More

The Religious Life Of Two Senators

Demint And Lieberman

First Posted: 08/17/2011 6:29 pm Updated: 10/18/2011 6:12 am

By Jack Jenkins
Religion News Service

WASHINGTON (RNS) Truth be told, when asked to name a spiritual role model, few people would likely pick a sitting U.S. senator.

In fact, with congressional approval ratings at record lows, few lawmakers -- Democrats or Republicans -- would seem to qualify as a profile in righteousness.

But two new books this summer, Sen. Jim DeMint's "The Great American Awakening" and Sen. Joe Lieberman's "The Gift of Rest," are trying to push back against the image of a godless Senate.

To be sure, DeMint and Lieberman have differences both political and religious: DeMint is a Tea Party Republican from South Carolina and a self-described "follower of Christ," while Lieberman, an observant Jew from Connecticut, is a sometimes unpredictable Independent.

But their books offer equally intimate glimpses into the spiritual lives of America's elected officials.

On the surface, DeMint's "The Great American Awakening" is primarily focused on the insurgent conservative movement, particularly the Tea Party.

"The book is really about what Americans did between when Obama was elected and the 2010 elections," DeMint said in an interview. "The power has shifted out of the hands of Washington and back into the hands of the people where it belongs."

While the topic is technically more about politics than religion, DeMint said the title of the book is meant to echo the Second Great Awakening, a period of religious revival in the early 19th century.

"(The Tea Party) is as much a spiritual awakening as a political awakening," said DeMint, a Presbyterian. "The concern about our country ... has awakened the faith of many people."

DeMint frequently cites Christian theology and biblical passages to help make his points. "The spiritual assessment is just the lens I look through," he said.

Such strong connections between faith and politics seem second nature to DeMint in his book. Arguing that the separation of church and state "is contrary to what our founders envisioned," he attacks the idea of big government on spiritual grounds.

"Big government is a religious issue," DeMint writes. "History shows in nations where there is a big government, there is a little God. When people are dependent on government, they are less dependent on God, and their spiritual fervor fades. Socialism and secularism go hand in hand, as do faith and freedom."

DeMint admitted that he hasn't always been so passionate about his faith. His political education started later in life, around the same time he started his faith journey.

"I had never spoken in public until I was 25," he said. "My first public talk was giving my testimony. ... I had some time wasted up until that point."

In addition to attending a weekly Senate prayer breakfast, DeMint meets once a week with a bipartisan group of Senators to pray and "keep each other accountable" despite the often tense political environment of Washington.

"(These meetings) help me recognize the bond we have in Christ and the love we have for each other even when we disagree, sometimes strongly," DeMint said. "I think it helps keep the flame (of faith) alive."

While DeMint speaks to a larger group of the faithful in his book, Lieberman's "The Gift of Rest" centers around his personal understanding of the Jewish Sabbath, the 24-hour period of rest and worship that starts each Friday at sundown and lasts until Saturday evening.

Lieberman, who in 2000 became the first Jew to receive a major party's nomination for vice president, often prays in Orthodox synagogues and takes the ritual seriously.

"Observing the Sabbath is a commandment I have embraced, the fourth commandment to be exact, which Moses received from God on Mt. Sinai," Lieberman writes. "For me, Sabbath observance is a gift because it is one of the deepest, purest pleasures in my life."

Lieberman's Sabbath-keeping, which usually means refraining from work and shunning electronics or cars, has sometimes complicated his political life. Lieberman almost never holds campaign or political events on Saturdays, and once had to scramble to find a non-Jewish staffer to drive him to a last-minute budget meeting at the Capitol.

Lieberman will still go to vote in occasional late-night Friday or Saturday sessions, but only after walking the hour-and-a-half trek to the Capitol from his home in Georgetown, even in the rain.

"I think that there has actually been a balance between honoring the Sabbath and honoring your responsibilities to others," he said.

The retiring senator said his faith supports his role as a lawmaker.

