iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Climate Change And Forest Fires Linked In New Study

Climate Change Fires

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 07/27/11 07:56 PM ET Updated: 09/26/11 06:12 AM ET

A study released this week predicts a grim future for the ecosystem in and around Yellowstone National Park.

The study, by researchers at the University of California, Merced, concluded that rising temperatures associated with climate change could result in many more severe forest fires in the coming decades. Professor Anthony Westerling and his team found that by 2050, forest fires “would likely cause a major shift in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem” and “affect the region's wildlife, hydrology, carbon storage and aesthetics.”

The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, predicts that by 2050, years with no major fires will be extremely rare. Towards the end of the century, the average wildfire size is expected to exceed the largest from the current record year of 1988. In that year, fires affected over 1,200 square miles of Yellowstone forest, an area about the size of Rhode Island.

This new study comes at a time when nearly half of all Americans believe “the seriousness of global warming is exaggerated,” according to a Gallup Poll earlier this year. But what do the results of this study mean for those who do believe in the seriousness of climate change?

According to Westerling, if these predictions come true, the visual landscape of Yellowstone will also be dramatically affected. Forests would become smaller and less dense as they are replaced by shrubs and grasslands. Westerling said he and his colleagues were surprised by the results of the study. According to U.S. News & World Report, his group “expected fire to increase with increased temperatures,” but they “did not expect it to increase so much or so quickly.”

The study, which used data from 1972 to 1999, compared wildfire statistics with climate data in the northern Rocky Mountains. Westerling warned, however, that the results of the study were based on models of the current ecosystem. He explained to Science Daily that these models “will not work once the increase in fires creates a fundamental change in the ecosystem. As the landscape changes, the relationships between climate and fire would change as well.”

The Associated Press reports that experts have seen an increase in the number of large forest fires in the past 25 years, with longer fire seasons as well. Several Canadian provinces are currently in the grips of one of the most destructive wildfire seasons to date.

Last month, Arizona was affected by the largest wildfire in state history, which helped to eat up the state's firefighting budget well before the end of the 2011 wildfire season. Some western states, like California, are turning to firefighting fees for residents near fire-prone areas, as a solution to the problem.

This news comes soon after federal officials revealed that the oil spill cleanup on the Yellowstone River will require more workers than are already in place, and most of the oil will remain for some time. The oil spill has not yet affected tourism at the National Park, but is a reminder that humans have the ability to damage fragile ecosystems in the short term as well.

Photos of last month's wildfire in Arizona can be seen here.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

A study released this week predicts a grim future for the ecosystem in and around Yellowstone National Park. The study, by researchers at the University of California, Merced, concluded that risi...
A study released this week predicts a grim future for the ecosystem in and around Yellowstone National Park. The study, by researchers at the University of California, Merced, concluded that risi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:23 PM on 08/26/2011
The majority of wildland forest fires are caused by man. The secondary issue is that the forests are
unheatlhy due to invasive insects & diseases. Third issue is a lack of controlled burns in the
forests to periodically clean out dead and dying trees and through controlled burns relase back
into the soil nutrients that are captured in plant matter both alive and dead. Releasing back to the
soil nutrients and other materials would vastly improve the health of the plants (make them more
disease resistant) and animals.
Fourth issue is the wildland / urban interface-more development encroaching into these areas-
using scarce water resources for urban recereation (golf courses, ball fields).
To properly manage this resource there should be limited logging of overgrown areas and removal
of diseased and dying timber.
01:07 PM on 08/26/2011
Global warming is a scam, period, end of story. The Earth heats and cools in a natural cycle. Changes occur as a result of this very normal process. Only man's arrogance leads them to believe they can alter this process or that CO2 provides a greenhouse effect.

50% and the numebr will grow as the Earth continues its normal process of heating and cooling and the bogus science/scientist keep getting exposed. Polar bears, polar ice caps, hockeyschtick, medieval period, etc. etc. The scam may have had a longer shelf life had it not been for the selection of Al Gore to be the lay leader and for Rajenda Pachauri, a railway engineer, to lead the IPCC.

