iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Must Act On Foreclosure Crisis, Democratic Senator Says

Obama Foreclosure 2011

First Posted: 08/30/11 05:51 PM ET Updated: 10/30/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) sent a letter to President Barack Obama on Tuesday urging him to address the nation's devastating foreclosure crisis as part of a new plan to create jobs.

"We can and should adopt an aggressive strategy to reduce foreclosures nationally," Merkley wrote. "There are as many as 5 million foreclosures anticipated to come -- this is a huge tragedy for individual families but it is also a drag on our communities and our economy."

Merkley's call to address foreclosures comes as Obama is poised to make what his administration is billing as a major new jobs initiative, with the nation continues to struggle with an unemployment rate over 9 percent.

The collapse of the housing bubble has left many families owing more on their mortgages than their homes are worth. As families struggle to pay their mortgages, they have less money to spend on other activities. This lack of spending, in turn, means businesses cannot sell as many products and are unable to hire more workers. A July 2010 report from the International Monetary Fund suggested that foreclosure problems added 1.25 points to the unemployment rate -- or more than 10 percent of the current unemployment rate.

In his letter, Merkley specifically suggested three policies designed to curb foreclosures and applauded Obama for vowing to "go back to the drawing board" on housing policies which have failed to stem the tide of foreclosures since Obama took office. Foreclosures accelerated dramatically during the final years of the Bush administration and have remained high. Obama's signature foreclosure relief effort, the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), is almost universally regarded as a disastrous failure.

Among the policies Merkley advocate for was the "right to rent" proposal developed by economist Dean Baker from the Center on Economic and Policy Research. Baker suggested giving foreclosed families a right to rent their homes at market rates for several years after their bank seized their home. Banks are generally reluctant to act as landlords, so the plan would encourage banks to work out affordable mortgage modifications with troubled borrowers. Merkley also suggested implementing new refinancing initiatives for borrowers who owe more than their homes are worth.

Merkley previously called on Obama to beef up the administration's anti-foreclosure efforts before this year's State of the Union address, asking the president to roll out new policies in his speech. Obama introduce any new initiatives during the speech.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) sent a letter to President Barack Obama on Tuesday urging him to address the nation's devastating foreclosure crisis as part of a new plan to create jobs. "...
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) sent a letter to President Barack Obama on Tuesday urging him to address the nation's devastating foreclosure crisis as part of a new plan to create jobs. "...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 275
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
Vegan, not a Murderer
06:14 AM on 09/09/2011
Homeowners should sue the government.
03:48 PM on 08/31/2011
Sen Merkley is my Senator, and I generally think he's doing a phenomenal job as a 1st term Sen. However, foreclosure is not a problem, but a symptom (result of the problem). I think the appropriate place to look is why people are missing payments, lack of a job, lack of a raise, or strategic default. In any of these cases, refinancing to a lower rate does not address the issue, and very likely they will default, just 2 years from now instead of this year.

That being said, I think Jeff (and Obama) are smart enough to know this, but also realize its the only way they can indirectly sneak in stimulus 'spending', (without it being called spending and the Reps instantly killing it) which is the only thing that is going to keep the US economy alive.

Housing (at least in Oregon) is still generally overpriced, so it *should* devalue by another 10% or so at least.
02:24 PM on 08/31/2011
Ed, please stop talking.
12:22 PM on 08/31/2011
The fore closure crisis cannot be stopped deregulation of banks and mortage lenders by reagan bush and bush2 have made that impossible
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
11:07 AM on 08/31/2011
If you want to stop a foreclosure, pay your mortgage payments. It's what you agreed to do when you signed your loan documents. You also agreed to foreclosure in the event that you do not pay your mortgage payments.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marioninreno
08:46 AM on 08/31/2011
What I don't understand is why the bank will not sell the house to the current owner for what they can get if u foreclose? So if u r underwater u r stuck with the original loan or u have to foreclose or short sell. It doesn't make sense to me except the bank must be making money by doing that.
09:12 AM on 08/31/2011
Some banks are making money through foreclosure incentivized by FDIC. Suppose a big bank took over a failing bank and paid 30 cents on the dollar for assets like mortgages and the FDIC guarantees, say 70 percent of face value of mortgage. The big bank forecloses on a $100,000 mortgage, sells property for $30,000, gets an additional $40,000 from FDIC. Instant profit since they had only $30,000 invested in the first place. Would have to check to see if this kind of FDIC incentive applies to a particular property.
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
11:11 AM on 08/31/2011
Most of the loans are not owned by banks. Also, if you completed the loan as agreed, and the mortgage is owned by a bank, they would realize an even larger profit.

