More

U.S. Troops In Iraq: Youngest Members Bore Heaviest Toll

Us Troops In Iraq

ROBERT BURNS   08/20/11 12:50 PM ET   AP

SILVANA, Wash. — In a hilltop graveyard overlooking this Stillaguamish River village lies a young soldier killed in the infancy of the Iraq war.

Army Spc. Justin W. Hebert's story is sad and sadly unremarkable, a tragedy bound up in the tale of a grinding war that took young lives with grievous regularity. Nearly one-third of U.S. troops killed in Iraq were age 18 to 21. Well over half were in the lowest enlisted ranks.

For Hebert, the Army was an adventure. But it didn't last long.

Barely two years after he finished high school, exactly three months after President George W. Bush declared the end of major combat in Iraq and just four days after his 20th birthday, Hebert was mortally wounded in an insurgent ambush that may have been a setup by an Iraqi "informant."

It was Aug. 1, 2003. The war, according to the Pentagon's plan, was supposed to be over. Baghdad had fallen swiftly. But a new, more menacing phase of conflict was just beginning. An insurgency was in the making, and in its formative months it perplexed U.S. commanders and cost Hebert his life.

In the years since, the U.S. effort in Iraq has veered from the brink of calamity to the threshold of surprising success. With the remaining U.S. troops now packing to leave, possibly for good, casualties and costs will be tallied one last time.

More elusive is a firm judgment on the net benefit of the American sacrifice, the more than 4,400 dead, the tens of thousands injured and the untold numbers suffering unseen psychological wounds for years to come.

The invasion, occupation and transition to Iraqi government control lasted far longer than predicted, cost more than imagined and left a town like Silvana, population 90, to wonder why a war so far away brought grief so close to home.

The sacrifice of so many lives like Hebert's helped turn U.S. public opinion firmly against the war by the time Barack Obama was campaigning for president in 2008. Three years later, young Americans still die in Iraq even though the war is widely seen as over.

It is also widely seen as a mistake, and by some as a waste.

Hebert was buried here in his hometown, about 50 miles north of Seattle, in a small, century-old graveyard surrounded by cedars and firs, beside a landmark known as The Little White Church on the Hill.

A recent visit to his grave shortly after the eighth anniversary of his death made clear that he has not been forgotten. His headstone was bedecked with one full-size and more than a dozen miniature American flags, potted plants, flower bouquets, cards and birthday balloons – silent tributes from a proud community.

Hebert's sister, Jessica Cole, described him as mouthy, a jokester, and a "smarty pants." He also had the inner strength, she said, to overcome his childhood fear of heights and volunteer for Army training in parachuting from airplanes. She said he had never been in a plane until he flew to Fort Sill, Okla., to begin basic training in June 2001.

"He would not get on a ladder to change Christmas lights on a two-story building for the life of him," she said in an interview.

He saw the Army as a ticket to a better life.

"He joined pretty much to get out of the little town we grew up in," she said, and for the chance to see the world. She never imagined he would return so soon to be buried by family and friends.

Was Silvana's and the Hebert family's loss for a greater gain?

Americans and Iraqis have to hope so. They hope Iraq, with the demise of Saddam Hussein and the promise of its vast oil resources, will overcome sectarian divisions to govern and defend itself with at least a semblance of democracy. They hope it will keep a lid on extremist fighters who will remain when the last American has gone home. And they hope Iran's militant Islam influence, already on the rise, will be kept in check.

But as the U.S. military role winds down, no one can be sure chaos will not return.

Chaos had not yet arrived when Hebert became the 254th American to die in Iraq. But it was closing in.

Six days after his death, a truck bomb exploded outside the Jordanian embassy in Baghdad, killing 17. Twelve days later insurgents destroyed the U.N.'s Baghdad offices, killing 22, collapsing U.N. aid efforts and crushing hopes for normalcy.

In Washington, officials saw a brighter side. On the day of the embassy bombing, Pentagon spokesman Larry Di Rita said, "While there is a lot of difficulty, things are getting better." Asked whether the insurgency was broadening, he replied, "There are plenty of indications to the contrary."

