iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

WikiLeaks: Breach Has Exposed Unredacted U.S. Cables

Wikileaks Breach

RAPHAEL G. SATTER   09/ 1/11 12:01 AM ET   AP

LONDON — Anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks said Thursday that its massive archive of unredacted U.S. State Department cables had been exposed in a security breach which it blamed on its one-time partner, Britain's Guardian newspaper.

In a 1,600-word-long editorial posted to the Internet, WikiLeaks accused the Guardian's investigative reporter David Leigh of divulging the password needed to decrypt the files in a book he and another Guardian journalist, Luke Harding, published earlier this year.

WikiLeaks said that the disclosure had jeopardized the "careful work" it was doing to redact and publish the cables.

"Revolutions and reforms are in danger of being lost as the unpublished cables spread to intelligence contractors and governments before the public," WikiLeaks said in its statement.

Leigh and the Guardian both denied wrongdoing, and the exact sequence of events WikiLeaks was referring to remained clouded in confusion.

It has long been known that WikiLeaks lost control of the cables even before they were published. One copy of the secret documents leaked to the New York Times in the fall of 2010, and other media organizations, including The Associated Press, have since received copies independently of the self-proclaimed online whistleblower.

In comments to the AP, Leigh dismissed WikiLeaks' claims as "time-wasting nonsense."

He said that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange had supplied him with a password needed to access the U.S. embassy cables from a server back in July of 2010 – but that Assange assured him the site would expire within a matter of hours.

"What we published much later in our book was obsolete and harmless," Leigh said. "We did not disclose the URL (web address) where the file was located, and in any event, Assange had told us it would no longer exist."

Leigh added that "I don't see how a member of the public could access such a file anyway, unless a Wikileaks or ex-Wikileaks person tells them where it is located and what the file was called."

Repeated attempts to reach WikiLeaks staffers for an explanation of where the file was left and how it got online were unsuccessful, although on its Twitter feed the group described one of Leigh's previous statements as false and warned of "continuous lies to come."

To add to the intrigue, WikiLeaks asked its 1 million or so followers to download a large coded file which it said it would decrypt at a later point. Then it threatened to post the entire unredacted archive of State Department documents immediately.

The Guardian newspaper, in a news article on the matter, said that the raw material was already circulating online. Several Twitter users claimed to have copies of the unredacted documents, although the AP could not immediately verify the authenticity of the hundreds of copies of the files now circulating online.

Past disclosures already drawn from WikiLeaks' trove of embassy cables have infuriated and humiliated high-ranking officials across the world – with the U.S. ambassador to Mexico losing his job over the revelations.

WikiLeaks says the cables' release also played a role in setting off the mass movement that has jolted dictatorial regimes across the Arab world.

But the American officials have warned that the disclosures could also have serious consequences for informants, activists and others quoted in the cables.

"What we have said all along about the danger of these types of things is reinforced by the fact that there are now documents out there in unredacted form containing the names of individuals whose lives are at risk because they are named," Defense Department Col. Dave Lapan said Wednesday, before the full scale of the issue became known.

"Once WikiLeaks has these documents in its possession, it loses control and information gets out whether they intend (it) to or not," Lapan told Pentagon reporters.

In its statement Thursday, WikiLeaks claimed that it had tried to warn the State Department about what was about to happen. The State Department did not immediately respond to a call seeking comment.

___

Pauline Jelinek in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

LONDON — Anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks said Thursday that its massive archive of unredacted U.S. State Department cables had been exposed in a security breach which it blamed on its one-time part...
LONDON — Anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks said Thursday that its massive archive of unredacted U.S. State Department cables had been exposed in a security breach which it blamed on its one-time part...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 176
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Deihl
08:16 PM on 09/01/2011
If their wasn't so much Corruption in Our Politics there wouldn't be People out of jobs and fraudulent Mortgage Dealings and Banks more or less getting away with their crimes.Our Goverment was MADE By The People For The People.But now we are faced with betrail from the People We Allowed into Office.Did we know they were that BAD a Doing their Dutys at the time ? I would think NOT ! The wool was over our eyes,and now someone wants to help us see what's really Happening behind the Closed Doors,and we Damn them for it ?!! Then I only have one thing to say, " You deserve what ever Finicial Burden or Health Issues that come your way." We need to Save Our Country,not allow People in Office to get kick backs in keeping their mouth shut or Special Favors.Right now we are being used and abused and lied too left and right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lambdin1
What's this?
01:57 PM on 09/01/2011
You mean WikiLeaks has a leak?!?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pashovski
1/2 man 1/2 amazin
01:01 PM on 09/01/2011
WL is responsible for more headlines than all other newspapers combined

JA is a hero

FREE BRADLEY MANNING
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
12:59 PM on 09/01/2011
BTW, since the HP felt no need to actually link the Wikileaks statement:

http://www.wikileaks.org/Guardian-journalist-negligently.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
12:53 PM on 09/01/2011
From the Guardian:

"Our book about WikiLeaks was published last February. It contained a password, but no details of the location of the files, and we were told it was a temporary password which would expire and be deleted in a matter of hours."

What a joke of an excuse.