Would it have been better if the FDIC had been stuck with the assets of these failed lenders?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rlkinny
Liberals do the math.
09:14 AM on 08/31/2011
You're right. I don't understand it either. One thing that I'm surprised about is that nobody has started a business that buys a foreclosed home and then sells it back to the original owner at the reduced cost. I guess owner financing would still be an issue, though.
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
11:11 AM on 08/31/2011
Why would I buy your house, and then sell it to you for less than what it's worth?
08:01 AM on 08/31/2011
The honest fact is that Obama could have taken a giant step towards ending this crisis by letting homeowners in trouble declare their principal residence as part of their bankruptcy but because the banks are against this and it is the banking industry that contributes more campaign cash than any other group Obama has refused to do what is right.
09:15 AM on 08/31/2011
This would be one step in the right direction but wouldn't cure everyone's problems. One size does not fit all, and complexity means there should be multiple types of solution options. Obviously HAMP does not work, was structured to favor banks, not borrowers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msm859
03:20 PM on 08/31/2011
Actually Obama can Not do this by himself. You are correct though, this is the single biggest step to end all of the foreclosures that could be done. Congress did try to amend the bankruptcy laws to allow people to include your first mortgage and let bankruptcy judges cram down your loan -- didn't pass with the Democrats in control certainly would not pass today. So now only the super rich with their second, third homes, yachts etc can be included in Bankruptcy and the judge can now say that yacht you owe 2 million and now only worth 1 million -- well you only own 1 million now. If people could do that with their 1st and Only home banks would then have to get serious about modifying loans. Until we stop the foreclosures this economy can not turn around.
07:56 AM on 08/31/2011
What a backward approach. Slowing foreclosures to create jobs? How about creating jobs to PREVENT foreclosures!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rlkinny
Liberals do the math.
09:16 AM on 08/31/2011
Don't think you quite understand the issues. It reverses the trend that caused the downward economic spiral to begin with. Allowing homeowners to maintain their equity creates consumer confidence that leads to demand for products and services that then results in job increases. It's Economics 101.
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
11:12 AM on 08/31/2011
If they have any equity, and they can't afford to keep their house they should SELL.
07:23 AM on 08/31/2011
Senator,

How about you and your buddies in Congress do something?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marine1942
07:17 AM on 08/31/2011
Democratic senators seeing that their leader has failed. Good Sign
47 Million people on food stamps shows another failure
Really, what good has this bird done ? He truly is a turkey--
09:16 AM on 08/31/2011
Some suggest that he has been successful in following some agenda most people don't understand. Or maybe I've been reading too many comments on investment blog zerohedge.com
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rlkinny
Liberals do the math.
09:19 AM on 08/31/2011
He stopped the devastating downward economic spiral left to him by the previous administration.
He killed Osama bin Laden which the previous administration couldn't do, in spite of all their flag waving and "Top Gun" strutting.
He provided a health care program that actually reduces the deficit.
I could go on, but I bet you're not listening.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
xlntcat
04:01 AM on 08/31/2011
There are less than 6 members of the U S Senate who shouldn't remain silent on the foreclosure crisis. I watched every minutes of multiple Senate hearing on the crisis following the financial meltdown. There was posturing, preening and chastising of bankers but not a single piece of legislation was written to make the banks resolve the problem. Only 6 Senators voted to give homeowners relief through the courts regarding a primary residence allowing a judge to set payments that homeowners were capable of making and forcing the banks to take the loss.
09:20 AM on 08/31/2011
Appreciate your attention to the problems/ developments. Wonder if you have read the white paper by California surveyor David Woolley on the problems created by MERS and lack of public recording of land titles. Real estate is geography, different from other assets.

We haven't seen people so dispossed of legal title to land since Native Americans were rounded up and confined to reservations. Some of them are still fighting for land rights in the courts.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
southernfried29
tiny-piddles
01:18 AM on 08/31/2011
Thank you Senator ,for stepping up to try and help give us little folks a voice. I would like to suggest a Taxpayer Lottery as well for those homes. It could be done state by state and the winner could either inhabit the property or sell it.
photo
falconsso
Be Right.
01:03 AM on 08/31/2011
Dane-Jah - WE THE PEOPLE - Dane-Jah
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MCTSilverlakeCA
retired Sr Litigation Insurance Fraud Manager
12:54 AM on 08/31/2011
I'd like to point out also that most States require a permanent residence STREET ADDRESS before you are allowed to vote - NOT a P.O. Box. California is one of these States and it very specifically says on the Voter Registration Card that you MUST have a residence street address and very specifically also states (quote) "NOT A P.O. BOX". Now - look around you - look around your neighborhood and surrounding cities. How many foreclosures do you see? How many rentals require "good credit" (foreclosures ruin it) to rent to these families and thus establish again this basic Voter Requirement? How many MILLIONS of prior Voters - most of them former Middle Class - angry at being ignored - are there do you think affected by this Law? Take a close look at your Voter Registration requirements - you might be surprised by what you find. Now..if you as a Wealthy Industrialist, or Banker, or other well paid CEO - didn't want a lot of Americans - perhaps a whole new Class of American's (The Homeless Class) to vote for Industrially or Wealthily- unpopular Bills- this Provision would come in handy - don't you think? Now -Tell me again that the 2nd Great Depression wasn't planned..!!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
vippy
Carpe Diem!
05:36 AM on 08/31/2011
Anyone with a brain knows this situation did not just appear overnight but was planned long time ago.
That is why we are seeing Washington always do the wrong thing!  They get their marching orders when they meet at the G8 and G20 Meetings.  They are always in sync.  The 14 trillion dollars deficit did not just appear one day, and the stupid politicians have you believe that it was not their fault.  
But people will vote for the dummies on both sides of the aisles again, there is no hope for our stupidity!
09:25 AM on 08/31/2011
The World Trade Organization, IMF, UN, etc., are set up so they are not accountable to citizens of sovereign nations. Politics these days reminds me of the power of the original corporations going global, the Dutch and British East India Companies. Corporate owners sought to make themselves rich and powerful, overriding the good of the people they ruled. Oh, they said it was to modernize the world and trade, but ...
iridium53
Semper Fi
12:39 AM on 08/31/2011
Senator Merkley is, apparently, unaware of the US Constitution.

"All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills."

"To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;"

If the Senator wants to regulate banks and mortgages, he should get together with his colleagues to make a law.