iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Boehner Debt Plan Cuts $915 Billion From Deficit: CBO

Boehner

First Posted: 07/27/11 07:58 PM ET Updated: 09/26/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- One day after being rebuked for introducing a debt ceiling plan that fell short of the Tea Party's desired levels of cuts, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) announced a revised debt limit plan that would cut $22 billion in spending for the 2012 fiscal year, an attempt to win support from conservative members who said his previous plan did not go far enough.

The bill would reduce the deficit by $915 billion while raising the debt limit by $900 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office -- a balance that keeps with Boehner's vow to impose cuts that either match or exceed the debt ceiling hike.

A senior GOP aide said the Rules Committee is expected to take up Boehner's revised bill at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, after the House wraps up its votes.

Boehner drew heat for the CBO score on his previous plan, which would have raised the debt ceiling by a larger figure than it slashed in spending -- a non-negotiable to many Republicans. Tea Party groups and a number of members of his conference came out against the bill, saying it was too weak to be approved.

That plan would have shaved $1 billion from the deficit during the next fiscal year and $850 billion over the next decade, the CBO reported on Tuesday, a far cry from the $1 trillion in cuts over 10 years that were promised. After the CBO score was released, the leadership announced it would rewrite the bill to ensure it cut a larger amount than its debt ceiling increase.

The new bill, though, stands better chance of passage. Without Democratic votes, Boehner can lose 23 Republicans for his plan, which will see a vote later this week.

Some Republicans will likely continue to oppose the bill because of the way it handles the balanced budget amendment. Boehner's plan would require a vote on the amendment, but not passage, which some say throws too little weight behind what they see as the only path to fiscal responsibility.

"I just can't [support Boehner's plan], I want to do something better," Rep. Joe Walsh (R-Ill.) told HuffPost on Wednesday. "They are doing a really great job and trying to put something great out there, but my message is thanks, you guys, but we've already got something great out there. Let's push Cut, Cap and Balance."

Others, though, may be more likely to support the plan with larger cuts, particularly over a plan by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). The Reid plan would cut $2.2 trillion from the deficit over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office, but would raise the debt ceiling by nearly as much. Reid's plan also counted nearly $1 trillion in war costs, which Republicans say should not be considered savings.

The Republican leadership is cracking down on its membership, according to reports, and many privately say they expect the Boehner plan to pass.

"It's far from perfect, I call it 'Cut, Cap and Balance Light,' but it gets close enough for me," Rep. Lou Barletta (R-Pa.) told HuffPost of the Boehner plan. "Because if not this, than what?"

Beyond the $22 billion in 2012 fiscal year cuts, the Boehner bill would require Congress to draft proposals that cut at least $1.8 trillion from Medicare and Social Security. It would also make major cuts to Pell Grants, which help students attend college, and establish caps on discretionary spending until 2021.

First, though, the bill faces an uphill battle in the Senate and beyond, with Reid threatening to vote it down and President Barack Obama promising a veto.

Additional reporting by Jennifer Bendery

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- One day after being rebuked for introducing a debt ceiling plan that fell short of the Tea Party's desired levels of cuts, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) announced a revised debt li...
WASHINGTON -- One day after being rebuked for introducing a debt ceiling plan that fell short of the Tea Party's desired levels of cuts, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) announced a revised debt li...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 803
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
06:18 PM on 07/30/2011
Obama should perhaps let the country default and let the GOP take the blame... He needs to make a stand.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MarieB
07:18 PM on 07/28/2011
$915 billion vs President Obama's $4 trillion. Now please don't tell me that this grandstanding and delay is about raising the debt ceiling and isn't about ruining a president.
07:11 PM on 07/29/2011
Bingo!

Even if Reids proposal counts $1 trillion from war drawdowns and we through that out.
Based on CBO scoring: It's still $915 billion vs. $1.2 Trillion.

What it is is thus: They want the economy to crash so they can use that for 2012.
Also, Reid's plan cuts from things that they like.
photo
drwtsn
Could I please get an upgrade to a macro-bio?
05:47 PM on 07/28/2011
"Reid's plan also counted nearly $1 trillion in war costs, which Republicans say should not be considered savings."

This makes sense, since throughout the Bush years, they didn't consider war costs to be spending.
05:15 PM on 07/28/2011
Now America. Are you ready for term limits on congressmen ?
05:51 PM on 07/28/2011
They'd become even more rapacious, as their time horizon to loot us would be shorter. If we can't vote for and elect responsible individuals, then we get what we deserve. People get the government they deserve. As John Wayne supposedly said, life is hard, but it's harder when you're stupid.
09:26 PM on 07/28/2011
edwcorey,
You are right. People do not vote for the right reasons. The do not study the
candidates. As a result you get someone like Obama. I would be willing to
bet a dollar that most Blacks voted for Obama with no knowledge of the
man or his agenda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Garyatty10
Ignorance is a WMD
04:18 PM on 07/28/2011
Obama Offer 4 trillion in defict reduction

Reid Plan 202 trillion in deficit reduction

Boehner Plan 915 billion in deficit reduction.

Quote by Boehner:

House Speaker John Boehner said on Sunday that President Obama is "really not serious" about tackling America's deficit problem.

In an interview broadcast on CBS' "Face the Nation" Sunday, Boehner accused the president of failing to take "real action" on the deficit, saying it is time to "just deal with" the nation's economic problems.

