iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Missouri Abortion Bill To Become Law

Missouri Abortion Law

First Posted: 07/14/11 05:06 PM ET Updated: 09/13/11 06:12 AM ET

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Missouri doctors and hospitals will face new restrictions and penalties for performing late-term abortions after Gov. Jay Nixon announced Thursday that he would let legislation backed by anti-abortion groups take effect without his signature.

The law is part of a trend among states to limit abortions past the point when a fetus may be able to live outside the womb. Missouri's proposal leaves it to doctors to determine viability on a case-by-case basis, unlike new laws in several other states that bar most abortions after 20 weeks.

Nixon, a Democrat, cited a section of the Missouri Constitution that allows bills to become law if not signed or vetoed by the governor within 45 days after the Legislature adjourns. Thursday was the deadline for him to take action.

"This legislation was approved by an overwhelming, bipartisan majority in both houses," Nixon said in a brief written statement.

At a signing ceremony in Kansas City for unrelated legislation, Nixon told reporters that abortion "is a public policy obviously that's talked about in Missouri tremendously, and I've tried to – you know – make sure that we are sensitive to all sides of the issue."

This marks the second straight year that Nixon has allowed an anti-abortion bill to become law without his signature as he attempts to walk a political tightrope by neither directly supporting nor opposing the measures. His decision prompted praise from some anti-abortion activists and disappointment among abortion-rights backers.

Since 1974, Missouri law has prohibited aborting viable fetuses unless necessary to preserve the life or health of the woman. The new law will delete that general health exception effective Aug. 28. Instead it will allow such abortions only to save the woman's life or when the pregnancy poses a serious risk of permanent physical harm to a major bodily function.

The effect could be to eliminate a woman's mental health as a justifiable reason for a late-term abortion – a change which some abortion-rights advocates say could run afoul of previous U.S. Supreme Court rulings.

Missouri is among 31 states that currently have a general health and life exception to their bans on late-term abortions, according to the New York-based Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports abortion rights. With its new law, Missouri will join Idaho, Indiana, Kansas and Nebraska as now granting exceptions only for a woman's physical health or life.

"It is an effort to try to restrict abortion as much as possible, and one way we are seeing this play out is by narrowing these health exceptions," said Elizabeth Nash, a policy analyst for the institute.

Under Missouri's new law, doctors who abort a viable fetus when a woman does not qualify for an exception could face prison sentences of up to seven years, fines up to $50,000 and the loss of their medical licenses. Hospitals and surgical centers allowing such abortions also could lose their state licenses.

But those penalties may seldom come into play. The state health department says just 63 of the 6,881 abortions recorded in Missouri in 2009 were on fetuses at least 21 weeks old, and none were reported as being viable. Figures were not available for 2010.

Some anti-abortion lawmakers and activists have questioned the veracity of those figures, suggesting that it is in the best interest of abortion providers not to report that a late-term abortion was conducted on a viable fetus.

Missouri law already requires doctors to determine the viability of a fetus when a woman is at least 20 weeks pregnant and requires that a second physician be present for abortions of viable fetuses. The new law will require that a second physician concur the abortion is necessary to preserve the life of the woman or prevent permanent harm to one of her major bodily functions.

The result is "it will save babies and it will protect women from the effects of late-term abortions," said Susan Klein, a lobbyist for Missouri Right to Life. "When you're five months into pregnancy – at this point and time – you could feasibly save the life of the baby and save the life of the mother."

Some abortion rights groups had called upon Nixon to veto the bill.

Under the new late-term abortion law, "Missouri's emergency exception is one of the narrowest in the country – it's basically your kidneys are going to fail or you're going to die," said Pamela Sumners, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri.

The bill passed both the House and Senate with bipartisan, two-thirds majorities that could have been sufficient to override a gubernatorial veto. But the rhetoric between supporters and opponents was more intense in the House.

House Speaker Steven Tilley, R-Perryville, said Thursday that "late-term abortions not only are wrong, they're inhumane." He added: "When you've got a fetus that's viable to live, I don't see how anyone can argue that baby should be aborted."

The law that Nixon allowed to take effect last year requires abortion providers to offer women the chance to view an ultrasound and listen to the heartbeat of their fetuses. Among other things, it also requires a consultation before an abortion to occur in person, instead of over the phone.

___

Associated Press writer Maria Sudekum Fisher in Kansas City contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Missouri doctors and hospitals will face new restrictions and penalties for performing late-term abortions after Gov. Jay Nixon announced Thursday that he would let legislation...
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Missouri doctors and hospitals will face new restrictions and penalties for performing late-term abortions after Gov. Jay Nixon announced Thursday that he would let legislation...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,392
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iamone3
03:50 AM on 07/17/2011
Good for Missouri.
07:36 PM on 07/18/2011
Not really.
03:06 PM on 07/16/2011
This is exactly the level of abortion restriction I am in favor of...except I would allow late terms in the case of rape and incest too. So...STOP now, righties! I do not support going any further. Women have a right to choose without government intrusion up until the fetus is viable...after that, there is adoption, if you must. But just because contractions start does not suddenly, magically make killing the baby wrong. Viability is a reasonable cutoff.

