iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Rembrandt And The Jewish Jesus (PHOTOS)

First Posted: 07/25/2011 12:26 pm EDT   Updated: 09/24/2011 6:12 am EDT

An exhibition to open in Philadelphia takes on one of Rembrandt's boldest and most controversial innovations: the invention of a more human, humble and accurate face of Jesus.

One of Rembrandt's greatest paintings normally resides on the north side of the Louvre, the 1648 Supper at Emmaus. While small in scale (60 x 60 cm), it is the crowning achievement of Rembrandt's great obsession with his favorite story of the gospels. It shows the moment after the resurrection, when an unrecognized Jesus casually joins two dejected disciples leaving Jerusalem after his crucifixion. They've heard rumors about his resurrection, but are confused and he explains the meaning and necessity of his death to them, and they pull him aside in nearby Emmaus for dinner. As he breaks challah bread, they recognize him in great shock, but just then he disappears.

Rembrandt loved the story's potential for showing ignorance, revelation, miraculous appearance and the problem of showing a resurrected Jesus realistically. This painting has been cleaned, and is now a revelation of light, texture and subtle color. In this painting, Rembrandt debuted his new, humble Jesus, but it was only one of many ways he tried to make the scene more primitive and historically accurate. Below the table, the dog (probably a reference to the gentiles) has a solid red eye, a psychotic touch in this mystical yet earthy work.

When Rembrandt sought bankruptcy protection in 1656, the detailed inventory of his handsome house in the Jewish quarter listed three paintings called Head of Christ. One of them, in the small studio (where you would expect to find sketches) was called "Head of Christ after life," showing that even the court clerk knew what is otherwise obvious yet still controversial today: that Rembrandt had posed a living and probably Jewish model for this experiment.
These three "heads" are likely among the eight small oil sketches on wooden panels that he (and his studio?) made, seven of which survive. In Rembrandt and the Face of Jesus, powerful and emotional panel portraits of Jesus are reunited for the first time since 1656. When the exhibition is presented at the Philadelphia Museum of Art (Aug. 3-Oct. 30) and the Detroit Institute of Arts (Nov. 20 to Feb. 12), the great Supper at Emmaus will also appear for the first time in the United States since 1936.

The oil sketches depicting Jesus show a humble, gentle face in contemplation with different expression and different casts of the rich subtle light by which we know Rembrandt.

We don't think of Rembrandt, a Protestant artist in a remarkably free country, as being tied to tradition and using canonical models. Up to his own day, however, sticking to models for the face of Jesus that had miraculous beginnings was still an important, if not a dominant rule that we see followed in his early works. Representing the Christ with the high forehead, shallow feminine features, long nose and narrow mouth familiar from early Christian and Byzantine icons, artists were obsessed with the true image of Jesus. The stories of Veronica's veil, the Lentulus letter and the Mandylion of Abgar of Edessa were still being printed and used by artists in the age of Newton and van Leeuwenhoek, all the more so after the Protestant reformation.

Rembrandt was raised in a liberal reformed family in Leiden, and worked for Baptist, Lutheran, Catholic, Mennonite, Jewish as well as Liberal and Orthodox reformed clients. He was a manic illustrator of the Bible, taking on many subjects never before seen in art, clearly reading the Bible carefully for himself and also using other books, like Josephus' Jewish Histories (he had a German version) as well for extra details to improve the accuracy of his images. This freedom to interpret the Bible for himself is familiar from Protestant theology, but he takes on a new task in making Jesus human, as well as divine, through his realism.

One of the most controversial aspects of this exhibition has been the question of the Jewish Jesus, the subject of two recent exhibitions, one in Amsterdam and the other in Paris, which were divided on the question of whether Rembrandt was a "friend of the Jews." The myth of the Jewish Rembrandt, one who used Jewish models for a huge range of works, has undergone dramatic revision in recent years, so, for example, we understand the famous "Jewish Bride" as a illustration of a theatrical play of the time, and not a portrait of a Jewish couple, and that not all of the old men in Rembrandt's works are Jewish.

