iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Keystone XL Pipeline Obama's 'Biggest Climate Test,' Green Groups Say

Keystone Xl Obama

First Posted: 08/24/11 02:21 PM ET Updated: 10/24/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- In a boost for grassroots efforts pressuring the Obama administration to block approval of TransCanada's Keystone XL oil pipeline, the heads of major environmental organizations released a letter on Wednesday calling on Barack Obama to deny presidential approval to the pipeline, which would stretch from tar sands in Alberta to oil refineries in the Gulf of Mexico.

In their letter to Obama, the groups described the pipeline as “perhaps the biggest climate test you face between now and the election,” and warned that a failure to deny the permit could come back to haunt him in 2012.

"If you block it, you will trigger a surge of enthusiasm from the green base that supported you so strongly in the last election," wrote the groups.

Signatories included leaders from Natural Resources Defense Council, the Sierra Club, the Environmental Defense Fund, the National Wildlife Federation, Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and the Rainforest Action Network, among others.

"There is not an inch of daylight between our policy position on the Keystone XL pipeline, and those of the protesters being arrested daily outside the White House,” wrote the groups in their letter.

As of Wednesday afternoon, 275 people had been arrested in connection with the protests. Organizers say more than 2,000 volunteers have signed up to participate in the sit-ins, which are slated to run through Sep. 3.

“For those of us out there protesting, the best thing about this ringing statement is that the administration won’t be able to play one group off against another by making small concessions here and there,” author and environmentalist Bill McKibben, who is helping to organize the protests for tarsandsaction.org, wrote in a statement accompanying the press release. “They’ve all shown that there is one way to demonstrate to the environmental base that the rhetoric of Obama’s 2008 campaign is still meaningful -- and that’s to veto this pipeline. Since he can do it without even consulting Congress, this is one case where we’ll be able to see exactly how willing he is to match the rhetoric of his 2008 campaign.”

Read the full letter below:

Dear President Obama:

Many of the organizations we head do not engage in civil disobedience; some do. Regardless, speaking as individuals, we want to let you know that there is not an inch of daylight between our policy position on the Keystone Pipeline and those of the very civil protesters being arrested daily outside the White House. This is a terrible project -- many of the country's leading climate scientists have explained why in their letter last month to you. It risks many of our national treasures to leaks and spills. And it reduces incentives to make the transition to job-creating clean fuels.

You have a clear shot to deny the permit, without any interference from Congress. It's perhaps the biggest climate test you face between now and the election. If you block it, you will trigger a surge of enthusiasm from the green base that supported you so strongly in the last election. We expect nothing less.

Sincerely,

Fred Krupp, Environmental Defense Fund

Michael Brune, Sierra Club

Frances Beinecke, Natural Resources Defense Council

Phil Radford, Greenpeace

Larry Schweiger, National Wildlife Federation

Erich Pica, Friends of the Earth

Rebecca Tarbotton, Rainforest Action Network

May Boeve, 350.org

Gene Karpinski, League of Conservation Voters

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- In a boost for grassroots efforts pressuring the Obama administration to block approval of TransCanada's Keystone XL oil pipeline, the heads of major environmental organizations released...
WASHINGTON -- In a boost for grassroots efforts pressuring the Obama administration to block approval of TransCanada's Keystone XL oil pipeline, the heads of major environmental organizations released...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 283
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
05:45 AM on 09/06/2011
The posters carried the wrong message.They should have read; STOP MORE JOBS.Regulate more Junk Science. If the truth were known,these people are not experiencing long unenemployment lines and threats of foreclosure because of excessive and un-necessary regulations placed on industry and services. if this economy wants to survive then we are going to have to be more compliant to common sense.
photo
OzzieTonto
“Hatred, the only thing that lasts.”
05:05 AM on 08/29/2011
Obama Faces Tough Call On Keystone XL Pipeline

On one side: environmentalists, farmers, ranchers, indigenous people, residents of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.

On the other side: Big Oil.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:07 PM on 08/28/2011
Want the oil sands facts?


http://www.amazon.ca/Ethical-Oil-Case-Canadas-Sands/dp/0771046413

"The methodology of _Ethical Oil_ is to argue for the oil sands from a politically liberal world-and-life view. The question this methodology is employed to answer is not "whether we should use oil sands oil instead of some perfect fantasy fuel that hasn't been invented yet. Until that miracle fuel is invented, the question is whether we should use oil from the oil sands or oil from other places in the world that pump it."

