iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Elections 2012: Pledge Hype Sweeps GOP Presidential Field

Elections 2012 Pledge Madness

NANCY BENAC   07/18/11 08:08 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Republican presidential contenders may be feeling nostalgic for the days when a candidate could focus on just one pledge: the oath of office.

With pledges spreading like kudzu on the campaign trail, candidates this year are being asked – in some cases, pressured – to profess their fealty to a whole host of positions: supporting marriage, opposing taxes, reducing the deficit, fighting abortion and gay rights and more.

And these aren't just bland statements of support for broad ideals.

There's a 14-point "marriage vow," a three-pronged "cut, cap and balance" declaration on the national debt, a four-point "pro-life leadership presidential pledge" and a deficit-reduction promise tied to the "Lean Six Sigma" method of reducing wasteful spending.

The pledges, many advanced by right-leaning interest groups, are roiling the race, boxing candidates in to positions that could hurt them in the general election, and pushing contenders to make promises they might come to regret if ever seated in the Oval Office.

Some candidates welcome the pledges as an opportunity to strengthen their support among various voting blocs and to draw distinctions between themselves and their competition. But others are resisting pressure to adopt pledges that attempt to put words in their mouths.

Interest groups, for their part, use the pledges to get their names in the news, and to flex some muscle by threatening to withhold support unless candidates sign on – and stay true.

There are signs that some candidates have had enough.

"I don't know why anybody puts up with it," said Republican strategist Rich Galen. "You just don't know all the ramifications of everything that is put before you."

It's a sentiment that's apparently shared by former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman. He's made a pledge not to pledge.

"I don't sign pledges – other than the Pledge of Allegiance and a pledge to my wife," Huntsman said recently.

Rep. Michele Bachmann, who's making a big play for the caucus votes of social conservatives in leadoff Iowa, is at the other end of the spectrum. She's taken a shine to pledges on marriage, abortion, taxes and other issues, and has laid into her competition for holding back at times. On Monday, she signed the "cut, cap and balance" pledge during a campaign stop in South Carolina.

It was a reversal for Bachmann, who had said she wouldn't back it because it didn't go far enough. The Minnesota lawmaker said she would include her own addendum to the pledge – repealing the sweeping health care law.

True economic reform depends on it, she said. "I have the resolve and titanium spine to do just that," Bachmann said.

When former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who's less invested in Iowa, refused to adopt the Susan B. Anthony List's anti-abortion pledge, Bachmann's campaign called it a "distressing" move and said it raised questions about his "leadership and commitment to ending the practice of abortion."

The pledge includes sweeping promises to advance only anti-abortion appointees for "relevant Cabinet and executive branch positions," cut off federal dollars for hospitals and clinics that perform or finance abortions, and support a ban on abortions after the fetus reaches a certain stage in development, among other things.

Romney, who once supported abortion rights, opted to write his own, narrower "pro-life pledge," saying the Susan B. Anthony List's declaration could have unintended consequences.

"It's one thing to end federal funding for an organization like Planned Parenthood," he said in an op-ed explaining his decision. "It is entirely another to end all federal funding for thousands of hospitals across America."

As for the "marriage vow" advanced by The Family Leader, a conservative Iowa group, Romney and former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty were among a number of candidates who balked.

Pawlenty, who's staking his candidacy on doing well in Iowa, stepped away ever so gingerly, saying he "respectfully" declined to sign.

"I prefer to choose my own words," he added.

Yet when it comes to taxes, Pawlenty, Romney and all of the other major candidates except Huntsman are willing to let anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist choose the words.

The Taxpayer Protection Pledge, created by Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform, commits candidates and office holders to oppose all net tax increases. The simple declaration is the granddaddy of political pledges, and has been adopted by more than a thousand candidates and public officials since its rollout in 1986.

Norquist frames the pledge as almost a service to candidates, giving them an iron-clad way to demonstrate to voters their opposition to tax increases.

"It makes it easy for people to make a commitment not to raise taxes that is credible," Norquist said. Failure to live up to the pledge "has real repercussions," he says, pointing to the unsuccessful re-election bid of former President George H.W. Bush.

Norquist was dismissive of some of the other pledges in circulation, saying "they have too many moving parts" and would be too hard to enforce.

And Galen was dismissive of some of the other pledge profferers, casting them as Norquist wannabes.

"Everybody wants to be the next Grover Norquist," he said. "One of him is plenty."

While Democrats at times get asked to sign pledges, the phenomenon appears to be far more pronounced among Republicans. But interest groups also try to pin down candidates of both parties by asking them to fill out questionnaires on important issues. And the candidates' answers can come back to haunt them, just as do broken pledges.

In the 2008 presidential race, Barack Obama, for example, tried to distance himself from answers about health care, abortion and capital punishment on a 1996 questionnaire submitted when he was running for the state Senate. His campaign claimed someone else had filled out the paperwork for him. On another 1996 questionnaire, Obama said he supported legalizing same-sex marriage, a position he did not adopt during the 2008 campaign or as president.

___

AP writers Seanna M. Adcox in Columbia, S.C., Brian Bakst in St. Paul, Minn., Shannon McCaffrey in Atlanta, Charles Babington in Washington and Beth Fouhy in New York contributed to this report.

