iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Lawyer: Penis Amputee Doesn't Feel Like A Man

Phillip Sexton

BRUCE SCHREINER   08/22/11 09:37 PM ET   AP

SHELBYVILLE, Ky. — A Kentucky doctor said Monday that he saved a truck driver's life when he amputated part of the man's penis after discovering a rare and deadly cancer, but the man told a jury he wanted to escape from the hospital when he learned it was removed without his knowledge.

The truck driver, Phillip Seaton, 64, of Waddy, is suing Dr. John Patterson, who performed the 2007 surgery that was initially meant to be a simple circumcision to relieve inflammation.

"What I saw was not a penis. What I saw was cancer," Patterson, a Frankfort urologist, testified in Shelby County Circuit Court.

Patterson said he removed less than an inch of Seaton's penis. The rest of the penis was amputated by another doctor later, said Patterson's lawyer, Clay Robinson.

Seaton's wife, Deborah, is also a plaintiff in the suit, which seeks unspecified damages for "loss of service, love and affection."

In earlier testimony, Phillip Seaton described the moments after being told part of his penis had been removed.

"I pulled the dressing down, and I didn't see nothing," Seaton said under questioning by his attorney, Kevin George. "Then I came out of the restroom and I said, `I'm getting the hell out of this damn hospital.'"

Patterson testified the cancer prevented him from inserting a catheter into Seaton's urethra, and he was concerned about the possibility of kidney damage from urinary retention. Although Deborah Seaton was in the hospital waiting room, the doctor said he did not consult her because she had not accompanied her husband to office visits or into the pre-operation area, which he thought was unusual.

"My impression was she would not be someone I would ask what he would want," Patterson testified.

Deborah Seaton testified that if the doctor had consulted her after finding the cancer, she would have advised him to halt the surgery and wake up her husband.

"It's his body," she said. "He should have a say in it."

Phillip Seaton had earlier testified about his emotional state since the surgery, saying he was a "bad case."

"I didn't have no say in it," he testified. "I wasn't told what had to be done. It was just done."

Seaton testified that Patterson had told him he would cut foreskin during the circumcision and described it as "more or less in and out." He said he had even joked with the doctor about the procedure.

During opening arguments, Robinson said Seaton had before the surgery initialed a document authorizing treatment in unforeseen circumstances.

George said the document had been read to Seaton because he cannot read.

The eight-woman, six-man jury was shown graphic images early in the day.

George presented four photographs of Seaton's groin saying, "You can see there's nothing there." He also told jurors that Seaton "doesn't feel like a man" anymore.

Robinson offered up a photograph of the cancerous tip of a penis – not Seaton's.

Seaton's brother, David Seaton, testified that Phillip Seaton has been depressed and angry since the surgery.

"The spark is gone out of his life. He used to be such a happy person," David Seaton testified.

The jury includes two alternates.

Testimony is scheduled to resume Tuesday.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WEIRD NEWS

Filed by Michael McLaughlin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 535
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
03:59 PM on 08/31/2011
The people who are throwing around insulting comments or making a joke out of this mans misfortune completely baffle me. There is this concept we have you see, called QUALITY of life. To some people, that is far more important than quantity of life. Just ask any person who was contemplating suicide at one point in their lives. They are likely to say that they were considering it because they felt their life sucked and they could see no other way out. The psychology behind this is fundamentally the same thing. The doctor is in the wrong. He should have refrained from taking any action until his patient had been informed and could make a decision for himself. He was not terminally ill. Any decision the jury might make to excuse the doctor is likewise wrong. That's all there is to it.
10:33 PM on 08/26/2011
The fact remains that the Dr should have informed them of what he found. It was unethical to not inform and tell the patient about all the options. Now we are to say what it has been done are they going to grow him a new penis construct a new penis with nerve endings? The fact that his life will suck; is so unimportant that the well he is alive sucks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kenneth Stout
02:01 PM on 08/24/2011
hey, the chicks dig it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maxout22
01:27 PM on 08/24/2011
Hopefully one day he can wear a sign that says " Open under new management"
photo
Axekick
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolve
09:53 AM on 08/24/2011
"During the morning proceedings, jurors were shown graphic images.- George presented four photographs of Seaton's groin saying, "You can see there's nothing there.""

Doctors argued that those are the pre-surgery photo's . .
05:28 PM on 08/24/2011
Ha ha ha!!
photo
Axekick
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolve
04:02 AM on 08/25/2011
glad someone got the joke . . or at least found humor in it : )
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
exile
11:47 PM on 08/23/2011
loss of service
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:26 PM on 08/23/2011
Penile cancer? Who the heck was this guy skrewing?
photo
Axekick
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolve
09:51 AM on 08/24/2011
LOL
Gracey28
Lady Sunshine
08:33 PM on 08/23/2011
I feel sorry for the guy. Shouldn't before his surgery they have had him sign something in case they had to do something radical like that? Doing that without him knowing is wrong. Sounds like the doctor is a bad doc. I hope his lawsuit wins big.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pnllsprkf
GOD Please help us
08:51 PM on 08/23/2011
he will win--if the extra surgery was not"immediate life saving" they should have stabilized him and bought him out of anesthesia long enough to make sure he was able to make a reasonable decision before continuing or rescheduling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
exile
11:48 PM on 08/23/2011
oh come on
another republican suing a doctor
that's not news
05:08 PM on 08/23/2011
Phillip Seaton: "I still feel like Jennifer Hudson. Just with a new body and this smile."
04:55 PM on 08/23/2011
In a related story.....Fox News has offered the detached part a job in Glenn Beck's old timeslot
photo
imtruthmonger
Bacteria are more interesting than the GOP
06:10 PM on 08/23/2011
Not the same old thing again? Sheesh! Alternatively, from a marketing standpoint I suppose it's wise to go aHEAD with what works.
09:21 AM on 08/23/2011
ribbed for her.......
09:20 AM on 08/23/2011
now with 99% less penis
09:18 AM on 08/23/2011
he did everyone a favor taking that lil tip away
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ami Munro
I voted for Obama!
03:56 AM on 08/23/2011
PLASTIC has it's advantages. It doesn't talk back. When you're done, just shove it in a drawer till next time.
03:22 AM on 08/23/2011
This poor guy, the doctor should have allowed time for a second opinion or at least explained the situation better to this couple before whacking off his wee-wang, even if it was in the best interest of the patient.