iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Natural Gas: Arkansas Commission Votes To Shut Down Wells

07/27/11 08:19 PM ET   AP

EL DORADO, Ark. -- The Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission on Wednesday voted to ban wells for the disposal of natural gas drilling fluids from a region where hundreds of earthquakes have struck, a move officials said was necessary to prevent a potential catastrophe.

Commissioners voted 6-0 to close a disposal well between Greenbrier and Enola in the Fayetteville Shale, an area rich in natural gas that stretches across the state. The commission also voted 7-0 to issue a moratorium on new disposal wells in a 1,150-square-mile segment of the shale in central Arkansas north of Conway, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported.

Three other disposal wells in that area have already been closed by their operators.

The moratorium would not affect the drilling of natural gas wells, but it changes how fluids from the process are disposed.

Gas companies have tapped reserves of natural gas in the Fayetteville Shale by injecting water and chemicals under high pressure to fracture the shale, a process known as fracking. The fluids that emerge in the process have the potential to taint rivers and drinking water.

Separate disposal wells are used by drillers to dump the fluids.

With a moratorium, companies would have to truck the fluids to injection wells elsewhere in Arkansas or in Oklahoma or Texas, Commission Deputy Director Shane Khoury told The Associated Press after Wednesday's vote. About 730 disposal wells are active in the state, he said.

The commission pinpointed four wells in central Arkansas that it said needed to be closed to prevent earthquakes. Those wells are near a fault system that has spawned dozens of earthquakes this year. A magnitude-4.7 earthquake in February near Greenbrier was the most powerful to hit the state in 35 years.

After two of the four stopped operating in March, there was a sharp decline in the number of earthquakes. In the 18 days before the shutdown, there were 85 quakes with a magnitude 2.5 or greater, but there were only 20 in the 18 days following the shutdown, according to the state Geological Survey.

The fault system was discovered after the state allowed operators to drill the four wells, Khoury said.

"Bottom line is had we known that the fault system existed ... we would never have permitted the well in the first place," Khoury said.

The last well still operating belonged to Deep-Six Water Disposal Services, a subsidiary of Oklahoma City-based Hurst Oil Investments Inc. Deep-Six contended its well did not have an effect on seismic activity nearby.

A company representative declined comment Wednesday. But an expert who testified at the commission's hearing said tiny earthquakes near the well did not have a proven link to the well, the Democrat-Gazette reported.

Haydar al-Shukri, director of the Arkansas Earthquake Center at the University of Arkansas-Little Rock, testified Wednesday that his testing recorded nearly 10,000 small seismic events near the Deep-Six well. Most were too small for humans to notice.

Only 280 of those seismic events happened within three miles of the well, a sign that the well wasn't the cause of most of them, al-Shukri said.

But Commissioner Mike Davis said the commission had to act to close the well after hearing two days of testimony.

"Our first and foremost obligation is to the safety of the citizens of the state of Arkansas," Davis said, according to the Democrat-Gazette.

Commission director Lawrence Bengal said the Deep-Six well was within the "geologic fabric" of the region and could contribute to earthquakes near Guy and Greenbrier even if the well was several miles from the fault.

Khoury told the AP the well would likely close within three to five business days.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

EL DORADO, Ark. -- The Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission on Wednesday voted to ban wells for the disposal of natural gas drilling fluids from a region where hundreds of earthquakes have struck, a move o...
EL DORADO, Ark. -- The Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission on Wednesday voted to ban wells for the disposal of natural gas drilling fluids from a region where hundreds of earthquakes have struck, a move o...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
08:12 AM on 08/28/2011
To be fair, I don't think studying earthquakes for a couple months can provide conclusive evidence that the wells caused the earthquakes. We need good science, not jumping to conclusions. However, extractive activities are generally harmful for soil and water contamination. But knee jerk reactions do not help in careful consideration.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:12 PM on 08/15/2011
Chemically tag all wells so we can trace the pollution back to the polluters. That will change things fast. Let's give corporate persons some responsibility.
06:42 AM on 08/16/2011
Believe it or not that is a common oil field practice. Your "irresponsible" people want to know where these fluids and propants are going. Any time they they do not go into the target zone, that is lost opportunity, increased cost and reduced profit.

So do you really think the industry just goes around finding opportunities to waste money and create financial responsibility for restoration?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:03 PM on 08/16/2011
No it is not common, and the oil extractors resist all attempts to make it common.

Big business is always looking to cut corner to save money. Stop being naive.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DemFem
02:50 AM on 08/10/2011
One by one the states will realize that the contaminated ground water left in the wake of the fracking process is a very dangerous thing, indeed. After all, even politicians have to drink water sometime.
08:45 AM on 07/30/2011
"a move officials said was necessary to prevent a potential catastrophe."

Ludicrous. Apparently the Commission watched the Bond movie "Moonraker"

"After two of the four stopped operating in March, there was a sharp decline in the number of earthquakes. In the 18 days before the shutdown, there were 85 quakes with a magnitude 2.5 or greater, but there were only 20 in the 18 days following the shutdown, according to the state Geological Survey."

The CERI data shows that the Survey cherry-picked data. Frequency of 'quakes did not decline for nearly 2 months.

"Haydar al-Shukri, director of the Arkansas Earthquake Center at the University of Arkansas-Little Rock, testified Wednesday that his testing recorded nearly 10,000 small seismic events near the Deep-Six well. Most were too small for humans to notice.

Only 280 of those seismic events happened within three miles of the well, a sign that the well wasn't the cause of most of them, al-Shukri said."

