iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama: Social Security Checks Threatened If Debt Ceiling Deal Isn't Reached

AP/The Huffington Post  
First Posted: 07/12/11 02:53 PM ET Updated: 09/11/11 06:12 AM ET

President Barack Obama told CBS News' Scott Pelley Tuesday that he cannot guarantee that Social Security checks will go out as planned if Democrats and Republicans fail to reach a deal to raise the debt ceiling by August 2.

"I cannot guarantee that those checks go out on August 3 if we haven't resolved this issue, because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it," Obama said in an interview on the CBS Evening News Tuesday evening.

"This is not just a matter of Social Security checks," Obama said. "These are veterans checks, these are folks on disability and their checks. There are about 70 million checks that go out."

WATCH:

Obama has been pushing for $4 trillion in a 10-year deficit reduction proposal. But House Speaker John Boehner, after seeking to forge a deal of that magnitude, told the president that a smaller, $2 trillion to $2.4 trillion deal was more realistic. A deal is essential to win Republican votes to increase the nation's debt ceiling by Aug. 2, or risk a government default.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday that Republicans will "do the responsible thing and ensure the government doesn't default on its obligations," but said Democrats and the Obama administration were relying on budget gimmicks to give the "appearance of serious belt-tightening."

His comments underscored the seemingly inflexible bargaining positions that have created an impasse between Obama and GOP lawmakers as they struggle for agreement on budget cuts as the price for maintaining the government's ability to borrow.

McConnell's remarks represent an escalation for Republicans, who had earlier acknowledged that bipartisan negotiations led by Vice President Joe Biden had managed to identify up to $2 trillion in spending reductions. Details of those cuts, however, were still being worked out.

McConnell accused the administration of leaking its proposals for spending cuts to the media without details.

"The lack of detail concealed the fact that the savings they were supposedly willing to support were at best smoke and mirrors," the Kentucky Republican said..

Democratic officials familiar with Obama's private talks with leaders of the House and Senate insist that Congress will not let the government go into default for the first time in American history -- and that Republicans, ultimately, would vote to raise the debt limit even if a deficit-cutting package does not come together over the next two weeks.

Republicans say they won't allow a default, but that a major reduction in spending must come as part of the package -- and therefore both sides remain in a stalemate on the debt limit.

After a Monday White House meeting among Obama and top congressional leaders, neither side showed any give that might generate hopes for a speedy agreement. Instead, Republicans again took a firm stand against revenue increases while Obama and his Democratic allies insisted that they be part of any equation that cuts programs like Medicare.

"I do not see a path to a deal if they don't budge, period," Obama said on Monday.

At the same time, the president turned up the pressure by announcing he won't sign any short-term debt limit increases.

"We are going to get this done," Obama insisted during a news conference.

Obama's declaration seemed aimed at pressuring lawmakers to continue to strive for the largest deficit reduction plan possible, even though hopes for a "grand bargain" mixing a complete overhaul of the tax code with cuts to benefits programs like Medicare and Social Security fizzled over the weekend.

An advocate of the bigger bargain, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, explored the idea but scotched it in its infancy after learning the extent of White House demands for tax increases.

"The American people will not accept -- and the House cannot pass -- a bill that raises taxes on job creators," Boehner said Monday before heading to the White House.

The Treasury Department says lawmakers have until Aug. 2 to extend the nation's debt limit to prevent a catastrophic government default on its bills. With that deadline fast approaching, the public is growing more concerned about what happens if Congress and the White House can't reach a deal.

Forty-two percent of Americans say they see a greater risk to the economy from not raising the debt limit, according to a Washington Post-Pew Research Center poll conducted last week. That's up 7 points from late May. However, there are still 47 percent of Americans who say they are more concerned about the consequences of raising the debt ceiling.

The business community is also upping the pressure on lawmakers, warning that a failure to increase the nation's borrowing limit could have an immediate impact on the economy recovery.

"An unprecedented default on the nation's bills would have dire consequences for our economy, our markets, and Main Street Americans," said Thomas Donohue, president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Despite lingering hopes for a larger deal, the goal of the White House talks is to produce spending cuts of at least $2.4 trillion or so over the coming decade. Such cuts wouldn't do enough to address deficits that threaten the economy, but they would represent a down payment on further reductions that would be imposed after next year's elections.

The $2.4 trillion figure would meet the House Republicans' own standard of a debt-cutting package: one that would exceed the size of the increase in the debt limit, and provide enough borrowing room to get the country through 2012.