Nevertheless, the bare fact that he illustrated a messianic tract on the Book of Daniel for the renowned Rabbi Menasseh bin Israel (Spinoza's teacher) cannot be refuted. He did so at the moment the Rabbi was engaging Protestant theologians in an unprecedented dialogue on common ground. Documents about his financial quarrels with the Pinto family on the right side of his house, for instance, are lately taken as evidence of anti-Semitism, rather than as more obvious signs of worsening financial peril on Rembrandt's part. While there's no proof the famously querulous artist had any friends, Jewish or otherwise, his engagement with humanity in his art, including his images of Jewish subjects, show an intense engagement with their common humanity.

Rembrandt's house was in the middle of what had become the favorite quarter for Sephardic refugee merchants, where they would soon build the imposing Esnoga or Synagogue. Scholars are correct to point out that his accurate portrayal of challah in the Supper at Emmaus, the details in Christ and the Woman taken in Adultery (London) taken from the Bible and Josephus, and the sketches of Jewish models from life are all ways Rembrandt sought to deepen the expression and impact of his Christian art, rather than explorations and signs of respect for contemporary Jewish practice after the manner of Romeyn de Hooghe and Emmauel de Witte. As a "history" painter and portraitist, we should not expect him to be a reporter on contemporary life, and frankly it cannot be more respectful than to find common ground, common faith and common humanity with his neighbors.

Lloyd DeWitt
Associate Curator, John G. Johnson Collection/Philadelphia Museum of Art
Editor of Rembrandt and the Face of Jesus published by the Philadelphia Museum of Art in association with Yale University Press

Christ and the Woman Taken in Adultery
1 of 10
Christ and the Woman Taken in Adultery, 1644. Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn, Dutch (active Leiden and Amsterdam), 1606 1669. Oil on panel, 33 x 25 3/4 inches (83.8 x 65.4 cm); Framed: 42 15/16 x 36 5/8 x 4 1/16 inches (109 x 93 x 10.3 cm). The National Gallery, London. Bought, 1824.
Total comments: 326 | Post a Comment
1 of 10
Rate This Slide

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Current Top 5 Slides
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

Filed by Josh Fleet  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 326
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:23 AM on 07/29/2011
This article is about paintings, not religion. Rembrandt lived in the jewish quarter of Amsterdam. He used live models for his paintings. It is likely that he used a young jewish man to sit for the portraits. and, yes, the model looks like he could hae been an Arab man. But, I have never read about Arabs then in Amsterdam. There were, and are, two kinds of jewish communities in Amsterdam. The Portugese community was influentual and prominent, more so than the Askenazi community. More of Rembrandt's models were jewish. In any case, it is a nice example of how European Jews were ME types ad not European types.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
zelduh
Democrats: the REAL American patriots.
02:45 PM on 08/13/2011
As was Jesus Christ.

