'Rent' Revival: Smash Musical Returns To New York After Three Years

Rent Revival

First Posted: 08/04/11 08:44 AM ET Updated: 10/04/11 06:12 AM ET

For some hit shows, moving off-Broadway after a groundbreaking around-the-world run seems questionable. But the cast and creative team of the new production of "Rent" insist their new revival feels more like a homecoming than a defeat.

After all, the original production of Jonathan Larson's Tony Award and Pulitzer Prize-winning rock musical was first staged at the New York Theatre Workshop in early 1996 before taking up residence on Broadway for a staggering 12 years, as well as playing to packed houses across the globe.

And while a mere three years (or 1,576,800 minutes, in "Renthead" speak) have passed since the Broadway production closed, the revival, which opens Aug. 11 at New World Stages, marks the first time the show's creative team has been able to freshen up its staging with new costumes, improved visuals and a revamped set that heightens the sense of gritty claustrophobia found in the East Village, circa 1991. The 2011 version of the musical -- a loose re-telling of "La Boheme" which tackles themes of drug addiction, poverty and HIV/AIDS -- has the added bonus of director Michael Greif, who helmed the original production and was a close friend of Larson's prior to the composer's untimely 1996 death.

Check out photos from the new production, then scroll down to keep reading:

1 of 11
From left: Matt Shingledecker (Roger) and Adam Chanler-Berat (Mark)
Total comments: 40 | Post a Comment
1 of 11

"I really felt like I wanted to experiment with being able to tell the story somewhat differently," said Greif, who recently directed the Broadway hit "Next to Normal" as well as last year's off-Broadway revival of "Angels in America." "In seeing it over the years, I was anxious to have that opportunity. I'm hoping we're staying very true to the material and still presenting it in a poetic way."

Not that reviving a show that electrified a generation didn't come with its own set of unique challenges -- and while some numbers ("Seasons of Love," "La Vie Boheme") appear similar to the original production, others ("What You Own") have been drastically re-conceived. "We walked this fine line of paying homage to the original piece and what has happened before, and re-discovering the text and re-examining what can happen in the story to tell it more efficiently," said actress Annaleigh Ashford, who plays Maureen. "It's both fascinating and artistically challenging."

Still, whether or not the show's then-groundbreaking portrayal of HIV-positive characters will remain relevant for a fresh crowd of theatergoers remains to be seen. "To a 16-year-old nowadays, AIDS is certainly more distant," said Peter Nigrini, who produced the colorful projections which appear throughout many of the show's numbers. "I think maybe we've reached some sort of historical distance where it's possible to reflect on that. So while a lot has changed, the bigger themes -- consumerism, capitalism, living a life as an artist -- are still very relevant."

So while a boutique-free East Village still accessible to struggling artists as seen in the show may be a thing of the past, the pop concert-like squeals that greeted the opening of Act II during one early preview indicate the "Renthead" audience is alive and well. And what would Larson, who died from an undiagnosed aneurysm on the eve of the original's first off-Broadway preview, think of the new production? "I would love for him to just explode with pride," said Adam Chanler-Berat, who plays Mark. "I think somewhere he knows what an impact it's had, not only on the theater community, but also on the world…how we talk about homosexuality, how we address the AIDS crisis. He should doing nothing but beaming with pride."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CULTURE

