iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

United States Divorce Rate: 2009 Census Report Reveals Startling Marriage Trends

Census Divorce Rate

By HOPE YEN   08/25/11 06:10 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- Singles, take note: With marriages at an all-time low, states in the South and West rank among the highest for couples hearing wedding bells. But many of these states also have higher rates of divorce.

The first-of-its-kind analysis by the Census Bureau, released Thursday, also finds that people are waiting longer before marrying for the first time. In particular, the percentage of women who wed as teenagers has dropped precipitously since 1970, while many men are postponing marriage past their college-age years.

In all, there were 19.1 weddings performed per 1,000 men and 17.6 per 1,000 women across the U.S. in 2009, while divorces became final for 9.2 of every 1,000 men and 9.7 of every 1,000 women.

By region, the South and West had the most marriages, with rates of roughly 19 per 1,000. But they also led in divorces, each at about 10 per 1,000.

Maine, Alaska, Oklahoma, Kentucky and Nevada, ranked at the top for divorces, while Utah, Wyoming and Arkansas – which had the highest marriage rates – were also higher than average in marital breakups. New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts and New York ranked among the lowest in divorces.

North Dakota ranked among the top states in marriages while posting lower than average divorce rates.

The Census Bureau report attributed the lower rates of divorce in the Northeast in part to delayed marriage in those places, which decreased the likelihood of marital discord down the road.

"Surprisingly, the South and West, which we think of as more socially conservative, have higher rates of divorce than does the supposedly liberal East," said Andrew Cherlin, a professor of sociology and public policy at Johns Hopkins University. "The reason is that young adults in the South and West tend to have less education and marry earlier, both of which lead to a higher risk of divorce."

"The South and West also have many migrants from other parts of the region who have left their social support networks behind. When they have marital problems, they have fewer people to turn to for help," he added.

As to the age at first marriage, the Census Bureau found that men and women were now joining in wedlock later and across a greater range of ages.

For instance, in 1970, more than half of men, 57 percent, were between the ages of 20 and 24 when they first married. By 2009, the age distribution was much wider, with 24 percent marrying between the ages of 20 and 24, 34 percent marrying between the ages of 25 and 29, 20 percent marrying between the ages of 30 and 34, and 9 percent marrying between the ages of 35 and 39.

Similarly for women, in 1970, 42 percent of women were teens when they married, and by the age of 24 about 88 percent of women had a first marriage. By 2009, the shares had dropped to 7 percent and 38 percent, respectively.

As a whole, since 1970, the median age at first marriage increased from 22.5 years to 28.4 for men and from 20.6 years to 26.5 for women.

Pamela Smock, a sociology professor at the University of Michigan, said the rising median age of first marriage is a reflection in part of the proliferation of new types of family groups, including couples who choose to live together and/or have children outside of marriage.

"People are no longer following some lockstep script about when it is time to get married," she said.

As a whole, marriages are now at a record low, with just 52 percent of adults 18 and over saying they were joined in wedlock, compared with 57 percent in 2000, according to census data released last September. The never-married included 46.3 percent of young adults 25-34 – the first time the share of never-married young adults exceeded those who were married, 44.9 percent, with the rest being divorced or widowed.

Marriages have been declining for years due to rising divorce, more unmarried couples living together and increased job prospects for women. But analysts say younger people also may now be increasingly choosing to delay marriage as they struggle to find work and resist making long-term commitments in the recent recession.

Other findings:

_Recently divorced women and their children who typically lived with them were more financially strained compared with others, having higher poverty rates, lower incomes and greater use of public assistance despite higher rates of participation in the labor force.

_Roughly 1.1 million children, or 1.5 percent of all children, lived in 2009 in the home of a parent who divorced in the previous year.

_Delaware and Wyoming ranked at the top for states with more widowers (5.4 per 1,000 men), while Hawaii had the most widows (10.3 per 1,000 women).

The census analysis is based on 2009 data from the American Community Survey, which sampled 3 million households. It is the first to describe detailed information on marriages and divorces from this survey after the National Center for Health Statistics stopped collecting such data in 1996.

