More

Congress Increasingly Staffed By Former Lobbyists

Congress Lobbying

First Posted: 07/12/11 06:26 PM ET Updated: 09/11/11 06:12 AM ET

The number of former lobbyists working as key congressional staffers has more than doubled since the Republican Party took control of the House, a new report finds.

The Center for Responsive Politics report notes the pervasiveness of former lobbyists in the 112th Congress is due in part to an influx of those working for freshman Republican representatives, many of whom campaigned as enemies of the establishment. And it finds that "major companies' former hired-guns now work for the very congressional committees they used to lobby."

The Center found that 128 former lobbyists work in key staff positions in this Congress, compared to 60 in the last one. Researchers also determined that two House committees -- Financial Services and Energy and Commerce -- "have the highest cumulative number of former lobbyists employed by their members." Each have 14.

"AT&T alone has six former lobbyists who at one point lobbied on behalf of AT&T and now work for senators or representatives sitting on the Senate or House committees related to energy and commerce," the report states. And that's out of 13 congressional staffers in all who formerly lobbied for AT&T or a company it swallowed.

Among the other companies with more than five former lobbyists now on congressional staffs: Lockheed Martin, Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America, Verizon and Microsoft.

When people in Washington refer to the "revolving door," they generally mean the one that sweeps people from government jobs into the influence industry.

In 2009, for instance, HuffPost reporters Ryan Grim and Arthur Delaney described how the House Financial Services Committee -- "The Cash Committee" -- often served as a way-station for those seeking the big payoffs of K Street. According to their analysis of the 243 people who worked on the committee from 2000 to 2009, "almost half of the 126 people who have left registered as lobbyists, mostly for the financial services industry."

But the new Republican domination of the House has called attention to the so-called "reverse revolving door."

Dan Eggen of the Washington Post noted the irony in December, reporting that "many incoming GOP lawmakers have hired registered lobbyists as senior aides."

Lobbyists are sometimes suspected of writing legislation for sympathetic members of Congress. But now, increasingly, they are actually getting paid to do exactly that -- though as Kevin Bogardus and Rachel Leven wrote in The Hill last month, "many of those lobbyists agreed to substantial reductions in their annual salary for a chance to work for members of Congress."

The reverse revolving door poster child would have to be Howard Cohen, formerly of HC Associates Inc., who is now chief health counsel of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. The Hill reported:

While working at his firm last year, Cohen earned more than $1 million lobbying for clients including Amgen, the Federation of American Hospitals and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, according to his financial disclosure form. Now in Congress, Cohen has an annual salary of $168,000, according to House records.

Senior congressional staffers are required to file financial disclosure forms; for new hires, those forms include salary information from their previous jobs. (The forms are web-posted by Legistorm.)

Eric Lipton wrote in The New York Times in November about Congress' highest-ranking reverse revolver: Dan Coats, the new Republican senator from Indiana. Coats' "blue-chip list of 36 clients included corporate titans like General Electric and Google," the Times wrote.

Coats is now sitting on the Senate's Appropriations, Select Intelligence, Energy and Natural Resources committees as well as the Joint Economic Committee.

What's wrong with having all these former lobbyists around? Well, as the Center for Responsive Politics puts it:

It may, plausibly, be the case that these individuals are able to keep the wishes of their former clients separate from the wishes of the constituents their bosses represent. But it may also be the case that these former lobbyists are now in the position to exercise considerable sway over everything from policy outcomes to government contract decisions and anti-trust decisions. Particularly where the issues are complicated and do not drive significant constituent interest, former clients of ex-lobbyists now working in Congress could be well placed to reap the rewards of enhanced access and deeper connections into government's legislative branch.

READ THE FULL REPORT BELOW:

Hired Guns to Hired Hands
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
The number of former lobbyists working as key congressional staffers has more than doubled since the Republican Party took control of the House, a new report finds. The Center for Responsive Politi...
The number of former lobbyists working as key congressional staffers has more than doubled since the Republican Party took control of the House, a new report finds. The Center for Responsive Politi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,021
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (43 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
TXfemmom 08:13 AM on 07/13/2011
This demonstrates the lengths to which Republicans bend to their corporate owners.  Do the Dems take money and bend some, of course.  However, these former lobbyists are running the offices of the Republicans, writing the legislation, and running the place.  They are either being subsidized via deferred compensation or in other ways by their former employers, and they are working for those  Read More...
07:58 AM on 07/14/2011
Just wait, soon a lobbyist is going to run for president and win after being backed by tons of $$$ from his/her supporting corporate interests. I'm joking, but seriously, how far does this have to go before changes are made?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
09:29 PM on 07/13/2011
All of them are just a bunch of power craving criminals. The whole system is violent and destructive and should be abolished. Eventually the people will wake up and stop giving others power over them.
08:41 PM on 07/13/2011
Are we now the United Subsidiaries of America? Wholly owned and operated by a few CEO's? Makes George Orwell seem less like science 'fiction.' Well, if I was disappointed by the success rate of Democrats, I now feel a lot better about 'disappointment' than I do about middle-class annihilation. Republicans are starting to make me feel like some sort of 'undesirable.' I hope voting is enough action to halt this insanity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
"I write to make it right, don't like what I see"
04:17 PM on 07/13/2011
Of course the party of business is bought and sold
Helloise
Healthy skeptic admires reason, trusts intuition
02:36 PM on 07/13/2011
This could be solved very simply. Make up your mind. You want to be a lobbyist, fine; that's your job unless or until you find another that must be outside of government. And vice versa. The unholy alliance between pols and lobbyists stains everything that happens in Congress with pols hiring lobbyists for their staffs and retiring pols looking forward to becoming lobbyists. Choose one or the other and that's the end of the story.
02:31 PM on 07/13/2011
More evidence that the teabag agenda is total astroturf, not grassroots, and that the whole "movement" is a transparent rebranding of far right, gop extremism in the service of (as always) Corporatist Corruption. The 86 tee pee freshmen (like the rest of republicorpers) are running dog lackeys of ALEC, and their blatant Hypocrisy in Staffing Choices should be exposed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dax49
02:02 PM on 07/13/2011
It would help- and be journalistically appropriate-to list the Congressmen who have spent OUR money on these "questionable hires"!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
american-dolt
Truther since 2004
02:01 PM on 07/13/2011
Back and forth they go, and they consider themselves "Good Americans", but they are Fascists.
photo
dukesman2000
We have guided missiles and misguided men
01:51 PM on 07/13/2011
Then when they lose their seat they go back to being lobbyists
01:38 PM on 07/13/2011
Corptocracy
gwithc
I don't talk to trolls, only at them
01:29 PM on 07/13/2011
The old revolving door is one of the major reasons America is hurting.
photo
TomTheSeal
Represent our wishes; best interests are arguable
01:20 PM on 07/13/2011
Our current form of government is going to be altered or abolished.

