iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Solyndra, California Solar Company Touted As Model Of Green Economy, Will File For Chapter 11

Solyndra Bankruptcy

First Posted: 08/31/11 02:25 PM ET Updated: 10/31/11 06:12 AM ET

Solyndra, a solar technology firm in California that the Obama administration once touted as an exemplar of an emerging green economy, said Wednesday that it intended to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

The company said it would be evaluating its options, which could include selling the business and licensing its technology. Roughly 1,100 employees were being laid off, the company said. A local NBC affiliate in California reported that employees were "standing around in disbelief" and that they were being handed "yellow envelopes with instructions on how to get their last checks."

The decision comes just weeks after the company -- and the Obama administration -- faced charges by conservative critics that Solyndra, based in Fremont, Calif., was being supported with generous government subsidies despite clear indications that it could not survive in the competitive energy marketplace.

“We are incredibly proud of our employees, and we would like to thank our investors, channel partners, customers and suppliers, for the years of support that allowed us to bring our innovative technology to market. Distributed rooftop solar power makes sense, and our customers clearly recognize the advantages of Solyndra systems,” said Brian Harrison, the company's president and CEO, in a prepared statement. “Regulatory and policy uncertainties in recent months created significant near-term excess supply and price erosion. Raising incremental capital in this environment was not possible. This was an unexpected outcome and is most unfortunate.”

In May, 2010, President Obama visited Solyndra and told an audience of employees that the "incredible, cutting-edge solar panels" being manufactured there were "testament to American ingenuity and dynamism and the fact that we continue to have the best universities in the world, the best technology in the world, and most importantly the best workers in the world."

But in July, Republican members of the House Energy and Commerce committee filed a subpoena seeking documents from the Office of Management and Budget relating to a $535 million loan guarantee issued to Solyndra by the Department of Energy in 2009.

Shortly after receiving the loan guarantee, Solyndra closed a factory and canceled plans to go public, leading critics in Congress to charge that the loan guarantee -- a substantial expense to taxpayers -- had gone to a demonstrably unqualified company.

“In an apparent rush to push stimulus dollars out the door, the Obama Administration wasted $535 million in taxpayer funds in guaranteeing a loan to a firm that has proven to be unviable in the global market,” Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.), who heads up the subcommittee on oversight and investigations for the Energy and Commerce committee, said in an email Wednesday. “For months, we have been investigating how and why nearly half a billion dollars in taxpayer money was committed to this financially troubled company.”

Harrison vehemently defended the company's performance in a July letter to House Republicans, writing that the federal loan guarantee had helped the company to build a new factory.

In a blog post this morning, the Department of Energy defended the awarding of a loan guarantee to Solyndra:

This loan guarantee was pursued by both the Bush and Obama Administrations. Private sector investors – who put more than $1 billion of their own money on the line – also saw great potential in the company.

We have always recognized that not every one of the innovative companies supported by our loans and loan guarantees would succeed, but we can’t stop investing in game-changing technologies that are key to America’s leadership in the global economy. These projects, which include more than 40 other companies, are on pace to create more than 60,000 jobs.

Congress recognized the risks inherent in such an effort, and wisely set aside funding to offset any potential defaults or losses. That funding made it possible to support such a broad, promising portfolio of investments, and is significantly greater than the amount that the government stands to lose on this transaction. While we are disappointed by this outcome, we continue to believe the clean energy jobs race is one that America can, must and will win.

The American solar panel manufacturing industry in general has struggled over the last year, as prices for panels plummeted -- largely due to the rise of manufacturing in China.

According to the Department of Energy, the government’s loss on Solyndra represents less than 2 percent of the total dollar value of the loan guarantees it has committed to date.

Rhone Resch, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, said in an emailed statement that the "success of the solar industry cannot be viewed through the lens of one company. Like all industries, some companies will fare differently than others." Resch also defended the the DOE's loan guarantee program, calling it a success in helping to attract the private capital needed for solar projects and manufacturing plants.

"To date," Resch said, "solar projects that have received loan guarantees will help to deploy enough clean solar energy to power nearly 1 million homes and create tens of thousands of jobs across 28 states.”

This article has been updated to include a quote from Rep. Stearns.