___

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DIVORCE

WASHINGTON -- Singles, take note: With marriages at an all-time low, states in the South and West rank among the highest for couples hearing wedding bells. But many of these states also have higher ra...
WASHINGTON -- Singles, take note: With marriages at an all-time low, states in the South and West rank among the highest for couples hearing wedding bells. But many of these states also have higher ra...
Filed by Ashley Reich  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 656
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
11:59 AM on 09/21/2011
Chili Chili hit the nail on the head. Hope Yen, the author of this article, is just hopelessly ignorant about statistics. Her interpretations here are flawed on so many levels. Its very sad that she is in a position to spread her ignorance to other gullible people who, like herself, never had many rigorous math or statistics classes in college.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
11:16 PM on 08/29/2011
Here's the big problem here. There seems to be a perception that divorce somehow indicates an unhappy marriage. The problem is, it's far too affected by other factors. For example, I have no doubt that the reason North Dakota has a high marriage rate but low divorce rate is because they're so religious. That doesn't mean they're happy, which is something that a lot of people don't understand. It just means that they're quick to get married and slow to get divorced.

People need to stop believing that marriage and divorce have something to do with being happy. It doesn't. It has to do with religion and it has to do with insecurity.
10:50 AM on 08/30/2011
Uh...what?

(1) Who says North Dakotans are "so religious," any more so than people in the south, the Bible belt, even? Or even "so religious" in comparison with anyone else? So the super-religious Southerners who get divorced are what?

(2) Granted, being married doesn't necessarily mean one is happy, but the article isn't talking about who is happiest.

(3) Divorce does, in fact, typically have to do with people who are unhappy for whatever reason. It's not often that "happy" people get divorced just for the heck of it. I'm sure it happens in strange circumstances occasionally, but typically people get divorced because they're not happy.

(4) The only reasons people get married are for religious purposes or because they're insecure? Really? I would counter if that's your experience, then you must be pretty unhappy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
09:35 PM on 08/30/2011
1) I do. I was in the military there. And they are very religious (and, of course, conservative.)

2) People are equating marriage with being happy. Not even close to the same thing.

3) That statement is an illogical expansion of what I said.

4) I very happy. So, if you feel there are others reasons, tell us what that is.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
09:58 PM on 08/26/2011
I am curious by what the mean "west"? The comment that people in the west have less education seems odd to me. I live in a state (Washington) that has a high percentage of those who have gone to college than most states. This goes for most of the west coast. I suspect that for these poll takers, maybe they are calling everything west of the Mississippi is called the west, that is a pretty broad blanket.
photo
WhoIsNoOne
What I need is a Micro-Brew-o
01:11 PM on 08/27/2011
That's what crossed my mind first too (I always think West Coast when people say
west. WA, OR, CA). but I think technically they use the rocky mtns
so if you follow the Rockies down and go west from there. MT, WY, CO, NM and west.
this would include a lot of rural areas, and also as the article stated
some high immigrant areas.
it makes sense to me, that lower education and earlier marriages would lead to
a higher rate of divorce
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
01:24 PM on 08/27/2011
Yes that is plausible. But historically "west" kinda referred to anything west of the Mississippi, and that covers a lot. To me, everything east of the Rockies and west of the Mississippi I consider "Midwest" but that ain't necessarily so, I guess. For these people I think Midwest is all the area east of the Mississippi and west of the Alleghenies. I know they claim that Minnesota, Michigan, and Wisconsin are called the "Northwest" and we here in Washington and Oregon and sometimes Idaho are called the Pacific Northwest. Yeesh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
11:12 PM on 08/29/2011
They are counting Texas.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
01:16 PM on 08/30/2011
Well, then that sure explains a lot.

All kidding aside, I think they have blocked out regions that are far too big to draw any real conclusions about anything. It would be better to draw correlations between education, income, rural-suburban, even TV watching to marriage/divorce rates. Heck, even a state like Texas is so large and has such a varied type population that trying to draw conclusions about that state are virtually impossible. At the end of the day, space (i.e., square miles) plays a factor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronaldus785
Gay, Black, Jewish, Adopted
07:11 PM on 08/26/2011
I wonder if they'd do a comparable study for the Jeopardy contestants who brave that game show. I'd love to know the total distribution of where the contestants live to the U.S. regions most commonly represented to date.
02:57 PM on 08/26/2011
I find the "Other findings" note about recently divorce moms depressing. These moms are trying to raise their kids, and even though their working outside the home more than was historically the case, they're still living in poverty. Why? Women still making less? Having to take lower paying jobs in order to have something flexible enough to still parent? Dads not paying child support as they should be? Any other ideas?

