iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Secure Communities Nets Immigrants For Minor Offenses: Report

Secure Communities

First Posted: 08/19/11 11:52 AM ET Updated: 10/19/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The Department of Homeland Security took deportation action against at least 127 undocumented immigrants for minor offenses, such as loitering, under the Secure Communities enforcement program, according to a report this week from the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

"DHS claims it's targeting dangerous people, but AILA found otherwise," American Immigration Lawyers Association President Eleanor Pelta said in a statement. "These people are not the high priority, public safety threats this Administration says it's targeting. DHS should not be wasting resources pursuing low priority cases."

The Obama administration has attempted to tailor its immigration enforcement to what it calls the "worst of the worst": undocumented people who have committed serious crimes or are repeat violators of immigration law. But critics of Secure Communities, an enforcement program in which local police share fingerprints with immigration officials, say the program nets a significant number of non-criminal undocumented immigrants and people picked up for minor crimes.

Although it did not examine a major sample, the AILA report found that since 2008, at least 127 people have entered deportation proceedings under Secure Communities despite a lack of serious criminal history. The report, "Immigration Enforcement Off Target: Minor Offenses with Major Consequences," looked cases represented by immigration lawyers in 24 states and Washington, D.C., all of which involved minor offenses or no offense at all.

In one case, a man was arrested for being in a bar where a fight broke out between two other patrons. The police arrested everyone in the bar, regardless of whether they had been fighting, and the man was arrested and entered into deportation proceedings. In another case, a man was arrested for sitting on the steps of the New York City subway. Others were detained for not carrying identification or driving with an expired driver's license.

In about half of the cases examined, the individuals in question had resided in the United States for more than 10 years or had deep ties to the community, such as U.S. citizen family members, the report said.

"As a whole, the cases starkly illustrate how individuals who present no criminal justice concern to [local law enforcement agencies] and no risk to public safety are nevertheless being funneled into the removal process," the report states.

The Obama administration insists that a majority of those it deports have committed crimes and fit the profile of "worst of the worst." In a blog post on Tuesday, White House director of Intergovernmental Affairs Cecilia Munoz wrote that more than half of all removals were of people with criminal records, while non-criminals were mostly repeat immigration law offenders.

"Those statistics matter," Munoz wrote. "While we have more work to do, the statistics demonstrate that the strategy DHS put in place is working."

On Thursday, the administration announced it would conduct a case-by-case review of cases pending in the immigration system and close those of people considered "low-priority" for immigration enforcement.

View this slideshow to see who could benefit from prosecutorial discretion under the new policy:

DREAM Act Students
1  of  9
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Undocumented young people who want to go to college or join the military -- the same individuals who would benefit from the DREAM Act -- could see their cases closed by the Department of Homeland Security. Immigration agents are instructed to factor in "the person's pursuit of education in the United States, with particular consideration given to those who have graduated from a U.S. high school or have successfully pursued or are pursuing a college or advanced degree at a legitimate institution of higher education in the United States." This could help young people in deportation proceedings, such as Monji Dolon, a 25-year-old born in Bangladesh who is slated for deportation.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The Department of Homeland Security took deportation action against at least 127 undocumented immigrants for minor offenses, such as loitering, under the Secure Communities enforcement p...
WASHINGTON -- The Department of Homeland Security took deportation action against at least 127 undocumented immigrants for minor offenses, such as loitering, under the Secure Communities enforcement p...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 582
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
08:40 PM on 08/22/2011
The bottom line, in all of this, is very simple.
Come here legally and you will not have a problem.
Come here illegally and you HAVE NO RIGHTS.
07:54 AM on 08/21/2011
Over the past 10 years I have had the opportunity to work in foreign countries. Working with citizens of those countries and passing by the American Embassys where long lines of people would be waiting for VISA applications; when asked for help in getting a VISA I jokingly would tell them you dont need a VISA, get to Mexico and just walk across the border.

Truth is stranger than fiction.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
Black Democrat
04:03 PM on 08/22/2011
You are right, as crazy as it sounds. Free education, free health care, free citizenship. Until America goes broke.
photo
Gupdiver
We are in a period of Ineptocracy!
05:54 PM on 08/20/2011
If we had a mandatory e-verify law for all employers, we wouldn't have to waste time trying to figure out if they are violent offenders or not because the rest would have self deported. They come for jobs, if there are none then most will leave.
11:31 AM on 08/20/2011
Obama won't be the first President to do this, nor will he be the last, but this is a great example of steering Federal policy to the electorate. Obama's immigration decision has much less to do with what's good for the country, and much more to do with what's good for his re-election campaign and his support among Hispanic voters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John fulano de tal
10:22 AM on 08/20/2011
The devil will be in the details of this one. Meanwhile, people on both sides of the fence will either propagandize or wishful think it to death.