For some hit shows, moving off-Broadway after a groundbreaking around-the-world run seems questionable. But the cast and creative team of the new production of "Rent" insist their new revival feels mo...
For some hit shows, moving off-Broadway after a groundbreaking around-the-world run seems questionable. But the cast and creative team of the new production of "Rent" insist their new revival feels mo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 40
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:56 AM on 08/28/2011
Rent is one my favorite plays/movies of all time. It's poignant story behind the scenes of Jonathan Larson's death on the eve of exploding into mainstream public, has always added to the aura of it's success. It brought stardom to several characters, and from the pics above it promises to be a well-thought out, and updated version Larson would be fine with. I'm looking forward to seeing the new version and having as deep and meaningful a reaction as I had the first time around. Where the first brilliant version lost it's popularity way too soon, as the issues du jour moved out of public spotlight, perhaps this new version will have enough of today's concerns and public interest to have it stay around, yet ever longer, so that many more will enjoy and garner value from it's original script, intent and essence. Good Luck to the cast and director.
02:42 AM on 08/11/2011
I loved Greif's original staging of Rent. And his staging of Next to Normal was also a mark of a great director. I don't think, however, he should have been part of this revival. I saw it in previews a couple weeks ago, and it really didn't have significant changes to make it fresh and interesting to the audiences who'd seen Rent before and to make it relevant to new audiences. I only noticed cosmetic changes like Angel's new outfit, projection images for Over the Moon, and a cool new set that, yes, felt claustrophobic, but also felt cumbersome. Even the choreography to La Vie Boheme was nearly identical to the original. I would have preferred seeing a different director's vision for Rent. Perhaps Julie Taymore could've taken the project and redeemed herself from the Spiderman debacle.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tayneshia Jefferson
Sometimes I rock, sometimes I just roll.
03:58 PM on 08/15/2011
I was with yuo until you threw Taymor's name out there. I think she's going to be untouchable for a minute after the money pit of an abortion that calls itself Spiderman.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ethan Erickson
08:44 PM on 08/07/2011
even though i auditioned for angel back in the day
when j. larson was putting rent together
i avoided seeing the play or movie (which looked fake to me)
i didn't like "seasons of love" and i ignored rent for 16 years.
this year i helped a college cast here in CA with their makeup
and coached the angel character be be "drag-like".
it was eye-opening!
i saw the play thru the young cast's eyes
and i realized it's an excellent show!
these current photos show a great eye for period costume!
there are more actors of color featured as the focus:
the director has clearly tried to play down the "2 white buddies & company vibe of the 90s rent.
woohoo! i like it!
06:04 PM on 08/05/2011
I really felt like I wanted to experiment with being able to tell the story somewhat differently http://www.andeanlifeperu.com
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
04:05 PM on 08/05/2011
OK, call me a philistine, but I like the condensed version of Rent they put in Team America better than the movie.
It covered all the same ground, and was much less tedious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hickspy
World's top researcher of Chicken Pot Pie Theory.
10:48 AM on 08/05/2011
Hmm...

How will this return affect the level of pretentious that comes with this musical?
02:39 AM on 08/05/2011
As the kids would say...SQUEE!

Was in the city in '06, and never got the chance to see it. And now she lives again!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill J4321
07:55 PM on 08/04/2011
At a time when many Americans can not afford to pay their rent, it is a bit odd to expect them to go and see a musical about people who can't afford to pay theirs.
05:01 AM on 08/28/2011
The inability to pay rent comes from far different reasons ... and the story is about so much more. It should actually inspire more than anything...at the least, share a bit of history and reality, most never see or know about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:01 PM on 08/04/2011
How topical is it when people aren't really dying from AIDS anymore?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill J4321
07:57 PM on 08/04/2011
16,500-18,000 Americans per year still die from complications from HIV/AIDS. Globally, that number is in the hundreds of thousands.

According to the CDC anyhow, Dr.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:31 AM on 08/06/2011
Almost three times as many die from firearms. Why not make it topical to that. I think people forget that when this was written AIDS was a death sentence. Not so much these days. That was ALL I was stating. I guess people read really don't read all the words in a sentence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
meeks
Perfectly my flawed self at all times
08:20 AM on 08/05/2011
They are not?! May-be what you meant to say was that they have a longer life span now or maybe that it is not an automatic death sentence anymore. I think that is what you mean.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:36 PM on 08/04/2011
Is even off-Broadway this f'n desperate?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TucsonEd
12:20 PM on 08/04/2011
Lordy! I can't believe ANYONE liked this show the first time it was out. NOW it's back??? WHEW that show stinks to high heaven. I was really excited to see this show when it toured because I heard so much about it. We left at the intermission because it was unwatchable. The usher told us that generally men hated the show but women liked it. Neither my husband nor I could make heads nor tails out of what in the heck was going on. At intermission my husband turned to me and asked "do you have ANY idea WHAT is going on?" we read the synopsis and neither of us got any of that out of what was going on, on the stage. Story telling at it's worst!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mypathoflight
02:25 PM on 08/04/2011
In all the times we've seen it I have noticed that frequenly some of the older audience members do tend to leave during intermission. You can't please everybody, and wouldn't the world be boring if you could? For those of us who know and love RENT, the characters are like old friends. The last time we saw it was with two of the original cast members, Anthony Rapp and Adam Pascal, and it was every bit as moving as the first time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
meeks
Perfectly my flawed self at all times
08:26 AM on 08/05/2011
I noticed older people leave early too. One time I went, this couple next to me didn't make it pass the end of Angel's reappear at the boy's apartment. LOL.. It was almost like they were like "Drag Queen!!! We are out of here."
My parents left because they couldn't hear the words to the songs. As such, they couldn't follow the plot. When I sat down with them to talk about the plot, they borrowed my cd and fell in love with the story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A Dub
Conservative government is an organized hypocrisy
05:53 PM on 08/04/2011
I thought is was very good.
11:58 AM on 08/04/2011
First a disclaimer: I am one of the original investors in Rent when it went to Broadway. That being said, I'm grateful to everyone who was affected by the show as much as I was when I first saw it in 1997. I have not seen it in its newest incarnation at New World though I'm very eager to see what Michael has done to "reimagine" it. While I naturally hope it has a long run again, my only wonder is not that will it do well after a three year hiatus, but how will it play in context of today? It would seem out of place when the Bohemians hear their pagers go off and say it's their AZT break compared to the current world of the gentrified Lower East Side. It may come of as a period piece which there is no shame in it. Coupled with Jonathan Larson's still wonderful music and book, it's still a wonderful, funny, and moving story. I hope to see it after it re-opens August 14 and hope it's as memorable and even refreshing as it ever was.

