iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Safety Concerns Raised Over Deal To Allow Mexican Trucks On U.S. Highways

First Posted: 07/13/11 03:28 PM ET Updated: 09/12/11 06:12 AM ET

Burgundy Semi Truck

Under an agreement quietly signed in Mexico City today, Mexican trucks will be able to transport goods on U.S. highways in return for Mexico's decision to lift tariffs on U.S. goods. Business groups were elated, anticipating a boost in trade and a lift to the economy.

Amid concerns expressed by the Teamsters union and American truck drivers that unsafe Mexican trucks will present a danger on U.S. highways, Department of Transportation officials outlined strict new rules to ensure that Mexican truckers live up to U.S. safety and emissions standards: Their trucks will be electronically monitored and drivers will be drug-tested and will have to show they speak English.

But recent government studies raise some doubts about the effectiveness of those measures. The cost of ensuring Mexican truck safety outweighs the amount saved by U.S. importers or exporters, according to a February 2010 Congressional Research Service report.

The rationale of eliminating the truck drayage segment at the border, and of NAFTA in general, is to reduce the cost of trade between the two countries, thus raising each nation's economic welfare However the cost to federal taxpayers of ensuring Mexican truck safety, estimated by the U.S. DOT to be over $500 million as of March 2008, appears to be disproportionate to the amount of dollars saved thus far by U.S. importers or exporters that have been able to utilize long-haul trucking authority. Beyond the hindrances to greater utilization of long-haul operations associated with the demonstration project, delays associated with customs processing are significant and a long-term obstacle to efficient trucking across the border. Any accumulated savings in trucking costs enjoyed by shippers therefore should be weighed against the public cost of funding the safety inspection regime for Mexican long-haul carriers.

Though the DOT's Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration released a study finding a 90 percent compliance rate by Mexican motor carriers with U.S. safety regulations, those results were disputed by the DOT's inspector general in 2008. The IG criticized the scope and methodology of the study, saying that the border crossings chosen for inspectors were not random; the DOT used the wrong formula in its final stats; and the study relied on an assumption that trucks built in Mexico since 1996 were automatically complaint with safety rules.

Opponents of the deal occasionally engage in hyperbole about Mexico's drug problems impacting the program, but the statistics relating to truck-related crime in Mexico are startling. Criminals hijacked over 10,000 commercial motor vehicles in Mexico in 2010, according to a highway cargo trade group estimate cited by the Transportation Security Administration in an October 2010 newsletter. According to the TSA, drug traffickers also have been known to hijack and mimic legitimate commercial trucks to transport illicit cargo across the border.

And cargo theft rose 50 percent between 2009 and 2010, Mexico's National Cargo Shipping Chamber told the Christian Science Monitor.

All the hand-wringing may be for naught since the new security requirements make U.S. transport prohibitive for only a small share of 400,000 Mexican trucks, claims Refugio Munoz Lopez, director general of Mexico's shipping chamber.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers have expressed their concern about the issue, with Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Oregon) writing Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood last week to challenge the cross-border trucking program and introducing legislation to limit DOT's authority to implement the program.

DeFazio is upset that Highway Trust Fund money, which is used to maintain the interstate highway system, will be used to pay to install onboard recorders on Mexican trucks, calling it "outrageous that taxpayers are being told to foot the bill for the Mexican trucking industry to comply with American safety standards."

A group of 34 lawmakers, including Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) and Rep. Daniel Lipkinski (D-Ill.) sent a letter to LaHood last month, calling on him to terminate the program, citing the shortcoming of the previous cross-border program, which "failed to assure that every Mexican truck was properly inspected at the border."

Dodd-Frank Summit: Zandi's Endorsement Greeted With Silence, Kudlow's Tirade

Top regulators, Wall Street executives and lawyers are meeting at the Grand Hyatt in New York on Wednesday for a summit on Dodd-Frank. Among the speakers are former Comptroller of the Currency John C. Dugan (now at corporate law firm Covington & Burling), CNBC's Larry Kudlow, FDIC's James R. Wigand, former Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions at Treasury Michael S. Barr, Moody's big brain Mark Zandi, JPMorgan managing director Don Thompson and Treasury's Assistant Secretary for Financial Markets Mary J. Miller.