Kind of like the old Wizard of Oz our President is, no?

My understanding is that these 300,000 cases are cases before the "highest court" of immigration, the Executive Office of Immigration Review. Some of these cases have been pending for many years.

The majority of these 300,000 cases are non criminal cases (79%). Of the criminal cases included in this 300,000, many are for very minor offenses.

Don't forget that "lower" immigration courts along the border deport thousands of criminal aliens on a monthly basis. The worst of the worst never make it this 300,000 group simply because they are ineligible or not stupid enough to do so.

Whichever side of the fence that you are on - please be careful with how this is spun. Just because DREAM Act cases are not perused does not mean that the Government is giving them any legal status. And just because Obama is touting that this deal targets only the worst criminal cases means that they are focusing upon the criminal cases pending within this 300,000 group.

ICE actually targets the worst prison cases on a daily basis.
Do you want to stop this political immigration madness?
http://twopesos-protestfortheundocumented.blogspot.com/2011_03_01_archive.html
09:59 AM on 08/20/2011
I still see both sides of the issue. As a former disgruntled Republican (now an Independent) I understand if you read with suspicion.

Under current law, not using an established border crossing is illegal even for US citizens. For the argument of taxes, only those legally remitted are sales or value added taxes as all others require a valid SSN or TID #. This constitutes tax fraud, mail fraud and identity theft. If taxes are collected, they are typically consumed during auditing of the accounts to determine the legitimate beneficiary.

Conversely there's the spirit of the Constitution, yet we punish those seeking the dream with no repercussions to those truly responsible. Corporations move south to seek the lowest bidder, further perpetuating the need to migrate. Once here, employers pay below fair wages for backbreaking work and feign ignorance if caught. Legally here or not these are human beings and deserve fair treatment and protection under the law yet there is inequality in policies even in processing. Wealthy applicants gain citizenship in six months while the poor have waited decades in some cases for approval.

Both sides have legitimate concerns, both will have to make concessions. I believe in state sovereignty but reform must happen at the Federal level otherwise the laws violate the Supremacy Clause as well as the 4th Amendment. Neither blanket amnesty nor mass deportation is the answer, we need practical and fair immigration reform for pathways to citizenship.

Thank you for taking the time to read.
09:42 AM on 08/20/2011
The black woman was serving over in Iraq,when an illegal alien gunned down her son.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-p5UZMH6jP4&feature=related

Obama needs to decide who he is going to support. Americans or those who ignore our laws.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
09:51 AM on 08/20/2011
It is my understanding the non-citizens have been allowed to serve in the US military since the Revolutionary War. That means that some "aliens" are criminals, some are heroes, just like the rest of the population,
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
Black Democrat
01:31 PM on 08/20/2011
Legal immigrants can enlist in the military, illegal aliens can not.

" A non-citizen that is eligible to join the military must meet certain requirements: (1) Have an Alien Registration Receipt Card (stamped I-94 or I-551 Green card/INS Form 1-551), (2) Have a bonafide residence established, and (3) Have established a record of the U.S. as their home. "

 "In order for an immigrant to join the United States military, they must first go through the immigration process of the USCIS and then and then begin the enlisting process. Another requirement is that the Green Card and/or visa if the immigrant desiring to join the military must be valid for the entire period of their enlistment."

http://usa-green-card.com/blog/index.php/2011/03/24/immigrants-in-the-military/
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
09:31 AM on 08/20/2011
It seems to me that the overarching purpose of immigration legislation is to regulate the size and composition of the labor pool. Like it or not, the high demand areas of labor in the US today are dirt cheap labor and very high end, and the loudest opponents of progressive labor policy are those in the middle who are not directly impacted by it. Their jobs are drying up one way or another, with or without legalization of the status of the majority of undocumented immigrants in the US.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sibyl9
Cloaking Device Engaged
03:49 PM on 08/20/2011
You are uninformed. Illegals take construction and other skilled trade jobs. They also get managerial jobs. Look up the article on H. P. about the illegal who was a manager at Chipolte earning $44k per year.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
09:25 AM on 08/20/2011
All these immigration "debates" seem like a cheap trick to keep the little people busy blaming and hating each other for their ever decreasing lot, while the real criminals at the top are busy stealing what's left of our wealth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sibyl9
Cloaking Device Engaged
03:53 PM on 08/20/2011
The super-wealthy want illegal immigration to bust unions and lower wages and education standards. My question is why are so many libs on their side?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dtairtime
It is what it is
09:03 PM on 08/22/2011
Siby nailed it.

