iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

IBM 'Synapse' Chips Mimic Human Brain (VIDEO)

First Posted: 08/18/11 09:18 AM ET Updated: 10/18/11 06:12 AM ET

JORDAN ROBERTSON, AP/THE HUFFINGTON POST (SAN FRANCISCO) -- Computers, like humans, can learn. But when Google tries to fill in your search box based only on a few keystrokes, or your iPhone predicts words as you type a text message, it's only a narrow mimicry of what the human brain is capable.

The challenge in training a computer to behave like a human brain is technological and physiological, testing the limits of computer and brain science. But researchers from IBM Corp. say they've made a key step toward combining the two worlds.

The company announced Thursday that it has built two prototype chips that it says process data more like how humans digest information than the chips that now power PCs and supercomputers.

The chips represent a significant milestone in a six-year-long project that has involved 100 researchers and some $41 million in funding from the government's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA. IBM has also committed an undisclosed amount of money.

The prototypes offer further evidence of the growing importance of "parallel processing," or computers doing multiple tasks simultaneously. That is important for rendering graphics and crunching large amounts of data.

The uses of the IBM chips so far are prosaic, such as steering a simulated car through a maze, or playing Pong. It may be a decade or longer before the chips make their way out of the lab and into actual products.

But what's important is not what the chips are doing, but how they're doing it, says Giulio Tononi, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Wisconsin at Madison who worked with IBM on the project.

The chips' ability to adapt to types of information that it wasn't specifically programmed to expect is a key feature.

"There's a lot of work to do still, but the most important thing is usually the first step," Tononi said in an interview. "And this is not one step, it's a few steps."

Technologists have long imagined computers that learn like humans. Your iPhone or Google's servers can be programmed to predict certain behavior based on past events. But the techniques being explored by IBM and other companies and university research labs around "cognitive computing" could lead to chips that are better able to adapt to unexpected information.

IBM's interest in the chips lies in their ability to potentially help process real-world signals such as temperature or sound or motion and make sense of them for computers.

IBM, which is based in Armonk, N.Y., is a leader in a movement to link physical infrastructure, such as power plants or traffic lights, and information technology, such as servers and software that help regulate their functions. Such projects can be made more efficient with tools to monitor the myriad analog signals present in those environments.

Dharmendra Modha, project leader for IBM Research, said the new chips have parts that behave like digital "neurons" and "synapses" that make them different than other chips. Each "core," or processing engine, has computing, communication and memory functions.

"You have to throw out virtually everything we know about how these chips are designed," he said. "The key, key, key difference really is the memory and the processor are very closely brought together. There's a massive, massive amount of parallelism."

The project is part of the same research that led to IBM's announcement in 2009 that it had simulated a cat's cerebral cortex, the thinking part of the brain, using a massive supercomputer. Using progressively bigger supercomputers, IBM had previously simulated 40 percent of a mouse's brain in 2006, a rat's full brain in 2007, and 1 percent of a human's cerebral cortex in 2009.

A computer with the power of the human brain is not yet near. But Modha said the latest development is an important step.

"It really changes the perspective from `What if?' to `What now?'" Modha said. "Today we proved it was possible. There have been many skeptics, and there will be more, but this completes in a certain sense our first round of innovation."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

JORDAN ROBERTSON, AP/THE HUFFINGTON POST (SAN FRANCISCO) -- Computers, like humans, can learn. But when Google tries to fill in your search box based only on a few keystrokes, or your iPhone predicts ...
JORDAN ROBERTSON, AP/THE HUFFINGTON POST (SAN FRANCISCO) -- Computers, like humans, can learn. But when Google tries to fill in your search box based only on a few keystrokes, or your iPhone predicts ...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 421
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
10:08 PM on 09/24/2011
Interestingly, a lot of what we use the human brain for now is to run systems that are built on our technologies. So, we build a car, add roads, and require a certain skill set to navigate it...one that is easily compromised by impairment and is costly (cost of human driver per hour).

So this is closing the loop...letting the machines navigate the machines.

