iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Anti-Abortion Laws: States Pass Record Wave Of Abortion Restrictions

Antiabortion Laws States

DAVID CRARY and TIMBERLY ROSS   07/23/11 12:22 AM ET   AP

OMAHA, Neb. — Inspired by a contentious Nebraska law, abortion opponents in five other states have won passage of measures banning virtually all abortions after five months of pregnancy.

The late-term bans – based on the premise that fetuses at that stage can feel pain, a view that has been disputed – are among a record wave of more than 80 restrictions aimed at reducing access to abortion, all of them approved so far this year in state legislatures. Other measures expand pre-abortion counseling requirements, ban abortion coverage in new insurance exchanges, and subject abortion clinics to tough new regulations.

With only a few legislatures still in session, each side in the abortion debate is now assessing the potential impact of the new laws. They may not drastically slash the overall number of U.S. abortions – 1.2 million a year at last count – but they have emboldened anti-abortion activists, angered abortion providers, and will likely make decisions all the more wrenching for women affected by the late-term bans.

"In almost every instance at that late stage, something has gone terribly wrong with what typically was a very wanted pregnancy," said Peter Brownlie, head of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri. "What we see are parents in anguish over some type of medical condition – and these very cruel laws double or triple that anguish."

Kansas is one of the five states – along with Alabama, Idaho, Indiana and Oklahoma – that enacted abortion bans this year modeled after the groundbreaking fetal-pain bill passed in Nebraska in 2010. The Kansas ban is effective after 21 weeks, the others after 20 weeks. Exceptions are allowed when the mother's life is at risk or she faces severe physical impairment.

The bills depart from the standards established by the U.S. Supreme Court which allow states to limit abortions when there's a reasonable chance the fetus could survive outside of the womb, generally considered to around 23 or 24 weeks.

Mary Spaulding Balch, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee, said she was pleased the late-term bans got attention from lawmakers amid widespread fiscal problems.

"If we have to pass them in 50 states – and that's the plan – we will do that," she said.

In Nebraska, only one woman has come forward publicly to say the fetal-pain law prevented her from terminating a pregnancy. Danielle Deaver, of Grand Island, said she was denied that option at 22 weeks after she learned the baby was nonviable, ended up going into natural pre-term labor, and gave birth to a girl who died after 15 minutes.

"It was very frustrating and added to our grief because the waiting compounded everything," Deaver said in an interview earlier this year.

Anti-abortion activists acknowledge that some late-term cases can be difficult, but believe the bans are warranted for the sake of the fetus.

"The abortion industry always likes to run to the hard cases," said Julie Schmit-Albin, executive director of Nebraska Right to Life. "Yes, there are situations where tragedies occur, but that doesn't mean you allow the killing of unborn children beyond 20 weeks who can feel pain."

She contended that many women in the past who sought late-term abortions cited their own psychological concerns and were not faced with a fetal anomaly.

The Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports abortion rights, estimates that only about 1.5 percent of all abortions in the U.S. take place after 20 weeks of pregnancy. That would be roughly 18,000 annually as of the 2008, the last year with nationwide figures – and probably only a few hundred, at most, in states enacting the new bans.

"It's very small percentage – but it's a lot of distress," said Elizabeth Nash, who tracks state legislation for the Guttmacher Institute.

Critics of the late-term bans say other women in predicaments like Deaver's may be forced to choose between traveling out-of-state to get an abortion or proceeding reluctantly with a pregnancy after learning the fetus has a severe anomaly.

For pregnant women in Kansas who want an abortion after 21 weeks, that could mean a trip to Colorado or New Mexico.

"Some people will probably just give up – the logistics, the expense seems overwhelming," Brownlie said. "But in general, if women have decided the best thing for their family is to end a pregnancy, they will go to great lengths to do so."

Of all the anti-abortion measures introduced this year, one of the most ambitious remains pending in Ohio's Republican-led legislature. It would ban abortions after the first detectable fetal heartbeat, which can occur within six weeks of conception.

Ohio Gov. John Kasich signed a different bill Wednesday that would ban abortions after 20 weeks if the doctor – after a mandatory test – determines that the fetus is viable. There's no exception for the health or life of the mother, although those reasons may be used as a defense if a doctor is prosecuted.

Abortion-rights advocates say the roughly 200 late abortions performed in Ohio each year are often complex, involving decisions that should be left to women and their doctors.

"I continue to be amazed that legislators believe they should have a voice when I take care of my patients," said Dr. Catherine Cansino, an obstetrician-gynecologist from Columbus. "They should not dictate which medical interventions are available or not."

She cited the case of a pregnant patient who wrestled with whether to have an abortion because her fetus had a lethal anomaly.