The group of negotiators includes Obama, other top administration officials and a bipartisan group of the eight top leaders of Congress. At Monday's session, they heard competing versions of how much progress had been made in talks led by Vice President Joe Biden in May and June.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., a participant who left the Biden talks last month because of Democratic demands on taxes, spelled out potential spending cuts that had been identified. But Democratic lawmakers made clear that such a cutting-only approach without tax increases on wealthier Americans would never pass the Democratic-led Senate or the House, where Democratic votes would be needed, too.

Cantor, aides said, outlined up to $2.3 trillion in spending cuts over the upcoming decade, with $1.3 trillion coming from squeezing the day-to-day budgets of Cabinet agencies, including the Pentagon.

Cantor erred on the high end of the savings range in virtually every instance. The White House countered that the cuts really approached $1.7 trillion or so, which would leave negotiators $700 billion short of the $2.4 trillion being sought.

Republicans are also suspicious that Democrats want most of the spending cuts to be concentrated in the later years of a deal. They say that despite promising cuts of $1.1 trillion from Cabinet agency operating budgets, the White House is insisting on a two-year freeze in such spending at the current level of $1.05 trillion. At issue is the amount approved by Congress each year in annual appropriations bills.

Obama spent most of his time encouraging lawmakers to reconsider a bigger deal, on the order of some $4 trillion in spending cuts and tax hikes over 10 years. Democrats familiar with the talks said it was clear after the meeting that negotiators are going to have come up with some new ideas in hopes of finding a compromise.

As a measure of the political peril Obama is courting, the president is willing to discuss raising the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67 years, provided Republicans would allow Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy to expire at the end of 2012 and agree to other unspecified demands, according to a Democratic congressional aide.

All the officials familiar with the talks spoke on condition of anonymity to disclose details of the private discussions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
President Barack Obama told CBS News' Scott Pelley Tuesday that he cannot guarantee that Social Security checks will go out as planned if Democrats and Republicans fail to reach a deal to raise the de...
President Barack Obama told CBS News' Scott Pelley Tuesday that he cannot guarantee that Social Security checks will go out as planned if Democrats and Republicans fail to reach a deal to raise the de...
President Barack Obama told CBS News' Scott Pelley Tuesday that he cannot guarantee that Social Security checks will go out as planned if Democrats and Republicans fail to reach a deal to raise the de...
President Barack Obama told CBS News' Scott Pelley Tuesday that he cannot guarantee that Social Security checks will go out as planned if Democrats and Republicans fail to reach a deal to raise the de...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10,612
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (172 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
07:50 PM on 07/29/2011
Holding Social Security hostage is a big mistake, Obama.
06:59 PM on 07/17/2011
So in February when the Tea Party Republicans threaten a reworking of Social Security to cut costs; this isn't necessary because Social Security has a 2.6 Trillion (2,600 billion) surplus that means it can run without draining government revenue.

Now that the government can't borrow money the Social Security administration can't cover 23 billion in costs for the Month of August?

So which is the lie? Is the 2.6 trillion surplus a lie that doesn't exist? Or is the current threat to stop payments of less than 1% of the surplus money they have for these payments a lie?