In hindsight, American leaders now speak bluntly about the war's toll. Shortly before he retired in June as defense secretary, Robert Gates said he measures the cost "in lives that are shattered, in bodies that are shattered, in minds that are shattered."

Setting aside the political calculations for invading in the first place, the Hebert story is a microcosm of the war – determined, even valiant, efforts propelled by American ingenuity but ambushed by poorly understood Iraqi ethnic and religious forces aligning against the occupiers.

It was not supposed to turn out like this.

Jack Keane, who was the Army's No. 2 general when the war began, told Army historians in 2006 that he and others had believed Saddam's loyalists would fold once Baghdad fell in early April 2003.

"We did not consider it a realistic option that they would continue to attack us indirectly. And shame on us for that," Keane said.

Hebert had parachuted into northern Iraq with nearly 1,000 other "sky soldiers" of the 173rd Airborne Brigade on March 26, 2003, one week after the Marines and the Army launched the main thrust of the invasion from Kuwait. The 173rd was supposed to have been the junior partner with a far larger unit, the 4th Infantry Division, in opening a northern front, but Turkey refused passage. So the 173rd went in alone.

After a four-hour flight from their base in Italy, the paratroopers jumped from a fleet of C-17 transports. In addition to a few broken bones and dislocated joints, the jump merited a Bronze Star medal for each, including Hebert.

He was a member of Delta Battery, 319th Airborne Field Artillery Regiment, as a fire support specialist, sometimes called a forward observer. As such, his job was not to operate the big howitzers but to locate targets and communicate their coordinates, to act as the "eyes of the artillery."

It was a skill for which Hebert had been well trained. But on the night he died, that mattered little. On the fuzzy front lines of a war that was more like a street fight with shadowy criminals than a conventional battle of land armies, Hebert was driving a Humvee, the utility vehicle whose vulnerability to roadside bombs later triggered a push to build armored versions. His Humvee, with a soft-cover cab and open rear bed, had no armor, not even the makeshift variety that soldiers later bolted on for extra protection.

Spc. Adam J. Williams, who was in the Humvee during the attack, said Hebert was a regular that summer on nighttime patrols that operated out of makeshift outposts in an area west of Hawija, in Tamim province, where U.S. forces were in a relentless search for top fugitives of Saddam's military.

In his last letter to Jessica, dated June 26, Hebert lamented the harsh conditions in Iraq and looked forward to leaving.

"We are supposed to be out of here the beginning of August, but who knows," he wrote.

On the night of Aug. 1, Hebert's two-vehicle patrol began in Shumayt, a village along the Little Zab River, just east of the Tigris, about 150 miles north of Baghdad. In an interview, Williams recalled that the objective was to link up with an Iraqi informant at a gas station. Hebert and his comrades never made it.

As they descended toward a bridge over the Little Zab at about 9 p.m., gunmen popped up from behind earthen berms that effectively funneled the Americans into a kill zone. In the hail of gunfire, a rocket-propelled grenade sailed through the driver's side window, detonating in Hebert's lap, as Williams recalls. Three other soldiers in the Humvee were wounded.

Was it a setup? Perhaps, Williams said. He was told that a typewritten note found on the bridge threatened further attacks unless U.S. forces left the area. (Another ambush in Shumayt 10 days later wounded three U.S. soldiers.)

"This led some of us to speculate that we had indeed been set up by the so-called informant," Williams said.

Eight years later, it's easy to forget that the flood of violence that swept over Iraq in 2006-07, amounting almost to a civil war, began with the drip-drip of isolated attacks such as the one that killed Hebert. He is one of nearly 1,300 U.S. troops younger than 22 to have died in Iraq since the war began.

In a condolence note to Jessica, Williams regretted that her brother died so young.

"It isn't fair," he wrote. "I'm sorry."

