14/2011
mr obama put us out there,spending our money like was no tomorrow.dont cry now and l hope republican stand strong in what they believe.we have to keep spending money we do no have.and mr president stop sending our money to corupted country.we can use that money here in our god blesse country.ln job production for our american citezen no inlegal.and by the way mr cantor stay strong and may god bless america.
Harpo1129
You can't spell Progressive without Progress
10:54 AM on 07/13/2011
23 Million jobs created under Bill Clinton when he RAISED the tax rate for the wealthy to 39%

3 Million jobs created under George Bush when he lowered taxes TWICE on the wealty to 35%.

Tell us all again how LOWERING taxes for the wealthy creates jobs when ALL the evidence in our history shows that when tax rates are higher, job creation is higher.
10:29 PM on 07/13/2011
I agree! However, the taxes the Republicans are claiming the President wants to raise are not actual increases in any taxes, but closure of abusive tax loop holes. The Republicans are flat out lying to folks here, and being pure obstructionists in the debt ceiling talks. The news media has failed to point out is that the debt ceiling is something that every Congress has just automatically raised in the past because until this one they all knew the economic consequences of not raising it could be devastating.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Jenkins
Virtual Ferroequinologist
01:37 AM on 07/14/2011
Yea right...your mincing words again, taxes are taxes period...

Taxes are confiscation of wealth. You can be jealous of anyone's accomplishments but jacking taxes in a recession is only a fool's game.

Remember that every time the "debt-ceiling debate" has come up Democrats have cried about the faux-withholding of entitlement payments.

If your going to raise the debt ceiling every eighteen months, why have a debt ceiling at all?

Your idea of adding to the national debt sucks.

We have the Internet today however, we are Taxed Enough Already(TEA).

It's time to realize that there must be at least one adult in the room at all time to stop the foolish lying to the American people...John Boehner is the MAN!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Jenkins
Virtual Ferroequinologist
01:40 AM on 07/14/2011
You have failed to explain how that tax money created jobs...you are so fooled.

Obama signed the largest confiscation & redistribution of wealth since 1995 as the Affordable Healthcare Act.

That's what happened to the jobs...not obstructionism, sheer terror to employers.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SirenForSanity
The trouble vine keeps growing.
04:10 AM on 07/14/2011
The tax money didn't create jobs. The tax breaks given for reinvestment into this country created jobs. Now the jobs have gone overseas, republicans have obstructed every single jobs bill introduced by their insistence of making permanent the Bush tax cuts. You are blaming the wrong administration.
When will the Affordable Healthcare Act be implemented?
04:20 AM on 07/14/2011
The employers that I know are glad to get the help in providing healthcare to their employees---alot of 'em are family members, so they feel doubly blessed....
By controlling their health care costs they are better able to afford box seats at the track and tickets to alot of sporting events in the country----Final Four, NASCAR----
I'm glad they can write these off (operational costs).....
Harpo1129
You can't spell Progressive without Progress
10:33 AM on 07/13/2011
joeThibo 48 Fans Become a fan Unfan
13 minutes ago (10:08 AM) TO: "Harpo1129­"

The real joke has been on the liberal supporters of the progressiv­es that gave corporate welfare to big business all under the disguise of tax code exceptions allowed big business for their supplied tribute called campaign contributi­ons. __________________________________________________________

So you're saying that big business supports and backs LIBERALS????

Joe, Joe, Joe. All I can do is shake my head in disbelief at yet ANOTHER absurd, ridiculas comment by you. As you are not willing to at least TRY to speak the truth about who is REALLY out to destroy the middle class, then I am done wasting my time with you. Some people are just blind to the truth. You happen to be one of those people. And just the fact that you used the word liberal at least 7 times in your response tells me that your mind is snapped shut with no room to debate possible.
Justice1
get out of our house dot com
09:10 AM on 07/13/2011
to threaten Social Security checks is small by Hussein...if anything his pay checks and the paychecks of all congress should be held to help pay for debt...that includes the retirements checks...

no more retirement benefits for congress, senate, and former presidents...
07:04 PM on 07/13/2011
Absolute justice. How can we bring it about??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
07:53 AM on 07/13/2011
Debt means not just paying for what we get, but also paying interest. Paying interest on the debt means pumping money from workers to owners. In the long run, borrowing crowds out investment, decreases productivity (and thus standards of living), and pushes borrowing overseas (thereby exacerbating our trade imbalance). We should spend less on interest. That means paying down the debt: not just a smaller deficit, but a surplus; not just a surplus for a year or two, but keeping a surplus until the debt is down to a reasonable level.

