More

Pakistan: U.S. Diplomats Need Government Permission To Travel

Pakistan Us Diplomats

CHRIS BRUMMITT   07/30/11 03:14 PM ET   AP

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan has placed new travel restrictions on American diplomats living in the country, a U.S. official said Saturday, in the latest sign of the breakdown in ties between Islamabad and Washington since the U.S. raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

Pakistan reacted furiously to the May 2 bin Laden raid deep inside the country because it was carried out with no warning to authorities in Islamabad. The fallout battered an already frayed relationship seen as key to the fight against al-Qaida and Washington's hopes of reaching a settlement in Afghanistan and withdrawing troops.

Islamabad sent home at least 90 U.S. soldiers training Pakistani troops in counterinsurgency and severely cut back on intelligence cooperation. The Obama administration, which took office pledging to strengthen ties with Islamabad, announced it was cutting more than one-third of its military aid to the country.

While Washington's large civilian aid program has been unaffected, the move to restrict diplomats' movements adds a new irritant to the relationship and suggests military-to-military tensions are bleeding into the civilian sphere.

A letter from the Foreign Ministry sent to the American Embassy last month states that all of its diplomats must now apply for special permission to leave the capital five days in advance of travel, including visits to cities where America has consulates.

Such curbs appear to be an unusual step between friendly states. The 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations requires host states to allow foreign diplomats "freedom of movement" in the country except for restricted areas. Other foreigners living in Pakistan are free to travel around most of the country.

There are ways, however, to restrict the movement of diplomats without violating the convention.

The letter, dated June 13, was obtained by The Associated Press on Saturday. The AP obtained a second letter dated this month from the Civil Aviation Authority to security officers at Benazir Bhutto International Airport instructing them to carry out the Foreign Ministry order.

A U.S. official confirmed the new restrictions and said the embassy was working with the government to resolve the issue. He did not give his name because of the sensitivity of the relationship at present.

In Washington, the U.S. State Department said it was concerned about the restrictions and in a statement called on Pakistan "to ensure freedom of travel to diplomatic personnel."

It was unclear if other foreign missions in Islamabad had also received a similar notice.

In response to a question, the Foreign Ministry released a statement saying that no "U.S.-specific restrictions have been applied." It said Pakistan was fully mindful of its obligations under the Vienna Convention and was discussing the issue with the embassy.

Earlier this month, at least one carload of American diplomats was refused entry to Peshawar, the main northwestern city. Other diplomats have been able to travel unhindered outside Islamabad since the letter was sent, the American official said.

The United States is nominally a partner with Pakistan, but many Pakistanis, including those in the government, media and armed forces, regard it with mistrust or hostility. The bin Laden raid, and the shooting deaths of two Pakistani men by a CIA contractor in January, were taken as more signs that Washington has malevolent intentions in the country.

The fact that bin Laden had been hiding in an army town close to the capital only reinforced suspicions in Washington that Pakistan was an unreliable partner in the fight against al-Qaida. There are also growing frustrations with Islamabad over its refusal to act against powerful militant factions in the northwest that are killing U.S. troops in Afghanistan but pose no immediate threat to Pakistan.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan has placed new travel restrictions on American diplomats living in the country, a U.S. official said Saturday, in the latest sign of the breakdown in ties between Islamabad ...
ISLAMABAD — Pakistan has placed new travel restrictions on American diplomats living in the country, a U.S. official said Saturday, in the latest sign of the breakdown in ties between Islamabad ...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 280
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
Rexter
Question everything.
10:02 AM on 08/01/2011
That $3 billion a year, the advertised amount anyway, could really be put to good use here in the states. Cut them off at the knees and get out Afghanistan as well. How many more billions, that we have to borrow from China, are going to be squandered on these lost causes? The Afghan people will never be a democracy, it is a puppet regime that will only last as long as we fund it. Afghanistans fate and future should be of their own choosing (and financing).
08:02 AM on 08/01/2011
I guess this whole unraveling goes to show that bribes and threats to weak and corrupt leaders of "Bombing them into the stone-age" would only get you that far in making them fight your wars for you......

The indignation despite the 30000 or so deaths directly as a result of this WOT is rather telling...
03:06 AM on 08/01/2011
Hillary, please tweet me urgenty. I need to know how you are going to respond to this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yasser Yousufi
Parthian
01:52 AM on 08/01/2011
This song should be the new anthem of people from Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Libya

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ml4OG0n5WnA
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:23 AM on 08/01/2011
But there's no stopping Super Congress.
06:11 PM on 07/31/2011
FACT: Ameircan public at large loves India and H)_ates Pakiistan. Deal with it Biaaatch!
07:40 AM on 08/01/2011
They also believe $@ddam helped in the 9// attacks....... simple child

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hiRC5ZDTXk
04:03 PM on 08/01/2011
Namaste and Numuskaar SoldAmerican.

