iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tea Party Warns GOP: A Vote for Boehner's Debt Plan Violates Our Pledge


First Posted: 07/26/11 07:42 PM ET Updated: 09/25/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The Tea Party is causing more headaches for Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) over his debt proposal.

A coalition of several hundred Tea Party chapters declared Tuesday that a vote for Boehner's debt plan constitutes a violation of its pledge, which 51 Republican lawmakers have signed. The group, known as the Cut, Cap and Balance Coalition, notified its members of its position in a Tuesday memo entitled, "Clarification of the CCB Coalition Stance on the Speaker's Proposal."

"The greatest concern to the Cut, Cap and Balance Coalition is the integrity of the Cut, Cap and Balance Pledge that was signed by 39 House Members and 12 Senators, and whether voting for the proposed deal constitutes a Pledge violation," reads the memo."

"We hold that is does violate the pledge, on several grounds."

Lawmakers who signed the pledge agreed to oppose any debt limit increase unless it met three conditions: substantial spending cuts, enforceable spending caps and a constitutional amendment that requires the government to balance its books each year.

The Cut, Cap and Balance Coalition claims Boehner's plan violates all three conditions.

Boehner's call for $7 billion in first-year spending cuts "is well short of the 'substantial' standard," states the memo. Instead, the coalition has pressed for $111 billion in cuts in fiscal year 2012.

As for spending caps, the coalition says Boehner's plan fails because it limits caps to discretionary spending, which accounts for only about one-third of the budget, and it doesn't address entitlement reform. "Total federal spending is not really 'capped' at all," continues the memo.

Finally, the fact that Boehner's proposal allows for an increase in the debt ceiling prior to the passage of a balanced budget amendment "virtually assures that any vote would be, at best, a purely symbolic vote on a toothless amendment."

Therefore, the memo concludes, "the argument proffered by some Members of Congress who have signed the CCB Pledge that voting for the Boehner bill is not a Pledge violation ... is fallacious."

All told, Boehner's proposal would tie more than $3 trillion in deficit reduction to votes to raise the debt ceiling in two increments, by $900 billion initially and then by about $1.6 trillion next year. It would require lawmakers to vote to raise the debt limit now and then, in a few months, require a vote on the balanced budget amendment. A second vote to raise the debt limit would take place next year. Tea Party groups have howled over the idea of voting for a balanced budget amendment after, not before, agreeing to raise the debt ceiling.

The latest Tea Party missive comes days after the coalition flat-out rejected Boehner's debt proposal. Tuesday's memo serves the additional purpose of warning Congressional allies that their votes on Boehner's bill won't go unnoticed.

Twelve Senators and 39 Representatives, all Republicans, have signed the coalition's pledge. Among them: Sens. Tom Coburn (Okla.) and Lindsey Graham (S.C.), and Reps. Jeff Flake (Ariz.), Michele Bachmann (Minn.) and Allen West (Fla.).

The House is expected to vote on Boehner's bill on Wednesday. Some lawmakers who signed the Cut, Cap and Balance pledge have already said they won't support Boehner's plan, including Reps. Jason Chaffetz (Utah) and Jim Jordan (Ohio). Jordan chairs the conservative House Republican Study Committee, which boasts a whopping 170 members.

Action is needed on some kind of agreement to raise the debt ceiling by August 2, when the government is expected to run out of money to pay its bills and begin to default on its obligations.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The Tea Party is causing more headaches for Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) over his debt proposal. A coalition of several hundred Tea Party chapters declared Tuesday that a vote for Bo...
WASHINGTON -- The Tea Party is causing more headaches for Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) over his debt proposal. A coalition of several hundred Tea Party chapters declared Tuesday that a vote for Bo...
WASHINGTON -- The Tea Party is causing more headaches for Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) over his debt proposal. A coalition of several hundred Tea Party chapters declared Tuesday that a vote for Bo...
WASHINGTON -- The Tea Party is causing more headaches for Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) over his debt proposal. A coalition of several hundred Tea Party chapters declared Tuesday that a vote for Bo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,771
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (188 total)
02:18 AM on 07/29/2011
:(
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
almostlyniceguy
Not young enough to know everything..
07:54 PM on 07/28/2011
Anyone who signs a pledge that limits their ability to govern should be impeached. They are there to represent their constituentcy and the greater interests of the American people, not a limited splinter group.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlteSoldier
Micro This....Micro That....
06:36 PM on 07/28/2011
Why won't the GOP control the Tea Party? The GOP is now the Tea Party party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
01:52 PM on 07/28/2011
What will all of these people do after 2012 when their Tea Party puppets are all sent back to their day jobs at Taco Bell? First off, they should all go out and get their GED's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vobox3343
Each day is a new day - make the most of it
01:45 PM on 07/28/2011
Oh, that pledge - make Obama a one termer at all cost.
10:51 AM on 07/28/2011
I wish people could come to understand that significant spending cuts can't be made. The vast majority of income goes to social security, medicare, medicaid, national defense, and interest on the national debt. Do you really want to cut any of these? If you cut everything else you would still have a deficit!

