More

Donald Rumsfeld Torture Lawsuit Can Proceed, Judge Says

Donald Rumsfeld Torture Lawsuit

First Posted: 08/04/11 08:50 AM ET Updated: 10/04/11 06:12 AM ET

NEDRA PICKLER / AP

WASHINGTON -- A judge is allowing an Army veteran who says he was imprisoned unjustly and tortured by the U.S. military in Iraq to sue former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld personally for damages.

The veteran's identity is withheld in court filings, but he worked for an American contracting company as a translator for the Marines in the volatile Anbar province before being detained for nine months at Camp Cropper, a U.S. military facility near the Baghdad airport dedicated to holding "high-value" detainees.

The government says he was suspected of helping get classified information to the enemy and helping anti-coalition forces enter Iraq. But he was never charged with a crime and says he never broke the law.

Lawyers for the man, who is in his 50s, say he was preparing to come home to the United States on annual leave when he was abducted by the U.S. military and held without justification while his family knew nothing about his whereabouts or even whether he was still alive.

Court papers filed on his behalf say he was repeatedly abused, then suddenly released without explanation in August 2006. Two years later, he filed suit in U.S. District Court in Washington arguing that Rumsfeld personally approved torturous interrogation techniques on a case-by-case basis and controlled his detention without access to courts in violation of his constitutional rights.

Chicago attorney Mike Kanovitz, who is representing the plaintiff, says it appears the military wanted to keep his client behind bars so he couldn't tell anyone about an important contact he made with a leading sheik while helping collect intelligence in Iraq.

"The U.S. government wasn't ready for the rest of the world to know about it, so they basically put him on ice," Kanovitz said in a telephone interview. "If you've got unchecked power over the citizens, why not use it?"

The Obama administration has represented Rumsfeld through the Justice Department and argued that the former defense secretary cannot be sued personally for official conduct. The Justice Department also argued that a judge cannot review wartime decisions that are the constitutional responsibility of Congress and the president. And the department said the case could disclose sensitive information and distract from the war effort, and said the threat of liability would impede future military decisions.

But U.S. District Judge James Gwin rejected those arguments and said U.S. citizens are protected by the Constitution at home or abroad during wartime.

"The court finds no convincing reason that United States citizens in Iraq should or must lose previously declared substantive due process protections during prolonged detention in a conflict zone abroad," Gwin wrote in a ruling issued Tuesday.

"The stakes in holding detainees at Camp Cropper may have been high, but one purpose of the constitutional limitations on interrogation techniques and conditions of confinement even domestically is to strike a balance between government objectives and individual rights even when the stakes are high," the judge ruled.

In many other cases brought by foreign detainees, judges have dismissed torture claims made against U.S. officials for their personal involvement in decisions over prisoner treatment. But this is the second time a federal judge has allowed U.S. citizens to sue Rumsfeld personally.

U.S. District Judge Wayne R. Andersen in Illinois last year said two other Americans who worked in Iraq as contractors and were held at Camp Cropper, Donald Vance and Nathan Ertel, can pursue claims that they were tortured using Rumsfeld-approved methods after they alleged illegal activities by their company. Rumsfeld is appealing that ruling, which Gwin cited.

The Supreme Court sets a high bar for suing high-ranking officials, requiring that they be tied directly to a violation of constitutional rights and must have clearly understood their actions crossed that line.

The case before Gwin involves a man who went to Iraq in December 2004 to work with an American-owned defense contracting firm. He was assigned as an Arabic translator for Marines gathering intelligence in Anbar. He says he was the first American to open direct talks with Abdul-Sattar Abu Risha, who became an important U.S. ally and later led a revolt of Sunni sheiks against al-Qaida before being killed by a bomb.

In November 2005, when he was to go on home leave, Navy Criminal Investigative Service agents questioned him about his work, refusing his requests for representation by his employer, the Marines or an attorney. The Justice Department says he was told he was suspected of helping provide classified information to the enemy and helping anti-coalition forces attempting to cross from Syria into Iraq.

He says he refused to answer questions because of concern about confidentiality, and the agents handcuffed and blindfolded him, kicked him in the back and threatened to shoot him if he tried to escape. He was then transferred to an unidentified location for three days before being flown to Camp Cropper.

For his first three months at Camp Cropper he says he was held incommunicado in solitary confinement with a hole in the ground for a toilet. He says he was then moved to cells holding terrorist suspects hostile to the United States who were told about his work for the military, leading to physical attacks by his cellmates that left him in constant fear for his life.