WATCH -- Solyndra employees being laid off:

View more videos at: http://nbcbayarea.com.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Solyndra, a solar technology firm in California that the Obama administration once touted as an exemplar of an emerging green economy, said Wednesday that it intended to file for Chapter 11 bankruptc...
Solyndra, a solar technology firm in California that the Obama administration once touted as an exemplar of an emerging green economy, said Wednesday that it intended to file for Chapter 11 bankruptc...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,888
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mherrera
Indigenous Troublemaker
02:04 PM on 09/16/2011
I'm as green as they come but this deal smelled from the beginning. This company was up against some huge hitters int he market which are household names and they are in effect, a "met too" company. Burning through that much cash in two years is really troubling and I don't think it ended up on rooftops. THe numbers just don't add up. I don't fault the government for supporting green ventures but doing it this was was a mistake. There was no oversight and this company just ran up huge bills and now wants to walk and stick up with the tab. If anything, the far right should applaud this because this is just the kind of graft they like.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mutron
01:17 PM on 09/10/2011
That's a lot of money to burn through in such a short period of time. I certainly hope the media doesn't let this story slip through the cracks.
01:16 PM on 09/04/2011
I love the way HuffPo buries this story in the Green Section, to be read by true believers, or no one at all.
Michael5555
I built it despite you people
08:04 PM on 09/14/2011
You are so right, that's shameful, I am just now reading this article on sept 14 th and that's ony because I had to do a search to see if it was on H / P. It was delibberately kept out of the mainstream news as to not make Obama look bad.
03:39 PM on 09/02/2011
Why doesn't Al bail them out? or is all his capital tied up in Carbon Credit Brokeredges?
01:15 PM on 09/02/2011
#USA made #Solar Energy by itself very expensive but fast ROI if used in conjunction with extremely energy efficient systems like ALL USA made #LED lighting. Will create jobs here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimtodd
Unrepentant child of '60s
12:55 PM on 09/02/2011
One of the triumphs of capitalism has been to instill the idea of externals. These are costs of manufacturing and operating a product, that capitalists get pushed onto the general public rather than the buyer/user of the product. The largest external, by far, is the cost of carbon pollution. Imagine what a car would cost if its pollution costs were added to its price. Now think of the cost of electricity generation based on burning carbon. Green energy is not competitive because the entrenched, polluting providers get to ignore the major cost of their product. More importantly, since we attribute no value to clean air and water, they are never considered in the calculation of product value. This price distortion makes capitalism appear profitable, and continues to speed us along the path to species extinction.
02:38 AM on 09/14/2011
So jim here thinks were all domed....Uh Jim, weve only got about 2 years left Dude! The Algore prediction a few years back he gave us 10 years and we're about to reach that date there Jimbo.

So relax, smoke a joint and you wont feel a thing!.
brownfrown
Political Fundip
11:55 AM on 09/02/2011
Solyndra's site:
"The guaranteed loan, expected to provide debt financing for approximately 73% of the project costs"

This brings in a whole new era of "too big to fail" - "too big to fail with their own money"
10:16 AM on 09/02/2011
The above comment by Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins -accurate though it may be re the 'beauty' & 'danger' of capitalism, cannot explain or offer any valid excuse for what is the appaling & shocking reality! Over all these years of mostly self-serving 'progress' since WW2 by the few advanced industrial nations -they continue to allow -& have seemingly settled for the appaling situation on this planet whereby only an estimated ONE in EIGHT persons (perhaps closer to 1 in 10) has home-access to clean potable water via a tap and to electic or gas/oil power & flushing toilets! That is a complete abomination for so called world 'progress' & a tragic disgrace for capitalism! That disgrace is now dramatically furthered in the U.S given that latest figures show we now have a far worse infant mortality rate than Cuba, Bulgaria & Poland! --dropped from a bad-enough 24th to now 44th! What an indictment!!! For SHAME!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:09 AM on 09/02/2011
This is really bad news, but I would really like to know a fair comparision of technologies. Those PV-filled tubes - especially when produced in high wage countries are certainly not cost efficient compared to atmospheric deposition on metals and a cheap cover!
So next time before rolling out the big funding shower please let us analyse the technologies in depth before!
02:55 AM on 09/14/2011
I have a deeper concern, all that soap that comes from peoples homes when they take a shower. Soap is caustic, its nasty. don't beleive me? take a taste of it! And there are tons of it running down drains everywhere in every city, towns, in some small towns, out in the woods not so much there.

And its polluting our ground water, rivers, streams and who knows what its doing to the fish and the coyotys. And it must be altering the temperature of the oceans and that has to create a feedback loop that contributes to climate change.....right?

I say pass new laws that prohibit showering with soap. from now on you must use tree bark or grass or other natural organic products inplace of soap or you just dont clean yourself at all.
05:34 AM on 09/02/2011
Maybe if we began investing and researching solar energy 30 years ago when Jimmy Carter wanted to, we wouldn't be getting our asses kicked by the Chinese now.
brownfrown
Political Fundip
11:25 AM on 09/02/2011
Don't give Carter too much credit.. Watch this classic Jon Stewart video - puts things into a bit different perspective than "dems are green and repugs are petro"
01:08 AM on 09/03/2011
Carter wasn't great, he went back on quite a few of his promises, but at least he tried. He was the only president who reduced oil imports. He also put solar panels up on the White House, but Reagan tore them down.
brownfrown
Political Fundip
11:26 AM on 09/02/2011
Forgot to include the link!