Of course I am going to get slammed for this position. People are nuts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
05:54 PM on 07/15/2011
I wonder what the definition of "viable to live" is in that state?
Well enough to survive a few pain filled days?
Suffer for a year with certain death?'
Any particular health standard?
03:03 PM on 07/16/2011
Doctors are allowed to make the judgment for fetuses older than 20 weeks. There you go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
03:37 PM on 07/16/2011
I wonder if this legislation will intimidate medical professionals who don't want to risk prosecution in the case that a member of the woman's family or another medical professional challenges them.

It's a very slippery slope.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
03:43 PM on 07/16/2011
This is risky, removing the mother's mental state from the decision.
Suppose the baby will only live days our hours.
But the Dr. calls it viable.
The mother could then be forced to carry to term, dreading that loss and fearing for the baby's suffering every inch of the way.

I wouldn't wish that on anyone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wonder Woman2
Whats a micro-bio?
03:50 PM on 07/16/2011
It means if she gets a cancer diagnosis and the fetus is 'viable' she can not get an abortion because it is not certain to cause her death.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
10:16 PM on 07/16/2011
Ugh - I wondered if it were something along those lines.....

So many ugly bills like this coming out lately.

Thanks for clarifying.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:40 PM on 07/15/2011
So, this "harsh new law" prevents the type of abortion for which, last year, there were a whopping ZERO? This doesn't do a thing EXCEPT gin up sentiment that "the tide of choice has turned" and this appears to be the Right Wing's new strategy. Pretty soon, folks will just accept new laws that DO bar abortions just because "didn't we do that already"??

It is a vile and evil assault upon choice and it needs to be identified as such. This does NOT limit choice (not effectively, anyway) and *that* needs to be made clear. Abortion is not illegal in America and it is not a moral crime in our society and every woman who wants one SHOULD be given the opportunity to have one. The more that message gets obfuscated, the more the anti-choice wackos win.
11:12 PM on 07/15/2011
Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Black Hawk
05:45 PM on 07/16/2011
nobody should have a right to about a baby in the third trimester unless the mother's life is in serious jeopardy. You are demagoguing the issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lady1genius
No se puede tapar el sol con un dedo
03:13 PM on 07/18/2011
Sure, let's force that woman to give birth to a horribly deformed child who will be born dead or live a short painful life. How cold and cruel can you get. It won't put her life in serious jeopardy to give birth. Who cares about her mental state? Who cares about her family? It's all about what *you* think.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
02:26 PM on 07/15/2011
So less Restrictions on Business and More restrictions on Women?

Got it, GOP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Black Hawk
05:45 PM on 07/16/2011
Good. And who said a liberal can't be taught.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BannedFromCommenting
♼ ♼ PLEASE RECYCLE TROLLS ♼ ♼
01:55 PM on 07/15/2011
Yes I am a liberal, but I seriously could not agree with abortion late term, to spare a woman's mental health. She would have LONG known she was pregnant by then. The issue would be, though, does that woman KEEP her baby? If she is that mentally unsound that she herself is willing to terminate a viable baby? Odds are she would terminate the baby post-birth.

But what I wonder is "physical harm to a major bodily function." What do they deem a major bodily function? Are DOCTORS setting that rule or legislators??
photo
mydangself
I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me
04:05 PM on 07/15/2011
Mandating that she carry the fetus to term regardless of the impact to her mental health is a recipe for disaster. It is quite possible to have a viable fetus with such serious health and developmental issues that a person is unable to cope. In such situations forcing her to give birth and then forcing her to have to deal with giving the child up for adoption or attempting to care for the child will only cause further damage to the persons mental health and leave all of us to face the consequences.

The same goes for other non-permanent, but potentially serious health problems they will not be mandated to face and deal with (with ever diminishing support systems)
photo
mydangself
I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me
04:12 PM on 07/15/2011
*they will now be mandated to face"..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
04:53 PM on 07/15/2011
Here are some examples of how it spares the woman's mental health.

Imagine being forced to carry to term in these situations:
http://uncommonmisconception.typepad.com/home/2005/04/out_of_the_dark.html
http://texaskaos.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3116
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2009/jun/01/abortion-george-tiller
http://bostonwalkforchoice.tumblr.com/post/4003337927/dont-believe-the-lies-real-stories-of-late-term

How is it the states's business to determine her mental health in these painful times?
This should be between the woman and her Dr.
Anything else is adding injury to an already painful situation.
01:28 PM on 07/15/2011
Simple fact:

Libiots feel that the woman's right to have no responsibility for their actions trumps human life.