The British high court ruling on Inconcenient Truth's nine "scientific errors" aka LIES also takes some of the hot wind out of this scam.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7037671.stm

Like the Sopranos, this is over. Now lets arrest the perps and put them cells next to Madoff.
09:37 PM on 08/22/2011
Maybe this was forgotten in their research?? Yellowstone Has Bulged as Magma Pocket Swells
Its been killing trees for years... Yellowstone is overdue for a major volcanic eruption ....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:21 AM on 07/29/2011
So the Himalayas losing all ice in 20 years was made up? And the polar bears didn't drown because global warming melted all the ice away?
01:09 PM on 08/26/2011
In a word, yes.
photo
gaudeamus
igitur juvenes dum sumus
09:15 AM on 07/29/2011
What a dystopian future! The tourists will crowd around the sole remaining copse of trees passing for a forest in the park while the residents who lapsed on paying their fire-fighting fee watch their homes go up in flames as the fire-fighters refuse to deploy their equipment.
08:28 PM on 07/28/2011
Another study linked liberals and ret.arded foo/s.
08:02 PM on 07/28/2011
"The oil spill has not yet affected tourism at [Yellowstone] National Park, but is a reminder that humans have the ability to damage fragile ecosystems in the short term as well."

The oil spill will have no effect on tourism in the park as the river flows out of the park. The article linked was also in error as Governor Schweitzer was talking about tourism for the Yellowstone river, not the park.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlbanyConservative
Always right!!
12:21 PM on 07/28/2011
http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html

This report is on DRudge today. It says that almost every climate model being run is using faulty data about heat being trapped within our atmospherre. This is a NASA data report that should get more attention than it is.

Real-world measurements show far less heat is being trapped in the earth's atmosphere than the alarmist computer models predict, and far more heat is escaping into space than the alarmist computer models predict.

I htink it is time to reprogram the computers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Knocker
a mind is a terrible thing to waste
04:41 PM on 07/28/2011
What is expected from an article published on a right wing Corporate magazine, written by someone working for a right-wing think tank, where reason and logic does not exist.
01:27 PM on 08/26/2011
Yahoo is right wing? Is NASA also right wing? Far too many liberals dismiss any opposing argument as a conspiracy, lunacy, or idiocy. They do this for one reason, facts kill their position.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Wood
12:18 PM on 07/29/2011
Starting yesterday, the echo chamber was trumpeting Roy Spencer's newest research paper that claims NASA data inidcates significan­t amount of heat is not being trapped in the atmosphere­.

This is how this works.

Spencer is the scientist who did this research paper. He is affiliated with the Heartland Institute.

James Taylor, who works for Hearltand writes a blog on Forbes.com talking up Spencer's paper, which by the way is not peer reviewed yet.

Other web sites and blogs, particularly those that are "skeptics" or ideologica­lly stunted link up to this article and it gets lots of hits.

Pundits start talking the paper up. Spencer will go on Limbaugh, Beck and Fox.

Based on other research Spencer has been involved with,it is likely that his paper will get discredite­d, but it will only be noted on a few websites. Most people will never know the research was flawed.

Spencer, along with other industry friendly scientists such as Fred Singer, Willie Soon, Sallie Bailunas..etc do this routinely. Their "research" paper, op-ed or book will make a big splash thanks to the highly linked distribution system they have on the internet and the talking point pundits that look for content they can readily sell to their listeners. It doesn;t have to be right, so long as it spreads doubt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlbanyConservative
Always right!!
12:29 PM on 07/29/2011
You discredit his report because of the heartland institute.

Who funds the pro-global warming scientists. They have more to gain by their proving global warming is man-made. Most of their funding would dry up if their theories were proven wrong.

Al Gore Benefits financially from his global warming speeches and rhetoric, but everyone treats him like his opinions are gospel.

