More

Light Bulb Act: House Republicans Poised To Repeal Incandescent Light Bulb Restrictions

Joe Barton

First Posted: 07/12/11 11:35 AM ET Updated: 09/11/11 06:12 AM ET

Jordan Howard contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON -- The House of Representatives will vote Tuesday on whether to repeal light bulb efficiency standards that are set to take effect at the beginning of 2012, with some lawmakers arguing such regulations amount to an assault on personal freedom.

Though the new standards would save the country billions of dollars per year -- around $6 billion in 2015 alone, according to White House estimates -- Republicans have opposed efficiency standards on the grounds that consumer choice should not be dictated by government bureaucrats.

"This is about more than just energy consumption, it is about personal freedom," said Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas), a sponsor of the new bill, in a statement earlier this year. "Voters sent us a message in November that it is time for politicians and activists in Washington to stop interfering in their lives and manipulating the free market. The light bulb ban is the perfect symbol of that frustration. People don't want congress dictating what light fixtures they can use."

Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee and the lead sponsor of the light bulb provision when it was introduced as part of a Republican-backed energy bill signed into law in 2007, has since walked back his support for the standards: He told The Hill's Andrew Restuccia, "It was never my goal for Washington to decide what type of light bulbs Americans should use. The public response on this issue is a clear signal that markets - not governments - should be driving technological advancements. I will join my colleagues to vote yes on a bill to protect consumer choice and guard against federal overreach."

The new lighting standards do not ban incandescent bulbs, said Michelle Schaefer of Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports. Rather, they set benchmarks that are are technology-neutral, and manufacturers have already developed more efficient incandescent bulbs that are available and on the market today.

The Natural Resources Defense Council, a leading environmental advocacy group, said Americans' energy costs would be reduced by an average of 7 percent, or about $85 per household per year, and the country would save more than $12.5 billion annually by 2020, when the new standards are fully implemented.

"Lighting accounts for 10 to 15% of household electricity use, and is one of the cheapest efficiency upgrades available to consumers," Schaefer said in a statement. "By repealing these standards, we would increase consumer energy costs, waste energy, and diminish the lighting choices available to consumers."

The House debated the bill Monday night, and a floor vote is expected Tuesday that would require a two-thirds majority to pass. But whether the provision is passed by the House, it faces dim prospects in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

The Obama administration announced its opposition to the repeal efforts in a statement on Monday night, saying the bill would stifle U.S. innovation as well as the creation of new manufacturing jobs.

UPDATE 6:55 p.m.: House lawmakers on Tuesday night rejected a bill to repeal light bulb efficiency standards that conservatives have argued amount to an assault on personal freedom.

The Better Use of Light Bulbs Act failed to garner the two-thirds majority needed for passage. The vote was 233-193.

"Fortunately, the Republican attempt to repeal minimum efficiency standards for light bulbs failed," said Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), the ranking member of the Natural Resources Committee and a senior member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, in a statement after the vote. "But it is a reflection of how radical the House Republican majority has become that a bipartisan, common-sense provision supported by both industry and environmentalists was threatened with repeal, and that the House wasted its time on such a matter when we have much more important work to do to create jobs and reduce the deficit."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Jordan Howard contributed to this report. WASHINGTON -- The House of Representatives will vote Tuesday on whether to repeal light bulb efficiency standards that are set to take effect at the beginn...
Jordan Howard contributed to this report. WASHINGTON -- The House of Representatives will vote Tuesday on whether to repeal light bulb efficiency standards that are set to take effect at the beginn...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,117
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (123 total)
  1 of 7  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
MyResponsibility 01:32 PM on 07/13/2011
That energy isn't OWRS, either. Did you procure the coal, oil, natural gas, or nuclear fuels used to spin the turbines? Did you invest in building the plants? Did you invest in the infrastructure that transports the energy to your home? No on all counts. And you do misunderstand me and my type. Obama would never have the cure for cancer, such research is not performed by the Executive. The office can't even  Read More...
01:25 PM on 07/22/2011
Not a fan at all of incondescent light bulbs. Personally, I don't like the color /shade of the light and I also read that the ceramic base of the bulb as a fire hazard.

Next?
04:56 AM on 07/20/2011
The mandate for one is supported by light bulb manufactures which gives them a level playing field. Two this mandate does NOT!!! ban any light bulb, it simply states they need to be more energy efficient. Manufactures have already made and selling energy efficient incandescent lights bulbs! Look here: http://www.energysavers.gov/your_home/lighting_daylighting/index.cfm/mytopic=11975

So for those of you who want your antique bulbs here you go! Quit regurgitating what these misinformed tea-baggers are telling you and do your own research for once!
photo
BeautifulOnDaOutside
I ♥ Huffington Post
02:31 PM on 07/17/2011
Liberals think homosexuals should be allowed to get married and join the Army, but they don't think I should be allowed to buy an incandescent light bulb.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RickW44
06:43 PM on 07/17/2011
Who cares about homosexuals? Are you in the closet or something? We are talking governmental efficiency.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stefan Dembowski
Just an amateur photographer.
08:24 AM on 07/16/2011
Let me see if I get this straight: The 'fiscal' conservatives DON'T want the United States of America to Save Billions?

