iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Dominique Strauss-Kahn Rape Charges Dismissed

JENNIFER PELTZ and TOM HAYS   08/23/11 10:44 PM ET   AP

NEW YORK — Dominique Strauss-Kahn became a free man Tuesday when a judge ended the sexual assault case against him at the request of prosecutors, who said the hotel maid who accused the former International Monetary Fund chief couldn't be trusted.

Though evidence showed Strauss-Kahn had a sexual encounter with Nafissatou Diallo in his hotel suite more than three months ago, prosecutors said the accuser was not credible because of lies she has told, including an earlier false rape claim.

State Supreme Court Justice Michael Obus said he would dismiss the case, but there was one more legal twist to get through: He first wanted an appeals court to hear a request from Diallo's attorneys to keep the case alive by appointing a special prosecutor. The criminal case ended about two hours later, when the higher court agreed with Obus that there was no legal basis for removing the district attorney from the case.

The case drew global attention and left both the accuser and the accused – a one-time contender for the French presidency – with tattered reputations.

Strauss-Kahn arrived at court in a six-car motorcade and was greeted by protesters wielding signs carrying such messages as "DSK treats women like property" and "Put the rapist on trial – not the victim." The shouting could be heard inside the courtroom.

He appeared resolute inside. He smiled and shook hands with his biographer as his wife, journalist Anne Sinclair, sat nearby.

The couple left court without speaking to reporters, but Strauss-Kahn later issued a statement describing the case as "a nightmare for me and my family."

"I want to thank all the friends in France and in the United States who have believed in my innocence, and to the thousands of people who sent us their support personally and in writing. I am most deeply grateful to my wife and family who have gone through this ordeal with me," he said.

"We will have nothing further to say about this matter and we look forward to returning to our home and resuming something of a more normal life."

Later, Strauss-Kahn appeared outside the posh Tribeca town house where he was held under house arrest until July – when prosecutors first publicly admitted they had doubts about the maid's credibility. He summed up the statement in French and was mobbed by reporters.

Diallo, from the West African nation of Guinea, claimed that the 62-year-old diplomat chased her down, grabbed her crotch and forced her to perform oral sex when she arrived to clean his luxury suite May 14.

He was charged with a criminal sex act, attempted rape and sexual abuse, and was jailed for nearly a week before being released on $1 million bail under pricey house arrest.

DNA evidence showed Strauss-Kahn's semen on Diallo's work clothes, and prosecutors on Monday revealed additional details that led them to believe a sexual encounter occurred. But Strauss-Kahn's attorneys contended it wasn't forced.

"At the very first appearance ... I said in open court that this was not a forcible encounter," Strauss-Kahn's attorney Benjamin Brafman said outside court. "You can engage in inappropriate behavior, perhaps, but that is much different than a crime. And this case was treated as a crime – when it was not."

When prosecutors brought charges, they said their evidence was strong and Diallo was credible. But in July they said she had told them a series of troubling falsehoods, including a phony account of having been gang-raped in her native Guinea. She told interviewers she was raped in her homeland under other circumstances and embellished the account to enhance her 2003 application for political asylum.

Prosecutors continued investigating and said Monday they uncovered further information that led them to believe they couldn't ask a jury to believe her story. Like many sexual assault cases, in which the accused and the accuser are often the only eyewitnesses, the Strauss-Kahn case hinged heavily on the maid's believability.

"Our inability to believe the complainant beyond a reasonable doubt means, in good faith, that we could not ask a jury to do that," assistant district attorney Joan Illuzzi-Orbon said in formally recommending the case be dismissed.

She added that prosecutors' decision to drop the case "does not mean that we, in any way, condone the defendant's behavior."

The case was the biggest for Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance in his 18 months in office. He said in a statement that his job is to seek justice – not convictions at any cost.

"We should not blindly advocate for one side, or be afraid to assess honestly whether we can meet our burden of proof. Because when prosecutors fail to follow the facts where they lead, justice becomes secondary to victory," he said.

"In dismissing the case today, we believe – and I believe – this is the right decision."

Vance had scheduled a news conference to discuss the dismissal, but as it began the courts building started shaking from the earthquake in Virginia that was felt along much of the East Coast. Reporters and others rushed out of the building and the event was canceled.

