More

Minnesota Schools Budget Sets New Teacher Evaluations, Joins Band Of States Linking Student Progress

Teacher Reviews

By PATRICK CONDON   07/21/11 08:03 PM ET   AP

ST. PAUL, Minn. -- An education bill that presents a new approach to the evaluation of Minnesota public school teachers is among the myriad policy changes included in a pile of recently signed budget measures being dealt with by state workers, who flocked back to their offices Thursday after a three-week government shutdown.

The bill sets a process of yearly reviews more directly tied to student performance, a method increasingly common around the country, in part because opposition from teacher unions has ebbed.

Supporters of the changes said they are aimed as much at rewarding good teachers as they are at disciplining bad ones. The chief Senate sponsor of the education bill said the amendment should allow local districts more latitude to get teachers out of classrooms if they consistently fail to improve student performance.

"It isn't just a process aimed to get rid of teachers," said Sen. Gen Olson, R-Minnetrista. "First and foremost, it's aimed at enabling teachers to improve their own effectiveness. But that also provides some better grounds, when that is not possible, to have systems in place to see they can be removed and put more effective teachers in their place."

The change to teacher evaluations is one part of a 141-page education funding and policy bill, itself among nine bills that make up the budget compromise between Gov. Mark Dayton, a Democrat, and the Republicans who control the Legislature. Republicans had initially proposed more sweeping changes to how teachers are rated, with those evaluations largely replacing seniority as the key factor in the teachers' ability to hang on to their jobs.

Olson said Dayton administration negotiators fought hard to hold onto collective bargaining and tenure protections for teachers, adding that it was one of the final sticking points as representatives of Dayton and the Legislature rushed to nail down a final agreement as the special legislative session geared up earlier this week.

With the new system, which will be phased in between now and 2014, teachers will fall under an evaluation process using a mix of factors under which student test performance, as well as student engagement and commitment, will be weighted at 35 percent.

Teachers will also be allowed to assemble portfolios of student work that demonstrate improvement. In addition, teachers who initially receive poor marks on their assessments will get professional support to improve on a set timetable.

School districts will get considerable latitude to come up with their own criteria for assessing teachers; those that choose not to set their own will be able to fall back on guidelines that the Department of Education is charged with assembling via a task force to be made up of educators and teacher organizations, business representatives and parent groups.

"I think it puts in place some consistent and firm guidelines that helps identify teachers who are struggling, gives them mechanisms to improve, and if they're not able to, then it provides a process and objective criteria for administrators to take the next steps necessary to remove them from the classroom," said Charlene Briner, spokeswoman for the state Department of Education.

A number of states have made similar changes to teacher evaluations in the last several years. Sandi Jacobs, vice president of the Washington-based National Council on Teacher Quality said it's still too earlier to gauge whether the changes are improving student performance.

But Jacobs said she's spoken to many teachers around the country who have come to like the new means of evaluation because they tend to be based more on objective criteria and leaves them less at the whim of school administrators.

Tom Dooher, president of Education Minnesota – the state's largest teacher union – said he sees "the real potential for positive change" in the new evaluation system. He said the union is not opposed to the removal of ineffective teachers who show now motivation to improve.

The return of state employees to their offices was a potent symbol of the end to the three-week government shutdown. At the Department of Natural Resources headquarters in St. Paul, Commissioner Tom Landwehr held the door open for returning employees while his children handed out cookies.

Dayton himself had planned to greet returning workers, but canceled his appearance while telling WCCO radio that he was suffering a headache and fatigue from long hours tied to the getting the budget deal in place.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

ST. PAUL, Minn. -- An education bill that presents a new approach to the evaluation of Minnesota public school teachers is among the myriad policy changes included in a pile of recently signed budget ...
ST. PAUL, Minn. -- An education bill that presents a new approach to the evaluation of Minnesota public school teachers is among the myriad policy changes included in a pile of recently signed budget ...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:34 PM on 07/25/2011
In Florida, and probably in most states, principals are usually football coaches with good community relations/money raising skills. A principal was at one time a "principal (master) teacher."

-HDT

"How does it become a man to behave toward this American government today? I answer that he cannot without disgrace be associated with it."
-Henry David Thoreau, "On the Duty of Civil Disobedience," 1849
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ironicisntit
02:17 AM on 07/24/2011
Stay tuned....as we watch Minnesota on the news for their cheating scandal.
photo
novabird
It's me, novabird
03:59 PM on 07/23/2011
There is huge money behind the drive to eliminate public schools and unionized teachers. There is a billion dollar payday for private education companies once the public school system is destroyed. The current point of attack is teachers. Once they have destroyed teacher unions, the well trained, experienced (and high salaried) teachers will be fired and replaced with desperate, well educated third world teachers who will be willing to work for minimum wages with no benefits. If you think this is impossible, just look around you. It is happening as we speak.
02:55 AM on 07/26/2011
You are 100% right!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopnlisten
Hitch your wagon to a star!
01:50 PM on 07/23/2011
I would realy really really like to address bad parents...but they vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopnlisten
Hitch your wagon to a star!
01:49 PM on 07/23/2011
Et tu Minnesota?
photo
kid icarus
Democracy: Not a spectator sport.
02:45 AM on 07/23/2011
You know, the other sickening part of this (as I'm sitting here in disgust) is the fact that this was passed during MN's government shut-down crisis.