Among the highlights so far: Zandi called Dodd-Frank a "good piece of legislation" only to be greeted with the audience's silence; Dugan warned that tougher capital requirements could heighten risk; and Kudlow had some choice quotes, captured by New York Times's Dealbook: "The idea that fat cat bankers should be punished is crazy" and Michelle Bachmann is a "smart woman."

Fall Preview: The Most Important New Regs And Rules

Lobbyists, deregulation zealots and safety advocates -- get ready to rumble!

Last week, the Office of Management and Budget published its Unified Agenda, which lists upcoming regulations that federal agencies are expected to advance between now and April 2012.

Among the most important ones, per OMB Watch:

  • The Environmental Protection Agency is expected to finalize its rule regulating emissions from power plants that cause pollution in neighboring states.
  • EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will set emissions standards for heavy-duty vehicles.
  • The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is creeping ahead with its requirement that employers create and implement a program to prevent injury and illness.
  • The Mine Safety and Health Administration will update its exposure standards for crystalline silica, a dust that can be dangerous to breathe.
  • The Food and Drug Administration will require chain restaurants and certain vending machines to provide patrons with nutrition labeling on menu items.
  • The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration will move forward with its proposed rule to restrict cellphone use while driving a commercial vehicle.

Homeland Security Not Doing Enough To Secure Federal Facilities: GAO

The Department of Homeland Security's Federal Protective Service still has a hard time securing federal facilities, according to a new Government Accountability Office report.

For one thing, the service cannot ensure that its contract guards are properly trained and certified. In addition, the service's ability to protect such buildings is hampered by the absence of a risk management program that links threats and vulnerabilities to the service's resources. The FPS has not fully implemented any of the 21 recommendations made by GAO in 2009 and 2010.

Zadroga Lawyer Warns 9/11 Victims Fund May Be Inadequate To Cover Claims

The lawyer for James Zadroga, the NYPD detective who died of respiratory disease attributed to his rescue work at Ground Zero, says that the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund inspired by his client may be inadequate to cover future claims.

The fund, which allocates $2.7 billion over a period of years to those suffering from diseases linked to the 9/11 attacks, may be insufficient to cover future claims from those whose illnesses aren't yet full known, says attorney Michael Barasch. The proposed regulations for the administration of the fund are available for public comment until August 5 and have attracted dozens of comments from rescue workers who worry that the final rules may not be as fair and inclusive as permitted under the law.

Obama's Bioethics Adviser Should Step Down, Says Watchdog Group

President Obama's top bioethics adviser should be removed because she ignored serious allegations of research misconduct by a senior professor at the university she leads, according to a leading watchdog organization.

The Project on Government Oversight sent a letter to Obama yesterday asking him to boot Dr. Amy Gutmann as chair of the bioethics commission. Gutmann serves as the president of the University of Pennsylvania, where the psychiatry department chairman allegedly used a ghostwriting company paid by drug manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline to write a scientific editorial for a medical journal that was favorable to Paxil, an antidepressant sold by GSK.

Last Friday, another U. Penn professor filed a complaint against Dr. Dwight Evans, alleging that he used ghostwriters in another study favoring Paxil. A spokesman for the university maintained that the allegations of ghostwriting are "unfounded."

ConAgra Hit With Twin Class-Action Suits Over "100% Natural" Labeling

In a series of class-action lawsuits that could represent the leading edge of a trend, consumers are suing ConAgra Foods over the food giant's claims that its Wesson cooking oils are "100% natural" and "pure." Plaintiffs argue that the claims are misleading because the oil is extracted from plants that have been genetically modified, reports FoodNavigator-USA.com.

The suits, filed in Brooklyn and Los Angeles, seek millions in refunds for consumers who bought Wesson corn oil, canola oil, Best Blend and vegetable oil.