Levant examines the world's official ethical indicators that are applied to oil companies and finds them arbitrary, lacking an objective basis, and unhelpful in making judgments about the ethics of energy companies

Levant endorses ethical indicators put forward by a Canadian group called Kairos of which Levant is hardly a friend. The indicators are: (1) Justice - is there access to affordable energy? (2) Peace - do the oil sands promote peace or violence, directly or indirectly? (3) Sustainability - what's the environmental impact of the oil sands? (4) Democratic Decision-Making - is there a shared decision-making process between oil companies and citizens regarding the energy future of the citizenry?

Compared to any other country on the planet - whether Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan, Nigeria, Russia, Venezuela, Mexico, or China - there's no doubt as to which country meets these ethical indicators and which countries do not. Canada's oil sands are a light unto a dark, dark world. "
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
05:51 PM on 08/28/2011
Mid east oil producers import and burn coal to power their own economies which frees up more of the much more expensive oil for export to the USA.
What does that do to the environment?

How do you say 'patsy' in Arabic?

"The economics behind the coal fad are clear. To produce a megawatt hour of electricity using Australian coal, it costs just €11. Using natural gas, on the other hand, ups that price to €26 while oil-fired power plants swallow up €50.50 per megawatt hour of electricity.

Plus, coal is likely to be available for quite some time to come. Global coal reserves will last an estimated 100 more years and possibly even twice that long. As a result, coal is relatively cheap and in some cases can even be gleaned from open pit mines as in Australia, but also in the US, South Africa, China and Russia. The difference between the prices of natural gas and oil on the one hand, and coal on the other is growing increasingly large.

For the Gulf, the development is turning into a highly lucrative business model. They are currently able to sell their oil at record prices on the global market (currently over $140 a barrel). At the same time, they are able to satisfy their own energy needs at a much lower cost with coal shipped in from overseas.

From an environmental standpoint, of course, this trend is devastating."

http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,563502,00.html
11:36 AM on 08/26/2011
WE NEED JOBS
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
judibluiz
There is no planet B
12:43 PM on 08/26/2011
I bet those that shot passenger pigeons for feathers for ladies hats felt the same way.
01:00 PM on 08/26/2011
So you can have your say,,,but my opinion does not count..You just make a joke. Well let me tell you about Lusky a Welder that lives on the Navajo Nation who hasnt had work or insurance in 14 months. Or Alvie a welder in Oklahoma whos wife just come down with cancer..These are members of my Union who i represent And they need jobs...Do you think it would be better to transport the crude my ship? trucks? or just let the economy go to hell and we can all set around and sing cum by yall...get real people. I am all for real enviorment concerns not this one its just about campaign money.
photo
Dahveed1
I have Flying Monkeys...
11:07 PM on 08/25/2011
An empty threat - if Obama doesn't stop this they'll punish him at the polls? BS. They're going to vote for Perry or Bachmann or Romney? I don't see that happening. At most they'll do is stay home.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
judibluiz
There is no planet B
12:46 PM on 08/26/2011
If enough environmentalists stay home, it's a win for Perry, Romney or Bachmann - so what's the difference?
09:12 AM on 08/25/2011
If Canada wants to produce oil in this manner than let them build their own refineries. Why should the US jeopardise our environment to please another big oil pipe dream.
photo
Dahveed1
I have Flying Monkeys...
11:10 PM on 08/25/2011
Ok, so they refine it up there. That's more American jobs lost. Also, how do you think they're going to get the refined gasoline, diesel and fuel oil to us? A pipeline. So we've lost a lot of good paying jobs and still end up with a pipeline. Brilliant.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Johngy
Banned for what???
08:01 AM on 08/25/2011
When did the Red's go green? Remember, "Better Red than dead"? Now that they've changed their color, we need to come up with a new slogan. "Better green than____" You fill in the blank.
08:59 AM on 08/25/2011
I believe the slogan was "better dead than red".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
05:32 PM on 08/28/2011
Watermelons: green on the outside, red on the inside.
03:47 AM on 08/25/2011
viva la grange
03:47 AM on 08/25/2011
by the way I am a socialist.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Johngy
Banned for what???
08:07 AM on 08/25/2011
Then why do you live in America? (I'm assuming you're in the US.) There're plenty of countries out there that totaly embrace Socilist values. Would you go to a church and say that you were an atheist? Would you go to a bar and say you were a tea totaler? No! You would stay away from those places. So, stay out of America!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealTimeHistory
03:12 PM on 08/25/2011
Why do you assume that being a citizen of the United States is predicated on ANY political or economic philosophy? If you think it is, perhaps YOU need to study up on what freedoms are listed in the Bill of Rights.

