More

Public Pension Funds Lost Value As Stocks Fell

Stocks Pension Funds

MICHAEL GORMLEY   08/12/11 10:11 PM ET   AP

ALBANY, N.Y. — Wall Street's volatility has hit state pension funds just as they were beginning to recover from the recession, turning what was merely a troubled forecast into a potentially stormy future for taxpayers who are on the hook for billions in unfunded liabilities for government retirees.

As for the millions of government clerks, engineers, janitors, teachers and firefighters in the retirement systems, they are protected by law or, as in New York, by the state constitution, to be backed up by tax dollars if necessary. Their benefits remain safe for life in guaranteed "defined benefit" pension plans that are disappearing in the private sector, where most employees are left to fend for themselves with 401(k) plans that they mostly or entirely fund themselves.

California's main public-employee pension fund, the nation's largest, has lost at least $18 billion off its stock portfolio since July 1, about 7.5 percent of its $237.5 billion total asset value on June 30.

Florida's pension fund has lost about $9 billion since June 30, a decline of 7 percent for a fund valued at $119.4 billion on Thursday, while the Virginia Retirement System shrank from $54.5 billion on June 30 to about $51 billion by week's end, a decline of 6.4 percent, said its director, Robert P. Schultze.

New York's state comptroller will not say how much the state pension fund has lost during the latest Wall Street roller coaster, but the fund was 5 percent below its pre-recession value before the recent losses and remained nearly $8 billion below its pre-recession value.

And Kentucky, which has more than $20 billion in unfunded pension liabilities, has seen the value of its public pension fund decline $1.7 billion – or 15 percent – since July 1, falling to a total value of $9.7 billion.

Nationwide, states have a combined $689.5 billion in unfunded pension liabilities and $418 billion in government retiree health care obligations, according to data collected earlier this year by The Associated Press. Those benefits are protected by state law or, as in New York, by the constitution.

Pension fund managers say there is no risk current government retirees will miss a monthly check and that they are remaining calm and taking the long view in their investments. Some say the market plunge is even providing a great opportunity to buy stocks at fire-sale prices.

Kentucky Retirement Systems Chief Investor T.J. Carlson said his fund has not made significant changes to its investments in response to the market turmoil.

"We haven't changed our long-term strategy in any way," he said.

Critics of the defined benefit plans, which guarantee pensions for life to public employees and are rarely found any longer in the private sector, say the recent stock market plunge underscores the need for fundamental changes.

The amount state and local governments are being forced to funnel into pension payments is rising as retirees live longer and elected officials have awarded more generous pension benefits in recent years, taking taxpayer money away from core public services.

At the same, pension funds promise returns on investments – 7 percent to 8 percent or more a year – that many critics say are unrealistic in the future.

E.J. McMahon, a senior fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, said the asset levels of virtually all public pension funds are below 2007 levels despite the recovery of the market in 2009 and 2010.

"They still think there is a 'long-term norm,'" he said of fund managers. "The events of the last two months are a reminder of how wrong that might be."

As recently as last month, California's two public pension funds reported investment gains of more than 20 percent for the fiscal year ended June 30, largely driven by rising stock values.

The increase came as both funds – one for teachers, the other for state and local government workers – were clawing their way back from losses in 2008 and 2009 that cost them up to one-third of their asset value.

The recent losses are stoking fears again that taxpayers will have to bail them out at the expense of other programs that already have been subject to deep budget cuts. The state already faces an estimated $75 billion in unfunded public pension liabilities.

"The stock market volatility just shows that the public budget should not be subject to the Dow Jones Industrial Average," said Dan Pellissier, president of California Pension Reform, a group that is preparing a ballot initiative to limit the amounts governments can spend for future pensions.

Pellissier himself will qualify for a $5,000-a-month state pension when he turns 55 in five years after working in state government for two decades. Despite his own government pension, Pellissier said public employees should bear the investment risk for retirement benefits just as private-sector employees do through 401(k) plans.

