More

Bank Of New York Mellon Will Charge Clients To Hold Over $50M In Deposits

Bank Mellon Despoits

By PALLAVI GOGOI   08/ 4/11 07:39 PM ET   AP

NEW YORK -- Bank of New York Mellon Corp. said Thursday that it will charge its customers a fee to hold cash deposits over $50 million.

The bank said it has seen such a large increase in deposits over the last month that it will charge a 0.13 percent fee to clients with "extraordinary high deposit levels." Bank of New York Mellon, which has $23.6 trillion in client assets under its custody, said customers have moved money to cash as a safe haven in the past month as investments like stocks and bonds have become increasingly volatile.

The bank's customers are mainly large pension funds and money market funds. The bank collects dividends on stocks and holds cash deposits, among other things, on behalf of such large investment funds.

"This is a historic precedent in the U.S. banking system," said Dan Geller, Executive Vice President at Market Rates Insight, a firm that analyses bank pricing.

Normally, banks pay interest to customers for deposits. But with short-term interest rates near zero, and increased FDIC insurance premiums on deposits, it hurts banks when they hold large amounts of cash on their balance sheets. Deposits are considered a liability because they can be withdrawn at any time. When liabilities go up, banks pay more for FDIC deposit insurance.

Geller believes that the fee on deposits could soon trickle down to consumer deposits too. He said the same economic conditions and nervousness are impacting the American people as managers of pension funds.

"At some point, the safety and security of an insured cash deposit becomes so appealing that people will be willing to pay a small premium for that," said Geller.

Already bank customers are increasingly keeping their money in cash instead of putting it into other investments. The largest U.S. bank, Bank of America saw its deposits grow to $1.04 trillion at the end of the second quarter, up 18 percent from the first quarter and up 64 percent from the same quarter last year.

So far, the bank's chief rivals, State Street Corp. and Northern Trust Corp., say they have not instituted the same kind of fee.

Investors withdrew $122 billion from money funds in the seven-day period ended Monday, according to industry researcher Crane Data. That exodus cut holdings of money funds' by almost 5 percent.

That's more than the $121 billion that Crane said was withdrawn from money market funds during the worst week of the financial crisis, which ended Sept. 17, 2008. That was the week Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy. It was also the week the Reserve Primary Fund collapsed, leaving investor accounts temporarily below their original value. Money market funds earn very low interest, but rarely lose principal. They are considered to be the closest thing to holding cash.

Usually money market funds invest in short-term Treasury bills, which are so safe that they are considered a proxy for cash. However, money funds started selling Treasury notes that had payments due on Aug. 4 and Aug. 11 because it was not clear that a deal to raise the country's borrowing limit would be made by the Aug. 2 deadline. The government said it would not be able to meet all of its financial obligations after that date if the country's limit was not raised.

"The funds felt really exposed," to the possibility of default, said Brad Durham, managing director of EPFR Global, a fund research company.

These large movements into cash from pension funds and money market funds underscore the degree of nervousness in the market. That fear has only gotten worse as a string of reports point to slow growth in the U.S. economy.

The Dow Jones industrial average plunged 513 points Thursday, erasing its gains for the year. Treasurys soared as investors sought safer investments, sending the yield on the two-year Treasury note to a record low of 0.26 percent.

Bank of New York Mellon said that "once the markets stabilize, we expect deposit levels will trend lower ... At that time, it is likely this fee will no longer be necessary."

___

Associated Press business writer Mark Jewell from Boston contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
NEW YORK -- Bank of New York Mellon Corp. said Thursday that it will charge its customers a fee to hold cash deposits over $50 million. The bank said it has seen such a large increase in deposits ove...
NEW YORK -- Bank of New York Mellon Corp. said Thursday that it will charge its customers a fee to hold cash deposits over $50 million. The bank said it has seen such a large increase in deposits ove...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 281
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
10:50 AM on 08/08/2011
I thought the banks wanted more capital? So they penalize people who invest? There is clearly something amis here.
My bank wants 3 dollars a month for a paper statment. But they do not mind paying to send out credit card applications.
Humm, forced credit is what this is all about.
People can pay their bills with cash and bypass the banks also.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
So silly
06:43 PM on 08/07/2011
They charge you if your balance is too low, they charge you if it is too high. Is there aything they won't charge for?
photo
Exfl
A centrist until the center moved.
03:00 PM on 08/07/2011
The biggest hoot is the these thieves call their industry "financial services". If only John Dillinger had thought to label himself a "financial services coordinator" he could have a summer place in the Hamptons.
01:25 PM on 08/07/2011
There is a solution to creating jobs and paying for them without raising taxes. Let's initiate a new Roosevelt Era WPA program paid for directly not by dollars but vouchers in U.S. Treasury Bonds. This will raise the price of U.S. Treasuries while allowing WPA accumulators to borrow against their 'day job' acquired holdings in U.S. Treasuries from U.S. Banks for the expansion of small business '...night jobs'. Not only U.S. Treasuries, but also nongovernment bonds and stocks have always provided a 'second currency' for employees to save and grow nest eggs. At a time when unemployment provides a 'spare time' opportunity for the unemployed to find other ways to get ahead rather than stagnate, this may act as a jumpstart to the entire economy. Our laid-off time is worth something, and there should be a way to turn it into currency.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sockman
01:13 PM on 08/07/2011
What is a millionaire to do these days? Sheesh!
photo
lostinseganet
You need good D"Defence"? well so do I
08:31 AM on 08/07/2011
So the ultra rich put a tax on the rich. The super rich must be busting a gut. lol Obama thats how you get'er done.
05:38 PM on 08/07/2011
Well I'm convinced they've drained us about as much as they can -- without protest -- because now these rich guys are starting on each other.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angel R1240
Progressive for REAL change
05:54 PM on 08/06/2011
Well I think that these hedge funds can afford this fee that this bank is going to charge them. However these hedge funds should not even have that much money it's ridiculous. Welcome to the new America, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
04:46 PM on 08/06/2011
The lesson to learn is the Big Lie about Job Creators. Even the Job Creators themselves are admitting that they have too much money and nowhere to spend/invest it. Thus, they are forced to keep it.