So, what is the question?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gal416
is a Bible verse † † †
12:58 AM on 07/27/2011
Isaiah 53:2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlackYowe
I am a classical- liberal woman and a Jeweler.
11:16 PM on 07/26/2011
His paintings of Jesus have always been my favorites. The minister that married me and my husband told me me recently that he saw a survey of protestant clergy asking them their favorite depiction of Jesus by an artist and hands down they all said the best portraits of all time of Jesus were those done by Rembrandt .
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
zelduh
Democrats: the REAL American patriots.
02:47 PM on 08/13/2011
I thought they liked the paintings where Jesus had blue eyes, long light brown hair (with just a few waves rather than curls), and alabaster white skin . . .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bones Rhodes
03:19 AM on 08/14/2011
That is the Jesus of the funeral parlor fan : the Germanic hippie Jesus.
07:24 PM on 07/26/2011
if we want to get down to reality, the man jesus looked more like a modern palestinian arab than a european jew. but that's neither here nor there, all representations of jesus are symbolic (as is the figure himself).
08:42 PM on 07/26/2011
Tell my sister that. She speaks with him every day.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
zelduh
Democrats: the REAL American patriots.
02:47 PM on 08/13/2011
But does he speak with her?
06:41 PM on 07/26/2011
I grew up in a traditional Unitarian church (not UU). We were Christians but with one God, not a trinity. We believed Jesus to be a great prophet and not divine at all. What's more the miracles and resurrections of the bible were taken as allegory and parable and not as any kind of scientific truth. I didn't end up thinking much of it as a religion, but the Sunday sermons tended to be kind of fun and enlightening at least intellectually. I remember one Sunday when the minister got going on what Jesus must have looked like. We was quite a good speaker and he evoked quite an image of a tough semitic looking outdoorsy sort of fellow darkened by a life lived outside in the blazing sun wandering around the countryside with his followers; kind of like your basic Arab big game hunter. He compared it to the images of the suffering lily white western looking emaciated versions on the average altar. But you know, I don't think it really matters much. You can make religion as rational and theological as you like, but it doesn't make it more meaningful. Perhaps it even saps it of its emotional impact.
08:35 PM on 07/26/2011
No one has seen the face of God no one. Only Moses spoke directly with God, yet God told him to cover, while he passed over him. Were commanded also not to make a image of man or woman, interesting all theses idols we were commanded not to do, 3rd commandment. But sadly ever taught, why?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WesStrikesBack
A winegrowing secular humanist
07:04 PM on 07/27/2011
Maybe because it's the ramblings of 3000 year old goatherding poetry. Disobedient children are supposed to be stoned to death and we're not supposed to eat swine or shellfish. I'm sure you follow those rules, right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:02 PM on 07/26/2011
Adso, if I knew the answers to everything, I would be teaching theology in Paris.
William of Baskerville/The Name of the Rose
photo
Aryeh Melaris
Put our government back on its leash!
01:40 PM on 07/26/2011
What's up with you people! Don't you know that Jesus was Han Chinese?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgraham
There is no magic
11:33 AM on 07/26/2011
I've been reading the comments below, and I have lost all faith in humans. These are the dumbest writings in the history of HP. Most have missed the intent of the article. (Yes the paintings are nice.)

Now for the Loony-Tunes: If there really were a Jesus, no one ever painted him. All paintings are the artist's creation. Jesus would have been a Semitic Jew, with African roots. There can be no discussion of blue eyes and long blond hair.

If you don't understand why you believe that position, you also don't understand the bigotry involved.

Whether you believe Christ is the son of God, a nice historical figure, or a myth - - you have to know he was not a Jeffrey Hunter look-alike.

There is nothing in this article that is controversial. It's just about a few paintings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VictorLudorum
Chrysler .The 100 Year Contract..
01:00 AM on 07/26/2011
zey hav torn my scrrolls ,ransacked the pooblishing houze ,zey tore the sign boarz ,i am finished absolutely ,zey are no more my relations ,they are all the whole world trying to wriggle left and right secretly to join the herodian capital... i am the first jew to lose myself and all my money ,do you believe in another city a poor preacher who doesnt take alms! And his gold reserves are in heavan?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gutenmorgen
a.k.a. crowsnest
11:49 PM on 07/25/2011
I have had numerous discussions with my classmate (High School) and friend the former Bob Haak who was a co-founder of the Rembrandt Project that studied the true provenance of all paintings of Rembrandt. We also had numerous discussions on Rembrandt's paintings, drawings and etchings that depict Jesus. Haak thought, although he could not prove it, that Rembrandt did not truly believe that Jesus was literally "the son of God". Haak opined that compared to the depiction of Jesus by Italian Renaissance masters (Leonardo's Jesus in The Last Supper is a great exception) and ,say, Rubens, Rembrandt's adult Jesus is usually a person stunningly like you and me!
photo
Anybodyseenthepopos
אני כלום בלעדיהם
03:20 PM on 07/29/2011
I agree with Haak. The portraits speak to humility and thoughtfulness. No miracles, raising of the dead, or walking on water. Just an opinion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:42 PM on 07/25/2011
People don't realize white Christ is an advertising image just like Ronald McDonald. That's why the Buddy Christ joke is so biting. Churches commissioned art that looked like the localized ideal of what people would think a son of a god would look like. It's kind of funny and it's kind of spooky how much it matters so many hundreds or thousands of years later. Imagine the game of 'Telephone' except on a spiritual, social, and historical level, and you have Christianity. Jesus is kind of in there somewhere. Mostly when someone sees a spider.
09:45 AM on 07/26/2011
What is interesting is I had an argument with a Jehovah Witness, about the drawings of Jesus in their pamphlet. I asked, why is Jesus white? They responded does it matter, I said YES... because i never seen a white person pass out pamphlets of Jesus being black..