We need to stop pretending that cuts in non-military discretionary spending can make a real difference. We need to deal with the big items: raise taxes (not just on the poor, either), cut Social Security, cut Medicare, cut Medicaid, and cut the military.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
balmora
Liberals = feel good solutions that don't work
02:54 AM on 07/13/2011
They still haven't found the 2.3 trillion that Rumsfeld claimed the Pentagon had lost? If they could just find that missing cash we wouldn't be in this pickle. Something stinks in Washington.
10:50 AM on 07/16/2011
Like a dead fish. Instead Barry 'Mubarak' Obama prefers to cut Medicare and Social Security, to preserve it of course. Preserve by cutting...he really does think we are stupid.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:24 AM on 07/13/2011
QUOTE - " America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit ".
- Senator Barack Obama - VOTED AGAINST raising the debt ceiling.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DakkonA
www.DisentangledReality.com
01:53 AM on 07/13/2011
And guess who didn't vote against it? The Republicans.

If your side's being hypocritical, you can't also castigate your opponent for doing the same thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
balmora
Liberals = feel good solutions that don't work
02:55 AM on 07/13/2011
He was against the war then too. How things change.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
07:36 AM on 07/13/2011
Which war? The one he's pulled about 150,000 troops out of, or the one he was never against to begin with?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:22 AM on 07/13/2011
QUOTE - " Leadership means that 'the buck stops here' ". Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren."
- Senator Barack Obama - Voting AGAINST raising debt ceiling.
Harpo1129
You can't spell Progressive without Progress
10:44 AM on 07/13/2011
He didn't want to pay for GWB's UNPAID FOR war of choice in Iraq.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:08 PM on 07/13/2011
Please provide the exact location where you found Obama's QUOTE that what you state is the reason he voted against increasing the debt limit in 2006. I can't find, anywhere that SENATOR OBAMA gave what you listed as the reason. Thanks.

I did find a quote from Obama as to why he voted against the debt limit in 2006 - it follows - "This was just an example of a new Senator, you know, making what is a 'political' vote as opposed to doing what was important for the country".
photo
PotholesInMyLawn
Your micro-bio is empty
02:41 PM on 07/13/2011
Sorry... that statement has zero relevance...

He was a Senator... Now he is your president... and you just can't stand it!!

Diet Coke! NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:17 AM on 07/13/2011
QUOTE - "The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure"
Senator Barack Obama
Harpo1129
You can't spell Progressive without Progress
10:45 AM on 07/13/2011
This quote is ALSO because he didn't want to pay for GWB's UNPAID FOR war of choice in Iraq. Got any OTHER out of context quotes you'd loke to post?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:15 AM on 07/13/2011
How many 'poor' people create jobs VS How many 'rich' people create jobs ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DakkonA
www.DisentangledReality.com
01:58 AM on 07/13/2011
Rich people don't create jobs. Businesses do, which is based on revenue into the business. Overwhelmingly it is the poor and middle classes which drive this revenue. If businesses aren't getting revenue, not only do they have little resources with which to create and/or keep a job, the lack of business means they wouldn't be in need of creating any jobs. Even if you gave them more money back, they wouldn't need the new jobs.

Drive demand, you drive job creation. Cutting taxes and/or not raising them isn't the problem, and can only provide a short term benefit.

http://www.disentangledreality.com/2011/07/death-of-tax-collector-and-other.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
csnyfan13
E pluribus unum
03:51 PM on 07/13/2011
'Poor" people create jobs by their spending just as 'rich' create jobs by THEIR spending. When the demand for goods/services goes up then jobs are created. When money is hoarded by rich jobs are NOT created. Our economy is dependent upon people spending money on goods and services.