More

Children Now Make Up Smallest-Ever Percentage Of U.S. Population

Children Smaller Percentage Of Us Population

By HOPE YEN   07/12/11 05:20 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- Children now make up less of America's population than ever before, even with a boost from immigrant families.

And when this generation grows up, it will become a shrinking work force that will have to support the nation's expanding elderly population – even as the government strains to cut spending for health care, pensions and much else.

The latest 2010 census data show that children of immigrants make up one in four people under 18, and are now the fastest-growing segment of the nation's youth, an indication that both legal and illegal immigrants as well as minority births are lifting the nation's population.

Currently, the share of children in the U.S. is 24 percent, falling below the previous low of 26 percent of 1990. The share is projected to slip further, to 23 percent by 2050, even as the percentage of people 65 and older is expected to jump from 13 percent today to roughly 20 percent by 2050 due to the aging of baby boomers and beyond.

In 1900, the share of children reached as high as 40 percent, compared to a much smaller 4 percent share for seniors 65 and older. The percentage of children in subsequent decades held above 30 percent until 1980, when it fell to 28 percent amid declining birth rates, mostly among whites.

"There are important implications for the future of the U.S. because the increasing costs of providing for an older population may reduce the public resources that go to children," said William P. O'Hare, a senior consultant with the Baltimore-based Annie E. Casey Foundation, a children's advocacy group.

Pointing to signs that many children are already struggling, O'Hare added: "These raise urgent questions about whether today's children will have the resources they need to help care for America's growing elderly population."

The numbers are largely based on an analysis by the Population Reference Bureau, a nonprofit research group in Washington that studies global and U.S. trends. In some cases, the data were supplemented with additional census projections on U.S. growth from 2010-2050 as well as figures compiled by the Annie E. Casey Foundation's Kids Count project.

Nationwide, the number of children has grown by 1.9 million, or 2.6 percent, since 2000. That represents a drop-off from the previous decade, when even higher rates of immigration by Latinos – who are more likely than some other ethnic groups to have large families – helped increase the number of children by 8.7 million, or 13.7 percent.

Percentages aside, 23 states and the District of Columbia had declines in their numbers of children in the century's first decade, with Michigan, Rhode Island, Vermont and D.C. seeing some of the biggest drops.

On the other hand, states with some of the biggest increases – Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina and Texas – also ranked in the bottom one-third of states in terms of child well-being as measured by the Kids Count project. The project calculated child well-being based on levels of poverty, single-parent families, unemployment, high-school dropouts and other factors.

The slowing population growth in the U.S. mirrors to a lesser extent the situation in other developed nations, including Russia, Japan and France which are seeing reduced growth or population losses due to declining birth rates and limited immigration. The combined population of more-developed countries other than the U.S. is projected to decline beginning in 2016, raising the prospect of prolonged budget crises as the number of working-age citizens diminish, pension costs rise and tax revenues fall.

Japan, France, Germany and Canada each have lower shares of children under age 15, ranging between 13 percent in Japan and 17 percent in Canada, while nations in Africa and the Middle East have some of the largest shares, including 50 percent in Niger and 46 percent in Afghanistan, according to figures from the United Nations Population Division.

In the U.S., the share of children under 15 is 20 percent.

Depending on future rates of immigration, the U.S. population is estimated to continue growing through at least 2050. In a hypothetical situation in which all immigration – both legal and illegal – immediately stopped, the U.S. could lose population beginning in 2048, according to the latest census projections.

Since 2000, the increase for children in the U.S. – 1.9 million – has been due to racial and ethnic minorities.

Currently, 54 percent of the nation's children are non-Hispanic white, compared to 23 percent Hispanic, 14 percent black, and 4 percent Asian.

Over the past decade, the number of non-Hispanic white children declined 10 percent to 39.7 million, while the number of minority children rose 22 percent to 34.5 million. Hispanics, as well as Asians, Native Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders and multiracial children represented all of the growth. The number of black and American Indian children declined.

In nearly one of five U.S. counties, minority children already outnumber white children.

"The `minority youth bulge' is being driven primarily by children in immigrant families," said Mark Mather, associate vice president of the Population Reference Bureau who co-wrote a report released Tuesday on the subject. "They are transforming America's schools, and in a generation they will transform the racial-ethnic composition of the U.S. work force."

"Policymakers are paying a lot of attention to the elderly, but we have a large population of children who have their own needs," he said.

The numbers come as states around the nation are seeking to cut education spending and other programs – rather than raise taxes – to close gaping budget holes as schools districts run out of $100 billion in federal stimulus money that helped stave off job losses over the past two years.

In Texas, for instance, the Legislature changed state law so it could slash education spending by $4 billion over the next two years to help make up for a $27 billion budget shortfall. The move is the first cut in per-student spending in Texas since World War II, even as the state has gained nearly 1 million children over the past decade, many of them Hispanic.

The school cutbacks are expected to have a disproportionate effect on low-income communities which are less able to raise local school taxes. Advocates believe that could further widen the achievement gap between students of different races in states like Texas, where some of the fastest student growth is among those who are poor and whose primary language is not English.

The resulting cuts will be far-reaching and surprising to many parents and communities, from teacher layoffs to reductions in extracurricular programs and ballooning class sizes, said Jenny LaCoste-Caputo, a spokeswoman for the Texas Association of School Administrators.

"When people say, `Cut government spending,' they don't think about the impact on the school down the street, until local voters begin to see the harm later," she said. "That's when we will really see the backlash. The sad thing is we'll have many kids suffer in the process."

Similar battles over education funding have played out in California, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida and Wisconsin.

Other census findings:

_Based on current trends, Florida could surpass New York as the third-largest state in overall population before the next census in 2020, part of a long-term migration of U.S. residents to the South and West. The most populous states are California and Texas.