Doesn't one of these statements have to be a complete and utter crock of horse excrement?
01:16 AM on 08/12/2011
Not if they're talking about the administrative logistics - staff to handle the printing, mailing, moving, etc. I'm sure those folks aren't paid out of the Social Security fund.
05:15 PM on 07/16/2011
I don't see how the Social Security checks would stop. I pay my Social Security "tax" every month (as do millions of other working Americans). If Pres. Obama really cares about retired senior citizens, he should stop spending millions of our tax dollars bombing Libya.
05:09 PM on 07/16/2011
I wonder if people realize that GETTING DEEPER INTO DEBT is more of a threat to their Social Security checks and the American economy than having a balanced budget with existing tax revenues. Think about this situation in terms of your personal life: Let's say you are ACCUSTOMED to buying nice clothes, eating out at restaurants, going out to movies & sporting events, etc. If you've maxed out your credit cards, can't get a pay raise from your employer, and you can't get a bank loan, which would be a more sensible thing to do? A. Borrow money from relatives so you can continue a lifestyle you can't afford. B. Spend less money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillerm
10:52 AM on 07/15/2011
This is the way it works, even if there is a government shutdown 'Mission Essential' staff will remain on duty. That would include those that send out Social Security checks as they are used to purchase needed medical supplies and drugs, thus considered critical. Funding for Social Security will remain as usual, in the form of IOUs. The statement by Obama is just to scare the elderly and get them on the phone to their Congressman. It's a disgusting way to blackmail government officials, as the stress on the elderly can cause sickness and even death
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dtairtime
It is what it is
09:42 AM on 07/15/2011
If they really weren't able to send checks out why would he stop SS before welfare checks?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trollinabucket
what can I say today to piss you off?
09:36 AM on 07/15/2011
The American Disabled and Retired are being held hostage by this fiasco...Social security checks may not go out????....THE LAWMAKERS ARE GONNA GET THEIR CHECKS THO--RIGHT??????
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
08:10 AM on 07/15/2011
debnran: WHOSE behavior? A man who controls the questions to specifically start an issue. What if Obama had his interview and never put out the SS question? Would there have been such a tumult? NO This is all planned. You a naive.Every action of a social progressive has a calculated reason for it. This was to turn the rhetoric and blame the republicans. The behavior of the republicans. They have written down a plan and where is Obama's. Rule one. You never take the word of a democrat. They never are honorable. Republican presidents before have dealth with the same BS.Roosevelt was a social progresssive and did his part to control people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
08:02 AM on 07/15/2011
Charile Jones: We just didn't get here with one, but has this one made it better? Your side refuses to examine what is going now. In two years more debt has been added on and even faster. The government has grown 25%, the WH got raises, have you? Entitlement food stamps have reached over 45%? Is that good news, or a trend. I think you suffer from Bush derangement illness. You still blame him, but you should include Clinton, and elder Bush. No real surplus when Clinton left, that was a liberal myth. Saw the figures.
01:22 AM on 08/12/2011
The secret figures that no one else saw?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
07:58 AM on 07/15/2011
charlie jones: you don't get it? It is the same rules that the left are following against conservatives, personalities, corporate jet companies. I'm just playing by the Rules way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
07:53 AM on 07/15/2011
charlie: the only ones on meds are in your court----your ideology is mental illness to think a world would be safe and socialist has been proven to be a failure.
01:53 AM on 07/15/2011
I'm on social security disablity only, I'm not rich. I have worked all my life now i am old and can not work. Why want the president Obama and the people in the white house help with all their millions of dallors, that they get paided becauce we the people pay them.
10:53 PM on 07/14/2011
I think Obama is trying to wake up the country. American people as well as our country has let spending get way out of hand. This raising the debt ceiling is in conjunction with an overall plan to lower the national debt. Kinda like debt consolidation. I would feel bad for the elderly and disabled if social Security checks were stopped, BUT I know way to many people getting SSI for BS reasons and that use the system. I want to sit back and laugh when they can't buy their drugs at the fiurst of the month!! I am tired of paying for the deadbeats!
07:54 PM on 07/14/2011
Obama is just embarrassing. He is truly an embarassment to America. I worry about our image abroad with this joke of a leader in charge...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
debnran
Opinionated
08:44 PM on 07/14/2011
Enlighten us about why he is embarrassing. I find him MUCH better than the previous administration.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
09:33 PM on 07/14/2011
Didn't care for Bush because he was a liberal. HOW is Obama better?
07:51 PM on 07/14/2011
This guy has no shame. He just proved that there is no level for which he will not stoop to retain political power. This is in no way presidential.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charlie Jones
The GOP is between the stoneage and a hard place.
08:39 PM on 07/14/2011
The Dems bash Bush/The GOP bash Obama.....neither ever has anything good to say about the other... as if any and everything (either Prez) has ever done, is doing and will do in the future, in, or out of office is bad for America. Even sadder, is that both sides honestly believe in their heart of hearts, that they are 100% correct. Interesting!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillerm
11:01 AM on 07/15/2011
Charlie, 'the proof is in the pudding' as the British say. Obama's policies have done nothing to improve the condition of our dismal economy, record high levels of unemployment, loss in value of our homes, high gas, food, heating fuel, and product prices, higher taxes on all goods, record deficit that exceeds our GDP, etc. His record of failure has not produced much confidence in his ability to lead us out of this mess. Should we follow the media's lead and make him the victim of every opposition challenge or ask him to produce a budget for the people to see and comment on? The Republicans have done their job and put the budget on the table. It's time for the democrats to do the same.