More

More Men Die Of Cancer Than Women: Study

Cancer Men

First Posted: 07/12/11 02:13 PM ET Updated: 09/11/11 06:12 AM ET

Men have a higher incidence of cancer than women; now new research suggests they are also at greater risk of dying from it.

The authors of a sweeping new study, published Tuesday in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, analyzed nearly 20 years of data from the National Cancer Institute's "SEER" program, which has tracked cancer since the 1970s. For most cancers, the study found, mortality rates were higher in men than in women.

"Men are more likely to die from cancer than women," Michael B. Cook, Ph.D., an investigator with the National Cancer Institute and the study's lead author said in a statement. "We found this to be true for a majority of specific types of cancer."

This was particularly true among patients with lip cancers (per 100,000 people, researchers determined that 5.51 men died compared to one woman), cancer of the hypopharynx (4.47 men to one woman), esophageal cancer (4.08 men to one woman) and urinary bladder cancer (3.36 men to one woman).

Among the cancers that generally have the highest morality rates, such as lung and colon cancer, men also had higher death rates.

What this finding means, the study's authors suggest, is that differences in cancer mortality among men and women occur because men get cancer more frequently, not because men necessarily have poorer survival rates after their cancer has developed. In his statement, Cook argued that identifying the reasons why men get cancer more frequently is an essential next step in preventing cancer deaths among both sexes.

One possible area of focus is tobacco use.

Though differences in smoking rates among men and women have leveled out in recent years, men still smoke more than women. The Centers for Disease Control estimates that in 2009, 23.5 percent of men in the U.S. smoked, compared to approximately 18 percent of women.

James Marshall, Ph.D., chair of the department of cancer prevention and population sciences at the Roswell Park Cancer Institute said that in approximately half of the 30-plus cancer types the researchers of the new study considered, tobacco use can be a key risk factor.

"What this study emphasizes is that if you want to make a big dent in [the sex] difference and in the overall human cost of cancer, you need to focus on keeping people from getting cancer in the first place," Marshall said. "Tobacco is so important to that risk -- not just if you smoke before a cancer diagnosis. If you are still smoking while you're diagnosed, you do worse, too."

The new study points out other possible non-genetic risk factors for cancer, including HPV infections and exposure to UV radiation. And though they call for more research on how exactly this plays into cancer survival, the researchers point out that women "more readily" and "more often" seek out testing and early care.

"Looking at it from a public health perspective, it emphasizes the importance of early detection and screenings," said Rachel Ceballos, Ph.D., of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center who hailed the study as "important" given that it is among the first to compare mortality and survivorship in men and women.

"From a public point of view," Ceballos added, "it's about trying to get men in for screening."

For all of the environmental factors that could impact sex differences in cancer mortality, the study does suggest that there are further biological factors at play. Things like sex hormones or sex-linked detoxifying enzymes that are more effective at fighting cancer in one sex versus the other can also play a role.

But in a statement, Cook emphasized his belief that the "main driving factor" in the greater number of cancer deaths among men is frequency of cancer diagnosis, not poorer survival after the cancer has taken hold.

For his part, Marshall agreed.

"What [this study] is saying is that there's no great huge biological surprise," he said. "This is a very practical issue -- you want to lower the human cost of cancer in both men and women, you have to lower the risk."

RELATED:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

Men have a higher incidence of cancer than women; now new research suggests they are also at greater risk of dying from it. The authors of a sweeping new study, published Tuesday in the journal Can...
Men have a higher incidence of cancer than women; now new research suggests they are also at greater risk of dying from it. The authors of a sweeping new study, published Tuesday in the journal Can...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marsha McClelland
07:13 PM on 07/13/2011
Maybe more men die of cancer because more are in the military & vaccinated, big time, compared to women? Make sense?
08:01 PM on 08/07/2011
Men are also more exposed to the elements and, not to mention, most men have unhealthy lifestyle than women. In the end, all of us will die anyway.

http://dld.bz/validate
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeaBlood
cynical about religion
02:46 PM on 07/13/2011
More men die of cancer than women? Don't tell Dr Oz. He'll never have another show about cancer again ! H'd lose a few audience percentage points.
photo
Iatros78
Science is the consensus of expert opinion
07:57 PM on 07/12/2011
"One possible area is tobacco use."

Sounds like a good place to start. Tobacco use doesn't just cause lung cancer. It also causes bladder cancer, brain tumors, cheek and gum cancer, anal cancer, esophageal cancer, head and neck cancer, kidney cancer, laryngeal cancer, leukemia, oral cavity cancer, pancreatic cancer, pharyngeal cancer, renal cancer, stomach cancer, and ureter cancer.

Smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States. Every year it kills more Americans than AIDS, alcohol abuse, illegal drug use, murder, suicides, and car crashes, combined.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlonzoQuijana
Independent, Libertarian, Skeptic
04:59 PM on 07/12/2011
I'm always amused at the feminists who complain that not enough attention is paid to "women's health issues" and lobby for funding to be shifted into reproductive health and breast cancer, while the crisis in men's health is ignored.
techjockey
Keeping My Gratitude Higher Than My Expectations..
05:55 PM on 07/12/2011
Did not read anything in that article that mentioned that funding for women's reproductive cancer research had ANY relationship to men's current cancer survival rates....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CommonSense411
I live my life by my conscience.
06:23 PM on 07/12/2011
Last time I checked, cancer affected both men and women. Also, last time I checked, conservatives were trying to assume rights over my womb and what I do with it.
04:17 PM on 07/12/2011
Of course. This is obvious. More men wait until they're very sick to see a Doctor, vs. women who will go in earlier. Society pressures them not to be 'wimps'-- most of the time.
06:46 PM on 07/12/2011
You're right, this probably is a factor... I wonder if the study made attempts to account for that variable or not...?
03:36 PM on 07/12/2011
Well, duh!

Prostate cancer strikes more often than breast cancer and kills nearly as many, yet receives less than 50% as much research funding.

That's just one example of the sexism of cancer research.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sepulchre
A neutron walks into a bar...
03:50 PM on 07/12/2011
It isn't really sexism as no one is pushing for the notoriety of colon cancer as much as breast cancer. Men in general I have found are rather ambivalent about it, both in voicing that it needs to be researched more and in getting screenings for it. I have long said men need to get as proactive about colon cancer as women have about breast cancer. Pushes have been made by the medical community and scientists to try to get men to realize how important it is to get regular screenings and was met with a tepid response and only marginal increase in people going in for screenings.
04:52 PM on 07/12/2011
Actually, I think you are right about prostate cancer. The Doctors seem to discourage men from getting the PSA test because of false positives. Whereas women constantly get retested and biopsies for breast cancer most which end up not being cancer yet they don't discourage them from getting those test but in fact encourage lots of testing.
03:08 PM on 07/12/2011
This "study" has HUGE holes in it and isn't worth the paper it's written on. Move on folks.
photo
Iatros78
Science is the consensus of expert opinion
07:48 PM on 07/12/2011
And how do you know this?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R Davis
“The truth is rarely pure and never simple.”
03:08 PM on 07/12/2011
So then, why is our cancer rate higher than the Chinese?
photo
timbeaux
Novelist, anti-professional politicians, liberal l
06:26 PM on 07/12/2011
Because we live longer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RoughCollie
Destination: A new way of seeing things.
02:16 PM on 07/12/2011
Why am I not surprised? Because I suspect that another component to this trend is that a decent percentage of these men are probably like my husband, a meat eating guy who turns green at the sight of a vegetable on his plate. As for fruits, maybe in a pie with ice cream.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
Spiggy
If I can get you to think then I have succeeded.
02:43 PM on 07/12/2011
Or maybe it could be that A higher percentage of men deal with carcinogenic chemicals on a daily basis than women .
06:53 PM on 07/12/2011
I agree, but don't think it is just exposure to chemicals. Exposure to all sorts of items in the workplace may contribute. Until the past decade or so, the work domain of a female had a more or less different environment than that of the male. (and, please, I'm not saying that the females had it easier...just different working conditions.)
02:07 PM on 07/12/2011
Stupid.
01:46 PM on 07/12/2011
Must be a result of discrimination...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:56 PM on 07/12/2011
Not sure if you're being facetious, but this is absolutely true. Compare how much money is spent on breast cancer research, advertising, funding drives, etc. vs how much is spent on prostate cancer. The gap is disgusting, and is one of the many reasons why I am a masculist.
06:48 PM on 07/12/2011
So don't just cry about it, rally up all the men and get them to be advocates for their prostates and for their overall health. I suspect you will have a hard time doing so, but you'll never know unless you try, right?
photo
darquelourd
You Get What You Play For
01:40 PM on 07/12/2011
Reality has an anti-male bias. That's why it's important we act like jerks now while we can.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
INTUITE
01:34 PM on 07/12/2011
NOTHING NEW HERE, HAS EVER BEEN THUS TO THE LEAST OBERVANT OF US.
01:32 PM on 07/12/2011
My Aunt Ruth would say its because men are beasts.
photo
timbeaux
Novelist, anti-professional politicians, liberal l
02:37 PM on 07/12/2011
Would she say it twice?
03:38 PM on 07/12/2011
Three times I think. She outlived them all.