"Judaism is a religion that is focused on the law and the distinctions between right and wrong," Lieberman said. "I don't call my rabbi to ask how I should vote on the budget, but there is no question that a series of values that come with my religion ... have had an effect on me."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Jack Jenkins Religion News Service WASHINGTON (RNS) Truth be told, when asked to name a spiritual role model, few people would likely pick a sitting U.S. senator. In fact, with congressional...
By Jack Jenkins Religion News Service WASHINGTON (RNS) Truth be told, when asked to name a spiritual role model, few people would likely pick a sitting U.S. senator. In fact, with congressional...
Filed by Jahnabi Barooah  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
curiousdwk
Global Citizen. Not Democratic, not Republican, n
08:15 PM on 08/19/2011
If one "rests on the Sabbath" because of their personal values of fully relaxing (like the Buddhists), then that is fine. If one "rests on the Sabbath" because they worship the tradition of old men many generations ago, then that is bad. The commandment says nothing about cars or electricity. Thos are the ridiculous utterances of old farts who try to create a distinction between the holy and the unholy. I have no respect for them.
07:12 AM on 08/19/2011
Joe Lieberman is the guy who told us that he voted for a vile and immoral war as a matter of CONSCIENCE.

It reminds me of the books of Robert Ardrey which I read long ago. His opinion on conscience:

"...conscience as a guiding force in the human drama is one of such small reliability that it assumes very nearly the role of villain. Conscience has evolved directly from the amity-enmity complex of our primate past. But unlike civilization it has acted as no force to inhibit the predatory instinct. It has instead been the conqueror's chief ally. And if mankind survives the contemporary predicament, it will be in spite of, not because of, the parochial powers of our animal conscience."

As a long time resident of Connecticut I never had much liking for the self-righteous pandering of the now Senator, but I don't begrudge him his faith in the least. I only worry that he will continue to vote his conscience, and whatever those "distinctions between right and wrong" are that his faith gives him. There seems to be little hope that the citizens of Connecticut are ever going to get wise to him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rwaller
My bio never meets guidelines!
01:35 AM on 08/19/2011
I have no problem with their or anyone's beliefs. It is when those beliefs enter the realm of public policy that I have a problem. Anyone who has had the intellectual curiosity to google the question, "founding fathers on religion and seperation" would find that one of their greatest fears, if not the greatest fear, was the influence of religion in government and most particularlly Christianity. Christianity they describe as the most vile, most destructive and most abusive of all the religions invented by man.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Just say no to gasoline
08:05 AM on 08/19/2011
I googled your quotation. Most of the links that showed by were by a competitive religion called Secularism. This group wishes to be the only religion allowed to influence government. They wish to justify themselves as not being a religion by religiously proclaiming that they believe that there is no such thing as the supernatural.
I do not wish any kind of religious organization to influence government. Our Representatives should be representing We The People, not pushing the agenda of any religious organization. Actually, our Representatives should not be pushing the agenda of
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Just say no to gasoline
08:44 AM on 08/19/2011
Seems our founding fathers said that Germans were the most vile, most destructive and most abusive non-whites to be moving into the US. More specifically, Germans smell bad, they refuse to teach their children English, they are lazy, they beat their mothers, and allowing them into the US will likely lead to the downfall of the country.
Seems our founding fathers didn't like any non-white people like the previously mentioned Germans, Jews, Eastern Europeans, Asians, Africans, indigenous peoples or anyone that wasn't exactly like or believed like they themselves. Oh, did I forget women? Women weren't allowed to vote or own property. Seems this Secularism sect is patterning itself on the beliefs of our founding fathers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rwaller
My bio never meets guidelines!
05:33 PM on 08/20/2011
In both of your posts you choose to deceive by twisting thoughts. If your idea of a secular source is the Congressional Library then you must be right. The right has, and I am certain you are one, proclaimed America to be founded on the Christian faith. That was then and is now a lie. There is no argument because you or anyone will never be able to find a single doccument to support your position. The argument against you and all who believe as you can find reems and reems and stacks and stacks of doccuments produced by our founding father's stating emphatically and as clearly as Washington, "The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Just say no to gasoline
04:38 PM on 08/18/2011
All of the Senators are religious in seeking to be reelected while religious in following the tenets of their political party. When politicians get elected, they should quit their old job of being a Democrat or Republican and do the job they are being paid to do, represent We The People. The religious words Democrat or Republican should not be allowed to be spoken. Every meeting of our our employees should be televised. They should be required to follow the rules set down in the Constitution and not political rules set down by the Party in Power.
03:26 PM on 08/18/2011
The futility of trying to observe all the law is beyond Lieberman!
03:14 PM on 08/18/2011
Look: It’s the two things we’re never supposed to talk about at a party mixed together in one article! :)