He claims guards tortured him by repeatedly choking him, exposing him to extreme cold and continuous artificial light, blindfolding and hooding him, waking him by banging on a door or slamming a window when he tried to sleep and blasting music into his cell at "intolerably loud volumes."

He says he always denied any wrongdoing and truthfully answered questions but interrogators continued to threaten him. Both sides say a detainee status board in December 2005 determined he was a threat to the multinational forces in Iraq and authorized his continued detention, but he says he was not allowed to see most of the evidence against him. Documents the government filed with the court only say he is suspected of a crime, without providing details.

___

Array

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
NEDRA PICKLER / AP WASHINGTON -- A judge is allowing an Army veteran who says he was imprisoned unjustly and tortured by the U.S. military in Iraq to sue former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld...
NEDRA PICKLER / AP WASHINGTON -- A judge is allowing an Army veteran who says he was imprisoned unjustly and tortured by the U.S. military in Iraq to sue former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,990
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (60 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stacknef
Mothers! Dont let your daughters vote Republican!
12:00 AM on 08/26/2011
3 people who will never venture outside of the United States ever again......Cheney, Rumsfeld and the Shrub. Ya never know what those pesky international courts may decide to do with them!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stacknef
Mothers! Dont let your daughters vote Republican!
11:58 PM on 08/25/2011
How about having Rumsfeld arrested first, and then a civil trial later, after hes convicted of war crimes. Same goes for Cheney. Bush would probably be found unaccountable because of a mental defect anyway....
04:57 AM on 08/06/2011
About time. We hung Tojo and Nazi bosses because they either knew or should have knew what their subordinates were doing and did nothing to discourage those bad behaviors. Leaders need to be personally legally responsible. There has to be responsibility along with the perks of the job and each should be compensated accordingly.
01:26 AM on 08/08/2011
You said it !
03:26 AM on 08/06/2011
Meanwhile Rumsfeld's Wikipedia page has been updated. He is called a war criminal;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Rumsfeld
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
se72748
09:02 PM on 08/05/2011
I knew Nancy Pelosi was a weakling when she took the Bush administration investigations of his Iraq activities off the table.The GOP would never have done that for the dems.She should have investigated and prosecuted where ever crimes were found,,all the way to the Cheeeeny and Bush
03:48 PM on 08/05/2011
So will this open the door for people to sue Obama and his Clan?
05:48 PM on 08/05/2011
Yup! It sure does. That's why it has always been regarded bad form to sue gov't officials because, reeally, there'd never be an end to it. Somebdoy always doesn't like what some official did. Obama had opened another Pandora's Box. That bit about hate crime is another one that can bite both ways, all depending upon who is in power.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
se72748
09:03 PM on 08/05/2011
Oh Really
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
se72748
09:12 PM on 08/05/2011
and what will they sue him for,trying to save social security,medicare ,medicaid,food stamps,veterans benefits,insurance for everyone,even the poor,trying to help old people and children,paying the nations bills,preserving americas credit rating by paying our bills,Killing the three somalia pirates,Killing Osama bin Laden,food stamps for the poor?
What are the charges?Trying in the face of republican opposition to do good?
11:56 AM on 08/06/2011
For his war efforts. Duh! Pull the sheet over your head little lamb.
03:46 PM on 08/05/2011
This is very wrong! I want Donald Rumsfield punished for this! If he did this to a person with a developmental disability, I would go after Donald Rumsfield personally and place him under citizen's arrest for violating the Federal Disability Civil Rights Laws and I would personally turn him over my knee and spank him in front of 70 million viewers on CNN and Fox News!
02:48 PM on 08/05/2011
Being held accountable for the actions of the people under him, that has to be a new feeling for Rumsfeld. I personally feel horrible for the poor man that was being held. He and his family deserve some sort of compensation for the emotional and physical pain they had to endure.
02:01 PM on 08/05/2011
Only the first in a long line of defendants.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Binea
Only a fool denies she is a fool, I am no fool
01:15 PM on 08/05/2011
Lawyers for the man, who is in his 50s, say he was preparing to come home to the United States on annual leave when he was abducted by the U.S. military and held without justification while his family knew nothing about his whereabouts or even whether he was still alive.

Court papers filed on his behalf say he was repeatedly abused, then suddenly released without explanation in August 2006. Two years later, he filed suit in U.S. District Court in Washington arguing that Rumsfeld personally approved torturous interrogation techniques on a case-by-case basis and controlled his detention without access to courts in violation of his constitutional rights."