___

Robert Burns can be reached on Twitter at http://twitter.com/robertburnsAP

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

SILVANA, Wash. — In a hilltop graveyard overlooking this Stillaguamish River village lies a young soldier killed in the infancy of the Iraq war. Army Spc. Justin W. Hebert's story is sad and sa...
SILVANA, Wash. — In a hilltop graveyard overlooking this Stillaguamish River village lies a young soldier killed in the infancy of the Iraq war. Army Spc. Justin W. Hebert's story is sad and sa...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,532
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (41 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigWillyG
01:50 AM on 09/13/2011
Looking at a lot of these comments, why do people feel 18 year old's are children?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
08:58 AM on 08/27/2011
Tyrants ordering kids they don't know to kill kids they don't know in wars no one understand­s against weaker nations that pose no threat creating threats they further need to defend against. I think I got it!?!
09:56 PM on 08/22/2011
With the exception of Special Ops troops, who are mostly in their late 20's and 30's, most of the actual combat is carried out by young males in the 18-25 age group. Consequently that is where most of the casualties occur. That is the case in all wars. We owe these young men a lot.
06:24 PM on 08/22/2011
"They hope it will keep a lid on extremist fighters who will remain when the last American has gone home."

Extremist fighters? What's extreme about defending your sovereign country from an illegal invasion and occupation? We would do the same thing, wouldn't we? Or is this just another case of American exceptionalism (we're allowed to defend our country - you other countries are not allowed to defend yourselves from us)?

I don't want any American to die in Iraq. That is why I protested that godda*n bullshi*t war even before it started. But you can't fault the Iraqis for defending their country against a foreign military occupation. I certainly would.
12:47 PM on 08/22/2011
I tend to agree that "green" troops are more likely to pay the ultimate price, but what prepares you for battle but experience? I remember a soldier during Vietnam who was a real clown. He was from Ga. and had the whole barracks laughing when he was there.(Much-needed comic relief). But he went to Nam just as tet was starting and news of his death a week or two after he left got more than a few of us mad as hell. I guess that's "baptism by fire?." Another friend died just three months after joining his Vietnam unit,.1st Infantry.. He was a forward observer who was thrown into enemy territory.Only devine intervention might have spared his life on 11/27/68. .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
h111aryc1inton
Just trying to tell the truth
12:55 AM on 08/23/2011
God bless your friends and all the young men and women who serve for their country and for each other. And thank you for your service.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paisano
I am invisible and trying to stop time!
11:06 AM on 08/22/2011
We need to start a draft!
09:24 AM on 08/22/2011
It's sad that the generals never conceived of the insurrection that followed our invasion. Was it a "group think" that refused to accept any belief in possible failure? Obviously they never questioned whether we should invade due to a fear that there might be WMDs, rather than real proof. Should we be disgusted that they were so stupid to believe there were WMDs, or should be be disgusted because they were so immoral because they started a war knowing there were no WMDs to be used against us? Only time will tell.
photo
ycplum
Against Stupidity, the Gods themselves try in Vain
01:23 PM on 08/22/2011
First off, U.S. generals do not start wars. Thats is done on the civilian side. Similarly, National Policy is determined by The Executive and Legislative branches. It is a matter of Pride, Policy and Law that U.S. generals stay out of National Policy formation (other than giving technical advice). Never in teh history ofteh world has a military force been so powerful, while simultaneously, so apolitical. If America wants to blame someone for Iraq and Afhganistan, look in the mirror.