It is our, the people of America, right. It is our duty.

This government has GOT to go. To stand idly by and watch it kill America is morally bankrupt.
gwithc
I don't talk to trolls, only at them
01:41 PM on 07/13/2011
Our government is not really the problem. It's the inhabitants of government that we pay to run it.

Our election rules must be changed/abolished/reworked so we can start getting some honest people on our payroll.
02:40 PM on 07/13/2011
"GOT to go": Yes! We've got to get rid of the republicants, as they've sold us down the river to the Corporatist agenda, destroyed the Middle Class, weakened our National Security, Lied us into Unaffordable Wars, and have been willing storm troopers in the Class Warfare being waged by the Top Two Percent against the rest of us (which we're losing, by the way)!
01:16 PM on 07/13/2011
The Clinton Administration was teaming with corrupt individuals who begat the abolition of the Glass-Stiegel Act leading to the US economic meltdown. Not surprisingly, the only winners were those same guys who had returned to the “private sector,” Bob Rubin being among the top earners from this disaster. Another legacy from same minded individuals are the current wars that are senseless from the perspective of US interest and have more to do with Israel. Health insurance, medical costs in general are the result of corruption in Congress.

Perhaps there should be a national referendum on conflicts of interest and penalties for those who cheat the American public for self-interest.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
01:02 PM on 07/13/2011
I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you! - Claude Raines
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
ErnestineBass
No longer a cog in The Machine.
02:18 PM on 07/13/2011
I must be jaded. Nothing shocks me anymore. Disturbs me, yes.
12:58 PM on 07/13/2011
Another thought while we're talking about Congress. We have to remember that "time" is a finite resource; we can't "make" more. Any time that a Congressman or Congresswoman spends with lobbists (and it's considerable), is time NOT spent with their constituancy doing their jobs as "elected" respresentatives of the people who elected them. I AM GOING TO TRY A LITTLE EXPERIMENT AND I WOULD INVITE YOU TO PARTICIPATE AS WELL. Tomorrow, I am going to call my state Representative, Danny Davis, [D-IL7] to request a meeting. I will do the same with my Senators; Mark Kirk, [R-IL] and Dick Durbin, [D-IL]. The purpose of the meetings will be to discuss the "lobbying issue" we're discussing here. I will then document the responses from their offices, if they will even consider meeting with me, if they put me off, etc. I will then track their lobbying efforts to see who they are actually answering to now that they are elected. PLEASE, do the same in your districts as well. I think this little experiment will be quite interesting.
photo
jimtpat
Hell's Pretty Pink Bells
01:26 PM on 07/13/2011
I've never been able to get a meeting with one of my Congressmen or Senators. Never. In almost 60 years and I'm actually somewhat famous and very political. I'm an an ally to some of these guys. Never gotten a meeting. I've run across them at stores and such, but only platitudes are allowed there, nothing substantive.

We really should have passed the original 1st Amendment, especially after the disastrous fixing of the number of Reps at 435 back in the 1920s. Currently, my Congressman represents over 10 times the number of constituents that the Founders intended. Don't I wish we had the 2/3 representation a Southern slave was apportioned 50 years ago, not that they got anything out of it, but do we now?
01:45 PM on 07/13/2011
I appreciate your comment although it does disturb me very much because it confirms the point I was making. Thank you. I'm just your average guy, educated, but average. If you have been unsuccessful over the years, I'm never going to be able to meet with these people which is what I expect. Nevertheless, I am still going to try . . . and keep notes along the way. Yes, you are right. The original 1st Amendment would have put us on a very different course today. I don't often comment and don't see The Huff Post everyday. That being said, I am looking forward to reading your comments in the future because what you said really hit home with me. Thanks again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
ErnestineBass
No longer a cog in The Machine.
02:28 PM on 07/13/2011
Your observations regarding proportional representation (or the lack thereof, as it were) is spot on. F&F

(BTW - love your av! Given the current sorry state of affairs, Mike the headless chicken would make a most fitting national bird)