iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Secondhand Smoke Tied To Mental Health Problems In Kids: Study

Smoking Kids

First Posted: 07/11/11 08:50 AM ET Updated: 09/10/11 06:12 AM ET

Estimates suggest that anywhere between 4.8 and 5.5 million children in the U.S. live in households where they are exposed to secondhand smoke, putting them at greater risk for multiple health problems. Now, new research suggests that secondhand smoke exposure can increase the odds of developing certain mental and behavioral disorders by 50 percent.

Researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health looked at the data generated by a 2007 national health survey, analyzing the responses of the parents of guardians of more than 55,000 children ages 11 and younger from throughout the U.S. They found that children who were exposed to secondhand smoke were twice as likely to develop so-called neurobehavioral disorders -- including learning disabilities, ADD or ADHD, and conduct or behavior disorders -- than were children who lived in smoke-free homes.

"We estimate that 274,000 cases of the most common neurobehavioral disorders could have been prevented with smoke-free homes," said Hillel Alpert, ScM, a senior research associate at Harvard and one of the study's authors.

Alpert added that the study, which was published Monday in the journal Pediatrics, did not find that secondhand smoke directly caused any of these mental health issues. However, he argued that the "strong evidence of association" between secondhand smoke exposure and the incidence of certain disorders might underline a causal relationship that could be discovered with future longterm investigations.

Indeed, a growing body of research is focused on the link between secondhand smoke and mental health problems.

An August 2010 study in the Archives of General Psychiatry, which analyzed results from the Scottish Health Survey, found that people exposed to secondhand smoke were more likely to suffer from psychological distress, while a study published this April found that children and teens exposed to secondhand smoke may suffer from major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and ADHD. A 2008 study in rats that found that nicotine exposure during adolescence led to a "depression-like state" and increased sensitivity to stress and anxiety in those animals.

Joanna Cohen, director of the Institute for Global Tobacco Control at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said that while she thought the Harvard study was interesting and helpful, more work needs to be done in order to fully comprehend the risks of secondhand smoke.

"This current research isn't the end-all be-all in studies," said Cohen, who was not associated with the study. "We need more of a body of literature to understand the neurotoxic effects [of smoke]."

The U.S. Surgeon General's office has stated that there is "no safe amount of secondhand smoke," explaining that children who are exposed to it are more likely to develop lung problems, ear infections and severe asthma. It can also result in low birth weight in babies and is a known cause of sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDs.

And another new study, also published Monday in Pediatrics, suggests that children who are exposed to secondhand smoke are more likely to become smokers themselves.

Looking at a small pool of 201 preteens who lived in a house with at least one smoker, researchers found that those who said they found secondhand smoke "unpleasant or gross" were less likely to smoke in the future. The authors say their results suggest that this subjective reaction could be used to develop targeted smoking prevention efforts in the future.

"Sensitivity to secondhand smoke exposure among never-smoking preteens could serve as an additional behavioral marker -- in conjunction with many other family, social, and cultural factors -- that helps distinguish kids at higher versus lower risk for future smoking," co-author Christina N. Lessov-Schlaggar Ph.D., of the Washington University School of Medicine, told HuffPost.

"We may not be able to change sensitivity to secondhand smoke exposure per se," she added, "but knowing that it is related to future smoking behavior, we can try to eliminate appropriate triggers, which in this case is the exposure to secondhand smoke itself."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