Alyssa Johnson, LCSW
http://www.RemarriageSuccess.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
11:20 PM on 08/29/2011
I'm sure it's a combination of things. However, let's be clear on something. Men, generally view their careers as being more important than the children. On the other hand, women do just the opposite. Furthermore, women end up with the children far more often than do men. Women with children are far less likely to do well in business. Furthermore, whether men like to admit it or not, they don't like to pay child support. They'd much rather their children just fade off into the sunset - along with their ex-wives.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:44 PM on 08/26/2011
Huffington Post readers again reveal their ignorance about statistical analysis. Seriously, you all need to take a statistics course and learn how to (and how not to) interpret data.

Conservatives (at least as denominated by Republican leanings) are less likely to get divorced than liberals (at least as denominated by Democrat leanings). http://themonkeycage.org/blog/2009/06/28/are_republicans_more_likely_to/

If nothing else learn that you cannot take aggregated statistics and assign individual behavior to groups that were not separated in the data.

Look, your world view and analysis of scientific, social, political and economic problems are going to be skewed if you do not learn some math and statistics. If you cannot understand data, how can you possibly correctly analyze the problem - or expect to have anyone on the other side of the argument listen to you.

Please go get some education.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
10:05 PM on 08/26/2011
The main observation was that divorce rates appeared to be lower in the Northeast, which they portrayed as populated by a liberal population--I tend to have my doubts whether it is quite that simple. Even New York is primarily liberal in Manhattan and the rest of the state is somewhat conservative, same goes for Massachusetts. But then it is all about total numbers in these regions. Also, one may be religiously liberal or conservative but have different views on divorce. In reality, only the Catholic Church seems to have such an absolute prohibition on divorce. Since there are lot of Catholics in the NE, I am not surprised that divorces are lower there. That region may be politically liberal but religiously conservative.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
11:24 PM on 08/29/2011
What a hoot! Okay, let's accept your statement. Conservatives are less likely to get divorced than liberals. So what? What does that mean to you?

I do not know if you know how to interpret statistics or not, as you never explained your background. However, I do know one thing, you never took a course on Rhetoric, Critical Thinking, or Communication.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:08 PM on 09/04/2011
WSAY, I was responding to the fact that a majority of the comments follow the lines of "Man, those conservatives claim to support marriage but look how much lower the liberal divorce rate is." This is obviously a mis-interpretation of the statistics. To clarify that for the readers, I gave a link which would help them understand why they were wrong in their analysis. My comment also indicates my irritation with the average HuffPo reader who is far to quick to interpret data to reinforce the liberal memes that dominate the reports and commenting on this site. I believe it would help everyone if people learned to (1) study facts not stories, (2) learn to question those facts - how reliable are these reported facts, and (3) based on (1) and (2) what can you really say about the world and how it works. In other words I want people to actually think - do not just read a report, make an incorrect assumption and think you have an accurate view of the world.
04:07 AM on 08/26/2011
I think your point about professionally orientated people is definitely a factor in all of this, as people's careers eventually become more important than their marriages. I also think that this is influenced, as you say, by the casual nature of marriage these days. It's not as sacred as it used to be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
10:14 AM on 08/26/2011
"I also think that this is influenced­, as you say, by the casual nature of marriage these days. It's not as sacred as it used to be."

As well it should not be "sacred."
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
10:11 PM on 08/26/2011
Perhaps people are finally recognizing that marriages are not really until death do us part. Perhaps people are just becoming far more realistic about relationships in general, i.e., relationships come and relationships go. It is really only here in the west that we apparently have this strange notion that divorce is a deficit.

Perhaps if people took a more realistic approach and realize that their marriages are not destined to last till death of one partner, they might find the parting less stressful. I would suggest that both spouses at the very beginning of their marriage prepare for their divorce, at least psychologically. You will become two very different people and not the ones that entered into the original marriage contract. Hey, who knows, you may well be one of those who celebrate your 50th or 75th anniversaries. I toast your relationship.
02:29 AM on 08/26/2011
Actually, what strikes me is the low level of divorce I see among educated couples with children. It seems to be far lower than it was 20 or 30 years ago.There was an article a few months ago in the NY Times discussing the very low divorce rates among this population group. It gave a ~ 11% divorce rate after 10 years of marriage. This means that most of the kids in this cohort will grow up in a relatively stable environment - but then that is the express intention of this group as well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zalkreb
01:58 PM on 08/26/2011
Did the Times mention that when both spouses are college-educated, 90 percent of the time the initiator is the woman? That's according to one study, anyway. It's in line with others that show from two-thirds to three-fourths of divorces are initiated by women, with the lopsidedness rising with the presence of minor children and higher levels of income and education. Of course, it's easy to interpret this finding in a number of ways.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
11:02 PM on 08/29/2011
Now it's 90%. You claimed before it was 2/3. Isn't life easy when your wife dumps you and you run around just making things up?