The quake also prevented Strauss-Kahn from getting his passport back from New York authorities, which would allow him to return to France. He could retrieve the passport as early as Wednesday.

Diallo, 33, continues to insist that Strauss-Kahn attacked her; her attorneys vainly argued that Vance was biased. She has maintained that she feared what would happen if she had told the truth about her asylum application earlier.

Diallo has sued Strauss-Kahn and came forward in a series of interviews with media after it became clear prosecutors were losing faith in her credibility. The Associated Press does not usually name people who say they are victims of sexual assault unless they come forward publicly, as she has done.

Diallo did not attend the hearing in which Obus decided to dismiss the case. Her attorney Kenneth Thompson said outside court that she had been abandoned.

"No man, no matter how much power, money and influence he has, has a right to sexually assault a woman," Thompson said. "We are disappointed that District Attorney Vance apparently does not believe in equal justice under the law and has denied an innocent woman a day in court."

Thompson's partner addressed members of the French media in Paris, expressing similar concern and frustration. Diallo's lawyers had no other plans to appeal.

In France, Strauss-Kahn's fellow Socialists lauded the end of the criminal case. Party chief Martine Aubry called it "an immense relief."

"We were all waiting for this ... for him to finally be able to get out of this nightmare," she said on France-Info radio.

On the streets of Guinea's capital, Conakry, and on its airwaves and on the editorial pages of its major newspapers, opinions were mixed. A small and unscientific sample indicated that women tended to back Diallo, while men questioned her version of events.

"Since the beginning of time, the powerful have always won. Nafissatou Diallo didn't stand a chance against DSK," said Pepe Bimou, a computer programmer. "The only possible outcome was that she would lose."

Diallo's attorneys said they would aggressively litigate the civil case – though they expect it would take two years to go to court.

Meanwhile, another sex assault case in France against Strauss-Kahn continues. Novelist Tristane Banon, who says Strauss-Kahn tried to rape her in 2002, has filed a new criminal complaint in France. Strauss-Kahn's lawyers have called her account "imaginary."

___

Associated Press reporter Boubacar Diallo in Conakry, Guinea, Verena Dobnik and Associated Press Television News Reporter Bonny Ghosh in New York contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

NEW YORK — Dominique Strauss-Kahn became a free man Tuesday when a judge ended the sexual assault case against him at the request of prosecutors, who said the hotel maid who accused the former I...
NEW YORK — Dominique Strauss-Kahn became a free man Tuesday when a judge ended the sexual assault case against him at the request of prosecutors, who said the hotel maid who accused the former I...
Filed by Curtis M. Wong  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,615
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (32 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhineasGage730
11:00 AM on 08/25/2011
Our court system have are filled, if not defined by the powerful getting off while the downtrodden get railroaded...and I'm always disgusted. But I have to say in this case I couldn't see it going any other way. The fact that the woman lied about r@pe previously...I mean, that alone is reasonable doubt. In a case of his word vs hers, the witness credibility is all the jury has to go on. Especially if all the evidence shows is sex took place. If she was beat up or a r@pe kit showed some kind of evidence, then I'd be in her corner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
12:28 PM on 08/25/2011
The question is who should decide, normally in our system the jury gets to decide, but in this case it seems that Defense and the Prosecutor have decided. Lying in open court in front of a jury is different then telling lies outside of the court........ Follow....... DSK past behavior toward women has nothing to do with whether or not he forced or coerced this woman into an unwanted sex act, he is to be judged on the evidence in this case. The same thing goes for the victim, until she lies to the jury, the Defense shouldn't not be allowed to disregard her allegations. The jury is only allowed to apply the law to the case that is presented to the in the court.......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhineasGage730
06:38 PM on 08/25/2011
That's not true. The jury would hear about her past. I guess that's what they call putting the victim on trial...and usually I'm against it. Especially if the number of men she has slept with is introduced. But in this case, the woman seems dishonest. Look, it may be wrong. But it's like the boy who cried wolf. If I were to accuse someone of stealing from me, and it turns out I was lying. And then someone does steal from me, I would assume it would be near impossible to get the police and/or prosecutors (not to mention a jury) to take my word over the accused theft. That's the down fall of lying (and getting caught). Your word means less.
holyghostie
Spiritus est qui vivificat
09:48 PM on 08/24/2011
When will ICE or the IRS be bringing criminal charges against the maid for lying on her asylum application about an assault and for Tax evasion? When will the city of NY bring charges for perjured testimony that led to a false arrest AND for housing fraud? The lady lied her way into subsidized housing for AIDS patients....the lowest of the low.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Luuke
10:13 PM on 08/24/2011
I'm sure they've already started proceedings....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
12:28 AM on 08/25/2011
Faved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EJavaM07
Doing what no one else will.
08:43 PM on 08/24/2011
Is DSK's wife ok w/ him having sex w/ whoever he wants, or is she just there for the money?