If you are going to disqualify skeptics because of their revenue sources, then you would have to disqaulify almost every pro climate change scientits as well.

don't be a hypocrite.
11:06 AM on 07/28/2011
Re: Climate Change And Forest Fires Linked In New Study -

As Global temperatures rise, Forest Fires will become more abundant due to lack of moisture exacerbating Climate Change. Environmentally speaking, Humanity is at a crossroads. Scientists have found Global Warming alters Oceanic Currents thus changing weather patterns. Natural occurring Forest Fires are one adverse result. Deforestation and Lack of EPA Enforcement are others. The exacerbation and convergence of systemic inherent problems are upsetting the balance of CO2 in the atmosphere. Excess Green House Gases, Atmospheric Pollutants and Rising Global Temperatures caused in part by man's inefficient use of Earth's finite natural energy resources must be stopped now if we are to forestall the advance of Global Warming.
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
02:25 AM on 07/28/2011
Flora, fauna (and pests) are already making their way up mountainsides and into higher lattitudes. If your in a forest bizone just above a savanna grassland landscape down in the valley, expect the trees to retreat and the savanna to encroach.
10:46 AM on 08/22/2011
True. Here in Canada there are many documented cases of the northward movement of species. Just like the scientists predicted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Baneblade
Subversive Individual
09:25 PM on 07/27/2011
If I post some study debunking this, will the Koch brothers just pay me, or is there an interview first?
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
01:37 AM on 07/28/2011
Only if you mention Al Gore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlbanyConservative
Always right!!
12:23 PM on 07/28/2011
It helps if you actually post factual date instead of unproven theories being passed off as facts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Wood
04:16 PM on 07/29/2011
Facts haven't stopped the Koch Brothers before. They are major contributors to George Mason Univeristy. The Wegman report that was presented by Joe Barton in congress was produced at George Mason and is an absolute joke.

http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2010/11/usa_today_reports_that_wegman.php
08:37 PM on 07/27/2011
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/3237261/abstract

Here is a study from 2009 that on the face contradicts this study. So much for 'consensus'

This from the abstract: "Despite increasing temperatures since the end of the Little Ice Age (ca. 1850), wildfire frequency has decreased as shown in many field studies from North America and Europe.....The simulation and fire history results suggest that the impact of global warming on northern forests through forest fires may not be disastrous and that, contrary to the expectation of an overall increase in forest fires, there may be large regions of the Northern Hemisphere with a reduced fire frequency."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brian Novotny
What happened to Democracy?
10:11 PM on 07/27/2011
Wrong, try this chart:

http://csfs.colostate.edu/pages/documents/COLORADOWILDFIRES_reprt_table_cb_000.pdf

In just one state they have increased significantly every decade since the 1960's, and I could go on and on.
08:33 PM on 07/27/2011
It would be nice to see a study that stuck to the actual data and trends rather than extrapolating from model simulations. Even so, the authors of this study says that their model “will not work once the increase in fires creates a fundamental change in the ecosystem. " Surprise surprise .... the Yellowstone ecosystem for one, has been fundamentally changed by the 1988 fires.
photo
Deep Thinking Man
Always Remember, A Wet Bird Never Flies At Night !
08:17 PM on 07/27/2011
James,
does this come as a surprise ???...i've known for years that this will happen; simply due to the exploitation, and the grees that comes with it. we must take care of the Earth !!!!!!
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
08:17 PM on 07/27/2011
More Eco-mania there are cycles in the forrest that happen and fire is part of it. Cycles such as Harleys and Sazukees. Cycles happen. Bicycles and unicycles two. The reason Yellowstone burned several years ago was because the forrest [sic] service was ordered (Against thier[sic] advice) to fight all fires as hard as they could. Firefighters should never fight fires as hard as they could. They cudn’t of helped none. What happened was that one year it got to big two fight. Too fight. Anyway, I listen to Rush Limbauph every day and that way I knows that I am not listnun too no slimey libruls.

Sincerely,

Edger the Giant Roach
10:23 AM on 08/22/2011
lol