iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Senate Dem Pitches Tax Haven Abuse Bill As Deficit Reduction


First Posted: 07/12/11 03:20 PM ET Updated: 09/11/11 06:12 AM ET

To the ongoing Capitol Hill choruses of "tax the rich" and "tax the poor," Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) offered a third option on Tuesday: "Tax the cheats."

Levin is hoping that Washington's deficit fever will give his perennial proposal to stop offshore tax haven abuses the impetus it hasn't had the last four times he introduced it.

The basic fairness aspects of the bill "will get it to the goal line," Levin said at a press conference where he unveiled his Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act. The focus on deficit reduction in Washington will "take it over the goal line," he said.

The Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which Levin chairs, has calculated that offshore tax abuses cost the Treasury $100 billion a year in lost revenue, or about $1 trillion over the course of a decade [pdf].

White House and congressional negotiators have been arguing over whether their 10-year deficit reduction target should properly be $2 trillion or $4 trillion.

"This is a big chunk of whatever that goal is," Levin said.

For 10 years now, Levin has been proposing to close tax loopholes that let multinational companies and hedge funds shelter enormous sums by creating offshore identities and using tax-haven banks. This time around, there are some new features to his bill.

One measure would tax payments on credit default swaps that currently escape taxation because they are technically sent to offshore shell companies. "If you have a credit default swap -- a bet -- and you are making payments on that swap to a foreign corporation, that payment is considered as being sourced where it's received," Levin said. "That's absurd."

Another measure would require all domestic and foreign companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges to publicly disclose the extent of their offshore operations as a way of spotting tax haven abuse. The companies would be forced to disclose the number of employees, amount of sales, how much tax they owed and how much tax they paid for each country where they do business.

And yet another measure -- there are 18 in the bill -- would attempt to recover taxes on money that is deposited in unaccountable offshore banks but then redeposited into "correspondent accounts" in U.S. banks.

"The fiction that a lot of this offshore money is kept offshore would be punctured," Levin said, "because a lot of the money is not kept offshore, but in fact is in correspondent accounts here in the United States where it has the protection of United States banks, the security of United States banks and can be invested at the direction of the owner of that money."

Closing tax havens may sound like common sense, but on Capitol Hill, money talks. Big business tends to dominate tax reform talks, and groups that represent huge multinationals -- particularly in the pharmaceutical, technology and financial industries -- that use these tax havens insist that closing them would make American companies less competitive globally, causing dire consequences domestically.

"There's a lot of verbal support for closing down tax havens," Levin said of his congressional colleagues. "People say they're in favor of it. But there's a whole bunch of big companies that use those tax havens for their financial benefits."

"When the rubber hits the road, there will be opposition to this."

But Levin also said the bill could run into problems because of the subject matter. "These are complicated things. And anytime you're trying to address things that are complicated, where people's eyes glaze over when you're trying to explain what you're talking about, you're starting with one hand tied behind your back," he said.

Levin has four cosponsors for his bill, and Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), who has also been pushing to close tax havens for years, made closing the loopholes a key part of the deficit-cutting proposal he made on the Senate floor on Monday.

"The Democrats on the Budget Committee said: 'We have had it. We are going after those people. We are going to insist they pay their fair share just as the vast majority of Americans already do,' " Conrad said. "So we are saying:' We are coming after you. If you have a tax haven down in the Cayman Islands, we are coming after you. If you have an abusive tax shelter, we are coming after you because it is not fair to all the rest of us who are paying what we owe.' "

Levin said the amount of support the White House gives his bill will be a major factor in whether it passes. President Obama has often spoke of ending tax breaks "for companies that ship jobs overseas." And as senator, Obama twice supported Levin's previous attempts.

"Hopefully President Obama will be one of those who really puts his shoulders behind this effort," Levin said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
To the ongoing Capitol Hill choruses of "tax the rich" and "tax the poor," Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) offered a third option on Tuesday: "Tax the cheats." Levin is hoping that Washington's deficit f...
To the ongoing Capitol Hill choruses of "tax the rich" and "tax the poor," Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) offered a third option on Tuesday: "Tax the cheats." Levin is hoping that Washington's deficit f...
To the ongoing Capitol Hill choruses of "tax the rich" and "tax the poor," Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) offered a third option on Tuesday: "Tax the cheats." Levin is hoping that Washington's deficit f...
To the ongoing Capitol Hill choruses of "tax the rich" and "tax the poor," Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) offered a third option on Tuesday: "Tax the cheats." Levin is hoping that Washington's deficit f...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,431
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (28 total)
10:19 AM on 07/15/2011
I wonder if some creative accountant can come up with some simple way for every American to somehow claim some sort of offshore tax credit. Maybe something as obscure as reading and subscribing to a foreign newspaper for educational purpose or whatever. Then the procedures are put on facebook or something so everyone can save some money.