The problem is we have an income shortage. Yes, the economy is down. But that is only part of the problem. Prior to the Reagan administration, the income tax ladder went to 91% for the wealthiest Americans. Now it's down to only 28%. And at this level, the wealthiest 5% of Americans are still paying 40% of the income tax. How much more would the government take in if we kept the old tax rate? No one likes paying taxes, but how else can you have a government? We can't take it from those who don't have it. The plan was that those who benefited the most payed the most. We reduced their taxes. Is anyone surprised that government is now running huge deficits?

We learned from the Reagan years that wealthy people like their money, too. The trickle down effect produced an insignificant trickle. They preferred to hold on to it. But Republicans still want to give the money to the rich. That won't help the economy. It needs to go those who will spend it, producing jobs and growing the economy.
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
10:02 AM on 07/28/2011
I read that 10 page cut, cap, and balance bill and my problem is, where are the cuts? They do not specify anything, it is basically an outline. How can anyone vote yes for an outline? I want specifics, what are you going to cut to come up with the $111 billion you claim to want to cut in 2012???? Unfortunately, I am left to guess because the bill certainly tells me nothing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sbk85
09:42 PM on 07/28/2011
It was never their intention to pass that bill. It was purely symbolic. Just shows us how wasteful these Teabaggers are being with their limited time before we default.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mkelch
Know or listen to those that know.
08:38 AM on 07/28/2011
No wonder Boehner cry's a lot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
07:22 AM on 07/28/2011
SC Tea Party Leaders Arrested For Selling Pirated Software
What about the pledge of allegiance to the USA? These people are anarchist traitors dealing in sedition.
photo
Bettaman
Former Republican - now sane
12:05 AM on 07/28/2011
They represent a tiny fraction of the voting public yet, this gaggle of geriatric goofs known as the teaparty thinks they can hold the nation hostage to their ill-informed and unrealistic nonsense? Pizzoff tbaggers. America is very sick of you fools and you'll see that in the next election. You'll be lucky to hold even one seat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wayne Peterson
09:00 PM on 07/27/2011
Where were the tea party pinheads when Bush was running 2 wars for 8 years "off the books"????? Remember.....the economic collapse occured BEFORE Obama was sworn in!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norcal2
Rimmon Diplomacy
12:33 PM on 07/28/2011
moral majority...christian coalition....yes...they went off the radar for about 10 years....now they are back as the tea party.
Polly27
rebel w/ a Cause
08:46 PM on 07/27/2011
When in the course of human events, when we need to pay our debts, when the debt ceiling needs raising -- statesman put country above high school/college fraternity-like pledges.

You can be forgiven for being pushed and pulled into signing a silly piece of paper; you will not be forgiven for letting people suffer economically because you fear people who wave yellow banners in your face. You don't need to be the same color.
photo
asaman53
Get angry! 2012 the end of the Tea Party.
07:36 PM on 07/27/2011
The Republithugs should cut the Tea Baggers loose. Yes, they would lose their house majority, but that would be preferable to these Tea Bags holding them hostage. Think about it Republithugs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nypapajoe
06:48 PM on 07/27/2011
A recent demonstration in Washington by the baggers resulted in approximately 30 plus individuals showing up dressed in Colonial garb waving "don't thread on me" flags and their walkers! These fools better start fighting for their social security checks and Medicare which the Republicans want to eliminate!
04:57 PM on 07/27/2011
14th Amendment
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

In Perry v. United States (1935), the Supreme Court ruled that under Section 4 voiding a United States government bond "went beyond the congressional power."[