"Our state's legislators have decided to force women in these situations to endure weeks, months, of a doomed pregnancy," Cansino said in an email. "What a cruel situation to inflict on them and their families."

Overall, according to abortion-rights supporters, the new laws will have the most impact on low-income and rural women, especially in states which already have few abortion providers. In addition to the late-term bans, other new restrictions include:

_Regulations in Kansas specifying what drugs and equipment abortion clinics must stock and setting requirements for room sizes and temperatures. Two of the state's three abortion providers sued after they were unable to meet the new standards, and a federal judge has blocked the rules until the lawsuit is resolved.

_A Texas law requiring doctors to conduct a pre-abortion sonogram and describe the fetus' features to the pregnant woman. Doctors who don't comply would face loss of their medical license and possible prosecution. The law doesn't allow women to opt out, with exceptions for cases of rape or incest.

The New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights has filed a lawsuit to overturn the law, which is scheduled to take effect Oct. 1.

_A South Dakota law, now under a preliminary injunction, requiring women seeking abortions to face a three-day waiting period and undergo counseling at pregnancy centers that discourage abortion.

_A law in North Dakota, also subject of a lawsuit, that critics say would prevent the state's only abortion clinic from using medicines to induce abortions.

Another type of law – enacted this year in Wisconsin, Indiana, Kansas and North Carolina – eliminates public funding for Planned Parenthood. The funds had been earmarked for family planning and other non-abortion services, but Planned Parenthood became a target for cutoffs because it also is the nation's largest provider of abortions.

Rachel Sussman, a Planned Parenthood policy analyst, says the cutoffs could backfire if they undermine family planning programs and increase the number of unintended pregnancies that result in abortions.

Planned Parenthood has filed suit to challenge the funding cutoff in Indiana – one of numerous pending legal challenges to the array of new laws.

So far, however, abortion-rights advocates have not filed suit against any of the Nebraska-style fetal-pain laws – a fact likely to encourage their spread to even more states.

"We will challenge them when the right circumstances present themselves," said Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "They're unconstitutional."

The Nebraska law targeted Dr. LeRoy Carhart, whose clinic near Omaha was one of the nation's few to provide late-term abortions. After the law passed, he opened a clinic in Germantown, Md.

While some doctors contend that fetuses can feel pain after 20 weeks, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists says it knows of no legitimate evidence showing a fetus can ever experience pain.

The Supreme Court, which established the nationwide right to abortion in its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, has made clear in subsequent rulings that states can restrict the procedure after viability. It has not addressed the issue of fetal pain.

The anti-abortion movement holds out hope that Roe v. Wade will one day be overturned, but meanwhile many activists are enthusiastic about the state-by-state approach of enacting laws that chip away at abortion access.

"We talk about accumulating victories," said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life. "Any time you want to make long-term change, on an issue that's been extremely controversial, you do it by developing momentum. You don't change something all at once overnight."

___

David Crary reported from New York City.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
OMAHA, Neb. — Inspired by a contentious Nebraska law, abortion opponents in five other states have won passage of measures banning virtually all abortions after five months of pregnancy. The la...
OMAHA, Neb. — Inspired by a contentious Nebraska law, abortion opponents in five other states have won passage of measures banning virtually all abortions after five months of pregnancy. The la...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,390
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
photo
ProgressivesLoveAmerica
Former disciple of Mises, Hayek & Milton Friedman
05:05 PM on 08/10/2011
Does anybody remember which political action committees and organizations are behind this nation-wide push???

I remember Rachel Maddow exposing it one day but I can't remember exactly which ones...

is it the Family Research Council?
11:02 AM on 07/29/2011
Don't worry! All these restrictions will be ruled unconstitutional like pretty much every other restriction in the last 40 years. You can keep having all the condomless sex you want and keep having all the abortions you want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jennifer Zirn
Agree to disagree.
03:03 PM on 07/24/2011
I think the government should stay out of a woman's choice to decide about her body.

Yes, most women will know before five months if they want the baby, but to say a woman has to carry to term will the fetas has abnormalities is also wrong. The baby is going to died soon after it is born, but you have to carry it to term, what kind of torture is that.

These children that are born but then giving up because of the their abnormalities, who is going to adopt them? You can't say that the parents have to raise them, when they can't afford and/or mentally do it.

When they make these laws, do they think these thing through?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LennyR
03:25 PM on 07/24/2011
Do human rights depend on being perfectly normal?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jennifer Zirn
Agree to disagree.
04:46 PM on 07/24/2011
And when does "human rights" begin the unborn and end for the mother? Is it fair for the child to live a life that is a plastic bubble?