The guy look confused and said they had many black members in their church and Jesus is all loving... i played with him a little bit and said, so are you saying its ok to worship with you because white Jesus loves me the same a you... Then I said how about this...come to my church were we have the true HISTORIC painting of Jesus and its ok to worship with us, because black Jesus loves you and I the same. The look on the guy face was PRICELESS!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
surferlaments
Help me Rhonda......
10:33 AM on 08/02/2011
your post was priceless. the true historic painting of Jesus? which one would that be? christ was a jew so therefore... i think nowadays everyone can pretty much conclude Jesus was not blonde with blue eyes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R A Bows
11:10 PM on 07/25/2011
Rembrandt got it right: Jesus was a Jew. Everything he did was consistent with Jewish law, as his brother James made clear. It was Paul and the Church that stole his teachings and made a new religion out of it, persecuting the Jews and leaving them no choice but to reject a religion that made a centerpiece of a teacher who taught love, yet which killed those who did not accept such hypocrisy.
fanetiks
Sense in spelling and everything else
02:11 AM on 07/26/2011
Drivel. The New Testament records that "Paul" started as Saul of Tarsus, a Jewish zealot who persecuted Christians "even unto death". So who was against whom? Official Judaism and the Jewish mob killed Jesus when Pontius Pilate wanted to spare him, for finding no guilt in him. It is JESUS who made a new religion, a new God of Love that defeated the Jews' God of Wrath. We have no idea what Jesus looked like, and, believe it or not, not all Jews look alike -- not now, not then!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bholly72
11:58 AM on 07/26/2011
If you believe that Pilate wanted to spare a man who claimed to be a king, you just don't understand the Romans very well.
07:21 PM on 07/26/2011
Read the history of Pilate who as recorded was a vile, vile King who persecuted  beyond belief and what has never been preached or told about unless one seeks within the history books. Romans punishment was to  crucify, Jews form of punishment, was to stone to death in those times. The Jews were in bondage under the rule power of a Roman King Pilate and under him was King Herod.
05:54 PM on 07/30/2011
It wasn't Paul that "stole his teachings".

The change from the early church respect of father Judiasm to hostile was when the Devil took control of the church via Constitine. He made it a government controlled and appointed business. One of the first things Constitines Bishops in Rome did was divorce Christianity from prior Judiasm by banning Passover, Sabbath, and other prior Jewish customs.

Paul celebrated Passover (Acts) and warned the Gentile Church that the time of the gentiles was not permanent - but temporary (Romans 11). Paul was not a self-hating Jew, but a follower of the early church from Jerusalem, which was headed by Jesus' brother - Jaccob (James).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
surferlaments
Help me Rhonda......
10:57 PM on 07/25/2011
fabulous paintings!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oregon Mick
No bread? Let them eat micro-bio!
10:50 PM on 07/25/2011
Jesus was Jewish? No way. I seen his picture, he was clearly from northern France.