iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Google Buys Motorola: The Patent Wars Ramp Up


First Posted: 08/15/2011 7:46 pm Updated: 02/16/2012 4:18 pm

Google's purchase of smartphone maker Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion on Monday marks the latest salvo in the software industry's raging patent war -- a pitched battle that threatens to have far-reaching consequences for American innovation.

In buying the hardware company, Google made clear its desire to acquire the estimated 25,000 patents held by Motorola. Google CEO Larry Page characterized the defensive move as one that would "strengthe[n] Google’s patent portfolio, which will enable us to better protect Android from anti-competitive threats from Microsoft, Apple and other companies."

By gaining dominion over this trove of patents, Google will be better positioned to fend off lawsuits from competitors, including Apple and Microsoft. Both companies have launched several high-profile lawsuits over alleged patent infringements by Google.

Google, for its part, contends that these lawsuits are an attempt to levy a tax for the use of patented technology and, in turn, raise the prices of Android phones, which would make the product less competitive in the marketplace.

According to some industry experts, patented technology is, in many cases, far from original -- but simply by having access to a cache of patents, companies are in a better position to defend themselves against future lawsuits.

Dan Ravicher, the executive director of the Public Patent Foundation, explained that in the tech sector, "There's this notion that even if the Joneses are doing something crazy across the street, the popular perception is, 'We should be doing it, too.'"

And the patents themselves may be of questionable value. "There's a patent bubble -- a lot of speculation and bidding up," Ravicher said. He brought up the $4.5 billion a consortium of companies including RIM, Microsoft and Apple paid last month to acquire 6,000 patent rights from software company Nortel "This reminds me of the housing bubble, the dot-com bubble," he said. "Five years from now, people will realize that they have overbid."

Nonetheless, the market for patents has led to what some experts have dubbed an "arms race," with rival companies stockpiling patents as insurance against litigation.

"[The Motorola acquisition] is really about protecting the Android marketplace from these crazy patent lawsuits," said James Bessen, an expert on innovation and patents and a lecturer at the Boston University School of Law. "It's not like Google needed Motorola."

Patent litigation "tripled" after American patent law was changed in the mid-1990s to allow for a greater number of patents, Bessen said. Though he and Ravicher both pointed out that the biotech and pharmaceutical sectors have benefited from the increase in patents, the software industry has in large part been hurt by the change in regulations. This year, the industry is on track to have nearly 3,000 lawsuits.

"In the tech sector, since the late '90s, losses from litigation have been exceeding the benefits," Bessen said, citing his 2008 study.

And with Google's latest move, the increase in patents shows little sign of slowing down. "There will only be more acquisitions based on patents," Bessen said. "Back in the mid '90s, you had Adobe and Oracle saying, 'We don’t need patents.' Then they got hit with lawsuits -- and now they're suing other people. It's just this escalating arms race."

The endgame for the tech sector may be cross licensing deals, which Bessen described as "five year agreements by companies not to sue each other over patents in a particular field." With more patents in its arsenal, Bessen explained that Google may be able to secure a better cross licensing deal with Apple or Microsoft.

Yet if the patent battle continues unabated, there is always the threat that software companies will take their technology overseas -- simply to avoid a thorny and litigious landscape in the United States.

"With arms races, we can only have peace through a lot of fear," Ravicher said.

CORRECTION: A previous version of this post mistakenly said Apple and Microsoft had launched copyright infringement lawsuits against Google. They are patent infringement lawsuits.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Google's purchase of smartphone maker Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion on Monday marks the latest salvo in the software industry's raging patent war -- a pitched battle that threatens to have far-r...
Google's purchase of smartphone maker Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion on Monday marks the latest salvo in the software industry's raging patent war -- a pitched battle that threatens to have far-r...
Google's purchase of smartphone maker Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion on Monday marks the latest salvo in the software industry's raging patent war -- a pitched battle that threatens to have far-r...
Google's purchase of smartphone maker Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion on Monday marks the latest salvo in the software industry's raging patent war -- a pitched battle that threatens to have far-r...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LangstonA
Attempting to stand in the gap.
10:28 PM on 08/16/2011
“If you really wish to understand why Google made this purchase, check out the show When Patents Attack which aired on This American Life on July 22, 2011 (episode 411). This American Life producers did the show in conjunctio­n with the Planet Money producers.

Here's the link:
http://bit­ly.com/pA8­tr7?r=bb”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainObvvious
Calling me a liberal is a compliment!
09:03 AM on 08/16/2011
Anyone else tired of playing the victim game.

