iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Big Oil Companies Post Huge Profits On High Gas Prices

Oil Gusher

First Posted: 07/29/11 04:10 PM ET Updated: 09/28/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The sputtering economy, high unemployment rate and punishing gas prices are taking a huge toll on average Americans, but at least somebody is doing well: The Big Five oil companies this week announced they had made a whopping $36 billion in profits in the second quarter of 2011.

According to second-quarter earnings reports, ExxonMobil alone made $10.7 billion in the most recent three months. That's a 41 percent increase over the same period last year and a 161 percent increase over 2009.

Shell nearly doubled its profits year over year, taking in $8.7 billion in the second quarter. Chevron's profits were $7.7 billion, up 43 percent. BP earned $5.6 billion, a far cry from its $17.2 billion loss a year ago. Only Conoco Philips, with $3.4 billion in earnings, posted smaller profits than a year ago, dropping 18 percent due to the jettisoning of some Russian assets.

A good chunk of these profits is coming right out the pockets of the American public, thanks in part to astronomical gas prices and to $4 billion to $8 billion a year in deficit-increasing tax subsidies that oil companies continue to get, long after the incentives those subsidies were designed to create ceased to make economic sense.

Rather than invest their profits in such things as product development, new facilities, hot talent or research -- things that could create jobs, improve consumer offerings and accelerate alternative energy production -- three of the five big oil companies are spending large amounts of that money buying back shares of their own stock.

Exxon spent $5.5 billion -- or more than half of its total profits -- to buy back its own stock in the second quarter; Chevron spent $1 billion, or 13 percent of its profits; and Conoco spent $3.1 billion -- or 91 percent of its profits. The numbers were similar last quarter.

"What this means is these companies see their profits as a way of managing their stock price, rather than investing money in the future of their own companies and the future of the economy," said William Lazonick, a professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell.

Executives say stock buybacks reflect confidence in the future of their companies, sending a signal they think their stock is undervalued. Indeed, buybacks are almost guaranteed to send stock prices up by boosting earnings per outstanding share and increasing the demand.

But buybacks are also a self-serving way for management to spend the company's earnings, Lazonick said. Top executives reap benefits from the exercise of stock options -- and if stock prices don't go up, those options are worthless.

"Buybacks and stock options are the yin and yang of corporate executives," Lazonick said. "They spend the company's money to buy back stock and send up stock prices -- and they're one of the biggest beneficiaries of it. But everyone else loses."

The companies are only halfway through what could be a record year for oil profits. At this rate ExxonMobil, for example, will clear almost $43 billion in profits in 2011, just shy of its 2008 record of $45 billion -- the last time there was a huge spike in oil prices.

Democrats have tried, with only limited success, to make political hay of the fact that oil companies are doing so well, while consumers are doing poorly and policymakers are feverishly looking for ways to cut the deficit.

"America is swimming in debt, and oil companies are swimming in profits, yet Republicans continue to defend giving these companies special tax breaks that could help reduce the deficit if they were repealed," said Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) in a statement Thursday. "Instead of asking seniors for a cut in Medicare or Social Security, it's time for the oil companies to do their part and contribute to solving our debt crisis."

But one reason Markey and others have made so little headway is that the oil and gas industry is enormously powerful on Capitol Hill, spending over $1 billion in lobbying since 1998, according to opensecrets.org.

And the Big Five oil companies have already spent $75 million in lobbying just through first half of this year. That seems like a lot, until one considers that it amounts to about one-tenth of 1 percent of their profits.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The sputtering economy, high unemployment rate and punishing gas prices are taking a huge toll on average Americans, but at least somebody is doing well: The Big Five oil companies this ...
WASHINGTON -- The sputtering economy, high unemployment rate and punishing gas prices are taking a huge toll on average Americans, but at least somebody is doing well: The Big Five oil companies this ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,591
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (73 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BPorter51
11:55 PM on 08/04/2011
I think it's a waste of time to agonize over the oil companies, refineries, and their earnings/profits. Several people mentioned that the price we are paying at the pump is, in large part, taxes. You may also pay taxes on electricity that is produced by power plants. There are 2 points I'd like to make - #1, taxes on gasoline and electricity hurt the poor, working-class, and middle class more than the wealthy; and #2, there is no reason why such an advanced country as ours supposedly is, cannot develop AFFORDABLE alternatives to oil. Brazil is fossil fuel free. They grow and process their own "gas" - sugar cane. As long as US "leadership" continues to take care of it's base (corporations, including oil companies), and ignore the rest of us, we will not see alternative fuels replacing oil.
photo
RobertRapier
Pure energy
09:28 PM on 08/06/2011
"Brazil is fossil fuel free."