New York state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said public pension funds work well. New York has reduced pension benefits in the past year for newly hired workers and lowered its performance outlook to 7.5 percent, while most states remain at 8 percent.

"This is a fund that has worked and been able to pay out benefits for 90 years," he said. Managers also note the "funding ratio," which is the percentage of the fund needed to pay out all its obligations, is more than 80 percent in many states, which pension managers say is positive.

As an example of pension funds adapting to meet changing conditions, the $51 billion Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System increased its cash allocation to 8 percent after the 2008 market crash so it could pay benefits without having to sell assets. It has lost as much as 3 percent in value since July 1.

After a strong showing last year in a rebounding market, many state pension fund managers are confident they will ride out the latest gut-churning gyrations on Wall Street.

While Virginia's fund has an unfunded liability of $17.6 billion, it diversified after the stock market losses in 2008 and 2009, allowing it to better weather stock market swings. New Jersey's pension portfolio is more diverse than ever and includes real estate, hedge funds and private equity investments.

"It's a hedge against the kind of market conditions we've seen over the past two weeks," state Treasury spokesman Andy Pratt said. "We have significant protection against the ups and downs of the stock market we're seeing now."

He said returns for the last fiscal year were between 17.5 percent and 18.5 percent, the best year since 1998.

In Massachusetts, investments are being diversified and loopholes to accrue pension benefits are being closed. The state also added 15 years to its deadline for fully funding the retirement system, pushing it to 2040.

Julie Graham-Price, spokeswoman for Ohio's Public Employees Retirement System, said the fund's bond holdings gained this week even as stock values sunk, evidence of a balanced portfolio.

"We have no idea yet what July and August will look like except to say it's not good when the market is volatile and has dropped like it has," said David Urbanek, spokesman for the Illinois Teachers Retirement System. "It's a cyclical thing. We will ride it out, just as we have overcome numerous other downturns over the last 72 years."

Even with the steady-as-she-goes response from pension fund managers, critics of the system say taxpayers should be nervous about their future liabilities to government retirees, said Jim Waters, vice president of the Bluegrass Institute, a nonpartisan group that has pressed for a defined contribution system for government employees in Kentucky.

"Without pension reform, Kentucky could be headed for bankruptcy and the inability to provide necessary services for its neediest citizens," he said. "Kentucky's been in a hole for a while now, but continues to dig ... There's no way we can rely solely on the stock market or even individual contributions alone to close the liability gap."

___

Associated Press writers Roger D. Alford in Frankfort, Ky.; Angela Delli Santi in Trenton, N.J.; Bill Kaczor in Tallahassee, Fla.; Johanna Kaiser in Boston; Bob Lewis in Richmond, Va.; Mark Scolforo in Harrisburg, Pa.; Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio; Adam Weintraub in Sacramento, Calif.; and Christopher Wills in Springfield, Ill., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
ALBANY, N.Y. — Wall Street's volatility has hit state pension funds just as they were beginning to recover from the recession, turning what was merely a troubled forecast into a potentially stor...
ALBANY, N.Y. — Wall Street's volatility has hit state pension funds just as they were beginning to recover from the recession, turning what was merely a troubled forecast into a potentially stor...
Filed by William Alden  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,529
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
08:00 PM on 08/15/2011
And to think, the GOP goons want to put Social Security in the hands of these thieves. Dumb idea.
photo
FoxIslander
Fox Island...no relation to Fox News
07:17 PM on 08/15/2011
ahhh the 401k....an efficient machine for transfering wealth from the middle class to the rich...more manipulated than Vega$
01:46 PM on 08/15/2011
"Despite his own government pension, Pellissier said public employees should bear the investment risk for retirement benefits just as private-sector employees do through 401(k) plans."

1. He is conveniently forgetting that many people in these funds opted out of Social Security and paid into the funds themselves. They were taking a huge risk by doing so at the time.