And to all the Rent-heads, my many thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
meeks
Perfectly my flawed self at all times
01:46 PM on 08/04/2011
I grew during that time period and as I get further and further away from it (old), I can't help be excited to revisit it. I think you are right about it being a period piece and hope it does not try to re-invent itself to much. Hope you come back and tell us how you felt about it. I will not be getting to NY anytime soon, so I hope you share your opinion.
01:50 PM on 08/04/2011
Why are people talking about it being outdated? What makes the show great is the grittiness and struggles occuring within NYC at that time that it is set in. References have to be specific to that time. Why would it be weird to hear them say "AZT break". To keep the grittiness and truth in the story, the devil is in the details with regard to costume, technology, contextual references..etc. Those details put you into the story. I guess am a little confused as to what point you are trying to make here. If you want to make something more contextual to today, you rewrite the same story but change the details to more modern references...I don't necessarily understand every reference in Million Dollar Quartet, Memphis, Funny Girl, or every period musical, but you are transported and you learn. Is that not the point.
11:03 AM on 08/04/2011
I really just don't know what to think about this revival. on the one hand, I'm THRILLED that RENT is back because I've missed it so much on my past two trips to NYC. I've also seen video interviews of the new cast and I like their speaking voices, so I think they are probably great in their roles. On the other hand, I hear that they "reimagined" songs, and I hate Mark and Maureen's costume changes, so I'm afraid that it won't be the play I loved, and just seem like a cheap imitation. I guess I will just have to plan to see it and find out!
10:27 AM on 08/04/2011
RENT is a really good musical... but even so, can the economics really make sense? Is there really a strong market for a *revival* after only 3 years? I take it as an obvious given that there are not enough RENT-heads to sustain a production on their own.

I don't know B'way well enough to say for sure, but I've certainly not heard of a revival being staged only 3 years after the end of the first-run.

Older audience members tell me that when it opened, RENT was already showing a bit of "out-datedness." Much about NYC and AIDS had changed, at break-neck pace, in the few years between Larson beginning the work, and the show's first staging. RENT (the movie) was only 5-6 years ago, and there's been a filmed live production since then.

I really hesitate to imagine there's that much still-unsatisfied RENT appetite out there.
11:00 AM on 08/04/2011
RENT-heads are never satisfied, is the thing. Going to see RENT multiple times is a hallmark of the fandom, along with bringing friends and family along so they can fall in love with it, too. I have family in NYC and go often, and going to see the play is basically a requirement every time I visit, and I drag whoever is traveling with me, so they will love it too. I "only" saw it three times at the Nederlander, but locals have seen it 50+. I think it was revived after only 3 years because people missed it. I know there was a hole in my heart when I visited NYC last April and going to see it wasn't an option. (I made a pilgrimage to the Life Cafe instead.) It was this sad feeling like an old friend had moved away. Also, this new show is a smaller-scale and costs less to produce, so I would imagine that RENTheads can keep it going. Yes, there's a filmed production and movie, but NOTHING compares to performers on the stage, and the live audience moo-ing with you!
01:54 PM on 08/04/2011
Every show set in a different time period is going to be dated isn't it? As long as everyone understands the date the show was set in, then that is all that matters, right? No ones says Hairspray is outdated. Um, well, it takes place prior to current, so it is going to be dated.
02:18 PM on 08/04/2011
Every show set in a different time period is going to be dated, yes -- but quite obviously, not all shows end up being dated in the same way.

Oedipus is not likely to be dated, even after another few thousand years.

The Mulligan Guard Picnic (1857), on the other hand, would seem awkwardly dated and long in the tooth, and isn't on anybody's Revival Wish List.

And I dare anyone to try a revival of The Sound of Music.

My point is, part of RENT's magic originally depended on audience experiences and attitudes about the Village, about HIV/AIDS, about money and power in NYC.

It might be similar to watching Angels in America now. It's still stunning, nothing about its artistry is diminished. But it's not the early '90s. Almost 20 years have passed.