wonder how long those loops holes stay open.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosey1017
08:13 PM on 07/14/2011
Get rid of Obamacare and return every Financial and EPA regulation to 2007 and the deficit is gone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bklynbob
self-made progressive
01:16 PM on 07/18/2011
Yes, people, including your loves ones, should be put to death should they fall ill and can't afford care, apparently.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
06:42 PM on 07/14/2011
mukarrib: what do you mean? I didn't vote for him.
photo
ssnt
670 Economists(6 w/ Nobel Prize) like Mitt's plan
06:35 PM on 07/14/2011
Ok, now we are talking.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
06:08 PM on 07/14/2011
Mastiff: problem of both sides, but you haven't looked much at the WH now have you? Bush derangement syndrome.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
04:59 PM on 07/14/2011
westoverallen: and 99.9% of all democrats. When our forefathers put together their constitution did they expect politicians to become millionaires while 'serving the public' , or career politicians?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
04:47 PM on 07/14/2011
Rosie Green: how do you know that?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
04:37 PM on 07/14/2011
rumpoint: I agree.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
04:28 PM on 07/14/2011
rascal bar: You are biased. It is the dems with the over zealous accountants. I know them!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
04:20 PM on 07/14/2011
hdvh56: I didn't.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sweattshop
Artist, logo maker, father of three, college age
04:00 AM on 07/14/2011
Awesome!! Way overdue. They want tax breaks, they observe same tax laws we do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aidendamien
Liberal
11:07 PM on 07/13/2011
I'll even do more of an extreme. Charge a 25% tax rate to everybody and every company. Remove the loopholes for everybody and if your company is created here, you employ here first, international second.
07:45 PM on 07/13/2011
Please start with GE and Obamas bud jeffy boy..thats the biggest tax abuse crap I have ever seen
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sweattshop
Artist, logo maker, father of three, college age
04:01 AM on 07/14/2011
Can you post any stats or is this just repeated from Fox Noise?
photo
ssnt
670 Economists(6 w/ Nobel Prize) like Mitt's plan
06:44 PM on 07/14/2011
Truth hurts, huh sweatshop?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosey1017
08:26 PM on 07/14/2011
Hey sweattshop that is from a CNN money report on April 4, 2011; it actually came from a story in the NY Times from March 25, 2011 that said GE was getting a refund. Doesn't matter, because GE didn't get a refund. It turns out they wouldn't disclose how much they would pay, but it was calculated (by CNN money) and the IRS that GE's tax liability for 2010 was 7%. Basically, they paid a lesser percentage of tax than a family earning $50,000 a year. Who runs GE? Jeffrey Immelt. Who got all the tax breaks on those lightbulbs? GE. Who does Jeffrey advise? You got it. Obama. Thank you for playing and hope to see you again.
11:56 AM on 07/13/2011
These clowns in Congress, who spend their entire careers figuring out how to take more money from the people, create more problems than they solve. They'd better be careful here. Globally operating corporations might just move their headquarters to another country if Congress continues to attack them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ken Tabor
11:50 AM on 07/13/2011
I can't be the only one that see's a "FLAT TAX(10%) on everybody ,as beening the solution and the fairest thing to do.When I say everybody ,I mean everybody,from large businesses to the lowest wage earner in the country. I'ts fair and would probably bring in more "revenue" in the end.No more tax codes and loopholes,no discounts no child credits.If you make $1.00 or $100,000,000 dollars you pay 10% period! Now sombody tell me why this is unworkable.
12:02 PM on 07/13/2011
It is unworkable because the tax code is what our Congresspeople sell to get their campaigns funded. If we had a flat tax with no "exceptions" or exemptions or deductions, why would large organizations bother giving huge sums of money to candidates? They wouldn't. Therefore, it'll never happen.
photo
ssnt
670 Economists(6 w/ Nobel Prize) like Mitt's plan
06:45 PM on 07/14/2011
I do not disagree, but there is no way they can do it. Think of all the people that would become unemployed.

It is the same thing for the insurance companies.