Estimates suggest that anywhere between 4.8 and 5.5 million children in the U.S. live in households where they are exposed to secondhand smoke, putting them at greater risk for multiple health problem...
Estimates suggest that anywhere between 4.8 and 5.5 million children in the U.S. live in households where they are exposed to secondhand smoke, putting them at greater risk for multiple health problem...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 230
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
12bcox
your guess is NOT as good as mine
03:09 PM on 07/15/2011
And vaccines cause autism, right? The same physiological precursors that cause a person to smoke may also cause mental health issues...this doesn't mean second hand smoke makes you crazy....another worthless study by scientists looking for more grant money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank David Nall
Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense
07:31 PM on 07/14/2011
"Don't like gay marriages? Don't get one.. Don't like cigarettes? Don't smoke them.. don't like abortions? Don't get one.. Don't like sex? Don't have it.. Don't like drugs? Don't do them.. Don't like porn? Don't watch it.. Don't like alcohol? Don't drink it.. Don't like your rights taken away??? Don't take away someone else's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank David Nall
Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense
09:16 PM on 07/11/2011
When do gooders set out to do good..........get out of the way.
photo
Iatros78
Science is the consensus of expert opinion
03:10 PM on 07/11/2011
I've asked several posters who have questioned the legitimacy of this study to provide me with the hyperlink to the actual study. None have done so. No one who presumes to critique a scientific study relies upon a journalist's report on a popular news website for her or his understanding of said study. No one, that is, who understands and respects science. Unfortunately, many Americans neither understand nor respect science. Science is not a collection of desultory comments offered by random people and unrelated to facts. Science is the consensus of expert opinion based on the organized accumulation and scrutiny of evidence.


Those who want to read the actual published study may do so here: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2011/07/06/peds.2011-0023.full.pdf+html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BacSi
Celer, Silens, Mortalis
03:56 PM on 07/11/2011
Oh I think that more than a few here who brag about how they put no stock in science or actual data.

You know a statement like that made in the year 1411 I can kind of understand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
12bcox
your guess is NOT as good as mine
04:56 PM on 07/15/2011
You mean we have to sift through pages of boring data to critique a BS study? ..I'm assuming if the report had been able to draw any real conclusion at all they would have mentioned it; the fact that they would even publish a paper based on this nonsense is remarkable.... obviously fishing for a way to justify themselves to their departments.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Silverwolf72
Are We There Yet?
01:37 PM on 07/11/2011
I think it has to do with the food they eat, a higher % eat worse than non-smokers.
01:01 PM on 07/11/2011
Did anyone read the study?!? There's a reason they stated it cannot be proven! The link exists only when the reader buys off on a slanted opinion. READ THE STUDY!!
photo
Iatros78
Science is the consensus of expert opinion
01:36 PM on 07/11/2011
Did you read the study? If so, provide us with the hyperlink.
02:34 PM on 07/11/2011
Do you know how to read this or any other study? The link exists regardless of any opinion. The question is one of causation vs. correlation. This study implies correlation, which is often the first step in establishing causation, though it doesn't necessarily always follow. Clearly, more data is needed before establishing causation, but this study strongly establishes correlation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dominick Roffo
Cut the b.s..I'm tired of it
07:23 PM on 07/11/2011
ok...there is a correlation to abused kids that have parents that drink. Make alcohol illegal?
12:52 PM on 07/11/2011
I can resist anything but temptation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TBull
Come And Take It is a dare, not a request
12:37 PM on 07/11/2011
Fact. Psychiatrists are liberal as a rule. Fact. This study was done by non-MDs. Fact. Children of liberals suffer from serious mental distress which results from exposure to anti-social parental behavior.
photo
Iatros78
Science is the consensus of expert opinion
01:11 PM on 07/11/2011
Fact: the first author listed on this study is Zubair Kabir, MD PhD. Where are you getting your "facts"? Also, since you seem to know so much about this study, can you provide me the hyperlink to it?
03:35 PM on 07/11/2011
TBull you have lived up to your name - again!
11:59 AM on 07/11/2011
When two people are under the influence of the most violent, most insane, most delusive and most transient of passions, they are required to swear that they will remain in that excited, abnormal and exhausting condition until death do them part.-- George Bernard Shaw

No second hand smoke is the reason there are more couples just living together instead of getting married. The less smoke the saner they are becoming.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VanTroi
02:14 PM on 07/11/2011
HUH?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank David Nall
Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense
11:41 AM on 07/11/2011
IF this is true then everyone in their late forties, fifties and older must be insane.
11:55 AM on 07/11/2011
Smoking causes lung cancer. This is a fact.