And how about the French?

Are they alright w/ a man who forces women to have sex as their President?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Luuke
09:53 PM on 08/24/2011
In France they are not "holier than thou" like in the US ....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EJavaM07
Doing what no one else will.
01:43 AM on 08/25/2011
So they're alright w/ a man who forces women to have sex as their President?
photo
Kache
Citizens, Unite!
11:35 PM on 08/24/2011
"is she just there for the money"

Hey! Wake up! Pay Attention!

It's HER money, not his. She's the heiress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
06:23 PM on 08/24/2011
Inappropriate behaviour vs a crime. Who decides? Obviously not the victim. What does that say for all future victims who come forth?
rlivingston10116
Argue not with the universe; it's a bad listene
05:17 PM on 08/24/2011
The victim was a confused immigrant who was raped. Money rules the world; this guy ruled the money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhineasGage730
11:05 AM on 08/25/2011
Not sure where you got the "confused" part from. But this does not look like a case where the man got off because of his money/power. She wasn't credible. The fact that she faked this exact crime earlier would definitely affect the jury's ability to take her word.

I'm always disgusted when power/money/class/race plays a role in the result of judicial matter...which is always in the have's favor and against the have-nots, but this isn't (or at least doesn't look to be) one of them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dourdinlives
better to have loved and lost than never to have l
05:15 PM on 08/24/2011
women of color are always being called trash..thats what the dred scot decision said... thats what the DA is saying...that we were all trash.i m waiting to see if anyone dares call those two rich french women trash.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
12:29 AM on 08/25/2011
She's called because she is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhineasGage730
11:06 AM on 08/25/2011
If they previously lied about being rape...yeah something tells me they won't win either.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
05:10 PM on 08/24/2011
A day in court, what is so hard for you people to understand about that. The DA presents the evidence, the Defense examines the evidence and crafts their defense, the jury decides, pretty simple process in my opinion
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
06:30 PM on 08/24/2011
Do you really believe that happened here?

What is your opinion on the OJ Simpson trail 1991?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Luuke
09:56 PM on 08/24/2011
Do you really believe someone who lies about gang rape ? Do you believe someone who lies about the number of children to claim asylum ? Do you really believe someone who launders money to the tune of tens of thousands ??? What is your opinion about that ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
10:26 PM on 08/24/2011
No that is exactly what is not happening here, people are cheering the DA on in denying this woman her day in court.

Not many people who think OJ was guilty actually watched the trial. I watched the trial almost everyday, and I thought OJ did it, but Mark Furhman was the key witness, and his credibility got impeached when he lied in open court.

After the OJ trial more the one juror said that disregarded all of the Mark Furhman testimony and without it, they couldn't convict OJ.