I first moved to the US in 1983. At that time and till 1988, I distinctly recall my American University mates used to love Pakistan and hate your India. Indians used to feel proud in having friendships with Pakistanis. I apologize to bust your bubble here. It is all about change.
06:05 PM on 07/31/2011
f0rki Pak!stan.. Its done!
06:05 PM on 07/31/2011
Time to send in the B-52s
07:41 AM on 08/01/2011
why?
04:05 PM on 08/01/2011
Are you of sound mind? You suggested cutting all aid to Pakistan and now you are suggesting giving B-52s to them to take on who? India?
07:58 PM on 08/05/2011
Yes.. just like we are sending the Drones to Pakitan. Hope you guys are enjoyin it. We sure are. We luv giving it to the P0rkies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Itsbeenalongday
Eliminating poverty is smart business
04:32 PM on 07/31/2011
I guess it depends on how much you value a human life. The US puts no value on a Pakistani life. If Pakistan was to do in the US what the US does in the Pakistan, the rebound would be enormous. 19 supposed Saudis attacked the World Trade center so Bush bombed the bejesus out of Afghanistan.

Judging by most of the comment here, all you see are the dollars. You are not looking at the total disregard the US has on Pakistani civilians.
09:37 PM on 07/31/2011
That is a lie. If the US placed no value on innocent civilians, we would simply level everything in a 10km radius of any terrorist base and blame it on the terrorists.
07:49 AM on 08/01/2011
and not launch invasions and occupations based on knowingly false "evidence" of WMDs, or those which are outright avoidable:

Mr Kabir said: "If America were to step back from the current policy, then we could negotiate." Mr bin Laden could be handed over to a third country for trial, he said. "We could discuss which third country."

"But as American warplanes entered the second week of the bombing campaign, Washington rejected the Taliban offer out of hand. "When I said no negotiations I meant no negotiations," Mr Bush said. "We know he's guilty. Turn him over. There's no need to discuss innocence or guilt."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/bush-rejects-taliban-offer-to-surrender-bin-laden-631436.html
photo
nixthetrix
aiming for the center , being pushed to the left
10:18 PM on 07/31/2011
Don't you mean , 'The disregard that Pakistanis show for civilians' ? They are killing each other at an alarming rate and the public at large yawns or facilitates the murderers .
IMHO we need to take a tougher stance with our 'friends' in Pakistan .
07:53 AM on 08/01/2011
If Ru$$i@ launched an all out invasion and occupation of C@n@d@, it would be a matter of time before the U$ would be destabilized by the spillover affect......
04:02 PM on 07/31/2011
For Ozarks and other Indians on this site:

http://www.todaysviews.com/2011/06/03/hillary-clintons-false-claims-on-us-to-pakistan/

"We are all aware of Hillary Clinton’s recent boast in front of the Pakistan media. “We provide more support than Saudi Arabia, China, and everybody else combined, but I will stand here and admit that I’m not sure many Pakistanis know that,” US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton said in Islamabad on May 27. Various media sources in Pakistan and the US have started to scrutinize this boast."
04:27 PM on 07/31/2011
Did you get paid yet? Today was ISI payday.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yasser Yousufi
Parthian
04:32 PM on 07/31/2011
Stand up comedy isn't your 'thing' India~! Just keep spreading venom against Pakistan like you usually do
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ian Faus
12:33 AM on 08/01/2011
Shouldn't you be worried about what Americans have to say rather than the Indians ? It's not like the Indians are footing your tab is it ?
01:57 PM on 07/31/2011
It would be time to cut off aid to Pakistan, severely limit diplomatic ties and treat them as they are: hostile to our efforts against the taliban and Al-qaeda, but there is one big problem: they have nuclear weapns and technology. How does that affect us? Well, in the short term, with all the internal problems of corruption, a reactionary security apparatus and military, double-dealing, a stagnant economy and a efforts by various factions (including Al-qaeda) to establish an Islamic republic using any means neccessary, Pakistan could easily become unstable, and that nuclear technology or actual materials or weapons could end up in the hands of people who have absolutely no regard for human life, which is dangerous for our troops and other Americans in Afghanistan. In the long term..well just imagine dirty bombs being set off in cities here in the US oin other places where our troops are located. And if you think that is a far-fetched scenario, I'll tell you that it must be nice to have your head buried in the sand like an ostrich hoping that the problem will just resolve itself or go away.
02:44 PM on 07/31/2011
I 100% agree on cutting off the aid to Pakistan and limit all the ties with them. It's about time we realize that this country can not be trusted with anything. They kept Bin Laden hidden and helped him for 5-years, made everybody believe that they were 'helping' in controlling Al-Qaeda with USA's aid money, while in reality they are actually friends with them and helping them. A great little business they have going here! ...Al-Qaeda keeps making threats, Pakistan pretends they are working to control them but in real situation, they distribute the money between them.
I wouldn't worry about their nuclear capabilities. They are using it simply to threaten rest of the world. Why can't we walk in like we did in Iraq since WE KNOW they have the WMD's?
07:17 AM on 08/01/2011
"It would be time to cut off aid to Pakistan, severely limit diplomatic ties and treat them as they are: hostile to our efforts against the taliban and Al-qaeda"

What would those efforts of reeling in a rogue child of an unholy tryst be?

