More

Los Angeles Public Transit Access Top Among Major Metropolitan Areas, Besting Even New York

La Metro Rail

First Posted: 08/18/11 07:13 PM ET Updated: 10/18/11 06:12 AM ET

People stranded without a car may have better luck finding a bus in Los Angeles than in the greater New York City area, a new report from the Brookings Institution has found.

Of all major metropolitan areas in the country, Los Angeles does the best job of giving people without cars access to public transportation, according to the study. 99.1 percent of no-car households in the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana area have access to public transit, a figure bested only by much smaller Honolulu, where 99.3 percent of carless residents have transit access.

That means that in those California cities, nearly 355,457 carless households most of them low-income, rely on transit to get around. In the New York region, including suburban parts of New Jersey and Pennsylvania, more than 2 million households without cars use the subway or a bus. Yet given the higher population, the overall rate of access there is slightly lower, at 98.7 percent.

Adie Tomer, the author of the report, said he wasn't surprised by the findings, despite "that classic archetype L.A. residents have to deal with all the time -- that L.A. is the capital of car culture."

"The reality is, it's also really good transit culture too when it comes to the ability to get on a bus," Tomer said.

Reached by phone, a Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority official seemed unaware of the study's findings but pleased by L.A.'s top ranking.

"That's good news to hear," Metro spokesperson Marc Littman said. "But the better news is that there's going to be even better access in the future."

Where Los Angeles lags, the report and one that came before it suggested, is in providing the hundreds of thousands of carless Angelenos with a quick commute.

In that respect, L.A. has a lot of work to do: only 36 percent of zero-vehicle households can get to their place of employment in 90 minutes or less (that figure includes areas not served by Metro). The region's dispersed job centers -- Downtown, Culver City, Beverly Hills, and elsewhere -- make it difficult for transit to connect commuters to a single central business district.

Metro argues that its rapidly expanding rail network, catalyzed by funds from the Measure R sales tax, will enable people to get to work more quickly. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has made changing the city's car-centric reputation, through efforts like garnering voters' approval of Measure R to pay for Metro's rail expansion, a cornerstone of his time in office.

"The west side is underserved right now by rapid transit, particularly rail, but that's being addressed," Littman said.

"As traffic slows down, so do the buses, but when that subway opens to the west side, rain or shine it'll be 25 minutes -- no matter what traffic's like on the west side -- 25 minutes from downtown to UCLA."

Littman stressed that Metro still values its bus lines, but Esperanza Martinez, lead organizer for the Bus Riders Union, disagreed. "The problem with MTA’s line of argument is that they are massively reducing bus service," she said.

The Bus Riders Union is particularly steamed about the series of fare increases that have occurred over the last few years and the elimination of "critical rapid service in poor communities of color," like the 711 rapid in South Los Angeles.

Many Angelenos may live near a bus line, Martinez said, but "simply having access to a bus that runs once an hour does not mean that people will utilize ... it because it does not meet their needs."

One surprising finding in the report was that 21 percent of households without a car use one to get to work.

"How are they doing that?" Tomer wondered. He speculated that "if you don't have a car, you find someone's car to borrow. It reminds me of being back in college."

Yet borrowing a car to get to a part-time job at a video store in college, Tomer noted, was a lot less life-or-death than doing it several times a week to support a family.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

People stranded without a car may have better luck finding a bus in Los Angeles than in the greater New York City area, a new report from the Brookings Institution has found. Of all major metropoli...
People stranded without a car may have better luck finding a bus in Los Angeles than in the greater New York City area, a new report from the Brookings Institution has found. Of all major metropoli...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 52
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
05:26 PM on 08/20/2011
Yes, LA transit works just fine. IF, you have all the time in the world, no appointments to keep where a 20-25 minute delay isn't acceptable, don't really want to go any place popular or important and have enough money for cab fare when you finally give up on the RTD. The trains do work well, but they don't go to many places that aren't in a direct line to downtown. One very pleasurable experience was the Red Line from the Valley into Hollywood. Went to the Pantages with another couple who parked in the $20.00 lot on Sunset. Called them from the transit station in No. Hollywood on our way home, and they'd just exited the lot. That was cool, and a whole lot cheaper.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
09:48 PM on 08/19/2011
This article only shows that liars can figure.