We need to stop dwelling on the name-tags. Like, instead of worrying whether or not this politician is ‘Jewish’ or ‘Born Again’, let’s worry if he’s a good person or not. Do his policies show this, adjusted for all the things the media may misconstrue about them? Will these men look out for society’s best interest? For humankind’s best interest? Yeh, ‘all of us’ (Globalization is a reality; it’s time we face it).

Separation of church and state is just a way of removing some of the 'name tags' in politics. Somehow, the idea makes our minds illogical: Because we use “religion” as a lens to define what is good and bad, to take it away from politics means to remove our lens, to utterly erase our moral perspective, and we need that perspective to govern!!! (Can you spot the faulty logic?)

No! When you meet someone, you can only gauge whether or not the person is good. The more you know the person, the better you know if the person is good, right? And if that person never spoke about religion? Could you tell then? I could. And if I can't, I should at least try. Apply this on a macro-scale please.

The real trouble comes with understanding “good” as it stands alone from religion. But, uhg! What a task…
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rwaller
My bio never meets guidelines!
01:42 AM on 08/19/2011
If you had ever studied our founding fathers you would know that the seperation was far more than "changing name tags." They were not only adamant about a complete and total seperation of church and state, they went so far as to identify the one religion that was the greatest threat to our democracy, Christianity.
09:07 AM on 08/19/2011
That's so interesting, especially considering their own ties to Christianity. Funny to think I was taught the opposite in school; but I suppose we're taught funny things in school.

It takes a very self-actualized group of individuals to conscientiously avoid imposing their own religious ideals upon others in governing a society, and a very brave group to identify the pervasive religion as "threatening." But the founding fathers, I'd imagine, would have to be that group...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rev David Huber
A non-progressive mind is a wasted mind.
03:05 PM on 08/18/2011
Oh, lordy. If DeMint thinks that the teabagger "revolution" is another Great Awakening, it only serves to prove yet again that the teabaggers don't know history, and have only superficial and accidental understanding of Christian faith, and how dangerously and freakishly ignorant they really are in toto.
02:40 PM on 08/18/2011
DeMint’s uses the word “awakening” inappropriately. In spirituality, “awakening” implies a person has matured into a broader understanding of religion, spirituality and the purpose of life. The “broader” understanding INCLUDES more people and more of the universe in its concern.

Few in the Tea Party can claim an awakened spirit because by its very nature, the Tea Party is about exclusion. De Mint's God includes Christians only, as though Muslims, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists are somehow lesser forms of humanity. This is NOT a mature worldview.

Strictly authoritarian, De Mint’s God dictates rules to people supposedly incapable of recognizing right from wrong on their own. This is not a mature person’s God.

De Mint’s comment: "in nations where there is a big government, there is a little God.” also shows that he is not “awakened.” Surely, “big government” is no one’s goal. But where “big corporations” blithely pay their CEO’s millions, even billions, while laying off workers, a responsible government must stand up for the needs of the little people. If the government must enlarge itself to meet these responsibilities, then so be it. The main issue is not the size of the government, but the impartiality with which it addresses the needs of ALL people. De Mint’s God would leave millions bereft of healthcare. This is not a mature God. De Mint should find a more “awakened’ God.