2. The market is complex and requires a lot more research than most people have time to do. Why are we so eager to make a potentially vulnerable group (people on fixed incomes) even more vulnerable. Are we willing to take a risk that we will be unfunded and required to support this group if the stock market collapses? Three years ago, that comment might have been laughed at, but are any of us with 401(k)'s laughing now?

3. At least for CalSTRS, I believe you have the ability to opt out and manage your own fund if you want to do so.

He's welcome to give up his own pension if he feels that strongly about it. He won't, but he's welcome to do it. I just wish he weren't so hell bent on inflicting his decisions on others.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
12:29 PM on 08/15/2011
as always it is the public that loses !

so what else is new ??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
11:09 AM on 08/15/2011
that,s Why ?

they want to flood the stock market with our elders Social security Money ! after they privatize it of course

so as to keep them afloat up there on wall street
07:27 AM on 08/15/2011
We the people need to demand that there be a freeze on all pension plans because this is the last place that wall street can extort money from us. This market has not shown one ounce of evidence that they have any crediblity, SEC already proven that Goldman is guilty of fraud and fined. Its a case of the punishnment doesn't fit the crime. Anyone sitting in prison for fraud has a good class action suit on thier hands, even Bernie because what he did was no different than the rest of wall street.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anthonyNtx
12:52 AM on 08/15/2011
Everyone wants to cut future employee's pensions, social security, and Medicare. Have we baby boomers been that financially irresponsible to leave our children with all our debts.
12:14 AM on 08/15/2011
I guess it's just me but this always seems like the ultimate Ponzi scheme. The Bernie Madoff scheme seems to be amateurish compared to the rest of the stock market.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
diabloblanco513
TS69
08:29 PM on 08/14/2011
maybe they are intentional in their looting of the public pension funds, I must say I have no trust in the market and how they are run, timing is everything and they always stay ahead of the curve those in control
06:27 PM on 08/14/2011
Keep demonizing big business and be happy when your pension fund collapses!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
11:12 AM on 08/15/2011
big business ,s have left a trail of super fund clean up sites all across this country !

just saying is all :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ConsensusReality
RootenTootenZooten
06:18 PM on 08/14/2011
like mr. boehner said...he's happy; he got 98 percent of what he wanted
04:08 PM on 08/14/2011
I know this sounds like a bizarre suggestion but what about the novel idea of putting your money in...SAVINGS ACCOUNTS?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Walters
Give to each according to need!
06:34 PM on 08/14/2011
You know a national sales tax replacing income tax would drive saving and investment way up. An other bizarre idea! Nearly 100% of taxpayers attempt every known method to deduct from income, not report income, hide income, find loop holes placed in tax law by sucessful lobbiest. Millions pay no tax from the poor to the richest in the world because there is no incentive to save! Why do you think saving accounts that for decades paid 4% don't pay squat now!

Nobody saves as you point out! Consumption taxes verses income taxes promote savings AND investment.

If a millioniere wants to live like a pauper they can, just save and avoid spending.

If the 20 million or more laborers working "under the table" including illegal aliens that are paying NO tax right now, want to buy anything they will finially pay taxes like the poor saps working ligitimately!

Big rich spenders who are paying no tax after deductions will finially have to pay tax just like the poor saps in the middle paying it for them. And savings? No tax for savings or investments.