People think that there was "mountain" of evidence against OJ, and the truth is that there wasn't. The bloody glove is what linked OJ to c rime scene, and the person who found the glove was not just a liar (because we all lie) but a liar in open court, and you are not allowed in open court misconstrue facts or mislead the jury in a malicious way (lie). 
photo
JohnMavis41
Better than Broccoli
03:41 PM on 08/24/2011
The fact that Dominique Strauss-Kahn uses both his and his wife's maiden name as a surname
demonstrates his un-sexist views. How can such a man be guilty of the ultimate sexist crime?
Innocent.
photo
Kache
Citizens, Unite!
12:34 AM on 08/25/2011
Interesting theory. But, Strauss-Kahn was also his father's surname, and his grandfather's. As for his wife, Anne Sinclair's maiden name is Sinclair. Innocent yes, but not for this reason.
08:01 AM on 08/25/2011
Strauss-Kahn is the name he received at birth. His wife maiden name is Sinclair.
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
03:35 PM on 08/24/2011
The lawyer for the no-longer defendant does not claim that Strauss-Kahn was pure as the driven snow. He should not be prosecuted if this was a consensual act, but he should also not be hailed as a hero, either. This just appears to be one more powerful man who took what he thought he deserved. When you have sex with a maid (DSK) or with a housekeeper, there are consequences. DSK will not be running France anytime soon, and Arnold will not be seeking further political office, either.
02:25 PM on 08/24/2011
to the person who posted as to what the DA stated, so they did a background check.......was she the accused or the victim?..........see not reason for the prosecution to do background check on victim, wasn't the checking suppose to have been that of the perpetrator? or am I missing something here?........we can go on like this forever.........the burden of proof is on the defendant on criminal matters, not the victim.........just so you know........civil then the plaintiff has the burden of proof.......and must produce.......what does this mean, well that the defendant has to prove that they are not guilty.....the prosecution is supposed to have the goods on the defendant so only reasonable to assume that they should have been looking into Mr. DSK business not hers........but if instead they are looking into the plaintiffs background then I see no freaking point in them even conducting an investigation.......my observation in this matter is that they didn't want to prosecute and they just put on a show.......how bout that one.........but his reputation is still tainted and even if he got off people will always see him as a predator who got off because of his "Status" and the people he coerced.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MicheleO
02:57 PM on 08/24/2011
Please note that any and all DA's do background checks on both alleged perp and victim. If they don't, and they are blindsided by a victims less than honest past they will look like complete and utter idiots. It is ALWAYS done. Good thing they did. Did you know that when the DA was interviewing her and she was describing the phony gang rape in Guinea she actually put her head down on the table and pounded the table with her fists, all the time crying phony tears?? Than she has to tell them it was all a lie. What an actress.
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
03:38 PM on 08/24/2011
gwen5362 said "the burden of proof is on the defendant on criminal matters, not the victim."

Isn't the burden of proof on the prosecution, not on the defense in a criminal trial? Has this changed recently?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
12:46 PM on 08/24/2011
"In virtually every substantive interview with prosecutors, despite entreaties to simply be truthful, she has not been truthful, on matters great and small, many pertaining to her background and some relating to the circumstances of the incident itself."-- NY District Attorney statement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
02:13 PM on 08/24/2011
and yet even after first lying about it and then admitting to k illin g 19 people the DA still put Gravano on the stand to testify as the "MAIN" witness against Gotti......... OOOPS
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
02:17 PM on 08/24/2011
After being caught in lie in open court Mark Furhman's testimony was still allowed to be entered in as evidence in the OJ trial. With Furhman being the main witness that linked OJ to the c rime scene...... well maybe that's a bad example, because OJ was acquitted and we all KNOW how innocent OJ was........ maybe OJ shouldn't have been on trial in the first place, when the main witness is untrustworthy, why bother with a trial...... OJ was convicted the court of public opinion, but without a public trial, he could have easily assimilated back into everyday society......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
04:01 PM on 08/24/2011
Nonsensical red herring.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
12:42 PM on 08/24/2011
Deport DSK to his native France. Deport Nafissatou Diallo to her native Guinea. Done.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Johnny Bomers
12:20 PM on 08/24/2011
If he had done this to your mother or sister they would have been made out to be lyers. His attorneys would have dug around in their background and would have found something to make them look like gold diggers. He should have been investigated for lies he told in the past. The lies from the maid had nothing to do with this case. It referred to her application for assylum into this country. This pig has a reputation for doing these things and there are still many who see him as a pillar of society. Sick world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
01:31 PM on 08/24/2011
"The lies from the maid had nothing to do with this case."
Nonsense.
Accuser's lack of credibility is catastrophic to a case.

Consider the concept of "reasonable doubt," if able.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MicheleO
02:50 PM on 08/24/2011
DSK's attorneys did NOT have to dig into the maids background. The DA's office did it. They ALWAYS check a persons background so that they are not blindsided if the person is less than honest. It was NOT DSK's attornies that discovered that Diallo lied big time. Do you know that when she told the DA she was gang raped in Guinea she is such a great actress she put her head all the way down on the table and pounded the table pretending to cry?? Would YOU continue with the case if you were the DA? If you did you would be a fool and I sure as hell wouldn't want you as my attorney.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frenchfrog
12:20 PM on 08/24/2011
People who assume DSK got away because he could somehow buy his way out are cynical to think so. This theory is as much a conspiracy theory as the one stating DSK was framed by political opponents.