We can go back to playing lyres and composing myths. I guess.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:54 AM on 09/18/2011
of cours ethey will get there and then you will ahve a brain like human thinking at the speed of light a million times faster, more or less the difference between an animal, electric brain and a chemical plant brain. And then we will be history. This is so obvious as any ev olutionary/extinctive process in nature, the only difference is that we, humans are racing towards our self-extinction. So far robots and pcs are the new blue collar and white collar workers that cause this massive age of unemployment, but the machine is god, you cannot even argue it anymore except in scifi.
www.economicstruth.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Cash
Enlisted in 1971 - Retired in 1996
02:21 AM on 09/09/2011
Hmmm...brains, "Good sauteed with butter and garlic..." - Hannibal Lecter
01:40 PM on 08/22/2011
Query: How in the world are we programming a computer chip to process information and "mimic" the human brain, when we don't even understand how our own brain works?
Query 2: Is this the result of human arrogance?

End of query.
07:38 PM on 09/07/2011
We don't know exactly how our brain works, but we do know a great deal of information on it.

On IBM's part it is not arrogance. On the government's part for funding it, it is not arrogance. The information that is getting to you through the media will most likely make it sound like arrogance though. The news will make everything sound much different than it actually is.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Cash
Enlisted in 1971 - Retired in 1996
02:17 AM on 09/09/2011
No research is arrogance. "Arrogance" implies disrespect. Disprespect for what?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rex Devious
If you don't vote, don't bitch
04:35 PM on 08/21/2011
The don't seem to address much about how this differs from software Neural Nets.

They also don't say *which* human brain this mimics, which seems important. Because there are many people with brains that could be mimicked with a sock full of popcorn. Some days... it even seems like most of us.
07:41 PM on 09/07/2011
"They also don't say *which* human brain this mimics"
All human brains work relatively the same way. The differences in people's brain are caused by different paths, neurons, etc, but they all go through the same 'cycle' of motions.
03:44 AM on 08/21/2011
Get this down, combine with quantum computing, and what'll we have? Self aware computers that can not only out think us, but can outthink what we even consider possible. Imagine no encryption currently on earth impenetrable to a thinking quantum computer. Better get working on programming ethics into these things lest repubs get their hands on it. It'll be so far beyond their understanding they'll just say god did it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:47 PM on 08/22/2011
And they'll be right, because we will, again, have created G_d :3 I do hope our new Mistresses & Masters will keep good care of their pets (us) :3
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Cash
Enlisted in 1971 - Retired in 1996
02:32 AM on 09/09/2011
Isaac Asimov addressed this problem in "I, Robot" in 1953:
1.A robot (read: "Self-aware computer program") may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2.A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3.A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
It's just a matter of programming. If we fail to protect ourselves when it's so easy to do so, we'll deserve it.
02:45 AM on 08/21/2011
Humans are doomed.
08:13 PM on 08/20/2011
TERMINATORS (THE START FOR REAL)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:47 PM on 08/22/2011
Harlan Ellison is shore happy
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mora
05:48 AM on 08/20/2011
I want a chip that I can just download new release movies to my head. Then I don't have to go to the Movie theater and see a movie with people texting during the film.
12:45 AM on 08/20/2011
Please don't make a robot "brain" the human brain just makes me think it is going to end, very, very badly for a lot of people.
02:42 PM on 08/19/2011
at 2100 hours on Aug 12, 2013 SkyNet became "self aware"!
02:24 PM on 08/19/2011
No more auto accidents? Maybe one big error mistake ? Auto repairs and insurance companies and hospitals and funeral parlors might think about that!
photo
Ceartas
Guitars. Guns. Fast Women. Jeeps.
02:23 PM on 08/19/2011
I need one of these so I can remember the 60's. While standing in line waiting for my implant, I noted that Rick Parry wasn't in queue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edwardandersons
The Lord is my Shepard
09:28 PM on 08/19/2011
Funny comment! Rick Perry was on his yacht with hillary sipping human blood while gazing at the moon! hehe
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LittleStream
11:02 AM on 08/19/2011
I mistakenly thought this was going to be comments about the computer chip development. People there are other things in life than sniping matches between Democrat and Republican. I just want to know if they can invent this chip why they can't develop a chip that will run a car? Ahhh, gas companies probably wouldn't like that!
02:21 PM on 08/19/2011
Neither would auto repair shops or auto insurance companies. Oh yes there would be a slowdow in the hospital and death related bussiness. UNLESS SOMETHING GOES WRONG! Then the damage might be equal to that of an A bomb!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:48 PM on 08/22/2011
Why not try to design one yourself :3
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LittleStream
08:25 PM on 08/22/2011
I'm not a mechanical engineer, definitely not a computer engineer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:10 AM on 08/19/2011
As Kurzweil's says, the Singularity is Near.