Second, military solutions do not exists - with the exception of genocide. All other solutions are political solutions. The military exists to form the an environment suitable to a favorable political solution. Time and time again, our military held the door open for a political solution, but our civilan leadership failed to walk through.
photo
Namvet6871
Airborne!
08:17 AM on 08/22/2011
Same same Vietnam, I was 18 when I got off the plane in Nam, 2 weeks later I lost 35 of my brothers and 65 wounded in a 20 min firefight, we were fighting a country not terrorists. The rules of engagement were terrible in Nam , and also in these two theaters of operation!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howard53545
06:46 AM on 08/22/2011
They are too young to know that they are canon fodder and too naive to learn how to DUCK.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddokken69
06:01 AM on 08/22/2011
This is exactly what I have said since the start of the conflict over there.... What are we going to gain out of it and the reality of young lives not only snuffed out but the mental and phsycological effect its going to have on their young lives for as long as they live! To me its been a disaster from the start but yet we continue on and for what????????????
photo
tnash26170
A Liberal in Rural America
01:40 AM on 08/22/2011
It is amazing how many soldiers and innocents die under republican regimes. It seems the conservatives have to send people into die or it is not an example of how tough the US is. From Reagan on down there have been deaths, in Granada, Panama, Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan. The only conflict the Dems have fought was in the Balkans with minimal deaths and inherited GOP wars, capturing bin Laden and taking down Qaddafi with NO loss of life. Obama is a real leader...no flight suit, no banners.
photo
ycplum
Against Stupidity, the Gods themselves try in Vain
01:32 PM on 08/22/2011
Actually, Bush Jr. was an anomaly. Democratic Presidents have traditional instigated more Wars. The theory goes that Democrats tend to be more ideological crusaders (Wilson and Roosevelt are a very good example) while Republicans were conservative, to include being conservative if military force. However, that degree of conservatism seemed to have whittled away, starting with Reagan. Bush Sr. was actually a traditional conservative, but Iraqs invasion of Kuwait and threatening of Saudi Arabia could not be tolerated.

Ironically, Ithink Obama has done reasonably well because none of his peoplehave experience in military matters. He has deferred much to more experience people (e.g. Gates and the Chiefs of Staff).

Don't get me wrong, I am most certainly not a fan of the Nouveau GOP, but I need to be fair to the Republicans in general.
05:15 PM on 08/22/2011
Really? Conviently forgot Vietnam? (Organized military involvement intiated by JFK, turned into full scale operations by LBJ, ended under Republican Nixon).
photo
Moxo
Our enemies are in the GOP.
01:21 AM on 08/22/2011
Moxo They say ol' Dubya was a great pilot - odd how he didn't want to go to Vietnam and prove it.
posted Aug 20, 2011 at 14:30:59 Reply Link

dave0331 President Bush served just like a lot of other members of the miliary that didn't go to Vietnam. Somebody had to be trained and ready to intercept Russian bombers coming to bomb us.
posted Aug 21, 2011 at 16:22:06
----------------------

I don't believe SAC designated Texas as a "Fail-Safe" point.
12:21 AM on 08/22/2011
War is now big business with the cult aspect that we sacrifice our young for some product -- oil or minerals or land. As long as there are volunteers for the slaughter, it will always exist. The saddest thing about U.S. wars is not the business aspect but the people who are dying are dying for the Rich, not for America, not even for Iraqis or regular civilians anywhere. These wars are fought to make the Rich richer.

Young people need to stop volunteering to fight and die for the Rich. Let the old rich men fight and die themselves if they want the spoils of war so badly.
photo
newhouse1
The few, the proud...
12:18 AM on 08/22/2011
"Nearly one-third of U.S. troops killed in Iraq were age 18 to 21. Well over half were in the lowest enlisted ranks."

http://jsmatthew.hubpages.com/hub/Interesting-Words-and-Thier-Origins-IV

Most people using common sense will note the word "infant" is the main part of this word. So how did " Infant", meaning baby, end up being an every day military word?

Well, the truth is, that during the Middle Ages, the word was generally used in regard to any young person-the equivalent of what we consider a "minor" in today's standards. In Italy for instance, a youngster or Infante as they were called then, would be responsible to perform basic military duties as a young citizen should in that day. As a group, these young men were called Infanteria and thus, as Americans have a history of doing, we made Infantry our accepted version of the word.

Definitions aside, the real tragedy of the blood letting of the last 10 years in Afghanistan and Iraq is that service, for the good of all Americans, is not universal. If there was a draft, and those who most loudly advocate sending our troops to fight did so knowing their children would also be called as well, these conflicts would have ended long ago (if they started at all).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ben Winslow
Never Split My Vote After Bush v. Gore!
10:02 PM on 08/21/2011
Daddy Bush knew our young soldiers would suffer horrible losses if we continued into Iraq. Baby Bush didn't care one bit.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
h111aryc1inton
Just trying to tell the truth
01:03 AM on 08/23/2011
Bush Sr. wasn't allowed by congress to continue the war against Iraq. Stop overthinking it.