More

Catholic-Jewish Relations: How Far We've Come, How Far We've Yet To Go

Catholic Jewish Dialogue

First Posted: 08/31/11 05:35 PM ET Updated: 10/31/11 06:12 AM ET

By Philip A. Cunningham and Eric J. Greenberg
Religion News Service

(RNS) A fascinating exchange recently took place in the pages of the Vatican's newspaper between the chief rabbi of Rome and the Vatican's chief representative to the Jewish people. Their conversation reflected just how far we've come in Christian-Jewish relations -- but also how far we have yet to go.

It started when L'Osservatore Romano published an article by Cardinal Kurt Koch, president of the Vatican's Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews. Writing about the upcoming interfaith gathering at Assisi, Italy, on Oct. 27, Koch noted two key changes since the first Assisi summit 25 years ago: the collapse of communism and the rise in terrorism.

After arguing that "peace is the common effort of all religions," Koch concluded that from a Christian perspective, "the cross of Jesus erases any desire for vengeance and calls everyone to reconciliation, it rises above us as the permanent and universal Yom Kippur," referring to the Jewish Day of Atonement.

The cross is "not an obstacle to interreligious dialogue," he wrote, "but rather, it indicates the decisive way that especially Jews and Christians, but also Muslims and followers of other religions, should welcome with a deep inner reconciliation, becoming the leaven of peace and justice in the world."

The reference to the holiest day on the Jewish calendar disturbed Rome's top rabbi, Riccardo Di Segni, who replied to Koch, also in the pages of the Vatican newspaper.

"The Christian believer can certainly think of the cross as a permanent and universal replacement for the day of Yom Kippur," he
wrote, "but if you want to talk honestly and respectfully with the Jew, for whom Yom Kippur retains its permanent and universal value, you must not propose Christian beliefs and interpretations to the Jews as indicators of the 'decisive way."'

Koch, in turn, replied, saying he rejected the idea that "Jews should see the cross as Christians do in order to be able to journey
together to Assisi."

The back-and-forth, Koch said, got to the core of Christian-Jewish dialogue: "how to reconcile the conviction, which is binding for Christians, that God's covenant with the people of Israel has permanent validity with Christian faith in universal redemption in Jesus Christ."

Here's what's important about this discussion:

First, it is a sign of the priority given to Catholic-Jewish friendship that the Vatican newspaper published Di Segni's concerns, and that Koch immediately sought to address them.

Second, the exchange shows how easy it is to be misunderstood when using each other's religious terminology.

The same word, "atonement," can have different connotations for different traditions. In dialogue, both sides must try to understand the other on its own terms while also mindful of one's own religious perspective. Describing the cross as the universal "Day of Atonement" might go unnoticed by Christians, but it rings very differently in Jewish ears; it smacks of old replacement theologies that saw Judaism as obsolete and superseded by Christianity.

On the other hand, this does not necessarily mean that every Christian allusion to Jewish practices is supersessionist. Clearly, both traditions are still learning how to speak to one another about their respective, interrelated self-understandings.

Finally, contemporary Christian-Jewish dialogue must seek mutual understanding about such issues. Christians must really think about what it means to accept the validity of God's covenant with the Jews while also seeing Jesus as the savior of all mankind, the subject of a new book, "Christ Jesus and the Jewish People Today." Jews, for their part, need to assess Christian claims about being in covenant with the God of Israel.

For centuries, our competing claims led to reciprocal antagonism, or worse. Now, we have a respectful and civilized exchange of views. The recent exchange shows that we need more interfaith dialogue, not less. And when we do it right, it benefits both sides and contributes to a more peaceful world.