Why do you get to decide if I have a child or not? You know nothing about my background, so the choice should be made by me, with advice from my doctor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jennifer Zirn
Agree to disagree.
07:01 PM on 07/24/2011
So when does "human rights" for the mother end? Why should we say what is right for the mother? How many children have to go in the system before the laws change?

The mother has human rights to decide if she can handle the pregnancy. There are some test that you can't do until that time, what if the child is going to die at birth? Why does she have to carry to term?

If they child is going to be so mentally/physically handicapped that the parents can't take care of the child financially/mentally, then she is to go to term and put the child up for adoption, where they will most likely stay, taken care of the basic needs by the government.

Again, I state that all of this is between the woman and her doctor and the father if he is in the picture.
05:51 PM on 07/24/2011
I totally agree with you. Great post.
It is the private choice of a woman citizen over her own body. It is not the choice of other citizens with their own religious prejudices. It is legal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
"I write to make it right, don't like what I see"
11:26 AM on 07/24/2011
Call me cynical, but I wouldnt be surprised if they are doing this because the Koch brothers own a clothes hanger factory
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
posie Di Sesa
11:59 AM on 07/24/2011
as well as rights to all the back alleys.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MauricioC
beware of half truths...you may get the wrong half
01:17 AM on 07/24/2011
The right loves children in the womb but hates them when they get here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iamone3
01:57 AM on 07/24/2011
stupid comment
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ycr
10:46 AM on 07/24/2011
You are right. Extremely stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MauricioC
beware of half truths...you may get the wrong half
12:01 PM on 07/24/2011
It's the truth.

If they cared THAT much, they would push for greater sex education and more available birth control. If it were more freely available, maybe we wouldn't have to worry about abortion in the FIRST place.
photo
camanokat
Outta this world
11:50 AM on 07/24/2011
I'm not sure "hate" is the right word...they just don't care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iamone3
12:43 PM on 07/24/2011
Quit worrying about what everyone else is doing. Start a charity if the need exists in your community.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
12:53 AM on 07/24/2011
Have liberal women simply gone to sleep, or are they now outnumbered, or at least outworked, by far right women?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tanya OaksBrooks
Sarcastic, left-wing, science-loving rocker chick
06:09 AM on 07/24/2011
It's not that women on the right outnumber women on the left. The problem is that people on the far right, mostly men, have been successful in a campaign of lies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ycr
10:57 AM on 07/24/2011
Don't worry groovy rocker chick. We have the most radical pro-abortion president in the history of this country. He voted against the baby born alive act. You can have all the abortions you want, while the world falls apart around your groovy little world.
photo
camanokat
Outta this world
11:53 AM on 07/24/2011
So true! Most of the anti-choice posters here are male. I am looking forward to the day when we can transplant embryos into their abdominal cavities and they can give birth and raise the aborted fetus. I wonder how many will accept the challenge?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:20 AM on 07/24/2011
It's ghastly to abort a child after five months. Sickening to do that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tanya OaksBrooks
Sarcastic, left-wing, science-loving rocker chick
06:10 AM on 07/24/2011
Most late-term abortions are because of fetal abnormalities. Giving birth to an anencephalic baby is even more ghastly.
01:53 AM on 08/02/2011
"Anencephaly can often be diagnosed before birth through an ultrasound examination. The maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP screening)[7] and detailed fetal ultrasound[8] can be useful for screening for neural tube defects such as spina bifida or anencephaly."

A mother would not have to wait until the 5th month to discover her baby had this particular disorder or any the many other fetal abnormalities that occur.

Your statement is misleading at best and just plain false at worst.
photo
littlebrowngirl
Brevity is the soul of wit - Shakespeare
11:43 PM on 07/23/2011
What about the jobs Gop? I thought that is what interested you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sig226
12:34 AM on 07/24/2011
Why don't you ask Obama or the Democratic Senate. It seems to me that 2/3 of the Gov. are democrats.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MauricioC
beware of half truths...you may get the wrong half
01:19 AM on 07/24/2011
WRONG.

There are currently 29 Republicans, 20 Democrats, and 1 Independent serving as state governors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tanya OaksBrooks
Sarcastic, left-wing, science-loving rocker chick
06:11 AM on 07/24/2011
Why did Boehner say that job creation would be their first order of business?
photo
SuperMoncho
The worst kind of prejudice is the kind against me
11:41 PM on 07/23/2011
If only they used all that energy to help starving children all over this country not an internal pimple.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Steelsil
Warren/Grayson 2016! Yes We Can!
10:47 PM on 07/23/2011
How about old and handicapped people?  Are they humans, or are they a choice?  Republicans say they are a choice - a bad choice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Santeramo
10:41 PM on 07/23/2011
"...have won passage of measures banning virtually all abortions after five months of pregnancy."