The DA's motion is clear. They could not believe Diallo beyond a reasonable doubt, the medical evidence is not convincing to prove assault, and they came to this conclusion on their own, after Diallo's lawyer came to them with concerns about her credibility. Diallo's lawyer (it is not specified which one), not DSK's.

Vance did his job, no more no less. He showed that he would remain independent, without caving to any political pressure from an attorney who has been trying from the beginning to turn this case into a civil rights case, putting the stress on race and class.

Many say that DSK is not innocent because of the lack of trial. They should take a good look in the mirror. Had there been a trial, and had DSK been found not guilty, they would likely state that his expensive lawyers got him off. The only outcome possible to have justice in this case for these people was to send DSK to jail. And because of the lack of physical evidence and credibility of the main witness, it's plainly and simply wrong. In this sense, justice prevailed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
02:22 PM on 08/24/2011
there is no lack of physical evidence, actually there is plenty of that, and a trial is a good way for DSK to clear his name....... but just like in the r ape case involving the two NYPD officers that the DAs office lost, the public passed their verdict after hearing some of the evidence....... Without going to trial those two officers would still have their jobs, so going to trial and losing was worth it after all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frenchfrog
03:10 PM on 08/24/2011
the physical evidence does not show force or violence. She has no injury, only redness which can be caused by a number of things. The torn ligament can't be realistically linked to the alleged assault, if you tear a ligament, the pain is immediate and doesn't fade for a month before becoming sharp again. Read the motion.

The DA went to trial with the 2 cops because they believed the victim, beyond a reasonable doubt. In DSK's case, a trial would have an important waste of time and money for the city. It will be interesting to see if a judge decide if there's merit to the civil suit Diallo filed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Wanjiru
Debatably relatable ...
11:06 AM on 08/24/2011
I wish people would think analytically, for once! Why would this woman, a mere MAID - accuse this POWERFUL man of rape - not only publicly humiliating herself and her family because of the nature of this crime, but also understanding fully well what the odds were against her?

What a shameful testament to jurisprudence - justice is clearly not blind. It is completely and unashamedly biased FOR the economically and politically powerful.

This is yet another one for the books! And yet we wonder why sexual assualt/rape crimes are so under-reported! Well, simply because the victims of these crimes just get raped again, by the system!
.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanfran55
12:25 PM on 08/24/2011
Please take the time to read the legal motion for dismissal before you accuse DSK of guilt without a trial or evidence: http://www.scribd.com/doc/62888126/Dsk-Motion-to-Dismiss

You do know that DSK was slotted to be the next President of France, don't you? The polls showed that he would win over Sarkozy. Now Sarkozy (who has a lot in common with W. Bush) has an easy win for himself in the spring of 2012.

Timing is everything.

2 + 2 = 4

ps I don't know how often you travel, but when's the last time some maid was standing in your room while you were taking a shower? This man was in their top of the line suite, and this lady - who is supposed to be a professional - is right there in this giant set of rooms when he's getting out of the shower? Not to mention, maids never hang around or clean rooms when a guest is in the room. It really doesn't add up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dourdinlives
better to have loved and lost than never to have l
12:37 AM on 08/25/2011
oh! thats it. she saw his beautiful adonis like body and was so sexually aroused she couldn't help herself.....gives a break fool. he is a slimy little slug, the height of a 5th grader with a little wrinkled peanut shell. gives us all a break.
08:47 AM on 08/25/2011
Since at lesat 2010, every political pol in France shows that Sarkozy will be defeated, whoever his socialist opponent is (I hope my sentence is correct in english). Today, nothing has changed, except the name of the socialist candidate opposite him. Nicolas Sarkozy has not "an easy win for himself in the spring of 2012".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
12:38 PM on 08/24/2011
Why would this woman, a mere MAID - accuse this POWERFUL man of rape

The Benjamins.

Fact: Maid in recorded conversation with her incarnated boyfriend:" Don't worry. I know what I am doing. This guy is rich."

No further questions. Defense rests.