iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz Calls For Boycott On Campaign Contributions

First Posted: 08/15/11 05:38 PM ET Updated: 10/15/11 06:12 AM ET

Howard Schultz Starbucks Ceo

The CEO of Starbucks wants Washington to wake up and smell the coffee.

Infuriated by what he described as irresponsible behavior, Howard Schultz is calling on his fellow CEOs -- and other would-be donors -- to boycott all campaign contributions to either party until the nation's elected leaders put aside their political posturing and find some common ground on long-term fiscal issues.

Schultz wrote in a widely distributed email dated Monday that, like "so many common-sense Americans," he wants elected leaders to consider "all options, from entitlement programs to taxes," and reach a wide-ranging budget deal "long before the deadline arrives this fall."

Schultz concluded with a promise: "We today pledge to withhold any further campaign contributions to the President and all members of Congress until a fair, bipartisan deal is reached that sets our nation on stronger long-term fiscal footing. "

It's not clear who else he was speaking for -- and Schultz is something of an unlikely populist. His 2010 compensation was nearly $22 million, according to Equilar, adding to a net worth of over three-quarters of a billion dollars.

Then again, earlier Monday morning, the even richer Warren Buffett, in a New York Times op-ed, railed at Congress for being too billionaire-friendly.

Fred Wertheimer, dean of Washington's campaign-finance reform community, said his group, Democracy 21, will be working with Schultz to build national support for a donation boycott. "He asked for our help and we are happy to give it to him," Wertheimer said.

"We think it's a bold move," he added. "And we think the gridlock and deadlock and partisanship in Washington has reached such levels that it has to be broken through."

Wertheimer said the relationship between money and Washington politics is clear: "When you're in a situation when you need sacrifices to be made from all quarters, the power exercised by political money makes it extremely difficult to achieve that result."

Republican intransigence on raising any taxes whatsoever, even on the wealthiest Americans, has been a major source of Washington's gridlock.

Schultz has not been a particularly generous political donor himself. And if he ends up being the only donor who actually goes through with the boycott, the losers will be Democratic candidates. The opensecrets.org website shows Schultz gave $70,000 to the Democratic National Committee between 1996 and 2000, but in the last four years has contributed less than $10,000 total, shared among Washington State's two Democratic senators and President Barack Obama.

In his email, Schultz made what he called a "second pledge" as well, after noting that "while the long-term fiscal challenge is serious, even more painful to millions of Americans today is the immediate crisis of jobs."

He vowed: "Our companies are going to hire. We are going to accelerate growth, employment, and investment in jobs."

Schultz's boycott campaign was first reported over the weekend by New York Times columnist Joe Nocera. Nocera described how the boycott campaign was the outgrowth of an earlier email that Schultz sent last week to Starbucks employees and some fellow business leaders. In that email, Schultz described himself as "growing more and more frustrated at the lack of cooperation and irresponsibility among elected officials as they have put partisan agendas before the people's agenda."

He told Nocera the response was so positive that it galvanized him to take the next step.

Schultz was not immediately available for comment.

READ the full text of Schultz's email:

August 15, 2011

Dear Fellow Concerned Americans:

Our country is better than this.

Over the last few weeks and months, our national elected officials from both parties have failed to lead. They have chosen to put partisan and ideological purity over the well-being of the people. They have undermined the full faith and credit of the United States. They have stirred up fears about our economic prospects without doing anything to truly address those fears. They have spent a resource even more precious than the dollar: our collective confidence in each other, in the future, and in our ability to solve problems together.

As leaders in business, we have watched all this unfold, first with frustration and then with dismay. Like so many of our employees and customers, we are gravely concerned about the current situation. Today, with both humility and urgency, we propose to do something about it.

First, we aim to push our elected leaders to face the nation's long-term fiscal challenges with civility, honesty, and a willingness to sacrifice their own re-election. This means not kicking the can anymore. It means reaching a deal on debt, revenue, and spending long before the deadline arrives this fall. It means considering all options, from entitlement programs to taxes.

This is what so many common-sense Americans want. That is why we today pledge to withhold any further campaign contributions to the President and all members of Congress until a fair, bipartisan deal is reached that sets our nation on stronger long-term fiscal footing. And we invite leaders of businesses – indeed, all concerned Americans – to join us in this pledge.

We also believe in leading by positive example. And we believe that while the long-term fiscal challenge is serious, even more painful to millions of Americans today is the immediate crisis of jobs. Tens of millions are unemployed and underemployed. Right now our economy is frozen in a cycle of fear and uncertainty. Companies are afraid to hire. Consumers are afraid to spend. Banks are afraid to lend. Record levels of cash are piling up in corporate treasuries, idling. That cash is not being used to expand operations, train new workers, underwrite new ventures, or spark innovation.

The only way to break this cycle of fear is to break it. The only way to get the country’s economic circulatory system flowing again is to start pumping lifeblood through it. That is why we today issue a second pledge. Our companies are going to hire. We are going to accelerate growth, employment, and investment in jobs.

We do this because we want to set in motion an upward spiral of confidence. We are not waiting for government to create an incentive program or a stimulus. We are not waiting for economic indicators to tell us it’s safe to act. We are hiring more people now. We invite leaders of businesses across the country to join us in this pledge as well – and to bring their stakeholders into the effort. Confidence is contagious. The best thing we can do now is to spread it.