As an Independent I am okay with this. So long as conservatives don't restrict a women's protected right to choice any further, if you have not figured out by the fifth month whether or not you want to keep your child than you should simply just have it so long as there are no health concerns regarding the safety of the mother.


By five months in I personally feel that a women has waited too long for an abortion to be a viable option. The Independent stance on this issue follows along the same mindset; allowing abortions remains a Constitutionally protected freedom that no person, politician, or political party has the business of getting in the way of or repealing. A women has the right to decide what happens within her own body and outside influences aimed at brainwashing her personal beliefs should be outlawed. Independents do believe in limits on the procedure, as stated above, so I just wanted that to be clear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tanya OaksBrooks
Sarcastic, left-wing, science-loving rocker chick
06:18 AM on 07/24/2011
I agree that women who want an abortion should seek one sooner. The problem is that there are women who want to have a baby but find out AFTER the five month mark that they are carrying a severely deformed fetus. Anencephalic babies can't survive, and it's cruel to make the mother carry one to term.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Keith Scidmore
It's time for Laissez Faire economics.
10:22 PM on 07/23/2011
Still not tough enough. 5 months is a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LonosCurse
Some may never live, but the crazy never die
12:19 AM on 07/24/2011
Do your part and don't have sex.

Where are the jobs?
photo
FDRliberal
Terminating teabag ideology with extreme prejudice
06:25 AM on 07/24/2011
Most of the Baggers on huffpo are no doubt complying with your first request
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Keith Scidmore
It's time for Laissez Faire economics.
12:03 PM on 07/24/2011
It's about choices and consequences. When you have sex you run the chance of getting pregnant. If you don't want to get pregnant wait to have sex. It's very simple.
photo
camanokat
Outta this world
11:56 AM on 07/24/2011
You don't get to decide.
10:19 PM on 07/23/2011
Perhaps this will be a bit controversial, but I struggle to see the major problem with banning late term abortions. I'm not a conservative, or a tea-partier. I'm not basing my argument in religion or pro-life bumper-stickers. Nor do I think that PP should be defunded. But we're talking about 20 weeks old here. The "blob of tissue" argument is hardly applicable, and the medical procedures used (such as dilation and extraction) are pretty horrific. If the mother's health is in jeopardy, fine. But if it is not, and the fetus is viable (or close to it), then it should be born.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LonosCurse
Some may never live, but the crazy never die
12:21 AM on 07/24/2011
I think that if you don't have a uterus you should mind your business.

Why don't these people care about children after they are born?
03:40 PM on 08/31/2011
I don't disagree that some of the most ardently pro-life people do not do nearly enough to support women and children (after the child is born). That is one of many reasons why I'm a Democrat. But I think there is something to be said for defending viable fetuses.
10:01 PM on 07/23/2011
It never ceases to amaze me how almost everything the pro life movement does actually leads to more abortions. They constantly try to defund and place gag rules on the very institutions that provide the education and services to prevent unwanted pregnancies in the first place. In the process they further eliminate healthcare that has nothing to do with abortions. Please let some common sense come into play.
09:37 PM on 07/23/2011
It is really sad to read this. Here we are trying to fight a war against radicals overseas and we have our own radicals trying to eat us up from the inside. This is another one of the side affects of dealing with a people who work with a certain brand of religion (that will go unnamed). We hope that goodness AND freedom finds us and our women are not used as mere vessels for carrying fetuses.
10:33 PM on 07/23/2011
Whatever brand you refer to I do know it's NOT Christianity. Here is a thought If only those who were raped can get abortions then First you claim you was raped & name your Republican Politician. All women who have children that can't get an abortion Namve that Republican pro Lifer as the father. When thse folks have to pay Child support for all these kids you can bet these laws will change. The only thing Prolifers HATE other than abortion is WELFARE.
03:13 PM on 07/24/2011
We do not wish to convince people of the virtues of freedom (and the virtues of choice and the virtues of a woman's right to govern her own body and the virtues of a woman's right to not carry a fetus in her body) by first getting republicans to have unwanted children and then have the Republicans pay for child support. We don't want to do something evil to convince people to do the right thing. Ends do not justify means. Two wrongs don't make a right. The Republicans are OUR people. They love us and we love them. They will see what we are saying. We will see eye to eye. We will all get there in love and kindness and through gentle sensitive ways. The Republicans will side with us you have to LOVE them. You have to be kind and gentle towards them and we have to work together for the welfare of ALL humankind.