How backwards can the GOP be???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RickW44
06:43 PM on 07/17/2011
Agreed. This is beyond pathetic.
photo
Bettaman
Another Veteran For Obama 2012!!
03:10 AM on 07/16/2011
Next week the Republiclowns will be debating repealing sufferage for women and deciding if they should strongly condemn the iceburg that the Titanic hit. Stay tuned.
photo
Bettaman
Another Veteran For Obama 2012!!
02:55 AM on 07/16/2011
These Republiscumbags aren't worth one thin dime, the whole bunch of them.
photo
Vikki Rogers Steinrauf
Never take a knife to a gun fight.
11:01 PM on 07/15/2011
OK, let me get this right. The Rebuglethugs campaigned on the promise of new jobs. That hasn't happened of even been attempted. We are facing default on our debt because they aren't willing to comprimise. And their priority is light blubs?????? Something in the house seems VERY dim.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stefan Dembowski
Just an amateur photographer.
08:25 AM on 07/16/2011
Best summary yet...

The 'fiscal' conservati­ves DON'T want the United States of America to Save Billions?
How backwards can the GOP be???
06:44 PM on 07/15/2011
Mind boggling waste of time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:58 PM on 07/14/2011
Less energy efficiency = more $$$ for big coal, big gas, and big-whatever-is-bad-for-the-environment-for-the-sake-of-profit.

It's obvious the GOP is in bed with the later...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ocrmom59
06:12 PM on 07/14/2011
This is what happen when people do not get out and vote and leave it to those who have no brains do the voting for them. They elected people who promise one thing and delivered something different. Where are the jobs, jobs jobs and for those who want the hcr repeal, All we have heard is defunding PP, take away unions rights, cut cut, and cut things that the american people need. I think they all think that they are goiing to live healthy strong lives forever and will never fall down on their luck.

They never think of the possiblity of losing what they have and can't start over or their health fails them and their insurance company deny them coverage. Nor their followers think that all the things they want to cut will hit them the hardest but they just figured that somehow they would escape all those cuts and only the poor, the miniorties and illegals get the punishment instead.

Now they are realizing that they were led down a path to believe that they had the majic key to get rid of the president and any bill that he had passed only know to find out that they can not do anything but keep digging a whole that they can't get out of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
10:41 PM on 07/13/2011
Proving once again that the only thing boundless about the gop is stoopidity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
candcje
Progressive, Liberal Democrat and Proud of it!
09:12 PM on 07/13/2011
So....... the government felt it was perfectly fine to insist that every last TV in the nation be converted to digital - bye-bye analog - which is more expensive than "basic cable" and which required people with older TVs to either purchase converter boxes or new TVs. But they are not OK with insisting on some basic, minimum efficiency standards for lightbulbs? Knowing that when a person's bulb burns out, they can just buy one or two new versions that will then last 4 times longer than the old version... and that they can even still buy their precious incandescent bulbs, but even they will last twice as long?

Yeah, that GOP House really does have some clear and understandable methods to their madness... ugh.
08:16 PM on 07/13/2011
While you're at it, repeal the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 . . . Coca-Cola just hasn't been the same since.
07:45 PM on 07/13/2011
Like my great-great-great-grandparents, I want to be able to buy whale oil for my lamps, throw night soil in the street, and eat out of lead painted dinner wear. Now these ancestors of mine were starving in Ireland due to monocline farming practices, so they were too poor to actually do any of those three things, but I want the right to them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:41 AM on 07/27/2011
We should demand the right to drive our horse drawn carriages on the freeways! Why shouldn't I be allowed to commute to work on horseback, fer cryin' out loud! Government overreach, plain and simple. Bring back the horse and buggy, and repeal the laws that say I have to go over 5 miles an hour on the highway!
07:45 PM on 07/13/2011
Upon reading this, I pictured a crotchety old crank wheezing "TALKING PICTURES ARE JUST A FAD!!!" and then "TELEVISION WILL NEVER BE AS BIG AS RADIO!!!".

I hate to break it to you, GOP, but it's time to sell your shares of Amalgamated Buggy Whips and at least pretend like you want to build a better tomorrow.
photo
Bettaman
Another Veteran For Obama 2012!!
02:56 AM on 07/16/2011
LOL. Fanned and faved.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:42 AM on 07/27/2011
The GOP has become a laughingstock to thinking people, but they still have the ability to fascinate a large portion of the electorate.