Sad. Pathetically sad.
01:58 PM on 07/15/2011
That is not a fact but your own warped opinion. A fact is something that applies in every situation and is measurable. Government has no business unnecessarily meddling in the medical and moral decisions between a woman and her doctor. Women ultimately bear the responsibility for their health whether they choose to terminate a pregnancy or not. She has a RIGHT to privacy and is the ONLY one capable of making that decision. YOU have nothing to do with it and your insistence on engaging in some false advocacy about HER child and HER health is what is sad and pathetic. YOU are the ones compounding the pain.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BannedFromCommenting
♼ ♼ PLEASE RECYCLE TROLLS ♼ ♼
02:10 PM on 07/15/2011
Simple fact. Men with tiny members scream the loudest. They also walk from responsibility. Keep your sperm location in check and this would be a non-issue wouldn't it. Who rapes like 99% of the time? Men.
photo
The Right is Wrong
Pissing off CONS for more than 56 years!
01:12 PM on 07/15/2011
What an Effing MISERABLE place to call home.

If I lived there, I 'd move to a different state.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shaktas Na
The revolution is not being televised
12:55 PM on 07/15/2011
Missouri women just admit that you have to have the abortions because your men cannot properly support their kids before or AFTER their births.

American men face it: you have no jobs, you can't get or make jobs, and you cannot keep your government in check. Why are you blaming women by creating draconian laws because you cannot take care of them or your kids in a consistent fashion?

Men if you cannot care for you kids then women have the right to ask for an abortion. It's just a fact of life.
01:32 PM on 07/15/2011
What a load of hooey LOL


Your post implies that women are unable to take care of or provide for themselves.

They need big strong men or they would be lost.

Priceless. Simply priceless LOL
02:05 PM on 07/15/2011
You have to admit that this kind of legislation has a penis exemption. That the people behind these draconian laws do not have a uterus and they suffer no consequences. Though I too do not agree with blanket generalizations and assumptions, the issue of men's role is not generally discussed.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BannedFromCommenting
♼ ♼ PLEASE RECYCLE TROLLS ♼ ♼
02:05 PM on 07/15/2011
Its a fact that noodle pricks like you shouldn't stick it in if you cannot afford the outcome. A woman cannot prop it up with popsicle sticks and get it to ejaculate.

You are implying men can stick it in and walk away from responsibility.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:50 PM on 07/15/2011
Choice is called choice for a reason and what it means is that YOU don't get to decide what happens to a bunch of non-sentient cells in another person's body. It does not matter the circumstances, you do not get a vote in somebody else's womb.

That might displease you -- that you cannot play Almighty Decider to folks you have not met -- but it is kinda how we do things in America.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:29 PM on 07/15/2011
So now there will be a black market in illegal abortions, smart move Missouri.
01:32 PM on 07/15/2011
Probably correct.


Why? Because women in that state won't be smart enough to start taking responsibility for their actions and expecting someone else to fix their problem for them.


Sad, but true.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BannedFromCommenting
♼ ♼ PLEASE RECYCLE TROLLS ♼ ♼
02:06 PM on 07/15/2011
And noodle pricks like you cannot take responsibility for their sperm's location.
02:15 PM on 07/15/2011
What?!? Do you know the risks a woman takes with black market abortions ?! You've got a lot of nerve preaching to somebody about responsibility. When a woman makes a decision about whether to give birth or seek an abortion, SHE'S PUTTING HER LIFE ON THE LINE..either way it goes. And nobody has a right to make that decision for her.
Huzie
I do not suffer fools....period
12:20 PM on 07/15/2011
Okay Missourians let's see how much you love those unborn children AFTER they are born. HOW MANY WILL YOU ADOPT? HOW MANY?
01:37 PM on 07/15/2011
Tens of thousands of couples in the United States are waiting to adopt RIGHT NOW.

They are waiting for babies to become available.


That's HOW MANY!
Huzie
I do not suffer fools....period
01:56 PM on 07/15/2011
Yes you are right. If the baby is white. Otherwise not so much
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BannedFromCommenting
♼ ♼ PLEASE RECYCLE TROLLS ♼ ♼
02:47 PM on 07/15/2011
Then why does it take 4 years on average to adopt??? Even Sandra Bullock took 3 years, with all her money! Yeah they are there, waiting, and waiting, and waiting and waiting.... in the mean time babies are born and grow to 3 or 4 where adoption rates FALL big time!
12:08 PM on 07/15/2011
"Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law" - Thomas Jefferson. Separation of church and state. No one can say they are upholding the constitution and then support legislation like this when it is so clearly being driven by religious groups like Operation Rescue. Now THAT is unconstitutional.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scottsman
Carpe Diem
11:59 AM on 07/15/2011
George Carlin said it best about these control freaks http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvF1Q3UidWM&feature=related
12:55 PM on 07/15/2011
The wise words of George Carlin, he couldn't have said it any better
11:37 AM on 07/15/2011
While reading these comments I am seeing a lot of arguments saying that women who have abortions are poor, on welfare, can't provide for their child, was raped, in bad health, will die if they have that child.... That child if brought into our world will end up being supported in our system, disabled, unwanted, a drug addict, a criminal, a detriment to our society using up our hard earned tax dollars, will never have a decent or good life. Margaret Sanger is smiling in her grave right now.
photo
Littlewords
I think I am, therefore I am, I think?!?
10:59 AM on 07/15/2011
Righties just l0ve to grow big G0v't right into a woman's body.