iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

NASA To Privatize Space Travel After Last Shuttle Lands

Nasa

SETH BORENSTEIN   07/20/11 08:58 PM ET   AP

HOUSTON — How America gets people and stuff into orbit is about to be outsourced in an out-of-this-world way.

With the space shuttle's retirement Thursday, no longer will flying people and cargo up to the International Space Station be a government program where costs balloon. NASA is turning to private industry with fixed prices, contracts and profit margins. The space agency will be the customer, not the boss.

At least when it comes to the routine part of going to and from the space station, NASA hopes to rely on companies that will be the space version of FedEx and Yellow Cab.

The company that has been leading the commercial space race is hoping to launch its privately built rocket and capsule to the space station late this year. It won't carry astronauts, but if all goes well the unmanned ship will dock with the station and deliver food, water and clothing. And its major private cargo competitor may only be a month or two on its heels.

Getting people to orbit on a new American ship is a different story. Some ambitious companies hope to launch astronauts that way in three years, maybe four. Until then, the Russians will fly astronauts on a pay-for-play basis. Some space veterans like John Glenn, the first American in orbit, think five to 10 years is more realistic.

But two of the major players have surprised people before – the tech tycoons who founded PayPal and Amazon.

NASA has hired two companies – Space Exploration Technologies Corp. of Hawthorne, Calif., and Orbital Sciences of Dulles, Va. – to deliver 40 tons of supplies to the space station in 20 flights. The cost is $3.5 billion, about the same price per pound as it was during the space shuttle's 30-year history.

"It's time. Once NASA blazes the trail, creates the technology and it's available for private companies to take advantage of, this is the time" for the private firms to take over, said NASA commercial cargo chief Alan Lindenmoyer.

NASA met on Wednesday with companies wanting to taxi astronauts to the station. The agency hopes the money it saves by not flying the shuttle can be spent on new deep-space missions that will send astronauts to an asteroid and on to Mars.

Six private companies are working with NASA to send ships to the space station – either unmanned cargo ships or eventually astronauts in crew capsules.

For well more than a decade, boosters of commercial space have said they are ready to take over the job of going into low-Earth orbit on their own nongovernment ships, but hadn't done it.

Now one has: Space Exploration Technologies, which often goes by the name SpaceX and is run by risk-embracing PayPal founder Elon Musk, launched his unmanned Dragon capsule into orbit last December. Now his company is lining up for the first private visit to the space station. The lower and upper stages of the rocket are at Cape Canaveral, Fla. The capsule is almost finished.

"What we want to do is get back into space as quickly as possible and as sustainably as possible," said former astronaut Garrett Reisman, who now runs SpaceX's "Dragon Rider" program.

And maybe a month or two later, Orbital hopes to have its first test flight to the station. First, it has to finish building its launch site at Wallops Island, Va., which should be done in just a few weeks. Then later this year it will have a test launch of its new rocket, the Taurus II, and finally it will use that new rocket to launch its capsule, Cygnus, to the space station, said company spokesman Barron Beneski.

"Just like a person hires FedEx to deliver a package across the country and you pay him 50 bucks, we're delivering a 2,000-kilogram package to space, a few hundred miles above Earth, for a fixed price," Beneski said.

Four companies are building spaceships to take astronauts to the space station on a pay-per-seat basis. They are all constructing ships that would be launched on top of private rockets.

SpaceX appears to be leading the pack. Right behind it is Boeing, a giant in aerospace, which hopes to launch astronauts using its capsule as early as 2014. A third company, Sierra Nevada Corp., is taking a different route, proposing a shuttle-like spaceplane instead of a capsule. It is hoping to launch around 2015. And Amazon's Jeff Bezos is heading a fourth company, Blue Origin, that is much more circumspect about its plans for a gumdrop-shaped ship.

A fifth company, United Launch Alliance, just signed an agreement with NASA. It hopes to get its Atlas V rockets eventually approved for use in launching humans. Normally, Atlas rockets are used to put satellites in orbit. SpaceX is building its own private rockets, the Falcon series.

The crew of the final shuttle flight, Atlantis, left on the space station a small U.S. flag that flew on the inaugural shuttle voyage in 1981. The flag is the prize for the first rocket maker that brings Americans back to the station on a mission launched from the U.S.