"Yeah, I posted my pin # on my webpage. But, I didn't tell anyone where my ATM card was."

"Sure, we published the combination to our lock on the front page of our newspaper. But, we didn't publish our address."

If anything, this is just a good reason to cut the Guardian out of the picture. I've never heard a more inane excuse.
12:34 PM on 09/01/2011
Here in Oz the truth hurts?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Boodieugwumba
Crusader
12:22 PM on 09/01/2011
It's funny how people think these things don't matter because they want to hear gossip about what BoA did. My question to these people is; what will you do when you get this information? Bank of America owns you and will keep owning you until we do the right thing at the polling booth and vote out their minnions in Washington. Before then, you can't do squat with any gossip you hear from Wikileaks. Another thing I want to say is that such people should think about the harm that these leaks are doing to human lives and imagine if one of such lives in danger belongs to them or someone they love. Maybe, then, they'd reconsider the importance of the gossip they want to hear.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Boodieugwumba
Crusader
12:14 PM on 09/01/2011
Well, now, maybe the freedom of information people might begin to see the dangers of private organizations like Wikileaks getting their hands on secret governmen documents. I've always maintained that it does more harm than good and this proves it. I can't understand why some people feel that putting all of government's business out in the open is a good thing. Like I said in a blog I wrote about this; Every entity has secrets that are vital to its existence and governments are not exempt from that. http://ohaneze.blogspot.com/2010/12/that-wiki-leaks-leak.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:11 PM on 09/01/2011
I have no secrets that are vital to my existence, and I wish my government didn't either. I'd like to live in a world where both people and governments have all their cards on the table. It would make everything simpler and void of dishonesty. I don't care for secrets of any kind. They are not conductive to anything but dishonesty. I'm grateful to Wikileaks for exposing how our elected people and authorities are doing business. It's a real eye opener.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Boodieugwumba
Crusader
06:02 PM on 09/01/2011
Really? You have no secrets? Would you put your social security number and bank account no in your reply to this?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
11:07 AM on 09/01/2011
By all means, let's focus on the Wednesday/Thursday battle and ignore the Wiki cable that talks about US Troops handcuffing and murdering old women and children under the age of 5, then destroying the evidence that would convict them of this crime.

Speech scheduling is a much bigger deal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
framefiller
Left of Attilla the Hun, but still left
10:57 AM on 09/01/2011
This is why it so dangerous to acquire files from a nation that has world wide dealings. Information has a price and if the price is someone's life then the price is too high. No amount of rationalization can make WikiLeakes whole again. Every organization has to deal with competing personalities within it's structure, and it is inevitable that security measures will fail without rigid controls. When you treat secrets of a nation in a cavalier fashion then what can you expect. Julian Assange is not a hero, but a man who acts like a petulant child. Mr. Assange should fear the information that he has allowed to escape and will now have to deal with the consequences. Julian Assange should not fear the US, but some countries in the middle east don't share the ethics and restraint of America. WikiLeakes has put them in jeopardy and "all the kings men can't put Humpty Dumpty back together again".
11:35 AM on 09/01/2011
No doubt you are one of the first purchasers of Dick Cheney's Book. Assange is seen as a hero outside of Britain, Sweden and the U.S.
11:49 AM on 09/01/2011
Assange is seen as a hero by Americas enemies. So what's your point ? And who would you rather have on your side; Assange or Cheney... think about it.
12:54 PM on 09/01/2011
PinoCheney is a war criminal....period
10:25 PM on 09/01/2011
You are right about that the kind that gets Presidential pardon even before indicted. I would want Bush impeached just on that single ground !
photo
choctawwritergirl
Screenwriter & Futurist
10:52 AM on 09/01/2011
THE GOVERNMENT, THE FEDERAL RESERVE, THE STATE DEPARTMENT, THE MILITARY, THE PENTAGON, THE CIA, THE FBI, THE TOBACCO & FIREARMS AND YES, EVEN THE PRESIDENT AND HIS REGIME (BUSH/CHENEY IN PARTICULAR) AND ANY AND ALL BUREAUCRATS ON THE HILL HAVE BEEN OPERATING IN SECRECY AND WITH IMPUNITY FOR FAR TOO LONG!

TIME TO EXPOSE THEM ALL WIKILEAKS! NAMES AND ALL!
10:16 AM on 09/01/2011
A truly strange and embarrassing story. If there was one group you'd expect to know how to protect against leaks....
photo
ClarkOHrepub
BO & Co have Gotta Go!
08:53 AM on 09/01/2011
Poor Julian....he is just the victim in all of this. (hurl!)
photo
RobM1981
I try to be amused
08:14 AM on 09/01/2011
And if you can't trust Assange to tell the truth, who CAN you trust?

I'm pretty sure that many of the operatives who work in the shadows are both armed and dangerous. Perhaps not quite James Bond, but I'd still put them in the "bad ass" category.

And these are the people that Assange has exposed? I'm not sure that I'd sleep too well if I did that. And I'm not sure that "it was an accident! I swear!" is going to really get him off of the hook.

Bon Appetit, Julian. It will be nice to see you scraped off the bottom of our collective shoes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cybersense
08:07 AM on 09/01/2011
Wiki leaks should invest in some Poise.