Brazil is not remotely fossil free. Brazil is a major and growing producer of oil, and consume most of what they produce. This is a very common misconception. In fact, oil consumption per person in Brazil is 10 times ethanol consumption in Brazil. You can flip through my slides from the 2008 ASPO conference to see the data for yourself:

http://www.consumerenergyreport.com/2008/09/26/my-aspo-slides-are-available/

That isn't to say that Brazil hasn't done a good job. They have. But the biggest difference between us and them is that we use over 20 barrels of oil per person per year and they use 4.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BPorter51
11:34 PM on 08/06/2011
Thanks for correcting my sweeping generalization about Brazil. (that will teach me to do better fact-checking!) I did look at your slides and found them balanced and informative. I think what I was trying to get at from an environmental perspective, is that in the US we are not doing enough R & D and production of affordable alternatives to oil as an energy source. There is a finite amount of crude oil on our fragile planet, and we are spoiled and complacent. My political perspective remains unchanged. Thank you again for taking the time to share your research.
04:33 PM on 08/02/2011
It's so funny how wrong this article is.

The article is based on quarterly earnings reports, EARNINGS reports, NOT profit reports. For those of you who can't speaka de accounting, Earnings do not equal Profits! ExxonMobil could "earn" a trillion dollars, and yet still go bankrupt if they have too many liabilities. Let this be a lesson, don't ever expect straight reporting on oil firms from this "news" site.
photo
subcon
caution: snark ahead, proceed w/ reckless abandon.
11:12 AM on 08/04/2011
agreed .. I hate it when reporters, etc. mix the two up.
11:18 AM on 08/01/2011
Gas business should be government controlled.
baej
They call us "right" for a reason
09:20 AM on 08/01/2011
My husband and I have some oil stocks. They pay great dividends. Everyone should buy some. They are for sale to the public. Merrill-Lynch can handle that for you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:09 AM on 08/01/2011
And how many outsource jobs to foreign countries ?
photo
RobertRapier
Pure energy
04:16 AM on 08/01/2011
Mr. Froomkin, you are a fountain of misinformation, and it is exactly this sort of misinformation that leads to our dysfunctional energy policies. I just posted a response to the many misleading claims in this comically biased article, as well as to numerous incorrect comments from readers following the article:

http://www.consumerenergyreport.com/2011/08/01/tis-the-season-for-oil-company-misinformation/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Barron
11:55 PM on 07/31/2011
I cannot find the number of stocks outstanding but lets say it is between 3-6 billion,maybe more. They have made over 5 billion on this buy back plus $ 10/share on the stocks they own, and guess they possess 3 billion shares held by the company;think of that profit on all those shares that have increased $10/share.If a $2 dividend is paid for the $5 billion remaining that gives us at least 2 billion shares for shareholders whoever they may be.$90/share,if Exon has 2-3 billion shares gives them an amount close to $300,000,000,000 in value. I am guessing in the lower ranges.But if the upcoming dividend is .47 cents/share this divided into $5,000,000,000 gives over 1 trillion shares which seems improbable???!!! 3 billion shares divided into $5 billion gives $I.70/share which is close enough on "msn money".On "Daily Finance" the dividend is .47 cents.If the numbers are anywhere close then go figure but this is a guess.If my figures are wrong then I am in great error.However Exon does not have to declare a dividend and remember their expenses are in the billions and billions of dollars.
The buy back is interesting and implies that they are solid in the market.I wonder how much cash on hand to buy all their stocks if a great fall.I hope I have my figures right.
I certainly believe they own the automotive industry.
11:18 PM on 07/31/2011
F yes the oil companies are booming they're charging 3.50-4.00 bucks a gallon. F the oil companies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OilFieldGuy101
Support the needy, Oppose the lazy
12:10 PM on 08/19/2011
LOL...really. ARe you going to give up driving? Thank the value of the dollar and the taxes for the biggest reason gas prices are so high.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Villano
American Patriot
04:21 PM on 07/31/2011
Corporations can only use the legal tax codes and loopholes that govts approve. Dont blame the corps for trying to keep as much money as they can...we all do it is some way or another! They do produce millions of jobs and pay billions in taxes....maybe they should pay more, but blame the laws and loopholes that lobbyist and govt officials allow.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
db025
11:16 AM on 07/31/2011
How about equal treatment here, huffpoo?