You can thank your congressmen/women for voting in the military commissions act..do you see why it's so dangerous ? What if they decided the TP or some Black groups or anyone, was suspicious and started using the Military commissions act here at home against us ? After all the 'Tp are holding government hostage" and "tp are terrorist" " TP are holding a gun to our head" talk just this past week SPREAD by MEDIA ( Corporate owned media)..you should all worry.

If Obama does not outlaw those laws I can't vote for him again,even if I were convinced that his economics would work if we just hold on long enough for the "Change"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Robertson
09:03 AM on 08/07/2011
You're going to vote against Obama because of abuses conducted under Bush? Really?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Binea
Only a fool denies she is a fool, I am no fool
10:53 AM on 08/07/2011
He has continued the wars and even expanded them..and has done nothing to stop the Military commissions act. Though I do give him credit for not abusing the executive powers congress over the years have given to the executive branch.Not in the horrible ways that it could be abused.
The erosion of our civil liberties because of "wars" has left us nothing to fight for .
are we fighting for "freedom" ? sure..while TSA gropes and molest our children and old ladies in diapers
ETT
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
12:46 PM on 08/05/2011
The only ones profiting here are the lawyers! This will never go anywhere but in the trash heap. In the meantime taxpayers' money is being wasted to pay for Rumsfeld's lawyers!
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
12:20 PM on 08/05/2011
This is nothing but a good start....Now lets go after Bush, Cheney and Rice.
photo
baldwjo
Rehabilitating Liberals..One by one!
12:16 PM on 08/05/2011
Dow 11,193.75 -189.93 -1.67% Great job Obama!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
02:03 PM on 08/05/2011
Obama controls the stock market?
12:05 AM on 08/06/2011
Every time Barry shows up on TV, every single time he opens his mouth, the DOW drops 100 points or more. So, yeah.... by negative effect I'd say he controls the market.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GraniteSkyline
I wish you happiness!
10:58 AM on 08/05/2011
This sounds like a great idea but nothing will come of it(except some lawyers will get rich).
10:51 AM on 08/05/2011
It is apparant that many of these comments are more anti Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld than they are FOR the individual involved. The person involved - unnamed I might add and which I'll address in a moment - seems to be a mere excuse to spew more ultra-partisan, vitriolic venom toward a political party. Then there are the opposing views, just as partisan, railing against the present administration. This out of control, extreme partisan attitude that permeates our society is far more destructive than any torture or rights violations, real or perceived, and only contributes to our decay from within.

As for the lawsuit and the claims noted in it, the "unnamed" individual was working as an interpreter. Does that mean he is a Muslim-American? And if so, is there a possiblity that, in light of all of the recent "home-grown" terrorist incidents, his activities might have been in direct collusion with our enemies? We don't know because this story doesn't say. Which leads me to believe that there is much more to this story than appears on the surface. Ask any Israeli about the importance of security...a breach of which in this terroristic day and age could mean catostrophic consequences for their people, cilvilian and military alike.
If any of this was in play in the circumstances surrounding this lawsuit then I submit that whatever transpired was justified and necessary.

It's not about partisanship it's about citizenship and security. Period! Thus is the age that we live in.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sammi 56
01:27 PM on 08/05/2011
Phooey
10:52 AM on 08/08/2011
How eloquent!
02:04 PM on 08/05/2011
Are you unaware that there are many universities actively teaching the languages which would be represented in a strand or case such as this? I know a family where 2 of the sisters are fully lingual, one in Arabic, the other in Chinese - all thanks to college. I know others who have learned the more exotic language from fellow "kids." Please broaden your sources of knowledge so you do not embarrass yourself. Not every American spy is dedicated to helping the enemy - just the opposite.
10:40 AM on 08/08/2011
I'm not embarassed at all...except maybe by the stubborness of many who post here to see or hear any point but their own. It seems that perhaps you ought to broaden you attention span a bit and actually read what my main point was...namely that the partisan nature of the comments on this subject were more about attacking the previous administration than about concern for the individual involved. As for the language component...the main point is that we do NOT know what transpired with this individual but I am sure that he wasn't arrested for teaching language. There had to be some sort of evidence that prompted him being questioned in the first place. Perhaps you should consider the possiblity that the real world is not always so altruistic. And that was my point...because we don't know all the facts of the case we should at least CONSIDER the possibility.
06:14 PM on 08/08/2011
If you follow any of my posts, I am careful to provide facts, or request those who DO have them to share. I provide experiential explanations or facts to support opinions which I usually label as such - often with the opening word: methinks.

I hope you have found a few of those that I follow regularly: Chopin, Titus to name but 2.