I HAVE gone to a church, and explained that I am an atheist. That doesn't mean that I can not and do not occasionally accompany my friends to their place of worship. That also doesn't mean that I would join that church. Likewise, I have known of tea-totaling BARKEEPERS, and others who may go to a bar for occasions, and have no problem not drinking. Lighten up, buddy, your prejudices are showing!
09:06 AM on 08/25/2011
I'll bet you're a socialist/capitalist hybrid, which is someone who makes a comfortable living from a capitalist way of life yet self-flagellates over his own wealth to appear socially conscious. Like Warren Buffet, you are quite free to pay as much tax to your beloved government as you wish.
03:46 AM on 08/25/2011
I personally feel proud that Nebraska went purple in 2008, however, Obama has proven to be a leader that will probably sign off on this deal and then let the courts decide, and I know that something this big that affects a constituency that is very red he will let business win in favor of what is right, I am angry, we caucused in Nebraska for the first time and the debate was real and healthy, I may have chose the wrong side by not going for Hillary. My state is surprising, we brought this nation the end of the gold standard, we are a state to amaze you, come and see us, get off the interstate and travel north from york, kearney grand island, or gothenburg, you have seen the names if you travel I-80 but pull off get on a by way and see what this state is, rolling hills where you can literally see for miles, it gets dark here at night and you can see the stars and planets and the many excitements of our universe without any interference, so much of western nebraska still looks untouched, because it hasn't been touched do not let this happen because you want cheap gas, we have already hit peak, and this isn't gonna fix it, leave ne, all of us in the great plains as we are, this pipeline will ruin families, ruin towns, and ruin our land, and for what? corporate greed?
12:00 AM on 08/26/2011
Here is a map of the provinces and states that will be directly affected by the proposed pipeline. Speak up, sign a petition (easy to find online), write letters, support organizations that have success in lobbying (like Rainforest Alliance, had success in influencing a major Canadian bank to review funding this project). Keep our land beautiful and healthy, fellow Canadians and Americans. Be courageous and optimistic!

http://keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/clientsite/keystonexl.nsf/map.jpg?OpenFileResource
05:01 AM on 08/26/2011
Since Obama has nixed many permits for us to explore our own lucrative energy souces, how far are you willing to go to destroy our economy? It appears most would prefer we import foreign oil--certainly Obama has assured Brazil we will be their best customer of oil (keep in mind Obama gave Brazil $2 billion of our tax dollars so they can drill.) Everyone would support solar, wind, electric cars, nuclear, ethanol (you certainly can see what using corn for fuel has caused the cost in the increase of food prices)--but we aren't there yet! Let's use all our natural resouces until we can prefect alternative energy.

The environmentalists who continually stop any attempt to free us from foreign imports are imposing their idealogy on everyone. In Calif. it was a minnow that shut down the farmer's ability to access water (farmers that supply 20% of our produce,) a duck in another state that no longer allows boaters or fishermen to use the lake, subsides to farmers to grow corn for ethanol which has proven does not save the environment because the cost for growing, transporting and refining is even more expensive, and on and on. You may be able to add to this. The greenies are losing our attention because scientists cannot even support some of their unsubstantiated views.
02:15 AM on 08/25/2011
A pipeline is probably not the biggest test of Obama's current attempt to gain a second term, but pipeline is probably the last thing we need. The president does need to stop this, look around and one will immediately see things like what is happening now in Yellowstone, and what happened in with BP which covered the Gulf Coast. We cannot risk doing more damage to our precious eco system just to gain a buck.
03:24 AM on 08/25/2011
it has grown beyond ecology, this is a corporate takeover of personal property, I will always argue environment but if you look at the people affected first hand they are ranchers and farmers, and in Nebraska that is republican, this is a land grab in their minds, and an attack on their way of life which honestly has been under attack by corporate america and the us government, eminent domain will win unless we can, as a people truly stand up.
05:22 AM on 08/26/2011
This appears to be more personal in nature--if the government is taking your land by eminent domain--I certainly would not agree with that and most Americans would stand by you and agree. But if it is another avenue for Americans to rid ourselves of our dependence on foreign oil, the idea is great. Who cares what the oil companies earn, my costs will be reduced--not only are my 401 k's reflected in their profits but also they create jobs.
photo
Dahveed1
I have Flying Monkeys...
11:19 PM on 08/25/2011
Ha. If this wasn't so sad, it would be funny. That oil is going to come from somewhere. The only question is where. We're either going to import it by boat or build the pipeline and get it that way. Personally, I'd rather be paying the Canadian's for that oil rather than having giant tankers bringing it here from the middle east or Venezuela. Of course ultimately I'd like to not import any oil from any country. Now if tankers were a better way of moving oil, I'd be opposed to the pipeline. However, pipelines are a better and safer way to move oil around.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealTimeHistory
04:49 PM on 08/26/2011
There are also small, domestic oil developments that pay attention to how to extract oil with the smallest ecological impact. It's still oil, and it will still create CO2. But the problem is that we still use too much oil, and MUST change our energy use habits. NOTHING else will make a difference. It really comes down to kicking the addiction, not feeding it with more expensive fixes.

