iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'Secret' Fed Loans Reveal Divide Between 'Wall Street Aristocracy' And Ordinary Americans

Bernanke

First Posted: 08/23/11 05:10 PM ET Updated: 10/24/11 06:12 AM ET

If you've not yet read the recent piece by Bradley Keoun and Phil Kuntz of Bloomberg News, "Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion in Fed’s Secret Loans," please go read the whole thing. The report hits many of my favorite sweet-spots. By far the most important is the fact that, for all the reporting on the Troubled Asset Relief Program and the way every picayune repayment is worthy of an excited press release from the Department of the Treasury, the underreported story of the bailout remains the trillions of taxpayer dollars that the Federal Reserve has disbursed to major financial institutions in an attempt to make them whole, making the TARP just an overhyped sliver of the entire bailout.

Of secondary interest is that Bloomberg takes home this story thanks to the efforts of the late, great Mark Pittman. This week's disclosures are the fruits of a lengthy legal battle that Bloomberg has waged with the Federal Reserve, which began with Pittman's 2008 FOIA requests. Pittman, who passed away in November of 2009, produced some of the bailout era's most important pieces of reporting -- including this one, in which he described in detail the terrible deal that American taxpayers got in the whole process.

Speaking of, you definitely are going to want to scroll down in the Keoun/Kuntz piece to see for yourselves what sort of collateral your major financial institutions are permitted to put up in return for $1.2 trillion of your money:

As the crisis deepened, the Fed relaxed its standards for acceptable collateral. Typically, the central bank accepts only bonds with the highest credit grades, such as U.S. Treasuries. By late 2008, it was accepting “junk” bonds, those rated below investment grade. It even took stocks, which are first to get wiped out in a liquidation.

Morgan Stanley borrowed $61.3 billion from one Fed program in September 2008, pledging a total of $66.5 billion of collateral, according to Fed documents. Securities pledged included $21.5 billion of stocks, $6.68 billion of bonds with a junk credit rating and $19.5 billion of assets with an “unknown rating,” according to the documents. About 25 percent of the collateral was foreign-denominated.

For those playing at home, that's the equivalent of you going to the bank for a loan and putting up a garbage sack full of whatever you found in the trunk of your car for collateral. And it's not like ordinary Americans can't use a little liquidity of their own, seeing that "12.87 percent of mortgage loans on one-to-four-unit homes were 30 days or longer past due or in the foreclosure process at the end of the second quarter."

At this point, it would probably interest you to know that the $1.2 trillion secretly loaned to banks with junk as collateral is "about the same amount U.S. homeowners currently owe on 6.5 million delinquent and foreclosed mortgages."

READ MORE:
Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion in Fed’s Secret Loans [Bloomberg]

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
If you've not yet read the recent piece by Bradley Keoun and Phil Kuntz of Bloomberg News, "Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion in Fed’s Secret Loans," please go read the whole thing. The repo...
If you've not yet read the recent piece by Bradley Keoun and Phil Kuntz of Bloomberg News, "Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion in Fed’s Secret Loans," please go read the whole thing. The repo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 591
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vcgh2000
09:30 PM on 09/01/2011
So next time we have a GOP presidential debate, watch how many minutes of time is directed to Ron Paul.
The one candidate who will level with the American people and tell them exactly what are the problems and how to address them will be marginalized.
10:33 AM on 08/27/2011
"At this point, it would probably interest you to know that the $1.2 trillion secretly loaned to banks with junk as collateral is "about the same amount U.S. homeowners currently owe on 6.5 million delinquent and foreclosed mortgages.""

Jezussschrist. Unbelievable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blaine Knapp
Semper Fidelis
12:14 AM on 08/25/2011
There is a candidate that wants to end the Federal Reserve and it's cronyism. He wants to end the wars abroad so that we don't have to suffer austerity at home. I think it's about time we gave Dr. Paul's economic prescience more consideration.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
09:53 PM on 08/24/2011
"While he invested $10 billion in Goldman Sachs in October, twice as much as Buffett did the month before, Henry Paulson, Treasury secretary gained certificates worth one-fourth as much as the billionaire, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The Goldman Sachs terms were repeated in most of the other bank bailouts."

You have to wonder if Paulson was working more as Goldman Sachs alumni than for the good of America.