Acting like they're the little guy on the block getting picked on by the evil giant corporations...
photo
flinthfp
1John 5:11-12 Eternal Life in flesh
06:42 AM on 08/16/2011
Leave my Google Voice alone !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:47 AM on 08/16/2011
Blue Star loves Google.
05:20 AM on 08/16/2011
Mark Cuban said it just this week ... get rid of software patents. Many, if not most of the software patents granted to date would not stand the scrutiny of a prior art review. The Founding Fathers would be shocked to learn that someone could patent the way a calculation is done with an abacus. Software patents are basically the same thing. M$ may have visions of using patents to strangle Linux/Android but it is very unlikely that this will happen. Ultimately Linux/Android will crush Windows.

http://www.webpronews.com/mark-cuban-patents-2011-08
04:38 AM on 08/16/2011
Of course Google would have liked the Nortel patents, but were they just ***king with the others to drive up the final bid price? (Supported by those strange, though meaningful, bid numbers.) Some have suggested that Google did the same thing with Skype, making Microsoft think that it wanted Skype a lot when it didn't, just to drive up the price, which would explain why Skype sold for waaaay more than people expected (and prompting others to suggest we're in another tech bubble).

So this acquisition of Motorola coming at the heels of the Nortel patents auction makes me think it was something of a diversion tactic that paid off, considering the final bid was 3x higher than what analysts expected. An $8.5billion acquisition doesn't happen that fast unless it'd planned it. So perhaps it didn't even expect to get the Nortel patents and had its eye on Motorola the whole time. And if Google were really butthurt about the others colluding against it in the Nortel auction, would it really be so vocal and whiny? Considering all the litigation against Google, the execs surely would've expected some collusion against them, if they drove the price high enough...

I hate Google, but I can't help but think that it could've had its poker face on this whole time.
04:09 AM on 08/16/2011
Its is a amazing story so thanks for giving us.
Top medical colleges in china
01:23 AM on 08/16/2011
The Justice Department needs to stay out of antitrust in regards to tech. So if one of these companies is getting an edge that is too large they need to let the war continue. There is always a smaller company that is looking to compete in tech and the war is likely to continue for a long time.
07:14 AM on 08/16/2011
You actually do not understand the issue going on. There needs to be more rigorous regulation regarding software patents, not less.

The problem is, the little guy is getting screwed by this current patent set up. The big boys, Microsoft, Apple, Google, etc. control vast amounts of patents to drive the little guy out of business. They can claim you have violated a number of their patents, and will sue you for millions unless you basically shut down your business. Here's the kicker: You don't get to know what patent you're actually violating. You can only find that out in a long, expensive court case.

On top of that, a lot of patents are extremely questionable. Apple or MS could be holding a patent for a particular procedure that is too vague to enforce, or too broad to what *should* be allowed to be patented. Want an extreme example?

A guy patented toast. http://www.google.com/patents/about/6080436_Bread_refreshing_method.html?id=IpwDAAAAEBAJ

So no, there will not be that "smaller company that is looking to compete" in this world. Regulation needs to occur.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
From the Raft
12:46 AM on 08/16/2011
So this is what corporations do with their tax cut savings??
12:29 AM on 08/16/2011
I cant believe Google finally buys Motorola...
we see the Best Digital Frames http://www.digitalframestoday.com
10:55 PM on 08/15/2011
AT&T purchase of T-Mobile is more of an anti-trust/monopoly is a bigger issue then Google making this move.
Way to go Google, nice one.
01:25 AM on 08/16/2011
Anti-Trust is bs.
photo
Morgantheaxe
Eisenhower Republicans don't drink tea!!
10:58 AM on 08/16/2011
Actually we desperately need another Teddy Roosevelt. Someone who will break these companies up
photo
SirSlappy
My micro-bio is still empty.
10:46 PM on 08/15/2011
But Microsoft can't stick Internet explorer in it's OS?
Congress is a bunch of doddering old whi+eys without a clue.
photo
Brenda Starr
Time is before us. Time is after us.
10:56 AM on 08/16/2011
Microsoft hasn't even fixed Windows 3.1.
photo
SirSlappy
My micro-bio is still empty.
09:43 PM on 08/16/2011
I'm not presenting an argument about quality; just legal equivalencies when enforcing anti-trust suspicions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramon Moreno
Read below.
09:56 PM on 08/15/2011
Droid.
09:52 PM on 08/15/2011
No wonder innovation has died in this country, patent squatting...
07:17 AM on 08/16/2011
It's actually called patent trolls -- you want to cross a bridge, and somebody pops up demanding money. They don't actually own that bridge, but... You pay it because you want to avoid the courts.

It's a bit of a protection racket, really. This American Life had a pretty good episode about it all you should check out. It's both enlightening and nauseating.

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/441/when-patents-attack
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Calhoun
What are you DOING to improve things?
09:46 PM on 08/15/2011
Motoroogle? Lame....more like Googorola, if Google is the one buying Motorola. Plus it sounds cooler. ;)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:37 AM on 08/16/2011
Maybe they could dig up Joe Garagiola for the spokesman...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Calhoun
What are you DOING to improve things?
12:58 PM on 08/16/2011
Sounds like a sports guy, maybe?