"Filing" and "initiating" are two different things. You have a chip on your shoulder because she dumped you. So now you believe this? Seek help.
10:04 PM on 08/25/2011
This is no startling news as divorce rates have only been increasing since the divorce legislation was amended. It is no surprise that people would recognise this trend and consequently defer the prime cause, which is marriage. The sanctity of marriage has been abused to the point where people are finally realising the little value it has left. Now that
de facto relationships have become more popular, the sentiment “til death do us part” has undoubtedly deteriorated to “til the first bump in the road”. America’s ongoing recession, threatening employment, has produced a new breed of profession orientated people. The cynical, stingy culture of America simply views marriage as costly, freedom stifling and transitory. Therefore, marriage is no longer a major priority.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
10:18 AM on 08/26/2011
There is no "sanctity of marriage," and there is absolutely nothing wrong with getting divorced. In fact, it is a good thing. If someone had cancer, we don't say, "too bad - she ended up cured..." Why is it when someone has a bad marriage we say, "too bad - she ended up divorced..."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zalkreb
02:04 PM on 08/26/2011
Good question. Why do we say "she ended up divorced", when the odds are at least two to one that she is the one who initiated the divorce? It's strange how divorce is regarded as something just happens, like the weather, when in reality it is something people cause to happen of their own free will. And the overwhelming majority of the time, the person causing the divorce to happen is the female. Divorce is a female phenomenon to about the same extent that sexual assault is a male phenomenon. Of course, we would never blame a rape victim for, say, wearing a short skirt. The responsibility for that act belongs to her attacker. But, conversely, we never assign women responsibility for initiating divorce. It's always, "He must have been doing something..." Why do women get a free pass for all the havoc divorce wreaks?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zalkreb
02:08 PM on 08/26/2011
Eh, Georgina, what are you talking about? Divorce rates rose to their all-time high of about 50 percent after no-fault legislation became nearly universal in the 1970s, but they have been steadily falling -- not increasing -- ever since. And, while you're castigating America as a whole for the divorces that do occur -- still a pretty high proportion of about 40 percent -- why not refine your target to the specific people who actually initiate the overwhelming majority of divorces? That is, women. You might consider a small amount of general research into the topic of divorce while you're at it. Then maybe your next post wouldn't be quite so startlingly far off the mark.
09:55 PM on 08/25/2011
This is no startling news as divorce rates have only been increasing since the divorce legislation was amended. It is no surprise that people would recognise this trend and consequently defer the prime cause, which is marriage. The sanctity of marriage has been abused to the point where people are finally realising the little value it has left. Now that de facto relationships have become more popular, the sentiment “til death do us part” has undoubtedly deteriorated to “til the first bump in the road”. America’s ongoing recession, threatening employment, has produced a new breed of profession orientated people. The cynical, stingy culture of America simply views marriage as costly, freedom stifling and transitory. Therefore, marriage is no longer a major priority.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zalkreb
12:08 PM on 08/28/2011
Gigiphi, divorce rates have been declining -- not increasing -- for decades, as I pointed out to your other handle above.

It is no longer surprising to me that people constantly talk about things that they apparently have not spent even a few seconds trying to educate themselves on. But it is a disappointment and something I don't really get.