President Barack Obama described it last week as "a capture-the-flag moment here for commercial spaceflight."

For these companies, it's also about capturing the cash. NASA will soon be paying the Russians about $63 million for each U.S. astronaut who flies on that country's Soyuz rocket to the space station.

Boeing's Jon Elbon, manager of the CST-100, which is what the company is calling its ship, said Boeing's prices will be competitive with what the Russians are charging. Boeing is also working with Bigelow Aerospace on bringing paying tourists up to a potential private space hotel.

Musk, who also started an electric sports car company and hopes to someday send his rockets to the Mars and fly families for $1 million for one-way tickets, promises to undercut the Russians' price substantially.

For all the talk of launching soon, George Abbey, former director of NASA's Johnson Space Center, remains skeptical: "I'm not sure it will happen anytime soon."

Former astronaut Glenn likes the idea; he just doesn't think it will happen as quickly as the companies do.

"To me that's not all bad," he said. "The government has always stepped out and done the things that private industry wouldn't or couldn't do" and then let companies run it when it is more affordable. He pointed to the Pentagon-inspired Internet.

NASA is hoping these companies are ready.

Just minutes after Atlantis lifted off on the final space shuttle mission, NASA spokesman Bob Jacobs turned to his counterpart from SpaceX and told him, "It's your turn now."

___

Aerospace writer Marcia Dunn contributed to this report from Cape Canaveral, Fla.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

HOUSTON — How America gets people and stuff into orbit is about to be outsourced in an out-of-this-world way. With the space shuttle's retirement Thursday, no longer will flying people and carg...
HOUSTON — How America gets people and stuff into orbit is about to be outsourced in an out-of-this-world way. With the space shuttle's retirement Thursday, no longer will flying people and carg...
Filed by Alana Horowitz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Herren
"Human action is purposeful behavior."
12:00 PM on 08/16/2011
Sending rockets to the Mars...
06:30 AM on 07/22/2011
It's still a comfort to know that the remaining super powers, China, Russia, and Europe, will continue human space research.
08:48 PM on 07/21/2011
Over to you SpaceX, et al. Private human spaceflight is the logical next step.

There are several other craft able to ferry cargo to the ISS, including Europe's ATV, and Japan's HTV, and Russia's venerable Soyuz. ULA and Arianespace have been launching satellites successfully for years.

Just like EasyJet, RyanAir, BA, AA, FedEx, DHL, etc are privately owned, successful businesses, the same will logically follow with spaceflight There are many asteroids out there to mine. Once we figure that out and stop consuming our precious planet, half the planet will be working in the space industry.

These are first steps into a future where all the money is in space.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenCanadian
is mixing the new record
07:53 PM on 07/21/2011
Socialize the cost of R&D, privatize the profit......... I'm surprised it took this long
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
01:49 PM on 07/21/2011
Having things outsourced rarely ever means cheaper or better. Just like customer service being outsourced to India......... how often are your issues resolved after speaking to an off shored customer service center?

Many times corporate types are willing to overlook the quality of a service being provided because the cost looks cheaper, but rarely is because you have to have that task performed several times before that outsourced service gets it right..........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NJP1
11:55 AM on 07/21/2011
If there was any commercial profit in space exploration, private enterprise would have been there decades ago without input of government money, there would be no need of prizes to get to the moon! Posterity might recognize it as a great scientific achievement, but by the same token it could just as well be seen as unsustainable energy burning that was bound to bankrupt the nation and fizzle out in the end. Forget pride folks, the USA has run out of cash and can’t afford it; though if the comments on here are typical, most refuse to accept that. There’s 10% unemployed and 40 million on food aid who need the money more urgently. Obama is making it clear: you can have food or toys, make your choice. The Indians and the Chinese are now chasing space-glory, but the end result will be the same, a money-pit to nowhere, a gigantic firework watched by a population in poverty. As Shakespeare’s Macbeth so eloquently put it: "Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." http://www.yourmedievalfuture.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MichaelTenery
10:56 PM on 07/21/2011
Yes, Yes Columbus should have never sailed to America. I mean there was almost no funds at the time. Spain was broke from war after war. Ah well that crazy queen spent money they didn't have and now there is an America. The asteroids are filled with resources. Resources that are drying up here, rare earths, etc. So your argument doesn't hold water. It makes excellent economic sense. You should look sometime at the list of everyday items that were first produced for the space program. Your life would be much poorer had we never looked up. We are human beings. We explore, expand and expose what's out there to us all. It is never a good time to simply give up on that. Period.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabrobst
Return the top rate to 91%.
09:15 AM on 07/21/2011
It will end up costing taxpayers more as profiteers suck billions out of NASA into their own pockets and launches fail for lack of proper science and technology.
07:15 AM on 07/21/2011
As much as it pains me to say it, perhaps getting space flight out of politicians hands as much as possible is the way forward.

