iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Fracking: EPA Targets Air Pollution From Natural Gas Drilling Boom

Fracking

By DINA CAPPIELLO   07/28/11 05:52 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- Faced with a natural gas drilling boom that has sullied the air in some parts of the country, the Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday proposed for the first time to control air pollution at oil and gas wells, particularly those drilled using a method called hydraulic fracturing.

The proposal, issued to meet a court deadline, addresses air pollution problems reported in places such as Wyoming, Texas, Pennsylvania and Colorado, where new drilling techniques have led to a rush to obtain natural gas that was once considered inaccessible. More than 25,000 wells are being drilled each year by "fracking," a process by which sand, water and chemicals are injected underground to fracture rock so gas can come out.

The proposed regulations are designed to eliminate most releases of smog- and soot-forming pollutants from those wells. New controls on storage tanks, transmission pipelines and other equipment – at both oil and gas drilling sites on land – would reduce by a quarter amounts of cancer-causing air pollution and methane, the main ingredient in natural gas, but also one of the most powerful contributors to global warming.

The rules, according to the EPA, actually would save energy companies about $30 million a year because the companies could sell the gas they are forced to collect.

EPA Assistant Administrator Gina McCarthy said the steps announced Thursday will help ensure "responsible production" of domestic energy. The agency is also in the process of studying whether hydraulic fracturing is polluting water, research that also could lead to more regulations on the practice.

In March, pollution from natural gas drilling in the Upper Green River Basin in western Wyoming triggered levels of ground-level ozone, the main ingredient in smog, worse than those recorded in Los Angeles, one of the smoggiest cities in the U.S.

In Dish, Texas, a rural town northwest of Dallas, the state's environmental regulators detected levels of cancer-causing benzene, sometimes at levels dangerous to human health, likely coming from industry's 60 drilling wells, gas production pads and rigs, a treating facility and compressor station.

At the same time, a state study in Pennsylvania of air quality near Marcellus Shale drilling sites in four counties found no emissions at levels that would threaten the health of nearby residents or workers.

The gases escape into the atmosphere during drilling, from storage tanks, compressors along pipelines and other equipment. Until now, the EPA has mainly controlled pollution from natural gas processing plants. States have started to crack down on some emissions from well sites, and industry has voluntarily taken steps to reduce pollution.

The American Petroleum Institute, the main lobbying arm of the industry, pressed the agency to push back by six months its February 2012 deadline for finalizing the rules.

Environmental groups, who sued in 2009 to force the EPA to act, said the action Thursday was already overdue.

"Solutions for clearing the air mean keeping more product in the pipelines," said Jeremy Nichols of WildEarth Guardians, an advocacy group.

___

Follow Dina Cappiello on Twitter: (at)dinacappiello

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- Faced with a natural gas drilling boom that has sullied the air in some parts of the country, the Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday proposed for the first time to control air p...
WASHINGTON -- Faced with a natural gas drilling boom that has sullied the air in some parts of the country, the Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday proposed for the first time to control air p...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 71
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:02 PM on 09/05/2011
Not sure how to get this story out so posting it on this one. Montana will now require fracking companies to list the ingredients. Maybe someone more savvy with HP can bring it to their attention.

http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/article_a24da6c8-d561-11e0-b17d-001cc4c002e0.html?mode=story
01:48 PM on 07/31/2011
Here in the once beautiful state of Pennsylvania our government officials are all spouting talking points obviously culled from ALEC starting with the Ur-myth that there has been no water pollution from hydraulic fracturing. The PA DEP is also hamstrung by weak regulation and inadequate staffing and budget. It is clear then that the EPA's rules do not duplicate the state's. And what if they do? The companies may have to hire another lawyer, now we're creating jobs!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
knott wrench
11:29 PM on 07/30/2011
The EPA is trying to do its job.

As USUAL the only problem will be the "Hydraheaded GOP Monster" in Congress, beholding to:

Dave and Chickie Koch (Bros.).
10:43 AM on 07/29/2011
About Time !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Republican No More
I would like to nominate my dog...she's smarter...
04:09 AM on 07/29/2011
If it is amazing what the money barons will do right in front of us, its truly frightening what they might be doing where we can't see... underground--in the oceans, when we get a glimpse we are horrified... can you imagine the damage without the EPA? We should take a real good look at what's going on here... how many times have we found out there really was nothing to worry about...almost never, how many times are we shocked by what's going on...almost always..
02:00 PM on 07/29/2011
Look at the unemployment rate and you will see how good regulations are working. Than check out how much oil we import. Enjoy the $3.50+ gas and near record energy and food prices.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Republican No More
I would like to nominate my dog...she's smarter...
07:23 PM on 07/29/2011
I have always wondered why keeping people safe costs jobs...I don't see that. I do enjoy safe food and clean water.. I won't give that up for someone to have a job or to make a corporation more money... the air is much better these days, too...more cars, better air.. watch what happens with the Chinese when the people realize that their environment is killing them... that'll slow them down too...just like it did us, oops, maybe not... their grid will be better, their roads better, more renewables... the 21st century.. maybe we can make their tennis shoes for $ 10 a day... ya that'll fix the unemployment rate...Ooohh, I forgot that pesky minimum wage..who has to get paid off to get rid of that one?? Maybe those SCOTUS guys can help..Don't we know Clarence's wife? Someone should talk to her I bet she can help.. Nothing will happen if the debt limit isn't raised either... Many oceanographers are already predicting the decline of sea life will likely wipe most of us out within the next 100-150 years anyway.. let's dump a bunch of oil in there and chase it with nearly as much toxic chemicals... Better regulation, not less...
02:01 AM on 07/29/2011
We've recently dumped $350M into geothermal energy projects - where's the "fracking" outrage with supporting this process? Has anyone paid attention to the environmental hazards of GEOTHERMAL energy production? VERY LITTLE DIFFERENCE........Fracking is fracking - AND the "green mercenaries" behind this "clean" energy production have decided IT'S FINE to create earthquakes in areas of geothermal energy plants as long as they keep them below "5" on the Richter scale......Really? I wonder how many of those same green mercenaries live anywhere NEAR a geothermal plant? Be informed America - they've got plans to put these plants all over the country. Switzerland's fiasco with this problematic process is just one example of the potential trouble:
http://thinkgeoenergy.com/archives/3199
http://spectrum.ieee.org/green-tech/geothermal-and-tidal/earthquakes-hinder-green-energy-plans
http://www.geothermal.org/Obama350Mill.pdf
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/pdfs/egs-is-protocol-final-draft-20110531.pdf
http://www.eere.energy.gov/golden/ReadingRoom/NEPA/1733/Appendix_I-Report_on_Induced_Seismicity.pdf
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
02:05 AM on 07/29/2011
What's funny about that is that geothermal is commonly found in tectonically-active areas, which, in another HP article, is what got the drilling of disposal wells in Arkansas banned recently!
02:12 AM on 07/29/2011
The reality is - We don't know what the heck we're doing when it comes to ANY of this technology. High-level science in this country has failed us - and we need to focus energy dollars on NEW, NON-DESTRUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY. Solar and wind are about as good as it gets right now.......
g9
conservation ,Your grandchildrens future
01:55 AM on 07/29/2011
o' do not forget the related earthquakes in w. Penna.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
11:32 PM on 07/28/2011
Is it just me! I'm sorry - but would someone tell the gentleman in the picture how ridiculous he looks!
His driver license picture could not look that bad!
g9
conservation ,Your grandchildrens future
01:32 AM on 07/29/2011
no frackin way
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
09:44 PM on 07/28/2011
Nice hat. Easy to tell it's not a bagger; it's spelled correctly!
01:15 AM on 07/29/2011
What exactly is a "bagger"?
g9
conservation ,Your grandchildrens future
01:37 AM on 07/29/2011
most people know them as R.I.N.O.'s
they are seditionst & should be put on a rail...add tar...some feathers & get rid of them before they ruin AMERICA ....A GOP'r should be ashamed to oun one
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
02:18 AM on 07/29/2011
They are Republicans that use "teabags", presumably for tea? Similar to the Liberals who drink 'Kool-Aid"... They drink alot of Kool-Aid...
07:38 PM on 07/28/2011
Doesn't the hydraulic fracturing process do more damage than atmospheric? I seem to recall that the process seems to be contraindicated on other levels as well. Are these proposed regulations enough? Is a 25 percent reduction in cancer causing agents a regulation that we can live with? Possibly, the proponents of this hurried plan would be more convincing if they too would live in the vicinity of a site or visit and have a drink from the tap. Despite the potential liberation from oil dependence this process can be the risks associated are just not worth it.
g9
conservation ,Your grandchildrens future
01:44 AM on 07/29/2011
instead of 50 Gal. of "cancer causing agents" we only introduce 12.5 gal's ....Please not under my familys well..
The answer may be finding ways to use / need less energy....One child per couple would be a great start...( that is world wide) by 2112 +/- there would be 1 billions mouthes +/- on earth....ample amount to feed & support
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
02:10 AM on 07/29/2011
I just read an interesting article in Offshore magazine - there is a new biodegradable fracturing fluid on the market. It may not be right for all applications - will have to see.
photo
Difster
Government prefers its slaves to be unarmed.
06:21 PM on 07/28/2011
Hey people. You can all relax now. It looks like NASA has just put the kabosh on your whole charade. Alarmist global warming models are so far away from reality that they're simply invalid.

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Dood
06:28 PM on 07/28/2011
"James M. Taylor is senior fellow for environment policy at The Heartland Institute"
"In the 1990s, the group worked with the tobacco company Philip Morris to question the science linking secondhand smoke to health risks, and to lobby against government public health reforms.
"The Heartland Institute questions the scientific consensus on climate change, arguing that global warming is not occurring and, further, that warming would be beneficial if it did occur.