What about Intel, Microsoft, Apple, 3M, Deere, Cat, Manning, Pelosi, Boxer, Reid, SoCalGas, Verizon, AT&T, and thousands of others who have made massive profits.

They're out there. A little work on your part, huh! We all already know about oil profits. You force feet us that every day while letting your buddies off the hook.
photo
RobertRapier
Pure energy
02:28 PM on 07/31/2011
Or the fact that their own link shows that the computer and Internet industries spent even more on lobbying than did the oil industry. Ditto for Big Ag, the pharmaceutical industry, the insurance industry, electric utilities, and business associations. Thus, the author is really cherry-picking when he implies that the oil industry is a really big spender on lobbying. His link puts them in the middle of the pack among industries, but those are the kinds of facts that wouldn't fit his agenda.

So, a trillion dollar industry like the oil industry spent $82 million a year on lobbying. What do you expect, when people are so grossly misinformed on the topic, and one political party would like to put them out of business?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
db025
10:52 PM on 08/01/2011
Well researched and spoken, Robert. Thank you.
photo
steve11407
pending approval and won't be displayed until ...
02:51 PM on 07/31/2011
x2
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
09:15 AM on 07/31/2011
Oh dah! The rape and plunder continues. We all know this.

Already in my home town up 15 cents a gallon since the actual Fourth of July. Drove across WI arrived Oshkosh last Sunday, $3.67, by Friday, $3.69, but at the other end of the state this past Friday, $3.89.

We are subsidizing this people!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
02:13 PM on 07/31/2011
No. You are funding these people with your purchases. With your money you are giving these people a stamp of approval. If you are talking about gasoline, the oil companies don't make gasoline, refineries do. Refineries have about a 2% profit margin. Apple has a 25% profit margin.
photo
atomicrod
Atomic professional
05:01 AM on 07/31/2011
Never forget that the people who are pushing natural gas as a fuel for power plants are exactly the same people who are making obscene profits by selling oil and gasoline. Natural gas (CH4), otherwise known as methane, is a fossil fuel and a hydrocarbon that comes out of the same wells as crude oil, though there are some differences in the proportions of each component in all oil and gas producing formations.

My deeply held suspicion is that companies like Chevron and ExxonMobil - two of the largest natural gas producers in the United States - have purposely been over producing natural gas for the past several years in an effort to temporarily keep the prices low.

The reason for that is simple but not obvious - oil&gas companies have a long-term perspective. They have a strong financial incentive to do anything they can to derail the nuclear renaissance. Every reactor-year of delay that they can insert into the process of building new nuclear plants rewards them with another $400 million in revenue by selling a year's worth of natural gas in replacement of what could have been produced by a nuclear plant.

Every nuclear plant that does not get built can be worth 60 years x $400 million/year or $24 billion to the oil&gas industry.

An old fashioned price war now can result in huge returns in the future - especially when the companies are making tens of billions in profit already.