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-june-16-2010/an-energy-independent-future
photo
intellectualTradition
corruptisima re publica plurimae leges
05:42 PM on 09/01/2011
how come al gore didn't bail them out ? where is hollywood and and all the prius drivers ? oh thats right, the left always has to depend on others money for anything to work.

no more noble thing could be done for the US of A than deporting the left to someplace where they don't spend their whole life trying to put a round peg in a square hole.
MRITechnologist
your micro bio is empty as a GOTPers soul
05:04 PM on 09/01/2011
"The American solar panel manufacturing industry in general has struggled over the last year, as prices for panels plummeted -- largely due to the rise of manufacturing in China."
America cannot compete with China in manufacturing unless we are willing to work for less than what Chinese labor is paid.
05:45 PM on 09/01/2011
One word: Tariff

It's too bad that we are not in a position of leverage with China, they own too much of our debt, otherwise we could even the playing field with tariffs and enforcing patent protection.
MRITechnologist
your micro bio is empty as a GOTPers soul
10:36 AM on 09/02/2011
Exactly. There was no foresight in the past few decades within our govt. Of course who can see with all that money in the way. The only people that kept saying watch out for
China was the everyday Joe. No were in it and up to our necks. We are definately in a weak bargaining position.
MRITechnologist
your micro bio is empty as a GOTPers soul
11:02 AM on 09/02/2011
Oh of course the other option is if the Chinese workers demand better working conditions and wages. Maybe if we sent some union leaders over there to organize them. Every country has to go through it's own evolution the problem is the world is so small today that everyone is effected not like in the old days when it was simply what was happening "over there".
03:04 AM on 09/14/2011
Dude, the reason Solar is a flunk is because it dosent work effeciently to warrent the HIGH price of it, go check the prices, and then figure the returns of your investment,
MRITechnologist
your micro bio is empty as a GOTPers soul
09:49 AM on 09/14/2011
You are correct but only because the amount of subsidies and R&D that oil has been given has not been matiched for solar. Let me put it to you this way. The Sun is so powerful it makes all the planets circle it like they are it's little beatches, and we can't get any of of?
MRITechnologist
your micro bio is empty as a GOTPers soul
09:49 AM on 09/14/2011
oops "any of it" is what I meant to type.
photo
Bankerrkt
He's making things worse.
04:19 PM on 09/01/2011
Solyndra is a just another example in a long list of Obama's failed green jobs program. But not one to learn from the past, Obama has a green jobs agenda that he wants to ram through no matter the cost and no matter the consequences. No wonder our economy is listing at the hands of President AA+.
photo
vtmilitia
Vermont ain't flat.
08:23 PM on 09/01/2011
Oh please,give the guy a break. Sure stimulus was a futile expensive mistake as was cash for clunkers and this green solar panel thing only cost a half billion. Now you just have to admit he gives a good speech when he's with TOTUS. I just have to figure out why stock value drops when he does this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OLJW00
right is right
04:01 PM on 09/01/2011
The Gov't should not be in the business of picking winners and losers in business...and this stands testament to that truth.

And the whole "green jobs" Utopian promise is a boondoggle no matter how you slice it.
MRITechnologist
your micro bio is empty as a GOTPers soul
05:05 PM on 09/01/2011
Wrong. For China green jobs are booming. It's not the "green" it is the cheap labor
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MadInAmerica
06:53 PM on 09/01/2011
Also for Germany. They are doing quite well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OLJW00
right is right
10:57 PM on 09/01/2011
And we all know how much they care for the environment around their factories, how they regulate emissions, etc.
photo
Reaganite60
Don't tread on me.
03:13 PM on 09/01/2011
Another example that demonstrates the inefficiencies and failures of a government central planning bureaucracy.
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
04:57 PM on 09/01/2011
And the hundreds of thousands of other companies that go bankrupt every year without government involvement demonstrate what?
photo
Reaganite60
Don't tread on me.
08:20 PM on 09/01/2011
It demonstrates free market capitalism because they've failed with their own money. The corporate socialism and crony capitalism you get from central planning and state control of private industries leads to failures with taxpayer money.
JVene
Software Engineer, Parent, Cook & Musician
05:17 PM on 09/01/2011
By example, do you mean the company's failure or the loan?

The real problem is stated in the article: the company couldn't compete with Chinese manufacturing.

Though I'm not disagreeing that the loan may have been a bad call.