Not everyone who smokes develops lung cancer. Also a fact.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
11:29 AM on 07/11/2011
So all of us that grew up in the times when EVERYONE smoked all the time should have mental health problems?

Remember being in bars and restaurants with my parents and there was a fog of smoke at the top of the room.

Maybe it has something to do with the interaction between Second Hand Smoke and all the preservatives in our food?
photo
Lenape105
Austerity is fiscal terrorism
11:40 AM on 07/11/2011
I don't believe the article said that ALL children exposed to 2nd-hand smoke would develop problems. It says they are at greater risk. As with most health risks, there is a bell curve of susceptibility. Your suggestion that there is an interaction between 2nd-hand smoke and other environmental factors makes sense, and should be studied.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank David Nall
Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense
11:42 AM on 07/11/2011
so in other words it is blatant false science in the name of morality.
11:44 AM on 07/11/2011
Whether or not there are behavioral problems associated with second hand smoke, the other negative health impacts are real. I remember rooms filled with blue smoke and not being able to breath comfortably and my eyes watered and itched. Although my father was a chain smoker, I never got used to it.
11:25 AM on 07/11/2011
Strip mining prevents forest fires
11:18 AM on 07/11/2011
I see a lot of people here commenting on causation vs. correlation regarding secondhand smoke exposure and neurobehavioral disorders, and it's a valid consideration given the associated variables. However, I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss possible causation. The brain is a complex organ, and the young, developing brain is even more likely to be affected by various stimuli and environmental factors. I would definitely like to see more studies related to this subject matter.

Now, on the other hand:
"children who are exposed to [second hand tobacco smoke] are more likely to develop lung problems, ear infections and severe asthma. It can also result in low birth weight in babies and is a known cause of sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDs."

This goes beyond simple correlation. There is direct causation between secondhand smoke exposure and these severe health effects. This should be enough to dissuade any parent even remotely interested in their childrens' health from exposing them to secondhand smoke. To continue to expose children to secondhand smoke despite knowledge of these severe consequences is nothing short of neglect.
12:54 PM on 07/11/2011
If it wasn't for electricity we'd all be watching television by candlelight.
-- George Gobel
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jumpinjezebel
I'll show U mine if U'll show me urs
11:15 AM on 07/11/2011
More hysterical WhooHoo from the studiers. Inference and other suggestions don't make scientific facts. Why don't the busybodies worry about something important - why not try to ban restaurants from serviing Obese people?
photo
Iatros78
Science is the consensus of expert opinion
11:30 AM on 07/11/2011
So the medical researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health are/were hysterical? What is the scientific basis for your wild assertion? It is because you don't like the implications of their findings?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank David Nall
Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense
11:45 AM on 07/11/2011
After reading their study i think any sane person would believe that the only mental health issues were those of the Harvard school of public health. They have simply produced a paper that in their opinion strengthens an already strong intrusion into the rights of citizens who smoke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VanTroi
02:16 PM on 07/11/2011
The health effects of second hand smoke on children isn't important? I hope you are sterile.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:08 AM on 07/11/2011
I wish when they say "twice as likely" they would explain how likely those who are not exposed were to having the problems. For example, if a person in a non-smoking home had a 1% chance of having mental health problems, then this study would be saying that people growing up around 2nd hand smoke would only have a 2% chance of developing the problems.
11:51 AM on 07/11/2011
"For every fatal shooting, there were roughly three non-fatal shootings. And, folks, this is unacceptable in America. It's just unacceptable. And we're going to do something about it." -George W. Bush, Philadelphia, Penn., May 14, 2001
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:30 PM on 07/11/2011
I think that's what's called a Freudian slip ...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:50 PM on 07/11/2011
And this is supposed to change my desire to see to what degree there is an actual effect? GWB? If 25% of people in no smoking households suffered particular Mental Health problems, and in households that smoke 50% of people suffered Mental Health problems, that is great evidence for which further study would make sense (and it may say this in the study). I'm simply saying that it would be valuable information to have in the article. Surely you can't be saying that less information is better or that this particular information should have no bearing (using the great wisdom of GWB no less)?