Ask yourself this: Why would the people collectively making billions in income under the IRS radar EVER place any of it in savings or investment in plain sight? They don't! There's your trouble!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
diabloblanco513
TS69
08:28 PM on 08/14/2011
right my employer matches my savings account ! not
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
02:09 PM on 08/14/2011
Same as going to casinos - no doubt about it.  Every time the little person has accumulated a little, the stock market crashes.  Then they say, hang in there and you will come out ahead!  That is also a lie, because one just does not get 100 years old to wait it out.  Unless you can stand to lose a cool million dollars, don't enter this game!
photo
gonealreb
Our Constitution is just fine, thanks anyway.
01:24 PM on 08/14/2011
What's really frightening is that the stock market is supposed to be the "new, revised, fixed" solution to the Social Security system according to some in D.C. S.S. may need an overhaul, but I fear the results of forcing future retirees into the market, which we all now know cannot be the primary investment vehicle as we approach the years when no one will hire us, or, like me, are already there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Walters
Give to each according to need!
07:03 PM on 08/14/2011
Yea i am no stock trader and forcing me into putting my 40 years of SS investment into stocks would be as bad as........the expert stock traders are doing! It would be gone! Many of my friends who had IRAs and laughed at me for living now while they were going to have it all when they are old. Who's laughing now?

I invested in a good life and living happy without planning to die wealthy and now they have lost everything they lived for. As a Baby boomer I do expect to have my social security!

And those who call it an entitlement will be losing elections as the baby boomers fill the voting booths better then any other demographic! Privatize? They mean steal your pention fund and give to their friends up on Wall Street!

Code words like "modify", "reform", or others to "Save" Social security are just alternate words for stealing.

How bout I modify your pention? I'll make you wait longer and give you less so won't lose it! The WORDS "Medicare and Social Security" not the programs will be protected by changing what they mean! Just like "Jobs"! We can create ten million "jobs" and have ten million working poor but we still have more jobs!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
12:07 PM on 08/14/2011
Gee...maybe if the wealthy had agreed to be less selfish and to pony up a few bucks more in taxes for the sake of the stability of our society, they wouldn't have lost trillions in stock market value.

Just a thought...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Walters
Give to each according to need!
07:20 PM on 08/14/2011
Yea I pay 6% social security tax and my employer pays 6%.

My sister pays .6% on her million or one tenth of what I pay! She retired at 60 with a golden parachute and I could fly a kite inside her home! Naturally she is a Republican and the rest of us are working grunts who can't afford to be Republicans lest we destroy our pentions we call social security.

We love her dearly but she can't take any of it with her! When we all leave this life we will all be equal financially! Can't we all share a little more while we are alive?

I guess the rich won't have to consider heaven since they won't be fitting through the eye of a needle but if we taxed religion how much would money worshipers be paying?

I guess Jesus was a poor sucker like the rest of us asking that the rich share everything they have with the poor and asking the selfproclaimed Godly among us to be the most generous given their great financial power to help us all live better! If I am bitter about one thing it would be 40 years of investment in a program Republicans call an entitlement!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Norman
12:35 AM on 08/15/2011
How will more taxes from the rich stabalize our society?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
10:47 AM on 08/15/2011
Let me count the ways....

1) money is CURRENCY. The word "currency" implies a current, a flow. That's because money is a marker representing human energy that has been expended to benefit society. It comes to most of us as a reward for our hard work. That current, as designed, was intended to keep that energy in circulation, to stimulate the exchange of human capacity and creativity. What happens when it gets locked up in bank vaults and stock certificates is that the flow of energy ceases within our society - it's like a dam holding back all the water so the people downstream have nothing flowing to water their gardens and farms. Taxing the rich at higher levels forces that dam open, releases the backed up water and allows those downstream to grow crops again, to WORK and be productive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
10:47 AM on 08/15/2011
2) For over a century we've been eliminating the need for intensive human energy in the workplace, through the introduction of industry and technology. We're making life easier for people, but we haven't figured out how to translate that to actually living with less stress, because we still demand everyone work for wages to purchase the goods now being made by machines instead of people. The formula is broken, so government safety nets have picked up the slack and enabled people to continue to participate in the broken system. Until we fix the formula that demands labor hours for wages to participate in society, we're going to need government support because there will never be enough jobs to go around for seven billion humans on an industrialized planet. That's why wages are flat and falling; supply and demand theory tells us that the prices fall when the supply overhang is too high.