More

Arrests Not Likely To Slow Hacker Group Anonymous, Experts Say

Hackers

First Posted: 07/20/11 06:36 PM ET Updated: 09/19/11 06:12 AM ET

The arrests of 14 suspected members of the hacker group Anonymous on Tuesday could help authorities make inroads in the shadowy hacker collective, but don't expect the group's high-profile cyber attacks to end anytime soon, experts say.

The arrests of the suspected male and female hackers, ranging from 20 to 42 years old, could ratchet up pressure against Anonymous, causing divergent reactions from its remaining members, said Gabriella Coleman, an assistant professor at New York University who studies Anonymous and other hacker groups.

"Some people surely will get scared off," Coleman said. "Others will feel more emboldened to fight the fight."

"But I don't think at the moment it's going to slow things down," she added.

The charges announced Tuesday of conspiracy and intentional damage to a protected computer date back to December, when Anonymous members brought down PayPal's website for four days in retaliation for the company suspending payments to the whistle-blower site Wikileaks. The group called the attack "Operation Avenge Assange," in reference to the Wikileaks founder, authorities said.

The arrests took place in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Washington D.C., Florida, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Mexico and Ohio, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. Two other arrests were made unrelated to the PayPal attack, authorities said.

The arrests were part of a widening probe of cyber attacks aimed at major corporations and government agencies. The coordinated sting included another arrest in Britain, four arrests by the Dutch National Police Agency and more than 35 search warrants executed by the FBI in the United States, authorities said.

Experts said those arrested Tuesday did not appear to be high-level members of Anonymous or members of the splinter hacker group LulzSec.

LulzSec claimed to disband last month, but made noise again this week by hacking into the website for The Sun, a tabloid owned by News Corp., and publishing a fake story claiming the media company's owner, Rupert Murdoch, was dead. Earlier this week, LulzSec said it also planned to release emails stolen from a server belonging to News Corp., which has been engulfed in a phone hacking scandal.

After hacking The Sun, the group challenged Murdoch on Twitter: "Arrest us. We dare you. We are the unstoppable hacking generation."

Chris Wysopal, the chief technology officer of the security firm Veracode, said those arrested were likely inexperienced hackers who simply downloaded software causing PayPal's site to crash by flooding it with traffic -- a technique known as "distributed denial of service."

"They're just cannon fodder," Wysopal said. "There are probably hundreds more just like them who aren't very sophisticated but want to be associated with the group."

Wysopal said the arrests could have "a chilling effect" on lower-level members who now might think twice about following orders from Anonymous. But he predicted the sting would have little effect on the group's overall operations, "except that people might be a little more cautious."

Experts said the hackers likely carried out the attacks against PayPal from their home computers, making it easier for authorities to trace.

Authorities will likely try to use the arrests to glean more information about other attacks carried out by the group. But because Anonymous members know almost nothing about each other, they may not be able to lead authorities to the group's more experienced hackers, experts say.

"They are less likely to posses actual intelligence because of the layers of anonymity involved," said Michael Tiffany, chief architect at Recursion Ventures, a security technologies company.

Matt Harrigan, chief executive of the security firm Critical Assets, said it was inevitable that authorities would catch members of the hacker collective, which he described as "a lot of very young people who have very strong opinions on social, political and economic situations."

"If you piss off the same people frequently enough you'll put yourself in a position to be compromised," Harrigan said.

What may have pushed authorities to action was the group's announcement this week that they planned to create their own social network after their account was suspended on Google's new social network Google Plus. Harrigan called the announcement "a slap in the face" to authorities.

"It was just one more way of saying, 'We know you're not going to catch us,'" Harrigan said.

In coming months, Harrigan said he expected activity from Anonymous to occur sporadically, at least "until they find something else they're really angry about."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

The arrests of 14 suspected members of the hacker group Anonymous on Tuesday could help authorities make inroads in the shadowy hacker collective, but don't expect the group's high-profile cyber attac...
The arrests of 14 suspected members of the hacker group Anonymous on Tuesday could help authorities make inroads in the shadowy hacker collective, but don't expect the group's high-profile cyber attac...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 151
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:16 PM on 07/23/2011
Hacktivist is born today right now we are in the 1st phase of the new "Cyber World". http://hacktivistblog.wordpress.com/ chronicles the hacktivist.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lenguss
03:16 PM on 07/22/2011
I doubt that this "expert" has a clue as to whether thesehackers can be caught. It may take a year, it may take ten years, it may take a bribe of $1 million but they will be caught. Think 'Osama".
11:35 AM on 07/22/2011
You can't arrest & jail an idea. Anonymous is all of us…
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjwrites
07:18 AM on 07/21/2011
They worked faster with anonymous hackers than they did with Murdoch hackers. Guess who will go to jail and guess who won't?

Too easy?
photo
digital
Vote in the interests of PEOPLE, not greed
11:05 AM on 07/21/2011
All too easy
02:54 AM on 07/21/2011
Anyone who treats anonymous as an organization is seriously missing the point. And its not "Anonymous", as its not a name. That's like calling atheism a religion.