Personally, when I get interested in something, I do an internet search or two on it, focusing on government and educational sites and avoiding advocacy groups and the like. If I'm still interested, I search one of the databases of scholarly papers on the topic. That way, I may be stupid and misguided, but at least I'm not ignorant and putting my handle atop statements that are in direct opposition to easily observable reality. I recommend the approach.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:10 PM on 08/28/2011
Zalkreb -- I do extensive research like you do. I like to (or at least think I) know the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
11:36 PM on 08/29/2011
Things don't get more ironic than this.
photo
Otherday
Chief Imperial Sage, Earth, Milky Way Quadrant
07:31 PM on 08/25/2011
So every year about 990 marriages out of 1000 don't end in divorce? About 9 to 10 do? Considering all the harsh pressures exerted upon couples these days, maybe 990 out of 1000 surviving every years is pretty good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
10:20 AM on 08/26/2011
Not really. The divorce rate is not a measure of "good" or "bad." It is like trying to say that every year a certain number of people change their hair style.
07:18 PM on 08/25/2011
The state with the higest rate of subscribing to internet porn is UTAH. Another highly conservative state. LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pucifer
Fight Back Against Oppression!
10:59 PM on 08/25/2011
They're the first to try to stamp out marriage equality too.  Donating millions to pass Prop H8 with one hand and pleasuring themselves at xxx.com with the other...
07:17 PM on 08/25/2011
Those Church Going RW Republicans are all a bunch of hypocrites. They have a high divorce rate, teen pregnancy rate in the South. They are all a bunch of finger pointers and it's funny the divorce rate in Mass..a very liberal state is by far less than the bible belt area.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zalkreb
07:12 PM on 08/25/2011
As is almost always -- strike that -- As is always the case when divorce statistics are reported, nobody mentions the most remarkable fact about divorce. That is, to a rough approximation, it is a female phenomenon. Women initiate, depending in the study, from two-thirds to three-fourths of all divorces. Divorce is a female phenomenon about to the same extent that sexual assault is a male phenomenon. Why do we always talk about it as if it were gender-neutral? Most people actually think that men initiate most divorces. What is that all about? Such an important phenomenon, one that generates vast harm on children and (primarily) men, and so profoundly misunderstood. Why can't the truth get out on this?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onwisconsin
Trust women; protect choice.
08:32 PM on 08/25/2011
I initiated my divorce from my first husband. He was caught having sex with a 15 year-old. Hmmm... I still know I made the right decision.

All of the women I met during that time (and a couple of men) had put up with so much for so long that the love had left their marriages a long time ago. There was just finally the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back. In almost every case, the other partner couldn't figure out why they were leaving. When you are an abuser, you behavior seems normal. You think she/he should just put up with it. I was married to a narcissist. I got out. I'm much better for it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Indie Mom
independent does not mean lonely
12:49 AM on 08/26/2011
I have the same sentiment as your 2nd paragraph .. exactly and I love to cite Lundy Bandcrofts work which brought me out of denial and into the light.

I've spoken to soooooo many women who endured abuse (verbal and emotional as well as physical) for so many years .. so 'beaten' up, so weakened, and emotional messes .. it's wonder any of us have the strength to even initiate the divorces in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
10:46 AM on 08/26/2011
How does making up statistics help? I don't believe for one min. the numbers that you claim to know.

Furthermore, if it is true that women initiate divorce more often than men, which is not necessarily true, I could see a good reason for that. Women view marriage as the beginning of something. Men view marriage as the end of something. For men, the single life is over, but getting married is expected, or a way to guarantee fidelity. I think men believed that when they get married then no longer going to have to worry about sex, keeping the house clean, keeping fit, etc. Women, on the other hand, naively believe that marriage is the beginning of this great adventure together. Furthermore, men tend to believe that marriage is a way to control the woman.

Is it0 any great surprise, then, if it is true that women initiate divorce more often then men? If women initiate divorce more often then men, that says as much about the men as it does the women - probably more.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zalkreb
12:27 PM on 08/26/2011
Anybody with access to the Internet can find out in seconds that these statistics about women's overwhelming lead in divorce initiation are not made up. Anyone who doubts this easily verifiable fact is seriously ignorant about the entire topic of divorce. Claiming that it's men's fault when women initiate divorce indicates bigotry in addition to ignorance. In the hope that we will not have to add closed-mindedness to this list of traits, here's a link: http://tinyurl.com/3wcktzh

I know I don't like clicking on links, perhaps for fear that I'll learn something I don't like. Can you show me up?
05:40 PM on 08/25/2011
divorce rates are up? really? Seems to me it's the evolution of narcissism generation after generation of ever more self absorbed children growing into self absorbed adults. Why on earth does there need to be an us when I can only worry about me? After all it's so much easier at the end of the day when I don't have to face responsibility, accountability, morality or simple decency failing the rest. Sadly this isn't news, it's only a reminder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
10:47 AM on 08/26/2011
Actually, your statement is more of a reminder that as we get older we begin to believe that the later generations are going to hell in a hand basket. Children today are not more absorbed. They are not more selfish. You are just getting older.
11:21 AM on 08/26/2011
Perception is reality so you very well may be right.