Is the GOP a joke?
photo
santafesam
smart&snarky
05:48 PM on 07/28/2011
The kind of sick joke, that everyone is too embarrassed to laugh at..
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MarieB
07:14 PM on 07/28/2011
Mr Boehner's nose is growing.
photo
baxtron
tek phlarpt
03:21 PM on 07/28/2011
cut money and jobs during a recession. great plan. being stupid is easy.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dimplesmile7
03:11 PM on 07/28/2011
The republicans complained about how HRC was crammed down the american people throat. Yet, they are silent about how Boehner is trying to cram a debt ceiling plan on the people and the bill is lousy. Even his own members need arm twisting in order to go along with the plan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Izzymeister
Crush & Flush the GOP 2014 !!!!
03:09 PM on 07/28/2011
Has the GOP totally lost it? They are pushing a plan to gut social services and protect the rich and corporations from losing tax loopholes.

The plan is not going anywhere but gives ammo to the democratic party. It's is just an example of government masturbation.
photo
Littlewords
I think I am, therefore I am, I think?!?
03:02 PM on 07/28/2011
The fiscally conservative, natural position here to assure those to whom we owe money that we will in deed pay. However, the Righties have contorted this into their ruse to take down and thereby end or privatize SS and Medicare.

What has really changed this century? Why are we here? and how do we fix this?

What changed:
1) We're spending $600B per yr over 2000 levels for defense (every peer has cut theirs incl China). Top spending change in this century.

2) We continue two unfunded 21st century w@rs, hidden off the books by Repubs in congress and WH (moving onto the budget is painful with deficit spend pain and debt accountability). We never levied a w@r tax and instead, cut taxes to levels not seen in 60 yrs.

3) With W's 'no strings' attached to the mother of all bailouts. Rather than money used to to keep businesses afloat, the monies went to banker exec bonuses and derivative markets (creating/protecting no jobs), and as a result millions (who were paying taxes) lost their jobs and are now on unemployment doles.

To fix things, we must cut defense spending by $500B per year, levy a w@r tax to pay for our two w@rs (sorry but w@rs cost money), and we need to create jobs (implement business incentives to hire in USA and fund re-education programs) to move 8M folks (~5% of US workforce) from unemployment check collectors to income tax payers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VA Lady2008
01:52 PM on 07/28/2011
Last week, the at least sometimes formerly reasonable David Brooks op-ed' in the NYT that it might be reasonable to choose death, instead of life. He then went on to suggest that one of the reasons America is broke is because too many old people are living too long,. He then went yet one step further when he penned, " Obviously, we are never going to cut off Alzheimer’s patients and leave them out on a hillside. We are never coercively going to give up on the old and ailing. But it is hard to see us reducing health care inflation seriously unless people and their families are willing to do what Clendinen is doing — confront death and their obligations to the living. "

We already know that he's ginned up this argument to support gutting social services, and that absent these services, this is EXACTLY what the GOP intends to do to those it finds inconvenient: leave us to die on a hillside, in agony (drugs are bad, so let us scream), our families exhausted and bankrupted by the real work (something he might know, if at all, from some 19th century novel in praise of capitalism) of caring for the dead and dying.

People like him don't have to do the real work. Nor do they contribute their fair share toward keeping the country running.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pakaal
Pigs, in cages, on antibiotics
02:52 PM on 07/28/2011
That's so creepy I had to check to see if it was true. Even creepier that it was true--Brooks is actually blaming elderly and infirm for our nation's economic problems. Absolutely astonishing. Of course he never mentions the idea of taking health care insurance out of the hands of the vultures making a mint off America, oh no, we can't have that, instead, our elderly should be a little more willing to die a little younger.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/opinion/15brooks.html?_r=2&emc=tnt&tntemail1=y
photo
santafesam
smart&snarky
05:53 PM on 07/28/2011
Turned my stomach. Is this who we are becoming?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Garyatty10
Ignorance is a WMD
05:04 PM on 07/28/2011
Who was that screaming death panels during the healthcare debate?
photo
steama
just a common rock
01:42 PM on 07/28/2011
The entire GOP is ill.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dimplesmile7
01:41 PM on 07/28/2011
The debt ceiling is a tea party invented crisis to avoid job creation and the economy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
James Sunshine
03:02 PM on 07/28/2011
nah. just to screw over obama
doctorzap
Lies to the left of me, jokers to the right...
01:37 PM on 07/28/2011
"It's far from perfect, I call it 'Cut, Cap and Balance Light,' but it gets close enough for me," Rep. Lou Barletta (R-Pa.) told HuffPost of the Boehner plan. "Because if not this, than what?"

I'd call it, 'Cut the Crap and Turn Out the Lights'. As to what other solution might work. I call it, Solution 14. Let Obama finally do what's in the best interest of the country and ignore the Teagressives.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lwilkerson50
01:31 PM on 07/28/2011
I want to know how much is being cut from the congressional budget.
I believe even if they serve one four year term they get health benefits for life.
Their SocSec doesn't get hurt like ours.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kiranitisme
Politics
01:24 PM on 07/28/2011
So to pay for the war in Iraq and hefty tax cuts to millionaires and billionaires, they want to cut $1.8 trillion from Social Security, Medicare and Pell Grants for students.