This is a time for citizenship, not partisanship. It is a time for action. We don't pretend that our two pledges are quick fixes. We just believe that in this moment of great uncertainty, the government needs discipline, the people need jobs – and leaders need to lead.

Our country is better than this. Let’s get things moving now.

Respectfully,
Howard Schultz

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,062
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (34 total)
10:48 PM on 08/26/2011
GREAT IDEA! ... Maybe this will be the "tipping point" to stimulate substantive campaign finance reform with every American! ... Can each & every Starbucks store across the U.S. become a polling station? ... How can a meaningful grass roots network take root to DEMAND campaign finance reform?

Throw the useless bums out & let's get some good / smart folks in office who will make substantive improvements. ... ENOUGH is ENOUGH !! ...
07:36 AM on 08/26/2011
I have only had 3 cups of coffee from Starbucks, but if the gentleman really does this I will visit Starbucks often. I agree with him fully and will support the movement. The government has to realize that they work for us. Period.
photo
credfernjr
Writer, minister in conflict transformation
04:50 PM on 08/23/2011
This sounds like a great idea,but it actually sidesteps the real issue and lumps all politicians together. Furthermore, the Koch brothers would simply step in and rev up their donations. More on this here: http://charlesredfern.com/2011/08/23/well-motivated-side-stepping/
04:53 PM on 08/21/2011
Oh the irony is thick.

A mega millionaire is calling for a temporary boycott of bribing politicians.
11:20 AM on 08/17/2011
It sounds like a way for Starbucks to get publicity but I am in the mood to punish these companies for along time. The overreach is just too much. Anyone who tries it should be blacklisted forever so that others will fear the same reprisals. As it is, I doubt it is possible to ever have a government not elected by morons. Punish them all.
09:24 AM on 08/17/2011
Brilliant move. Important message. Unfortunate times.

This is a sad time in our country. As JFK might say today:

"Ask not what your country can do for you, but what your Government has done to your country!"

I am angry and I will not forget.

Good for you Howard!
06:08 AM on 08/17/2011
A former political commentator said some time ago in the face of the monumental ignorance of his fellow countrymen he was going to retire to a smallholding, grow vegetables and watch America feed on itself to destruction.

He will probably be drinking a Starbucks coffe right now.

Amen
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HawaiianLady
My name means Gift of God.
09:35 PM on 08/16/2011
Just another big-bucks guy trying to destroy Medicare and Social Security. Note he wants everything on the table, including what he calls the "entitlement" programs, after the Republicans caused the crisis we're in, pure and simple.
08:02 PM on 08/16/2011
Sounds like another way of saying "If you want this bribe, vote the way I want you to. Or we won't give you anymore money."
Definition:
Bribery, a form of corruption, is an act implying money or gift given that alters the behavior of the recipient.
07:51 PM on 08/16/2011
I would enjoy relief from the staccato of demands for contributions; however, Shultz' idea will let the guy with the biggest/best connections to CORPORATIONS (Starbucks? Mr Shultz?) who actually purchase their United States Senator or Representative. Yes indeed, finance reform is ever more necessary now that the SUPREME COURT fab five miscreants have torpedoed our democracy. Woops, you say financial support is now equal opportunity????? Go eat snakes and think again. Wage earners and unions cannot compete in this field. Why dont we try a simple method: All wage earners are required to drop $20 in the tray annually to support federal elections and $5 or $10 to support state and local elections. If we dont do something soon we will ultimately lose our democracy to the money elites. Also suggest we cut the election season to 6 months. This would give everyone time to identify candidates and for analysts to provide good data upon which we could make our pick.
07:45 PM on 08/16/2011
Yep, he's not gonna take it anymore because he already has it.
05:12 PM on 08/16/2011
We PAY for Social Security and Medicare separately from what we pay to the IRS. They are line items on our tax return. None of the discussions and posturing going on now should focus on either. If the programs are running any deficit, that deficit needs to be addressed outside of the money that comes from our tax payments to the IRS. Both SS & Medicare were set up to be separate from the tax gathering system. So, why are these programs being targeted?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HawaiianLady
My name means Gift of God.
09:38 PM on 08/16/2011
Because conservatives want the money that goes into them and comes out of them. They want to privatize Social Security because it's the only revenue-producing tax we have, and it brings in money they want. Letting it go to the people it was intended for isn't on their agenda.
Dogmudgeon
Saepe in Errore, Nunquam in Dubito
03:45 AM on 08/17/2011
Proud to be the first Fan!
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
05:06 PM on 08/16/2011
Responsible companies will boycott. Irresponsible ones will continue to buy their puppets.

And the Republibaggers will win. Because their supporters will continue to contribute to the hilt in a record breaking obscenity now allowable under Citizens United. They have no conscience or responsibility. They just want to win and own everything and everyone.

There's your market balance.
05:01 PM on 08/16/2011
Coming from the guy donating millions each year to Israel.. I dont know how legitimate his stance on the issue is.
04:53 PM on 08/16/2011
As a Washingtonian (state), I find it hard to believe that this is Howard's attempt at doing this for the good of anyone other than himself. My guess would be this was on the playbook for some time and Howard saw a way to make it a grand jester of sacrifice for the betterment of the country.

If it walks like a duck......it's probably Howard pretending again.