When Hank Paulson agreed to become Treasury Secretary in May of 2006, he owned about $500 million in Goldman Sachs stock, from his days as CEO of the firm.THESE WERE THE DAYS OF GS BETTING AGAINST ITS OWN INVESTORS!

So to avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest, government rules forced Mr. Paulson to sell all that stock.

Mr. Paulson’s conflict of interest also brought a very unique benefit: He didn’t have to pay any capital gains taxes on the sale of that stock — zero. The Economist estimated his tax savings to be $200m. That’s not bad compensation for less than 3 years of work at a “public service” gig. He also got a nice salary and generous benefits.

The ethics rules that forced Paulson to sell his GS shares encourages these rich executives to move to Washington after they’ve made their fortunes. Getting a government job with conflicted interest is a fantastic tax dodge.

Paulson needs to face charges of ....TREASON.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:03 AM on 08/25/2011
Are you Rick Perry in disguise?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vcgh2000
09:38 PM on 09/01/2011
And that's the way it goes...the big boys on Wall Street move on to key government positions and "enforce" the regulations. So who are they going to represent.....the taxpayer or their friends in the Financial Service Industry?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:58 PM on 08/24/2011
we are all hamsters on neocon "financially engineered" "financially innovated" wheels...

5/26/11 - one year later in this article

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/26/federal-reserve-emergency-loans-secret_n_867729.html

the Fed released a trove of documents that name the recipients of $3.3 trillion in aid

including one program in which

nine firms, FIVE OF THEM FOREIGN,

were able to borrow $5 billion for 28 days at the extremely low interest rate of 0.0078 percent

In late March, the Fed released information about its primary lending facility -- the so-called discount window -- which had provided ultra-cheap cash during the height of the crisis to a range of firms.

During the week in October 2008 when borrowing under the program peaked,

FOREIGN BANKS RECEIVED MORE THAN 70 percent, SEVENTY PERCENT, of the $110.7 billion that the Fed lent out, Bloomberg News reported.

Arab Banking Corp., a $28 billion lender now majority-owned by Libya's central bank, got at least $3.2 billion that autumn

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/26/federal-reserve-emergency-loans-secret_n_867729.html

THE FED GIVES GADDAFI BILLIONS!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
09:36 PM on 08/24/2011
When I read how we citizens are taken advantage of , I get so angry. The GOP and Obama keep complaining about our "entitlement programs" , such as Social Security, while they laud these thieves as "Job Creators."...
02:21 PM on 08/24/2011
So, where do we start? Who gets the axe first in Washington or Wall Street? Bernanke may become the most hated man in America! His face appears next to every article exposing the "big screw" the common people got. Sad thing that most don't even know what happened! Just keep feeding them mind-numbing TV and they will get away with everything!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
10:27 PM on 08/24/2011
Obama moving to protect banks from further investigation in mortgage fraud

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/08/24/1010045/-Pressure-Grows-on-NY-Atty-General-Eric-Schneiderman-To-Accept-Financial-Crimes-Cover-up

His should be the next most despised face in his coddling of these criminals
01:25 PM on 08/24/2011
Thank you ChasG for sharing what appears to be an intimate understanding of our monetary system. Because of a personal lack of knowledge in this area I must defer to you. So, if you would, please read the following as more of a question than anything else.
Is there is a basic philosophical difference between whether the money supply is adjusted thru interest rates or rules? Interest rates are akin to; yes you can have vs. no you can’t. Rules are not subjective; base the rules on facts with possible stated exceptions.
When I see the statement money supply it seems so pure, print more its worth less, print less its worth more. Now enter the word interest as in a method to control the supply, to me that degrades the purity of supply and demand. Then I must ask to what or whose benefit was this word added. I speak only of the fountainhead of money not downstream; I get making money on money, no problem there.