The Federal Trade Commission, which regulates labeling of food products, declined to comment on any pending complaints regarding Wesson's labeling.

The Lighter Side

Funny headline of the day (besides the Onion's "Lady Gaga Kidnaps Commissioner Gordon"): Safety and health blog FairWarning's front page screams: "FairWarning Launches Probe of Beach" to relay the news that its staff is going on vacation for two weeks until July 25.

And during his appearance today before the House Financial Services Committee, Ben Bernanke said he has not yet seen HBO's "Too Big To Fail" movie, in which Paul Giamatti played the role of the Federal Reserve chairman. See below:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Under an agreement quietly signed in Mexico City today, Mexican trucks will be able to transport goods on U.S. highways in return for Mexico's decision to lift tariffs on U.S. goods. Business groups w...
Under an agreement quietly signed in Mexico City today, Mexican trucks will be able to transport goods on U.S. highways in return for Mexico's decision to lift tariffs on U.S. goods. Business groups w...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 767
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
09:39 PM on 09/04/2011
the best thing about this is the trucks will be clean
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronald Malaney
12:00 AM on 07/18/2011
come join me at waffle house here in tucson and we can bet on how many couches and bicycles they can tie on a semi heading home
09:43 PM on 09/04/2011
where did they get the stuff,what kind of waffles do they have
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronald Malaney
11:58 PM on 07/17/2011
I am setting up my toll booth just like in mexico.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronald Malaney
11:57 PM on 07/17/2011
good now mexican truckers will have to wait in traffic jams when van loads of illegals wreck to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheRoosterman
Crazy Texan
02:41 AM on 07/17/2011
How soon will the Amero arrive?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
300millionblindmice
08:47 AM on 07/16/2011
"Mexican trucks will be able to transport goods on U.S. highways in return for Mexico's decision to lift tariffs on U.S. goods."

Mexico has been collecting tariffs after NAFTA. I was under the impression that the "Free Trade Agreement" ment free trade. I suppose the US territory was defined as "North American"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rfmaneater
May reason, not treason, rule the day
05:26 PM on 07/14/2011
I guess Cocaine can now come in by the truck load, or are we going to have enough border control to check every truck?
02:35 PM on 07/14/2011
MOST PEOPLE HERE GOT THEIR FACT WRONG AND OTHERS ARE JUST MAKING UP B.S. DON'T BLAME MEXICO OR THE US .THE BLAME IS THE AMERICAN CONSUMER ALWAYS WANTING THE CHEAPEST GOODS. CORP. AMERICA IS ALWAYS GOING TO MAKE IT'S PROFIT NO MATTER WERE IT MAKES IT. I BET YOUR HOUSES ARE FULL OF THINGS THAT ARE NOT MADE IN THE USA. IF YOU WANT JOBS BUY YOUR AMERICAN GOODS MADE IN THE USA AND NAFTA WILL WITHER AWAY ON IT'S OWN
08:36 PM on 07/14/2011
Do you like how gomez is schooling us on our way of living? I wasnt asked about NAFTA or this in the dark deal or many others going on. We paid for top quality items but now these things are cheap. How is buying a new vcr or tv every few months cheap? The cheap comes out expensive. WE DONT WANT CHEAP WE WANT WHAT WE PAID FOR..If it is so cool then why do the corporations go out of their way to disguise the fact these things are made out of the US? Why are we lied to constantly? What's in YOUR house Gomex? Is it all Mexican or American or Chinese? If Mexico was so great why are you all coming here? For the FREE RIDE that is why. The way it is set up right now no one would have a job if we did what you say and not buy. We have families too. And besides, there are always others like you that like to tell others what is right. YOU will always buy what YOU want right? YOU will never do without will you? You ran out on your own country & you expect us to walk away and hand it to you? NOT NOW..NOT EVER. Washington DC..YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK. Scumsuckers all of you. I didnt know they let you FAN yourself! Take your caps off Fool.
12:45 PM on 07/15/2011
i just say what i think , and i don't live in the usa no more ,i have lived in mexico for the last 6 years and i am happy here ,as a small diaryman i didn't have the capital to compete in california where i was born and raised.I never had a free ride ,i always worked for what i have and last of all i'm not a FOOL ,i don't need to go that low to name calling
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
methnkng
01:26 PM on 07/14/2011
The push towards a North American Union without our consent continues.
01:26 PM on 07/14/2011
The Mexican government will bar foreigners if they upset “the equilibrium of the national demographics.” How’s that for racial and ethnic profiling?