Go to the beach, look for a loose congregation of people in a specific spot. Lets call those people "anonymous". Now, go back tomorrow, and look at that same spot. We'll also call those people "anonymous". Go back a week from tomorrow and look once more at that spot. Now call those people anonymous as well.

Are they all the same people? Not necessarily. Some of them may be frequent visitors to that specific spot at the beach, but there is no guarantee that all the people there are always there at all times, and that no one else is ever in that spot. That's basically what anonymous is. A loose congregation of neckbeards hanging out at a website, who just happen to have a lot of time on their hands.
photo
JWerner
Beware Macduff; beware the thane of Fife!
06:13 AM on 07/22/2011
That's actually a good analogy. Very creative! :)

Might want to expand it beyond just 'a website'. 4chan is not the only place 'Anons' hang out. They use mIRC a lot (since it really is an efficient method of coordinating large numbers of people), along with a variety of other lesser-known forums. 4chan just happens to be the signature location, and a popular one.
02:54 AM on 07/21/2011
Sometimes I come to Huff just to read the comments. You guys and women make me lol.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trittydi
Special on pap smears at Walgreen's this week ....
12:32 AM on 07/21/2011
Are they kidding?? Arresting them will only make it bigger.
*
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zooperman
11:36 PM on 07/20/2011
Arrests won't slow them down. 5-10 years in a federal penitentiary will though.
09:44 AM on 07/21/2011
Not even. For each one arrested, two will join. And they will turn to darknets...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stacy Marston
47% - Representation without taxation
09:51 AM on 07/21/2011
Lets make it 20 years
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sail Away
11:30 PM on 07/20/2011
Will there ever be a time when liberals break away from fascist status-quo progressive agendas? I read these comments and I'm just embarrassed for those who back the status-quo. Those who do not advocate the arrest of the thieves of trillions (Goldman, JPM, BofA, Lehman, Contrywide, AIG, etc) but advocate arresting those who offer a glimmer liberty or freedom from plutocracy. At least conservatives, who want their freedom back, broke away from the Republicans (the tea party). Why can't true liberals distance themselves from the progressive Democrats?
photo
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
12:01 AM on 07/21/2011
I agree that Liberals need to challenge the establishment of their party. 

But I do not think that Anonbots who ha.ck into corporations are offering a 'glimmer of liberty or freedom from pIutocracy'. 

If the Anonbots really wanted that, they would be with the tea party who is trying to roll back this Big Government nonsense... .but instead the ha.ck.ers are just digital street hoodIums.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:33 AM on 07/21/2011
amen! anyone who's still backing the tea party should consider using LOIC to fight these pesky digital terr'ists.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sail Away
09:19 AM on 07/21/2011
I'm sorry you are guilty of what I described above, status-quo progressiveness. Either you back the status quo by backing a corrupt judicial system that ensures a corrupt plutocracy is functioning properly ... or.... you advocate liberal revolt. Again; either you advocate the financial, judicial, disparity abuses created your Government by doing nothing (other than blogging about how things "should be") ...or... you break the onerous laws. Again; either you maintain that your VOTE will make a difference (the American way) or you lawlessly demonstrate (like the rest of the world). True liberals changed the world in the 60s by lawlessly taking-on the status-quo. True progressives fully accept the system and may call themselves "liberals".
02:57 AM on 07/21/2011
You should look up the definitions of the following words:
liberal, status-quo, progressive, liberty, freedom, conservative
10:35 PM on 07/20/2011
alright everybody....calm down

Lets not give these guys the wrong impression....HP luvs Anonymous....nothin to see here

Everybody is just joking...all in good fun
10:34 PM on 07/20/2011
Gee my computer must have been part of one of those robotnet thingies
10:34 PM on 07/20/2011
This will be like the 1930s crime wave. For a short time, the criminals had the advantage in terms of firepower, and then 18 months later, the cops upgraded with help from FDR and J Edgar and it tapered off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MG Metiva
For Great Justice, I shall post.
10:23 AM on 07/21/2011
The anonymous structure means that they barely know who else is hacking with them. It's hard for the FBI to even get a foothold.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mitch Shaffer
Resisting the status quo
10:32 AM on 07/21/2011
XD how in the name of the gods do you people function in modern society? Seriously, it's like watching amish try to hack the pentagon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rotorhead1871
who are you jivin' with that cosmic debris?...
09:55 PM on 07/20/2011
terrorists.....off to GITMO........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rotorhead1871
who are you jivin' with that cosmic debris?...
09:53 PM on 07/20/2011
moderators= censorship focals......

BUT WHY????
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:36 PM on 07/20/2011
not "WHY????" but, "why do i participate?"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Isner
09:37 PM on 07/20/2011
If they want to catch Anonymous, all they need to to is look for groups of rough-looking people lurking outside churches at night smoking cigarettes.
11:02 AM on 07/21/2011
So Anonymous is a church group, good to know.