___

http://atr.org/taxpayer-protection-pledge

http://www.thefamilyleader.com/the-marriage-vow

http://www.sba-list.org/2012pledge

http://cutcapbalancepledge.com/

http://strongamericanow.com/pledge

___

Benac can be followed at http://twitter.com/nbenac

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Republican presidential contenders may be feeling nostalgic for the days when a candidate could focus on just one pledge: the oath of office. With pledges spreading like kudzu on t...
WASHINGTON — Republican presidential contenders may be feeling nostalgic for the days when a candidate could focus on just one pledge: the oath of office. With pledges spreading like kudzu on t...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,407
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (53 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ProgressivesWin
TeaParty? We don' need no steenkin' TeaParty
09:13 PM on 07/25/2011
Any candidate that takes any "pledge" superseding his/her duty to uphold the constitution for ALL is a tra!tor to our constitution.

How dare these people presume to speak and make policy for the vast majority of us who do not agree with these special-interest pledges? I'm glad they are outing themselves, and the Democratic Party would be lax indeed (okay, even more lax) if they fail to continually point out the meaning of these pledges, how they shift loyalty completely away from our constitution, and the inevitable results of electing such a candidate to high office.
12:31 PM on 07/25/2011
You would think politicians would learn that pledges are nothing more then promises to be broken. They are to capture voters, nothing more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opinioned1
MADAM president 2016
11:37 AM on 07/19/2011
IMO-- by signing on to a multitude of various fringe group pledges about taxes, abortion, gay rights, religious preferences, right to pray, or any other far right fringe wants, these types of people running for public office place the nations Constitution on the back burner in favor of placating a few at the expense of the majority.

Just who do these people ultimately represent,the Grover Norquist`s of the country or the American taxpayers?

In the case of the current crop of GOP/Baggers they have chosen to sign on to a radical right wing agenda of no taxes for anyone at anytime.

Some of the candidates for president find it more convenient to sign anti-America pledges guaranteeing their continued discrimination against segments of our population.

The question for 2012 should be--will you follow the laws and the Constitution of this nation, or will you be a fully owned subsidiary of the far right extremist who`s goal is discrimination and favoritism on a scale no seen since the days of Jim Crowe laws.
10:53 AM on 07/19/2011
"I have the resolve and titanium spine to do just that," Bachmann said.

If she didnt have that "representative" health care policy that she doesnt want real americans to have, I'm guessing she'd have an aluminum spine, if she was lucky...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cqyates
10:40 AM on 07/19/2011
How do they prioritize pledges....Is it Norquist, Constitution, Marriage Pledge?

Where does the oath of office fit in here with all these silly pledges?
photo
PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
Your BELIEFS do not trump my RIGHTS...
10:01 AM on 07/19/2011
The GOP "big tent" has pretty much become a circus pup tent............................... :p
09:36 AM on 07/19/2011
Newt and Sarah on the sides lines wondering when Mrs Bachman will join them
09:30 AM on 07/19/2011
I pledge not to support any candidate whs signs any pledge other than the one to do what we the people want. Any one who takes part in the Tea party or any other fringe radical group will not get my support or vote
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
disgustedcitizen
08:44 AM on 07/19/2011
"...and a deficit-reduction promise tied to the "Lean Six Sigma" method of reducing wasteful spending."

I have worked for two corporations that got wrapped up in Six Sigma. Neither corporation exists today. Yeah, Six Sigma is just what this country needs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ConDsenXieN
The Right is usually wrong.
08:40 AM on 07/19/2011
Why is Grover Norquist even getting involved? And why are candidates involving themselves with him? The man has no clear ideas other than "DON'T INCREASE TAXES!".
08:37 AM on 07/19/2011
It is insulting to any candidate or politician...for it limits or replaces his own decision-making, substituting it with some restricting pledge concocted by a political hack who never was elected to anything.

And the fact that any politician would sign such a document demonstrates on its face that he/she is not worthy of holding elective office.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
qaan
Cake or Death!
08:15 AM on 07/19/2011
How about getting ALL Senators and Representatives to sign a pledge not to take any farm subsidy money or similar giveaways? Try to get Bachmann to sign that one.
08:13 AM on 07/19/2011
Pledges are the worst symptom of the mindset of “I was elected to (insert mandate here)” followed by focusing on one specific solution and rejecting all others without consideration. This thinking assumes the candidate and the voters had all the facts at election time. Much of what they “know” is propaganda and distortions. There will be facts they did not know. Wisconsin, Ohio, Michigan…..voters have changed their minds when they see what was not clear during campaigns, and emotions die down. Opinions change with information and experiences. Elected officials should be open to other viewpoints as well as sharing their own with colleagues, if their goal really is what is best for the state/country. Signing pledges is the ultimate in arrogance – “I know all I need to know” and the ultimate betrayal of the oath to serve the people of the state/country to the best of their ability – they serve only the source of the pledge. Unwillingness to compromise is unwillingness to do the job. Unwillingness to change an opinion when situations change and new information is learned is juvenile, selfish, and lazy. To stop respecting and listening to people who did not cast a vote for them or agree with them now is un-American. We’ve been better than this for hundreds of years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:07 AM on 07/19/2011
Kids each day pledge to the United States of AMERICA not the tea party or republican parties.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:00 AM on 07/19/2011
Isn't pledging allegiance to another entity - Grover Norquist, for example - an act of treason? There's nothing patriotic about putting the agenda of a political organization above the United States of America.