Margaret Placentra Johnston
www.exploring-spiritual-development.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Just say no to gasoline
04:55 PM on 08/18/2011
The Tea Party is not a religion nor is it a political party. It is a small self-interest group like many others that are doing the exact same thing for their people. Outside people are stating what the Tea Party stands for. Why? To fulfill their own religious agenda. Me? I just ignore them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rwaller
My bio never meets guidelines!
01:50 AM on 08/19/2011
Margaret, thank you. Thank you for your informative post. Thank you for so clearly and elloquently stating the purpose. The purpose as envissioned by our founders. Founders whose greatest fear was the influence of religion on government and particularlly Christianity. They, the founders, saw government as a wall between it, the people, and religion. You are so right. F & F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockysparks
there's no law against being annoying.
02:38 PM on 08/18/2011
Are books by Jim DeMint and Joe Lieberman --- two of the most despicable politicians around --- REALLY all that Washington has to offer, when it comes to religion?

Explains a great deal about why nobody except ostriches --- people with their heads in the sand --- has any respect for Congress these days ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Hallmark
02:11 PM on 08/18/2011
The Great Awakening was a time when all of our crazy American religions were invented. Seventh Day Adventists, Christian Scientists, Jehovah Witnesses, Mormons. They all think the other one is completely wrong and they alone hold the truth of God's plan. That's the world DeMint wants? That's what he admires?

Religion has had plenty of opportunity to make good civil government and all we got from it was persecution, crusades, Papal Rome, and Sharia Law. Rather than the "Great Awakening", I would think a US Senator would be praising the "Age of Enlightenment" which finally broke free from the tyranny of religion and developed secular laws and constitutions that protected individual freedoms.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Hallmark
02:03 PM on 08/18/2011
Well there you have the fundamental problem of religion in government. Both Demint and Lieberman believe in the 4th commandment, but Lieberman correctly notes that it's the observance of the jewish Sabbath, Saturday and sundown Friday to sundown Saturday that we're supposed to observe if we're following God's law. If DeMint tried to get away with his new fangled reinvention of Sunday Sabbath back in Moses' time, he would have been properly stoned.
02:15 PM on 08/18/2011
agree thank you and nicely said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Just say no to gasoline
05:02 PM on 08/18/2011
You are wrong. Remember the Sabbath is the Third Commandment. Those people that divide the second Commandment into two separate Commandments are wrong.'Sarcasm'
I think the religion of getting drunk every Friday night is a bigger problem, especially if they don't have a designated driver. How many Representatives have DUIs? Also, how many Representatives have filed for bankruptcy or been charged with some kind of Monetary malfeasance? Who cares when they believe the new day starts if they never make any laws declaring we all have to believe the same.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rwaller
My bio never meets guidelines!
02:02 AM on 08/19/2011
Who cares? They use the mask of Christianity to isolate and entire group of the population. They have connected Christianity to patriotism. They openly express the belief in one and only one God. And they do this all in violation of the Constitution. They do it in violation of the strongest held beliefs of our founding fathers. Theirs, Christianity, was the most feared and despised by the founding fathers as the greatest threat to the democracy.
12:18 PM on 08/18/2011
Politicians, especially the ones cited, are self-serving. They do not represent the volunteerism and selflessness promoted by religion. I believe they talk the talk for votes; not for any true nor noble purpose.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:42 AM on 08/18/2011
"History shows in nations where there is a big government, there is a little God. When people are dependent on government, they are less dependent on God..."

Seriously does he have that much contempt for the people in this country as to float this garbage by them. Well I guess he does.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Just say no to gasoline
05:13 PM on 08/18/2011
Depends on how one interprets the saying. Is it talking about the Holy Roman Empire where the government controlled the church? Or in Iran where the church controls the government. Today, in the US, we have two religions trying to control the government. The Democrats and the Republicans. Depends on the definition of depend? Depend on something to be their mommy and daddy? Depend on the government to be fair? Depend on the government to screw things up? Depend on the government to defend us? I like Clinton's profound wisdom, "It depends on what the meaning of is is."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:47 AM on 08/19/2011
Depends upon if you're talking about the adult diaper.
relevancematters
You're so full of what's right, you can't see what
08:07 AM on 08/18/2011
These are two of the most mercilessly self-serving politicians in the history of this country. Neither Christian admonition nor Jewish law comes between them and their personal goals—ethics, compassion and the greater good be damned. This is the paradox of belief, that two such proud and ultimately faithless beings should claim to be standard-bearers of God.
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
06:25 AM on 08/18/2011
Useless and uselessER.