We should be DEMANDING that our government, and our manufacturers, and our city planners and our developers start providing alternatives to our automobile-centric way of life. Some hearty individuals have already pioneered the ways, but it will take whole communities to demand the rebuilding of our infrastructures to accommodate an "oil-lite" energy future. All this WHOOP-TI-DO over finding cheaper oil, or oil from "friendly" countries is just hiding from the real problem, and whistling past the graveyard..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
05:54 PM on 08/28/2011
The cost of having the US navy protect the mideast oil producers works out to about $50.00 per barrel.
In other words Canadian oil is $50.00/barrel cheaper.
02:12 AM on 08/25/2011
I must also make it known that the sandhills of Nebraska is one of those untouched pristine wildernesses in the middle of the "Great American Desert" that has not changed much. Sure there is some fencing to partition the land, and the original inhabitants have been moved to reservations, but the reality is that if you want to see America untouched by manifest destiny, if you want to see a wild America, exit off of I-80 and hit the sandhills, make sure your gas tank is full and bring some snacks because there is nothing but beauty out there. Head to Carhenge and you will know what I mean and you haven't even seen the most remote beauty that exists in wester Nebraska, please don't touch this gem, I would never ask that the Appalachian Trail be paved, don't ask me to destroy my home.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:52 AM on 08/25/2011
The tar sands are not just a global environmental monstrosity, but they represent what is already a colossal misallocation of scarce real capital by Canadian (and American) investors and taxpayers - a multi-hundred billion dollar security of supply "solution", producing the most expensive, dirtiest oil there is, based on the completely unnecessary problem, which is a US policy of extreme hostility towards much cheaper producers of far higher quality oil that can be changed the minute a real leader shows up in the White House or Congress. Not tomorrow, but easily imaginable inside a decade. Why not pay a fraction of the cost for what in every respect is environmentally better oil in a saner future wherein the US snaps out of its self-induced hypnotic security mania, simply opts out of the Empire business, and starts being a good customer looking for oil from lots of eager sellers?

Canada will commit economic suicide if it keeps pouring all its time, energy and money into one of the bigger things we all know will simply have to be turned off before they start killing us in real numbers we all can see - not in some fuzzy future, but easily within 20 years, and with the increasing violence and extremes of the weather, quite possibly much, much sooner.

Tar sands are a lose, lose, lose. We need smart solutions, not dumb money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
05:44 PM on 08/28/2011
Might be time to ditch the rhetoric and look at a few facts?

The oil sands oil is far from the dirtiest in the world, California's heavy crude has a bigger carbon footprint per barrel than the oil sands oil.
As does Nigerian oil, which also has a BP sized spill, EVERY YEAR.

Look it up.

The US can by clean ethical oil from politically stable Canada or they can buy dirty unethical oil from unstable human rights abusing dictatorships.'
The choice couldn't be more obvious.

But no worries, if you don't want it, China and India are lined up for it...

Pssst!
(There are individual coal fired plants in China that emit more C02 than all the oil sands operations, combined.)
01:44 AM on 08/25/2011
I myself am from Nebraska, and I must tell you this is a bad deal. First and foremost, the sandhills is a very uniqued and vibrant ecosystem that should be left alone, if all that happens on this land is ranching we are doing the world a great service, secondly the Oglala Aquifer is probably the most pristine water resource on earth, throughout western Nebraska there are natural springs untouched by any corporate hand, but, outside of all the talk about a need for oil/energy, which by the way it costs us more energy in to produce energy out from tarsands oil,
the fact of the matter is that this is a land grab through eminent domain, and on top of that this is a foreign company asking the federal government to use eminent domain for their own interests. So, if you believe that the United States should concede land from US citizens to give to a Canadian corporation to manipulate for there own purposes go ahead and fight for this horrible deal, or you can stand up with your fellow citizens and say NOT IN MY BACKYARD!!!!
02:02 AM on 08/25/2011
The true NIMBY speaks!

Soon to be a grease spot on the road to progress for the greater good.
hellinahandcart
Your silence will not protect you.
03:04 AM on 08/25/2011
F&F