Mr. Greenspan said it “we got it wrong”. The setting of interest rates is subjective, complicated with the possibility of less than noble intentions. The other hand, rules are rules if you enforce them. Why can’t we have government print money, set rules for supply? I reject the notion the government can’t handle it, I would think if you and others of like knowledge set up and run the agency it will be as successful as putting a man on the moon.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwalter
The State is a gang of thieves writ large.
12:04 PM on 08/24/2011
Austrian Economists and Libertarians have been telling you this for years.
photo
cobry4949
cobry1112
11:38 AM on 08/24/2011
The 50 Richest Members of Congress (2011) ban lobbying save AMerica
http://www.rollcall.com/50richest/the-50-richest-members-of-congress-112th.html
photo
cobry4949
cobry1112
11:37 AM on 08/24/2011
Bloomberg reveals massive corruption in the private Federal Reserve http://www.activistpost.com/2011/08/bloomberg-reveals-massive-corruption-in.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
10:42 AM on 08/24/2011
Bernie Sanders audit indicates MUCH more money given out to banks , including foreign:

http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3

Why the discrepancy?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
10:49 AM on 08/24/2011
1.2 trillion vs 16 trillion is quite the discrepancy. !!

And why would anyone believe anyone from the Fed? It is quite obvious they are motivated to enrich their cronies and Wall St pals and especially to keep the truth SECRET
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
12:10 PM on 08/24/2011
A 15 Trillion Discrepancy....Wall Street spills more than that a month.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Larry Scantand
10:15 AM on 08/24/2011
Once again. proving to the world that money trumps humanity... Greed is the cause here and who cares if an American loses their home as long as the rich get richer... Who cares if a mother has to choose a job over taking care of her kids... Who cares if it takes a wage earner two more hours in traffic because they lost their car... as long as Wall Street and the Banks get more and more...

What a sick society we live in... where the human element is totally ignored for power and greed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TabaskoKat
confrontational iconoclast
11:30 AM on 08/24/2011
your post should be one of the highlighted posts at the top of the page f&f'd
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Larry Scantand
12:37 PM on 08/24/2011
thank you... I feel we need to help Americans first... otherwise... where does that leave us...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldcliche
12:05 PM on 08/24/2011
#118
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustinP213
I dislike all political parties.
10:03 AM on 08/24/2011
People, this isn't a Dem or Repub issue. Wall street showers both sides with campaign contributions. It's clear that the Federal Reserve needs to be dismantled.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
09:40 AM on 08/24/2011
Not surprising, look at Obama's Sec of the Treasury, look at all his financial staff. Goldman, Merril and BOA alumni. They have no clue who the American people are, what we do and what we need. They live in a completely different world. They don't do laundry, they don't mow lawns, they don't go food shopping and they don't buy cloths were most of us do. They think that only they are important and that by takeing our money they are doing us a great big favor. The mystery is why we let them do it. "They got the guns, but we got the numbers.......we want the world......and we want it.........NOW!" Jim Morrison
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TabaskoKat
confrontational iconoclast
11:32 AM on 08/24/2011
to be fair, going back almost 20 yrs now. almost every sec of tres. has been a goldman sachs exec. goldman has had a lock on that position for a very long time. R or D not withstanding
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Twelve
Uber Liberal And Proud Of It
12:22 PM on 08/24/2011
So, you are blaming it on Obama?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
12:30 PM on 08/24/2011
Yeah, he should know better. Do you think we would do better with Romney or Perry? I think not. Sometimes smart people listen to dumb advise, but evil is evil.
09:37 AM on 08/24/2011
The concentration of wealth and the corrupt nature of our politics has guaranteed that the unemployment crisis will continue because all the resources have been gathered to enrich the economic elite and almost none to help the ordinary peasants.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
11:33 AM on 08/24/2011
Exactly. The peasants must rise up and take our country back. Otherwise we'll soon be living on the streets.
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
12:13 PM on 08/24/2011
In NYC you don't have to live on the streets,,,you can live in the Pot Holes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TabaskoKat
confrontational iconoclast
11:35 AM on 08/24/2011
so when are we collectively going to say enough?! we dont have to go into the streest and break and burn things. we can just stop. stop going to movies. stop paying rent/mortgage. stop paying traffic tickets. but just your essentials. dont go to work. reach out to your neighbors and start 'food collectives' broaden your circle of friends. itll hurt, but by collectively acting together we can just slow and shut to whole mess down. let the anarchists loot and pillage, itll keep the cops busy. we the people, the problem is, we the people dont really get along
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldcliche
12:06 PM on 08/24/2011
The "Us versus Them" dynamic of our politics helps keep us separated.