Yup...sounds like a certainly unbiased assessment of the data...NOT
photo
Difster
Government prefers its slaves to be unarmed.
06:42 PM on 07/28/2011
Taylor wrote the article, he didn't do the research.

The research was done based off of NASA data and performed at the University of Alabama, Huntsville by Dr. Roy Spencer. The data was published in a peer reviewed journal.

All you're doing here is shooting the messenger. Wanna try again?
02:16 AM on 07/29/2011
Smoking is freakin' NASTY......NOT a smoker here......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Fanney
Scribbler
05:47 PM on 07/28/2011
It's probable that we'll need to keep most of the frack-able oil and gas in the ground if we are to avoid the effects of catastrophic climate change. The EPA will need to regulate carbon in order to take these steps.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
05:52 PM on 07/28/2011
It's too late. We have already screwed the pooch. There is absolutely nothing we can do to avoid the effects of catastrophic climate change. It is going to happen. In 200 years London will be under 6 feet of water (according to climate change scientists). There is absolutely no reason to regulate "carbon."
photo
Difster
Government prefers its slaves to be unarmed.
06:22 PM on 07/28/2011
You can take a breather now, NASA just put your theory out to pasture. http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
06:28 PM on 07/28/2011
You may have to re-think that conclusion.

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html

seems a lot more heat is escaping than the scientist first thought.

I always said our best climatologist are equal in skill to an early 19th century doctor. They may be bleeding us to cure pneumonia.

They have to consider a lot of variables! That being said they are the only game in town. Just wish they would cut the politicization of the science.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
05:55 PM on 07/28/2011
We need to work on improving our environment. We need to get off of crude oil 40 years ago. We chose not to. We had every alternative energy then as we do now. Let's not go off trying to cure something that can't be fixed when we can be doing something about the polluting we do.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SoapboxKing
05:19 PM on 07/28/2011
After they are done in your area, you too, will be able to set your water facet on fire.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
05:23 PM on 07/28/2011
I would then go to the tractor/farm supply store and buy a liquid/gas separator and hook it up in my yard. I would run a generator off of this gas and say goodbye to the electric company. If there was enough gas, maybe I could add a gas furnace, gas stove, gas dryer, even a gas A/C.
g9
conservation ,Your grandchildrens future
01:49 AM on 07/29/2011
they make a great gas refridge...I installed one in the mid 60's ...still works
photo
Peter Sharma III
See clean energy's future Google revolutionswind
12:10 PM on 07/29/2011
@WESmith Kudos 4 your sheer commitment 2 #MarketEconomy, failed though the unregulated market is, especially in terms of service 2 society's whole.

What a lovely, misguided though optimistic lemonade from lemons response. If I misread you, let me know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
05:03 PM on 07/28/2011
Fracking is not a method of drilling any type of well. It is obvious that the author doesn't know his annulus from a hole in the ground.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
05:11 PM on 07/28/2011
All wells are drilled in exactly the same manner, including water wells. There is a surface casing that must be put in to protect the water aquifers (except water wells). The States are suppose to inspect these wells just like an inspector does a new building. All wells are completed in the same manner, except maybe water wells. It is only after completing a well is a service company brought in to hydraulically fracture the well. We need to be against all wells or none. Just picking on certain ones due to a political agenda is just that politics.
11:13 PM on 07/28/2011
You're off base. With 50+/- chemicals (including outlawed diesel fuel) in fracking fluids, many of which are known carcinogens, and the horizontal drilling techniques used in todays Hydrofracking, which can extend 1500 - 5000 feet sideways, there is a real possibility natural gas can escape the shale layers and permiate upwards into the drinking water tables. Surface spills of the used fracking fluids adds to the problems associated with hydrofracking, among the issues brought up by the above article. ...just saying
photo
Peter Sharma III
See clean energy's future Google revolutionswind
12:18 PM on 07/29/2011
@WESmith Pumping diesel fuel into the ground, (500,000G in upstate New York in 2010) at a cost greater than the resource extracted and using accounting games to then take a tax-loss on each well while selling of that which is recovered, thereby gaining an actual cash subsidy by gaming the federal and state energy exploration credits regimen is unacceptable fiscally, forgetting alone environmental objections!

COmparing fracking to subsistence water-wells is an absurd dodge.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Js420
Another beautiful sunny day!
04:44 PM on 07/28/2011
C'mon people who live in these states. How can you keep letting these companies do this in your backyard?!
04:57 PM on 07/28/2011
Tax and regulate
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
05:05 PM on 07/28/2011
That's why the government is for this. Our government owns the natural gas and will make a lot of money leasing, collecting royalties and tariffs and then taxing the customers.
08:24 PM on 07/28/2011
JS420: It's an uphill battle and especially discouraging for me since I get physically ill from the pollution. When our Democratic Governor recently defended the use of fracking in Colorado, my husband and I pretty much gave up the fight . . .

but we still do our own thing, like having the only push reel (green) mower in the neighborhood :0)