JFK & NASA set into motion a project that would take NASA to the moon within a decade, but tis hard to say any politician since then has had the gusto to look long-term instead of short-term. There are no politicians these days willing to put long-term investment into NASA for long-term results. Politicians want things they can show voters here and now, and it's really very sad that NASA suffered long and hard under that.

Perhaps, just perhaps, the private sector might be less pressured to achieve results as soon as possible, but might just go for the best results for as long as it takes.

At least being free of ferrying flights might allow NASA to move on and develop long-term long-range missions, but whether the appropriate necessary funding will be provided by Washington... We'll see.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabrobst
Return the top rate to 91%.
09:18 AM on 07/21/2011
Oh yeah profiteering has done so much good for the oil industry: blown wells, wrecked tankers and busted pipes everywhere. Pennies for paper towels and billions in executive pockets. Private space will be a disaster.
09:43 AM on 07/21/2011
Space Flight is risky. Even NASA has lost 2 shuttles & 20 Astronauts over its history. The Private sector already builds and maintains every space capsule or ship in the US' history, Mercury, Gemini, Apollo all private built and privately maintained. The Space Shuttle is built by Boeing & Rockwell, the SRBs are built by Thiokol and the ETs are built by Lockheed Martin. Private sector spaceflight is already here and has been for some time.

The only difference now is that politicians will have less direct say over what is built and on what timescale... and you're saying that's a bad thing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramkshrestha
Welcome to Nepal - the birthplace of Buddha
07:09 AM on 07/21/2011
In UK NHS going to be privatized and in USA NASA. Does this mean that these countries' government financial crisis in critical condition?
06:01 AM on 07/21/2011
Atlantis just landed

Shuttle program over.
04:57 AM on 07/21/2011
Internet was invented by government. But look what it has become in the hands of the private sector!

Internet is arguably the greatest invention of our lifetimes and it never would have been possible if the private sector didn't get involved.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
caland
SOCIALISM IS AWESOME
08:20 AM on 07/21/2011
but it would also not have been possible if not for the government. that's a double edge sword.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabrobst
Return the top rate to 91%.
09:20 AM on 07/21/2011
Internet was scientific advancement in the hands of government but spam and porn in the hands of profiteers.
04:11 AM on 07/21/2011
I had wrote a great comment on how corporate america plans on stealing any future Aerospace tech , but Huffpo CENSORED it!! I guess I pissed off the Masters of America! May God have mercy on our souls, for Big Brother will have NONE!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabrobst
Return the top rate to 91%.
09:22 AM on 07/21/2011
You do know to hit command A command C don't you? You can then tweet it in sections or blog it elsewhere and give us a link.
04:21 PM on 07/21/2011
Sorry, I DON"T know how to "command A command C". In fact, I never even touched a computer before 14 months ago - and have had to figure it all out on my own! But that's a non-issue now, as I plan on never wasting my time with Huffpo ever again! If I want someone to spit in my face, I'll just have my dingbat neighbors do it.
Thanks for the advice though. But, I'm moving on to a site that will at least let me know what their policies are, BEFORE I spend a half-hour carefully crafting a well thought out comment! Grace Be Thine, Jeffery Alfred Rooker
03:13 AM on 07/21/2011
The Mercury and Gemini capsules were built by McDonnell on a cost-plus contract. The Atlas and Titan rockets which launched them were build by Convair and Martin, respectively, on cost-plus contracts.