– If outsiders do not enhance the country’s “economic or national interests” or are “not found to be physically or mentally healthy,” they are not welcome. Neither are those who show “contempt against national sovereignty or security.” They must not be economic burdens on society and must have clean criminal histories. Those seeking to obtain Mexican citizenship must show a birth certificate, provide a bank statement proving economic independence, pass an exam and prove they can provide their own health care.

– Illegal entry into the country is equivalent to a felony punishable by two years’ imprisonment. Document fraud is subject to fine and imprisonment; so is alien marriage fraud. Evading deportation is a serious crime; illegal re-entry after deportation is punishable by ten years’ imprisonment. Foreigners may be kicked out of the country without due process and the endless bites at the litigation apple that illegal aliens are afforded in our country. When will the US government climb out of its myopic void?
01:05 PM on 07/14/2011
This is ridiculous ! We do not have enough Border Patrol agents protecting our border, but we are to believe we will have enough inspectors for these foreign vehicles ?
Are Mexican insurance companies going to pay for accidents ?
Folks, we owe Mexico nothing . We have been sending Mexico hundreds of millions in foreign aid, and what do we get in return ? We get at least 10% of their most unwanted citizens, we get deseases, murderers, rapist and thieves .
We get their president telling our Congress how not to secure our border, while they completely secure their southern border !
Our so-called leaders no longer represent the best interest of the American people .
This action from Washington gives drug dealers and illegal immigrants an easier way to invade our nation, not to mention safety on our highways .
03:40 PM on 07/14/2011
That is correct.
11:36 AM on 07/14/2011
O.K.! Here it is. I commented earlier about changing or better yet, re-naming MADD to Mothers Against Dangerous Deliveries. Someone replied and said "Mothers Against them Damn Mexicans" and so I came back with "MADAM = Mothers Against Damn Annoying Mexicans! Reverse the spelling and it still means the same thing." What do you think? Will it work?
photo
decat2
"He who governs best,governs least"
10:47 AM on 07/14/2011
The only way this should be allowed,is to require them to return to Mexico fully loaded,....with illeagalls !
11:45 AM on 07/14/2011
You know, that will work.
10:19 AM on 07/14/2011
When NAFTA was first passed, goods coming in to the U.S. from Mexico were off loaded at the border, inspected and then taken in to our country by U.S. carriers. And visa versa for goods going in to Mexico from the U.S. This was done primarily at the insistence of the U.S. since we were concerned about the conditions of the trucks and the ability of the drivers to negotiate our much more heavily travelled highways and their ability to read and understand directions. Now, in order to address a few of these issues, the American taxpayer is going to pay for monitoring equipment and language tests administered by border officials? Have we lost our mind? The first time a U.S. citizen is killed or seriously injured by a Mexican trucker, all hell will break loose. Just try to get the Mexican trucking company to pay for any hospital bills or admit any culpability.
10:17 AM on 07/14/2011
Recalling NAFTA as a lever against Central and South American countries that fail to control illegal drug shipments and facilitating smuggling of Illegal Immigrants would be a good start.
Shoppers: go to Advanced Auto Parts - ask for a brand new Delco Remy (GM) starter motor for your chevy - It is their Gold Line Starter it will have a Hecho in MexicoCrimeOnaStick sticker on it, in addition to the Delco Sticker. SHAME, unemployment in the USA. Who is bribing our officials into this stupidity ???? Your local GM dealer wants over $500 for this same starter they have created their own problem.