Welcome to Day 6 of the Obama-Tea Bagger Depression. Strangely, the few economists who predicted disaster if the Deb Deal included Spending Cuts, the fools who did the spending cuts are demanding more cuts. The reduced spending is why the ultra-wealthy have so much accumluated cash.

About the only thing to do with accumulated cash is to invest it in businesses. By reducing Spending the idiot Combo of Obama and the Tea Baggers have told the business world, "There will be a lot few customers in the next few years."

No business hires more people, buys more inventory or purchases new equipment when the government tells the world, "We will be spending trillions less and turn the recession into a depression."

When the government spends less, that starts a negative vicious downward spiral. If the feds close a military base near a small town, most the local businesses will go bankrupt or significantly downside and unemployment will raise. The second impact of the military base closure is all the employees who were dependent on the military stop spending, and that forces more local businesses to close laying off their employees. Cutting Spending is how a government turns a recession into a depression.
BigDaddyWow
This member is licensed to spank
01:45 PM on 08/06/2011
Wow, what a stupid bank!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:11 PM on 08/06/2011
Oh no that will effect the creators of jobs!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
11:59 AM on 08/07/2011
Affect.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:14 PM on 08/08/2011
I am going to go out on a limb and have to say that the best part of must have run down your mothers' leg
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissingAmerica
12:02 PM on 08/06/2011
Well, we've seen where the tax breaks are going! We've also seen where it's NOT going! One of my true heroes, TJ, once said that man "is the only animal which devours his own kind, for I can apply no milder term to the general prey of the rich on the poor." What we are seeing is another form of financial cannibalism. Rather than allow the bank to reap a fee from these accounts, the government should tax the accounts and thereby ensure the wealthy once again keep strong the country which allowed them to amass these fortunes, and allow the hard-working Americans to start to crawl back onto their feet!
photo
WoodsideCraig
Author of the blog "The Weiler Psi"
11:57 AM on 08/06/2011
Lose the big banks and put your money in the small local ones.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
narfpaul
Gay by birth, Me by choice.
12:59 PM on 08/06/2011
Couldn't agree more.
photo
jimtpat
Hell's Pretty Pink Bells
06:47 PM on 08/06/2011
Yeah, but then dropping $50Million into a small bank means they won't be small anymore. They probably wouldn't be able to afford it.

Oh, that's another thing: deposits ARE a liability. Banks don't make interest on them, they have to pay interest on them, and have to buy insurance to cover them, too.
photo
BeerLover
Carpe Diem!
11:04 AM on 08/06/2011
IT'll never happen. Even though banks have found every way to rip off the average american, they dare not enrage their masters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gilbert Albright
10:54 AM on 08/06/2011
Looks like the banks have run out of ways to rip off the middle class and poor, so now they are going after the rich and wealthy institutions. Hey the SHARKS have to be fed!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:40 AM on 08/06/2011
They surely won't be charging Mrs. Pennyfeather or Mrs. Heistiddipisty that rate, will they? Sure, we hear their reasoning, now, but why did BofA yank my safety deposit box and tell me if I didn't keep $10K in their bank I'd have to pay $20 a month for a freaking checking account back in the bad old days? That's when I went Credit Union. Oh, yeah, I pulled my money market funds. Just like cash? Wasn't that what they were telling folks those CDOs were before 2007? Right.

So,the banks are paying a tenth of a percent on savings, but charing over that if you save more? They really do want us to kick them to the curb so they can get out of deposits and practice gambling exclusively. Leave the banking to Uncle Sam, and give the casino to Banks.

Later, Mellonheads!