Philip A. Cunningham is director of the Institute for Jewish-Catholic Relations of Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia,
and Rabbi Eric J. Greenberg is director of interfaith affairs for the Anti-Defamation League in New York.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Philip A. Cunningham and Eric J. Greenberg Religion News Service (RNS) A fascinating exchange recently took place in the pages of the Vatican's newspaper between the chief rabbi of Rome and the...
By Philip A. Cunningham and Eric J. Greenberg Religion News Service (RNS) A fascinating exchange recently took place in the pages of the Vatican's newspaper between the chief rabbi of Rome and the...
Filed by Josh Fleet  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
06:22 PM on 09/13/2011
Ratzinger and Netanyahu. That's a combustible mixture, no question.
12:40 PM on 09/13/2011
Christ is FREE FROM THE CROSS an INSTRUMENT OF TORTURE. Christians are BEHELD BY THE CROSS because THE JEWS SET HIM FREE and HIS LIFE BLOOD RUNS THROUGH US this piece of TREE that GAVE US LIFE. We should all RESPECT this PRESENCE that the UNIVERSE describes as ALL SEEING. Every religion, every thought, every creature. Christ is NO LONGER on the CROSS. GENISIS 9:6 has been fullfilled through GENISIS 5:2. Man is the Son of God divided at the TREE IN THE MIDDLE of the GARDEN. Take down the Tree in the Middle of Auschwitz for maturitys sake. Instill Vatican III and the right to COMPLETE "MAN" divided AT BIRTH. The cross is a loved symbol for Christians just like the Menorah is a necessary symbol for the Jews. Every religion has a symbol and its not right to impose those symbols if it hurts another. The CROSS AT AUSCHWITZ hurts another. The feeling of estrangement is already there. And that is the feeling of being separated mother, child, father, son. That's what it feels like to be separated from your God. GO THERE and FEEL IT. And whoever reads these posts, you don't have to publish this. I just want the Pope and the Rabbi to be AWARE OF THE PRESENCE and the WORD that is CONTAINED in SCRIPTURE. Karry Haggard
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
iLdoRight
Encouraging The Rightest Rightness
11:51 PM on 09/11/2011
Caption suggestion; "Doesn't my new cologne smell good!"
photo
AbeMartin
The best person fer a job is never a candidate
10:11 AM on 09/09/2011
"For centuries, our competing claims led to reciprocal antagonism, or worse. Now, we have a respectful and civilized exchange of views. The recent exchange shows that we need more interfaith dialogue, not less. And when we do it right, it benefits both sides and contributes to a more peaceful world."

The Roman Catholic hierarchy's outreach to Jews only really began with Pope John XXIII's convening of the Second Vatican Council, 50 years ago, in 1962.  Prior to that, the Church, attacked the basic tenets and beliefs of Judaism for nearly 2,000 years.  During that time, various Popes tolerated Jews, however, the condemnation of Jews as the murderers of Jesus was Church dogma, uncontestable and authoritative.  And dozens of Popes, Cardinals, Archibishops initiated Crusades, Massacres, Trials by Fire, Torture, Pogroms, accusations of Blood Libel and expulsions from Catholic countries such as England, Spain and Portugal.  The Holocaust was initiated by Hitler and the Nazi leadership, all German Catholics and none excommunicated by Pope Pius XII, can be viewed as a culmination of this antagonism.

Dialogue is always to be encouraged and an awareness of the value of religious different religions should be required by all of the world's religions.  But, two generations of dialogue pales against still widespread traditions of hatred and persecution.  And, there are many, including ultra-Conservative Catholics such as Hubbard and Mel Gibson, who consider Vatican II an abomination and preferred the old traditions.
04:03 PM on 09/06/2011
why shouldnt catholics be kind to Jews. catholics have won. the jewish population is shrinking so rapidly that in 2 more generations the only jews left will be the hasidic, then catholics can start up their jew hatred again.we have jewish traitors such as joe potasnik and his israeli handlers to blame for the destruction of american and world jewry
09:18 AM on 09/02/2011
And humility. Folks need not just more mutual understanding and dialogue. Folks need more humility. Especially Catholics and other Christians who instinctively tend toward the "Triumphalist" points of view.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
01:43 AM on 09/01/2011
Catholic-Jewish, Muslim-Jewish, Christian-Muslim, Hindu-Muslim, Hindu-Buddhist, Hindu-Christian, Parsi-Hindu, Muslim-Muslim, Protestant-Catholic. There's a long, long way to go for amity to outdo hatred.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
iLdoRight
Encouraging The Rightest Rightness
11:55 PM on 09/11/2011
Have you ever noticed the "Anything But True Christianity" attitude among "Christians"?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
zippythedude
On 07/20/2005, Canada legalized gay marriage
10:06 PM on 08/31/2011
Oooh I love the picture for this article! The scene in Star Wars where the Emperor and Obi Wan Kenobi are talking together is classic!