If you look at support for illegals you only need to look at the wall street journal, the chamber of commerce and bug business groups. They all want amnesty AND increased legal immigration.

The reasons are simple - keeping wages low, increasing the demand for consumerism products (we shifted from manufacturing to consumerism, which requires an ever increasing population) and the propping up of a ponzi scheme social security system.

The propaganda of the groups above have been taken in hook, line and sinker by many liberals. They have even successfully managed to stop the Sierra club from fighting population increases due to donors withholding funds if they raise the issue.
BlueGirlRedState
C'est la vie
08:46 AM on 08/20/2011
Darned if they do and darned if they don't. Regardless of what got the cop's attention, the person was in this country illegally. That is what got them deported. It's no different than a person being arrested for trespassing and the authorities discovering warrants for other crimes.
08:40 AM on 08/20/2011
It behooves America to return all those beautiful people featured in the slide show back to their own country. Why should America have all the beautiful people?

BTW, walking on the street, as an illegal, is grounds enough to be deported.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
09:27 AM on 08/20/2011
Seems so archaic to me that this is the case. Why should it be illegal for our bodies to occupy space?
10:25 AM on 08/20/2011
It's called National Sovereignty.

A country can make its own laws.
07:57 AM on 08/21/2011
The rule of law.
08:01 AM on 08/20/2011
Being illegal is not a minor offense, it's a major offense!!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
09:23 AM on 08/20/2011
It is difficult for me to wrap my head around the notion of a human being just "being" as a state of criminality. Corporations have evolved to enjoy an almost borderless existence, why shouldn't humans aspire to do the same in a globalized world, where traditional notions of geographical states have less and less to do with how we identify ourselves than who we are and what we aspire to do as people?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chevyliddle
what's a micro-bayou?
06:18 AM on 08/21/2011
I can understand your thoughts but we are lucky to live in a country blessed with an abundance of land suitable for agriculture, natural resources and a democratic government. If immigration were to be allowed solely on the desire to live in a better country, we would be overwhelmed within a year. The U.S. now has approx. 1,000,000 legal immigrants entering into the country annually and this allows smooth assimilation into the general public. Unrestricted immigration would put so much stress on our economy that it couldn't possibly survive the shock.
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
01:43 PM on 08/21/2011
Then please leave your house unlocked and sign on your front lawn telling people it is ok for them to come in a take what they want!

Under the law Corporations are people. They need to be registered and operate under the laws of every country where they establish a presence and NO it is not a given that they will be automatically be allowed to do so if that country feels it is not in their best interests.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MinneMike
I am 1% deal with it
02:17 AM on 08/20/2011
Who doesn't benefit is Latinos and Hispanics who are being 'played' once again as political pawns to gin up dim votes.

Dims own the Senate and WH. They should be pushing some meaningful legislation to resolve these concerns instead of use Latinos and Hispanics for political gain. Disgusting.
01:50 AM on 08/20/2011
Being an undocumented immigrant is a major offense. Deporting them for further, minor offenses, is perfectly reasonable, if not altogether a little too late.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
02:31 AM on 08/20/2011
Unlawful Entry into the USA w/o authorization from the U.S. Gov't is a deportable civil misdemeanor

Even a Federal Felony, i.e. robbing a bank ~ is not a deportable offense

But ~ a minor offense, being arrested & having your fingerprints scanned could possibly identify you as being in the USA unlawfully AND thus get you deported
08:28 AM on 08/20/2011
The FACT is that if you are a naturlized US CITIZEN, and you rob a bank, you WILL be deported! Just ask all the Mafia wise guys who got kicked out and sent back to Italy.
photo
BeautifulOnDaOutside
I ♥ Huffington Post
01:33 AM on 08/21/2011
If a foreigner robs a US bank, he or she will spend a long time in prison and then be deported. Seems straight forward enough.
12:40 AM on 08/20/2011
I used to be an immigration consultant a few years back.

And I can tell you they have been deporting legal immigrants with (legal) residency for minor offenses for years. Since at least the Clinton presidency.

While minor traffic violations are generally exempt, a legal resident risks deportation for even minor crimes committed years ago if they come to light.

Illegal gambling (caught in a low level illegal poker game), a domestic argument where your girlfriend accuses you of hitting her (once in years), shop lifting something worth a few dollars.....................and this could have happened YEARS ago.

Say you did something minor as a teenager....it could get you deported as a responsible adult 20 years later.

****I realize that some people figure one strike and you are out....but some of us are not that draconian for ONE small stupidity.