Please do not confuse me with facts.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:10 PM on 08/15/2011
Fracking causes earthquakes. Well documented and researched. Most of the evidence comes from geothermal fracking, but it's the same process. So, unlike you, they knew the physics and realized it was a problem.
06:36 AM on 08/16/2011
And what, pray, was the scientist from Ceri saying? He could not find evidence that all the microseismic events he recorded could be reliably related to the injection (Yes injection; not fracking) wells due to their distance - most of them more than 3 miles distant from that well.

And if you had followed this story you would have known that the Arkansas Geologic Survey categorically denied that the many frac jobs in and arround the Guy and Greenbrier swarm were UNRELATED.

When microseismic studies can routinely relate earth seismic activity responding to "fraccing" you have a "prima facie" case. Up until present, there have been some anecdotal evidence of geoseismic activity coincident with oil and geothermal field practices in normally seismicaly active areas, you example included.

Cooling batholiths are natural loci for earthquakes as the earth is adjusting to that very cooling
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:14 PM on 08/16/2011
There is a fault there. Thus leaks and earthquakes. Deal with it.
11:32 PM on 08/16/2011
I suggest you try a least provide some evidence for that assertion. The Arkansas GS did not other than your statement. There are earthquakes on volcanoes but not necessarily faults!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
06:40 PM on 07/28/2011
How many natural gas wells did they shut down? Or is this just ______!
01:20 PM on 07/28/2011
730 active so called disposal wells pumping toxic waste into the ground just in Arkansas. Shutting down three is not even a slap on the wrist to drillers.

Risking contamination of water supplies for the cheaper disposal method should be criminal.

Deleting this comment again despite no violation of the comment policy may fall into that category too. What gives?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
12:42 PM on 07/28/2011
my 1st thought is how long will it take for the gas companies to challenge this decision and get a judge to rule in their favor to reverse this decision?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
eyelashviper
In wilderness is the preservation of the world
11:59 AM on 07/28/2011
Injecting toxic fluids into "disposal wells" is a nightmare in the making....out of sight, out of mind, is not good environmental policy.
Injections wells are also used to "dispose" of semi-treated sewage, a practice still carried out in Miami-Dade County in Florida, though those wells have been leaking into the Florida Aquifer for almost 2 decades.
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
01:48 AM on 07/29/2011
We could do what the State of PA used to do - send it to local waste-treatment plants, then let it run off into the rivers and streams... It is one of the realities of living in an industrialized age - most of the things we use every day were manufactured, and that takes industrial processes that, whether we like it or not, means using chemicals you wouldn't want to be around. Plastics, metals, clothing, cleaners; even our fuel supply is toxic. WInd-turbine prouduction uses both plastics and steel - dirty processes. Solar cells are filthy. Hybrid-car batteries? So filthy, let's not even go there - be glad most of it is done in China (out of sight, out of mind) or our healthcare costs would skyrocket due to all the Libs having strokes... Nuclear, while non-air polluting and dangerous in some cases, has waste so toxic we have in the past looked into ways of literally kicking it off the planet and sending it into the sun! All we can do is trust in technology and try to do things as cleanly and safely as we can. Do you know a better way?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lambdin1
What's this?
11:37 AM on 07/28/2011
Money and greed is the only thing that gas and oil are interested in. It took guts to shut them down. The commision should be comended for its fortitude. Cause and effect can be a big player in closing down alot of this nonsense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
personal beliefs
Things never go according to plan, so plan accordi
11:51 AM on 07/28/2011
they weren't shut down. Read the article.
10:03 AM on 07/28/2011
This is a step in the right direction but it isn't enough. I'd like to know where all of the disposal wells are because I live here but trying to get an accurate map of that isn't that easy....

Anyone know where to get a map of disposal wells in AR?
10:12 AM on 07/28/2011
It's probably NOT a step in the right direction, not really.

The Commission didn't shut down the disposal wells because it's a bad idea to do fracking, or a bad idea to pump the contaminated waste water into the ground. (That's all a bad idea, though.)

They did it because the drilling appeared to destabilize the existing faults that cause earthquakes in the area.
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
02:31 AM on 07/28/2011
Smart. Don't pump fluids into active fault zones. It's been known for years that injected fluids could lubricate faults. Like the official said, if they had known, they would not have allowed disposal wells to be put there. Just drill them in another area - simple enough.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdjay
09:40 AM on 07/28/2011
Hey man, hope you are well. Pretty wild stuff in Arkansas. I was just curious to find out what standard procedures they use in PA with disposal wells. I know they take a lot of the wastewater to treatment facilities but can you give an estimate on how many (if any) disposal wells are in PA? How do they go about deciding where to drill these disposal wells or are they just using old and abandoned wells as disposal wells?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
personal beliefs
Things never go according to plan, so plan accordi
10:26 AM on 07/28/2011
The PA oil and gas commission will have the info you seek. They are typically abandoned wells or science wells.
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
01:37 AM on 07/29/2011
Very few, JD. State of PA DEQ was not allowing gas producers up until a few months ago to use disposal wells - they were literally forcing the gas companies to take their industrial-grade waste (waste you might find in a solar-panel manufacturing plant, for example) to local water-treatment plants. As I've said before, most local plants have trouble getting a cup of Tide out of the water, let alone industrial waste. The "treated" water was then run off into local rivers, as is the practice all over the US for treated effluent (what else can you do with it?). Now PA has changed that rule, at the request of many gas producers who told them how insane it was, and are now transporting waste out of state to disposal wells mainly in Ohio and some in W. Va. They may be drilling some new disposal wells in PA as well.
12:12 AM on 07/28/2011
No gas wells are being shut-down. Headline is wrong.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:41 PM on 07/27/2011
"With a moratorium, companies would have to truck the fluids to injection wells elsewhere in Arkansas or in Oklahoma or Texas, Commission Deputy Director Shane Khoury told The Associated Press after Wednesday's vote. About 730 disposal wells are active in the state, he said."

Another misleading lede by HP and obfuscation of facts by AP.