Rod Adams
Publisher, Atomic Insights
09:05 AM on 07/31/2011
THIS IS A GOOD ONE . IT IS VERY CORRECT . TRY AND FIND A WAY TO GET THE PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND , GAS PRICE AT THE PUMP IS MOSTLY TAXES ....NOTHING ELSE . THE SO CALLED SUBSIDIZES THE OIL COMPANIES GET , IS PAID BY THE TAX PAYER ....AT THE GAS PUMP .....I HAVE BEEN SCREAMING FOR A WHILE , O P E C DOES NOT SET THE OIL PRICE AMERICA PAYS . AMERICAN COMMERCE DEPARTMENT SET COST OF LIVING . IT IS ALL ABOUT TAXES .....HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PRODUCT ......... THE NEXT ELECTION WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE ... ALL THIS STUFF BEEN HERE LONG BEFORE OBAMA SHOWED UP . OBAMA WILL BE RE ELECTED BY THE SAME PEOPLE AS BEFORE ............. GAS PRICE AT THE PUMP IS MOSTLY TAXES , CONSUMER PAYS THE SUBSIDY / PROFIT . ......AMERICAN COMMERCE DEPARTMENT ........My name is T i m
11:19 AM on 08/01/2011
Agree 100%
12:15 AM on 07/31/2011
I see the AOL/Huff Post censors are hard at work.
11:33 PM on 07/30/2011
Bush: Crude oil ~$144/barrel------gas ~$4.00/gallon

Obama: Crude oil ~$95/barrel-------gas ~$4.00/gallon

Based on the headlines and the underlying facts it appears it may be Owe-bama who is the true friend of big oil. Gas was in the $1.80 per gallon range when Owe-bama took office, but that did not last for long.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
walkingwolf
I'm sorry I offended you-I should have lied
06:53 AM on 07/31/2011
puleeeze now your blaming him for the price the Big Oil corps put on a gallon of GAS???>>> GET real...Im sure he sits up every night and says oh Yeah by the Way Citgo jack your price up another 8 cents today..and a week from now you can go another ten cents..we'll all get rich..BUSHY BABY--Oil well owners......cronies OIL company CEO"s Put a cap on the gas and be done with it..oil companaies will comply becasue they can't afford to stop selling it all together..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
personal beliefs
Things never go according to plan, so plan accordi
02:42 PM on 08/01/2011
yeah, you probably believe that Oil Companies control the price of gas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
db025
11:18 AM on 07/31/2011
Crude spiked to $144 under Bush for about one month, then was back to $65.

Obama held oil above $100 per bbl for about three months, and continues to allow it to be near that price.

And I really like the "Owe-bama."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bugweed
04:46 PM on 08/02/2011
How exactly does he do it? Holds the price of gas to slightly below 100 bucks? The guy must be omnipotent. He personally goes to the computer every morning and says "Behold, I will keep crude openly bought and sold by speculators, at an artificially high price to harm the American People. I am Satan and proponent of Socialism, and they will do what I tell them to. Just like congress".

What nonsense. The Black guy in the White Man's house is everywhere.
10:33 PM on 07/30/2011
This debt argument is just more stalling by the Republicans to keep the "eye" off the ball of jobs.
They want Obama to fail so badly they think this is the way to do that. It is absolutly disgusting to see the pay of the troops, who are fighting for us in Iraq and Afganastan, the wounded vets from wars around the world, and troops stationed at various bases around the world, to be in question for one minute, again, is totally disgusting. This should be the shame of the century for those Tea Party hacks who refuse to compromise. And Please don't embarrass yourselves by trying to spin it as "Obamas fault". Save the small and simple minded name calling for when you are out playing with your neighbors kids.
Pete & Sue
09:12 AM on 07/31/2011
THIS IS VERY CORRECT , ALL THIS STUFF BEEN HERE LONG BEFORE OBAMA SHOWED UP . GAS PRICE AT THE PUMP IS MOSTLY TAXES , NOTHING ELSE . PRICE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GASOLINE PRODUCT . AMERICAN COMMERCE DEPARTMENT CONTROLS COST OF LIVING , NOTHING ELSE ....IT IS ALL ABOUT TAXES ....NOTHING ELSE ......THE SUBSIDIES WE HEAR ABOUT , IS PAID BY THE CONSUMER AT THE GAS PUMP ...IT IS MOSTLY TAXES , HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH OIL . ...O P E C DOES NOT SET THE OIL PRICE WE PAY ......IT IS MOSTLY TAXES .....My name is T i m