How dare these people pass something that is going to impact teachers, students, and communities without having an extension public discourse about it. This is just another example of Republicans manipulating a crisis to push through their agenda.

Can't these people win arguments on their own merit? Why do they have to sneak legislation by like a burglar in the night? Disgusting.
photo
kid icarus
Democracy: Not a spectator sport.
02:42 AM on 07/23/2011
You think the love of learning is something so easily measured that it can be done by a test? The impact of a teacher who loves to teach and teachers in a manner that allows the students to love learning isn't going to have that love of learning immediately demonstrable.

Sometimes it takes YEARS for a student to have that seed blossom and mature into true appreciation.

Furthermore, how are you going to assess teachers who don't math, science, or English? How are you going to rate teachers who teach Family and Consumer Sciences? How about shop? business classes? Social studies?

Tests are NOT the answer when determining who is an effective teacher. Student, administration, parent, and peer input are the determining factors. But talking to all the parties who actually count would be too costly and time consuming - not to mention there's NO MONEY in the proposition. Testing companies love hawking their "solutions" for what ails our education system, but it's all bogus self-serving flavor-of-the-year dribble.

This looks like one step forward and two steps back and the splits all in one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rita Kothbauer
12:55 AM on 07/23/2011
Basically teachers with bad students will get paid less, unless they are extraordinary teachers.
That is not a bad idea if the extraordinary teachers are up for a challenge. Otherwise the bad students will get lower quality teaching. Oh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
indigoiris715
Mad as a wet hen!
05:01 PM on 07/22/2011
The Blueberry Story:
The teacher gives the businessman a lesson

“If I ran my business the way you people operate your schools, I wouldn’t be in business very long!”
I represented a group of business people dedicated to improving public schools. I was an executive at an ice cream company that had become famous in the middle1980s when People magazine chose our blueberry as the “Best Ice Cream in America.” ....
Now read the rest of the story- http://www.jamievollmer.com/blueberries.html
02:53 PM on 07/22/2011
Lets try an experiment...

Super Teacher gets students that hate school, are drug users, think educations is useless, or whatever other problem you can imagine. Also give a bad teacher this class. Then we get another Super teacher and bad teacher and give them classes of great students with family that values education and support them in their education.

I don't actually have to do this experiment because anyone with the ability to reason can figure out exactly what is going to happen.

Super teacher with a great class will be on top. Bad teacher with a great class will be behind the super teacher but their class will be doing just fine. The other two are going to be considered bad teachers because their students are going to be failures.

Point? Any teacher using these standards will be a "good" teacher if they have a good class. Any teacher using these standards will be a "bad" teacher if they have a bad class.

Anyone who has been to college should know this. People who want to pass will pass and those that dont care won't. A bad teacher makes the students job harder but everyone that tries will still pass.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ironicisntit
02:15 AM on 07/24/2011
I have been saying this for the last few years. I teach in a district that is 90% Hispanic, high poverty, migrant farm workers and second language learners. We have been PI (program improvement) for 4 years. We make consistent growth every year but not at the rate NCLB demands. My school has an API score of 690. Soooooo let's change teachers with a "high performing school" in our general area. How about Montecito, a very wealthy, slightly diverse community about 45 minutes away. Their score is 900. So we'll trade teachers for a year. Check the students score and then see if its really the teaching that is to blame.
02:31 PM on 07/22/2011
I would like to see the NEA, AFT and every other teacher union to file a class action lawsuit against every state and ALEC (the shadow org. writing these laws for republican gov's) under the rico act that was used to arrest the mafia in this country. ALEC's laws written by corporations and powerful groups in tandem with conservative politicians is the major force ruining our country.
Unfortunately, I don't think they have the guts to do it!
02:16 PM on 07/22/2011
If I have to agree to this, then I get to pick my own students and/or dismiss any that I consider to be a liability. The same way that an attorney can decline to take a case, that an NFL coach can cut a player, or that a doctor can say that he's "no longer accepting patients."
12:35 PM on 07/22/2011
Utterly insane.

The only teachers who are going to be highly effective on a consistent basis are those who can restrict their students in one way or another to children of families where education is highly valued. If you drive the best teachers out and push the public schools down far enough, you force the families that value education to go to private / charter / home school / online school alternatives.

I am a strong supporter of public education, but when we lived in Salinas I had a smart, very sensitive Aspie daughter. I sent her to Montessori. Once we moved to the Seattle suburbs, she went to public school.

I have to side with the conspiracy theorists here. The school reform movement shows every evidence of being driven by a desire to destroy the uniform public school systems.

Never judge somebody by their words - judge them by their actions and the foreseeable consequences of their actions. The consequences of the top-down school reform movement are now obvious to anybody who will look, even if it may take a decade or so for the full impact to filter down to the general population.
11:34 AM on 07/22/2011
Did we learn nothing from the debacle in Atlanta? Good grief!
photo
novabird
It's me, novabird
03:55 PM on 07/23/2011
That is correct.
11:19 AM on 07/22/2011
When 20-year old Johnny, who comes to school only to keep his pot business running, scores poorly on a test, I don't blame a teacher. Sorry, but there are far bigger problems in that scenario than "ineffective" teaching. And, to those of you who have not taught in a critical needs area, this is not uncommon.