_While more than half of U.S. residents now live in suburbs, the number of people living in cities also has rebounded somewhat in the past decade, increasing by 3 percentage points. Roughly one-third of the U.S. population lives in cities, the highest share since 1950.

___

Online:

Array

Array

Array

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Children now make up less of America's population than ever before, even with a boost from immigrant families. And when this generation grows up, it will become a shrinking work force t...
WASHINGTON -- Children now make up less of America's population than ever before, even with a boost from immigrant families. And when this generation grows up, it will become a shrinking work force t...
Filed by James Sunshine  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,066
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
06:25 AM on 08/20/2011
Who can afford kids now? The only people I see having more than two kids now are the same people who have to take the bus everyday.
photo
Eva Las Vegas
eco-preneur, idea-woman, damn good mom.
09:26 PM on 07/14/2011
We need to cut back on consumers to help us attain sustainability I'm glad we're not pumping our kids for farmhands anymore. Climate change is much worse and at hand.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
07:12 PM on 07/14/2011
smoker: I hope you are not. How successful has socialism been in Russian and Europe? I helped a Russian family 20+ years ago, and what they said was going on in Russia is like WE are doing now. They came here for freedom.
11:48 AM on 07/14/2011
Not only can I not afford them (I can't even afford myself), I am would be legitimately afraid for their future. No way am I going to bring a child into this world. If I'm able to, I'll adopt or take in a foster child instead.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:22 AM on 07/14/2011
and not a moment too soon, it will take a decade to remove the sticky excrements that they ooze from the surfaces they have touched.
09:01 AM on 07/14/2011
see what abortion has accomplished in a just 3 decades
photo
CarlyQ
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
10:30 AM on 07/14/2011
I thought the Repub mantra was not to have kids if you can't afford them. Given where America is headed, this is a good thing, not bad.
12:49 AM on 07/14/2011
We need the population to shrink. The environment needs it and the future generations will have easier more healthy lives if the population starts to decline.
10:25 PM on 07/13/2011
Philip Longman says conservatives will take over even more because liberals don't have enough kids - http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-03-13-babybust_x.htm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustinP213
I dislike all political parties.
04:43 PM on 07/13/2011
Good. Most people can't afford having more than two kids without some form of government assistance.
photo
ohslimgoody
Nothing new under the sun.
03:53 PM on 07/13/2011
Let me just say this America is raising the illegals kids, thats why they can have 5 -8 children they have free housing free food, and the ones that work and dont make alot might as well not pay income taxes because they get it all back. Oh lets not forget the free medical......

Lets start making them pay for everything like the rest of us and lets just see if they keep having 12 kids. Reality while hit real quick.
03:47 PM on 07/13/2011
Having more than 2 kids doesn't exactly send everyone to the welfare office. We have 6 going on 7 kids and pay enough in taxes to buy a government vehicle every year. We are raising a gaggle of upper middle class white children, in a well educated, liberal, non-religious home with strong environmental stewardship beliefs. If more of MY peers would take a moment out of there self indulgent consuming to raise well educated children, instead of masking their responsibility for having 2 narcissistic snowflakes with still more consuming and raising hell for the mere mention of paying taxes maybe we would be a little better off as a country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustinP213
I dislike all political parties.
04:45 PM on 07/13/2011
I'm really curious about two things

1) How can you have strong environmenatal views while having 7 kids?
2) Why would you want so many kids?

I'm genuinely curious and am not "dissing" you.
05:38 PM on 07/13/2011
We as a family of almost 9 create less waste then all of our neighbors (in some weeks combined). We eat an exclusively organic and mostly local diet, cloth diaper, recycle with inclusion of passing down hand me downs, buy used items when appropriate, compost, the list goes on and on. We also donate to environmental organizations to offset any net positive carbon impact. Keep in mind that on my street the vast majority have 0-3 children in the same size homes when it comes to heating/cooling and various other consumption. The preservation of the earth is a priority to our family and the grand overpopulation notion of the demise of the earth is misrepresented by the fact that those people considered to be breeding indiscriminately are not those that are the ones consuming the vast majority of resources. Americans per capita consume resources 32x greater than those in the third world so the issue is reducing consumption and cultivating existing resources. So the way you have 7 kids and remain an environmentalist is realize that once offsetting your family's own impact on the earth, raising educated environmental stewards is a positive gain to the cause.

As for our desire to raise a large family. Its multifaceted but boils down to the fact my husband and I love children and find no greater value than the one derived from family.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rg3gg16
09:47 AM on 07/14/2011
I would say that your family is the EXCEPTION and not the rule. Very few families can afford 7 children. In fact today most of us can't afford the 2.5 that we have. I think you should count your blessings, along with your children. Kudo's to you for trying to keep it environmentally friendly.......that is a hard task as well.
photo
StopThePlanet
Relentless pursuit of every silver lining's cloud
03:46 PM on 07/13/2011
And I thought the GOP was limiting access to birth control and abortion just because they hate women.  Who knew it was for the future of the country?
03:17 PM on 07/13/2011
The funny thing is, those that usually want the most safety net programs depend on new bodies feeding into the various ponzi schemes set up by the fed, such as social security - and these are the people who usually want children the least.
photo
StopThePlanet
Relentless pursuit of every silver lining's cloud
03:47 PM on 07/13/2011
On what concrete evidence do you base your assertions?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Body politic
and what would you do with a brain if you had one?
01:59 PM on 07/13/2011
AT least folks are wising up.......back in the day, I don't think they cared one bit about their pocket books......they just had children all willy-nilly. That's why a majority of blacks and Hispanics grew up poor.