There is no rapid mass transit in LA. It is all very slow. I live 2 blocks from the filth called the Hollywood subway and it takes 3 times as long to get to the courthouse via subway than driving -- in LA traffic at rush hour.

The reality is this. If you're Brown stay underground as the Light is for the White. The entire subway bus system is designed for the third world population so that the surface streets stay unclogged for the elite. In the last decade LA has become a nasty, corrupt, vile, bigoted city especially Hollywood -- which is why the population is fleeing while those of us in the hills spend much of our days devising news ways to deter the criminals which the corrupt politicos spawn. We actually do not dislike the "poor" -- we know that they're abused and victims, but we also do not like to wake up at 2:00 a.m. and find intruders in our bedrooms.

A decade of Corruption and Incompetence will take its toll on any city.
05:27 PM on 08/19/2011
Statistics aside, this is bullshit. I lost my car in an accident with a bus (their fault) and now must take public transport everywhere I go. What was once an 15 min drive from home to work is now an hour and 15ish minute train. Visiting a friend in WeHo from los feliz is a 45min trip, once the bus even gets there, of course. The busses are always late, always packed, and I have had them pass me by without stopping. Having "access" does not mean it is effective, well maintained, or reliable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
09:52 PM on 08/19/2011
Oh but Tommy LaBonge and Erika Garcetti insist that everything is fine. All we need is a 49 story high rise, a 55 story high rise and another 20 story hotel next to the Capitol Records building and everything will be fine. Then there is the 30 story building at Gower and Hollywood and the 30+ story on Sunset and then at the old CBS at El Centro.

you should follow Erika's advice and take the subway to WeHo.
05:23 PM on 08/19/2011
LA Public Transit Access is the Best in the country???,having lived here in LA for yrs I really doubt that, first of all it depends on where you live in LA, for me to take a bus/train from culver city to long beach will take at least 2 hrs, by car on the 405=less than 30 mins, but it must say a lot about other states if LA public transport is the best we have!!.
05:12 PM on 08/19/2011
I just started using the Metrorail to travel to my excursions and I love it! It's nice going to Little Tokyo or the fashion district and not worry about parking!!!!! I've done Watt's Towers, Universal, Olvera Street, China Town, and the Vincent Price Art Gallery at ELAC. All of the employees are on the ball too. Love all the design and artwork at each station too. Great job LA!
05:11 PM on 08/19/2011
Since buses can't magically fly above traffic, the biggest public transit "advantage" in LA is not much of one at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
09:55 PM on 08/19/2011
The Internet is the best transportation device
photo
ProudToBeVeryLiberal
Science is the antidote to the poison of religion
05:11 PM on 08/19/2011
I'm not sure what kind of metric this study uses, but to go from point A to point B by public transportation in LA usually involves spending an entire morning changing buses/metro. Which is why every time I'm there (my work brings me to SoCal often, not to mention my aunt's family lives in the OC) I have to rent a car. Heck the train from Norwalk to LAX doesn't even get to LAX!! It'll take you to a place south of LAX and then you'll have to hop on a bus for the airport. Ridiculous.

Granted BART in my native San Francisco isn't the best system in the world, but it_beats anything they have in LA hands down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
10:05 PM on 08/19/2011
In 1915, the city of Los Angeles conducted a very professional study which examined the possibility of subways in LA in great detail. (LA no longer publishes such honest research papers. Only what the corrupt politicians want published is seen.)

In 1915 LA found that people will not walk more than 1/2 mile to public transit, and thus, once a city reached 5 miles radius, subways ceased to function as viable transportation. As far as we can tell from the B.S. that passes for a "study" in today's corrupt environment, the Metro still adheres to that figure, but there is some indication that they may use only 1/4 mile walking distatnce. You can figure out for yourself why a city with a 5 mile radius will start having trouble with a fixed rail subway when people will not walk more than 1/2 mile to a station.