Im curious because the @fgh@n|$tan mission changes faster than the seasons....
01:30 PM on 07/31/2011
The India / Pakistani areas have been invaded for the past several thousand years, most recently by western government and Russia which has its own cross to bear. The primary point is that there is no need for te U.S. and its criminal allies to be in the nation. We seem to forget, these people have managed their affairs for a considerable longer period of time than those who seek occupying their nation. The real issue is the Asiatic Pipeline which the U.S> and its allied nations are building. The same holds true for Iraq adn gives explanation as to why they're twisting the Iraqi government to request additional U.S> troops to remain in the country past 2011. All at the expense of te U.S. taxpayer who can ill afford it. Reagan did this during the eighties... "we need a 600 ship navy adn increases in our defense spending, 18 Debt ceilings later the recession remained, but corporate taxes continued falling. What has changed... nothing whatever adn people sit about arguing over scraps...
09:46 PM on 07/31/2011
Any pipeline across Afghanistan is not worth even $1 Billion US from a strategic perspective.

Don't forget that the USA can stop importing oil from the Middle East if we really want to.
We have more oil than Saudi Arabia or Russia, and we could be using it within 24 months if only we had real patriots leading our country.

A few thousand acres in A.NW.R can lead the way very quickly.

There is oil all along the East Coast and California.
07:31 AM on 08/01/2011
"Don't forget that the USA can stop importing oil from the Middle East if we really want to.
We have more oil than Saudi Arabia or Russia, and we could be using it within 24 months if only we had real patriots leading our country."

Of course, the U$ might have more oil than $@udi (It doesn't), but then the ME has more oil than $A and the U$ combined. Besides i can think of one particular state that would not want the U$ involvement in the ME to end..... That should also give you an idea about your point about patriotism...
09:53 AM on 08/02/2011
Guess what, ANWR would only provide sufficient petroleum for about two years at our current consumption rates. You are aware that the U.S. consumes about 40% of the worlds petroleum daily and thhis has been going on for many decades. The problem is that capitalism is not a system of conservation but rather one that drives consumption. What reserves as might there be are currently being held for strategic purposes as the west would be blocked from importation of petroleum in any conflict with either Russia, Iran or China. Western economies and societies as a result of this would totally fail within three months. The U.S. crossed te threshold of “peak Oil:” in 1971 and our stocks have been rapidly declining since. Petroleum is a finite resource which ought to have never been selected as the energy driver for economic growth and stability. There were other options – Steam, Electric and currently there’s hydrogen. But adopting any of these would lleave tens of thousands of stock holders broke… the real problem.
01:22 PM on 07/31/2011
Yank in France: The real issue is obeying the existing laws of whatever nation one finds themselves. You're in France... I found it a very nice place to live, The real problem is the arrogance that seems to be part of a great manu U.S. citizens when they travel abroad. For some reason they think it is permissible to treat foreigners as second class citizens in their own nations. I've witnessed this even close to home - Canada and Mexico. I've seen the same while residing in Germany, France adn Sweden adn people really resent it. I've hardly seen many instances where those visiting or immigrating from the Middle East of even Europe have tramppled upon U.S. law or insulted its citizens. The solution may lie in increasing the number of exchange students worldwide. However, this would be contrary the agenda of the U.S. political elite becasue they'd return with broader views of what changes our nation needed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ian Faus
01:02 PM on 07/31/2011
Pakistan - You've lost that loving feeling.........that loving feeling!
05:02 PM on 07/31/2011
With Indians distracting us from the core issue of their Kashmiri occupation, you have all lost that human feeling. Please go back to Bollywood.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ian Faus
12:27 AM on 08/01/2011
LOL, apparently you don't get the reference!

Isn't music banned under a strict interpretation of Sharia law ?

Well if you can sneak one past your mullah you should check out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhs3Rj71gpo
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
spacewalker
no time to hate
12:57 PM on 07/31/2011
Pakistan is not a partner or a friend of America,they are an enemy and should be treated as such.They are corrupt and taking literally billions of US dollars all the while undermining our mission in Afghanistan.Let these people fight their own battles,we do not belong here and have no business giving them aid.
01:07 PM on 07/31/2011
dont be silly, Bush and Obama are not jerks. If they are giving billions they know its good for US.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ian Faus
01:07 PM on 07/31/2011
Pakistan's bargaining position is something like this - "If you don't pay us, we will let Al Qaeda set up base here and let the Taliban destabilize and take over Afghanistan after you leave, plus we will cut off your lifeline to Afghanistan. "

It's basically a shake down of ISAF in Afghanistan; pay-up or we'll cut you off and let the Taliban get at you!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
spacewalker
no time to hate
02:11 PM on 07/31/2011
No offense but as an American i have NO FEAR of the taliban.