The Apollo capsule and the second stage of the Saturn V were built by North American on a cost-plus contract. The first and third stages of the Saturn V were built by Boeing and Douglas, respectively, on cost-plus contracts. The Apollo lunar module was built by Grumman on a cost-plus contract. The Apollo moon suits were fabricated by ladies undergarment specialist Playtex on a cost-plus contract.

The Space Shuttle orbiters were build by Rockwell on a cost-plus contract. The External Tanks were build by Lockheed Martin on a cost-plus contract. The Solid Rocket Boosters were built by Alliant Techsystems on a cost-plus contract. Even the crawler-transporters that moved Shuttle and Saturn/Apollo to the launch pad were built by Marion Power Shovel -- on a cost-plus contract.

NASA doesn't build anything. They never have. It's always been contracted out to private companies under cost-plus contracts, similar to how military procurement works. There are two main changes being made to the NASA procurement model, and only for earth orbit services at this time:

First, the contracts will be fixed-cost. Contractors will bid a price for the specified solution to NASA requirements, and if selected, they are bound by contract to deliver that solution for the bid price. There's no extra funding if the project goes over budget, and no built-in profit guarantee.

Second, NASA will be issuing requirements rather than specifications. The contractors will be bidding their own design specifications to satisfy NASA requirements, with proposals competing not only on price but on the quality of the particular solution.

The net result is we get more innovation for less money, and programs no longer explode to several times their promised costs because of the rampant practice of underbidding cost-plus contracts and the lack of any real penalty for running way over budget on important programs.

Additionally, Congress no longer gets to build certain specifications into NASA authorization bills which steer funding to particular states and districts. NASA is empowered to select from contractor proposals without Congressional interference and pork-barrel patronage.

The traditional space state Senators like Richard Shelby (R-AL) loathe the new procurement model because it strips them of power to serve pork to the outrageously expensive aerospace contractors in their states, such as Rocketdyne and ATK. As far as I'm concerned, if we're pissing off Sen. Shelby, then we must be doing something right for the space program.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabrobst
Return the top rate to 91%.
09:29 AM on 07/21/2011
That sounds all right but I have my doubts. Somebody will find a way to underbid then build the product cheap after the prototype. They will find a way to stuff their pockets as military contractors have been doing for generations since the original "Uncle Sam".
12:29 PM on 07/21/2011
china will build all the rockets for nasa , can u buy anything build in america now days shame wall mart will do the space toylet
02:45 PM on 07/21/2011
Agree - the gunius of this appraoch is that it breaks the link to Cost-Plus.

There is an explosion of new desings and approaches happenieng in front of our eyes!
Admittedly a few years late - but the possibilities are breath taking.

Why am I thinking that Elon Musk might make it to Mars before NASA. And wouldn't that the most amazing thing ever!

Power to your arm Elon!
photo
General Washington
In the future, I return as Geddy Lee
03:13 AM on 07/21/2011
I don't necessarily have a problem with the commercialization of the space program, especially since the side-benefit is the final grounding of the Space Shuttle program, but equating this to past events where the government blazed a trail sort of ticks me off.

NASA has not provided an infrastructure upon which to make space travel possible or affordable. The Space Station is not a piece of infrastructure, designed as the jumping off point to destinations unlimited.

It’s a collection of very expensive metal and high-density glass designed to give the appearance of fostering international cooperation.

Rocketry and propulsion technology was developed by other individuals, groups, and government agencies. Yes, that includes ICBM’s. (I’d love to know what military purpose the Saturn V served. Carrying the Tsar Bomba to Mars?)

Apart from SpaceX, the other companies aren’t going to be using NASA’s launch facilities, nor their computers, nor their buildings.

Perhaps the Deep Space communications system, and a handful of experienced employees, but what else has been provided by 50 years of government-sponsored piloted space travel that private companies are going to be using?

At least when the land-grants were made for the railroads in the mid-/late-1800’s, there was a tangible asset being provided. Here? Are we giving away the right to use that we cannot conceivably control anyway?
12:01 AM on 07/21/2011
So, you'll print my complaint, but not my original comment? And you still won't give any reason why you CENSORED my original comment? So, you're so full of your power that you'll politically censor, and don't even know any remorse, guilt, or excuse for it! WOW!!!