Nonetheless, the corrupt developers keep saying they can build, build build because everyone will use the subway. Look at the nearly vacant W hotel. It is built on top of a subway station, but the subway covers 1/100 of the area of the county and much less of the Greater LA area. It is basically worthless -- plus it's dirty, noisy and dangerous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
voxpop88
04:53 PM on 08/19/2011
I'm an LA native (Echo Park, Redondo Beach, Hollywood, Westside, San Gabriel Valley AND Orange County-- and I've lived in all the major "beach cities" in California, and in other states.
The key to getting around anywhere (and I've driven around in lots of cars as well) is:

1. Bicycling/skateboarding & using the bus and/or train.
2. Walking (lots) & using the bus and/or train.

You will need to carry a backpack & use lots of maps & know where all the "facilities" and water & food resources are... this lifestyle will make you healthy BUT the weather (winter/summer) is the CRUSHER!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
10:07 PM on 08/19/2011
That's great -- unless you have a life to live that requires you to do anything more than Travel to and From.

It's great getting to court or a business meeting dripping with sweat and smelling like a pig.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dgoshilla
04:38 PM on 08/19/2011
It really depends on where you live. Right down my block I can grab a bus. 10 minute walk to Hollywood/Highland Metro gets me anywhere in the city. 2 minute walk from Ralphs/Trader Joes/Best Buy/Target, Melrose, Sunset, shopping on LaBrea etc. People that complain LA isn't walkable or that there is no public transit have made poor choices of where they live.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
10:12 PM on 08/19/2011
That is simply false. The Metro covers only 1/100 of the county so it cannot get you everywhere -- unless you don't mind walking 5 miles once you disembark in Chattsworth> what about Pomona? or Pasadena? Or bell or Downey or Santa Monica or even Beverly Hills???

There is no Metro stop near Trader Joes, except the Metro stop where you get on your subway. do you really take the subway from Hollywood and Vine to Hollywood and Vine? It does not go to Melrose or La Brea.

If you've taken the metro to those places, then you're really tripping but not on mass transit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Sachs
04:37 PM on 08/19/2011
There's only better access because there's a bus broken down at every other bus stop.
04:37 PM on 08/19/2011
This study is BEYOND ridiculous. I am a native of Los Angeles.

Go to Germany and see how to do transportation; CLEAN, punctual, and safe.

Good luck getting from one side of the SF Valley to another on on RTD bus, without feeling like you are in a third world country or county jail waiting room. Its not enjoyable, and I cant imagine taking it at night or if I were a woman.
04:25 PM on 08/19/2011
"That's good news to hear," Metro spokesperson Marc Littman said. "Because my car was just stolen".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
10:13 PM on 08/19/2011
Yeah, his car was stolen by someone who could not bear the thought to ride the Metro one more day!
04:00 PM on 08/19/2011
This is entirely not surprising. LA Metro has an incredible bus system that is extremely pervasive, and their Rapid buses are top-notch. Not only that but there also regional bus transit systems like LADOT, West Hollywood CityLine, Santa Monica Blue Bus, Culver CityBus, DASH, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
10:14 PM on 08/19/2011
Good drugs makes anything seem great
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
theuniversalcollective
from the ether that is net
03:53 PM on 08/19/2011
lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol ....... wait, what did you say again ...... lololololoololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololo
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Estevan Benson
03:49 PM on 08/19/2011
Hmm. Odd. Don't know what to say. I use the transit here often. It works. It's fine but a huge portion of the city is absolutely neglected. I don't understand how that's overlooked.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
theuniversalcollective
from the ether that is net
03:54 PM on 08/19/2011
it's the new math
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
10:16 PM on 08/19/2011
It would cost over $2 Trillion

The problem goes away when the high density goes away. It is not the cars; it is the high density.

in 1993, LA predicted this nightmare would happen if it did not stop its excessive oveer building. It did not stop and now the city's infrastructure is crumbling and the more educated and talented population is fleeing. can you say "inner City 1960's"?