iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

NASA To Launch Two 'Grail' Moon Probes To Measure Gravity

Nasa Grail Moon Probes

First Posted: 09/05/11 05:27 PM ET Updated: 11/05/11 06:12 AM ET

By Marcia Dunn, The Associated Press

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- Four decades after landing men on the moon, NASA is returning to Earth's orbiting companion, this time with a set of robotic twins that will measure lunar gravity while chasing one another in circles.

By creating the most precise lunar gravity map ever, scientists hope to figure out what's beneath the lunar surface, all the way to the core. The orbiting probes also will help pinpoint the best landing sites for future explorers, whether human or mechanical.

Near-identical twins Grail-A and Grail-B – short for Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory – are due to blast off Thursday aboard an unmanned rocket.

Although launched together, the two washing machine-size spacecraft will separate an hour into the flight and travel independently to the moon.

It will be a long, roundabout trip – three to four months – because of the small Delta II rocket used to boost the spacecraft. NASA's Apollo astronauts used the mighty Saturn V rocket, which covered the approximately 240,000 miles to the moon in a mere three days.

NASA's Grail twins will travel more than 2 million miles to get to the moon under this slower but more economical plan.

The mission, from start to finish, costs $496 million.

The moon's appeal is universal.

"Nearly every human who's every lived has looked up at the moon and admired it," said Massachusetts Institute of Technology planetary scientist Maria Zuber, Grail's principal investigator. "The moon has played a really central role in the human imagination and the human psyche."

Since the Space Age began in 1957, 109 missions have targeted the moon, 12 men have walked its surface during six landings, and 842 pounds of rock and soil have been brought back to Earth and are still being analyzed.

Three spacecraft currently are orbiting the moon and making science observations. A plan to return astronauts to the moon was nixed in favor of an asteroid and Mars.

Despite all the exploration, scientists still don't know everything about the moon, Zuber noted. For example, its formation still generates questions – Grail's findings should help explain its origin – and its far side is still mysterious.

"You would think having sent many missions to the moon we would understand the difference between the near side and the far side, but in fact we don't," she said.

Recent research suggests Earth may have had a second smaller moon that collided with our present moon, producing a mountainous region. The Grail mission may help flush out that theory, Zuber said.

Grail-A will arrive at the moon on New Year's Eve, followed by Grail-B on New Year's Day. They will go into orbit around the lunar poles and eventually wind up circling just 34 miles above the surface.

For nearly three months, the spacecraft will chase one another around the moon, meticulously flying in formation. The distance between the two probes will range from 40 miles to 140 miles. Radio signals bouncing between the twins will provide their exact locations, even on the far side of the moon.

Scientists will be able to measure even the slightest variations in the gap between orbiting Grail-A and Grail-B – every single second. These subtle changes will indicate shifting masses below or at the lunar surface: mountains in some places, enormous lava tubes and craters in others.

The moon actually has the most uneven gravitational field in the solar system, according to NASA. The moon's gravity is about one-sixth Earth's pull.

"We measure the velocity change between the two spacecraft to a couple of fractions of a tenth of a micron per second. It is an extremely accurate measurement that has to be made," Zuber said.

A tenth of a micron is about half the size of a red blood cell.

By the time their science mission ends in late spring, Grail-A and Grail-B will be within 10 miles of the lunar surface. Barring a change in plans, they will crash into the moon.

Each spacecraft holds one science instrument_ for sending and receiving radio signals between the two – as well as a digital video camera system, MoonKAM, intended for use by middle school students worldwide. Sally Ride, the first American woman in space, and her science education company in San Diego is leading the photo-gathering effort. It's billed as "eyes on the moon for Earth's students."

This is NASA's second robotic mission to be launched since the end of the shuttle program in July. A probe named Juno is headed for Jupiter following an Aug. 5 liftoff.

NASA officials will be thrilled if Grail generates even a portion of the immense interest ignited by the Juno launch. A large crowd is expected at Cape Canaveral for Thursday's morning liftoff, which features a pair of split-second launch windows a half-hour apart.

"We're just delighted by the way the country is responding to these exciting missions," said Jim Green, director of NASA's planetary science division.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

By Marcia Dunn, The Associated Press CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- Four decades after landing men on the moon, NASA is returning to Earth's orbiting companion, this time with a set of robotic twins that ...
By Marcia Dunn, The Associated Press CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- Four decades after landing men on the moon, NASA is returning to Earth's orbiting companion, this time with a set of robotic twins that ...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,438
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
10:01 PM on 09/08/2011
This just in. NASA discovers invisible planet with multiple personalities.

An invisible planet, which has not yet been glimpsed (since it's... invisible), has been definitively discovered by scientists using NASA's crafty Kepler spacecraft. According to scientists, the planet named Kepler-19c that comes after Kepler-19b, really cannot be seen, but it makes itself known by the way it influences other planets through force.
The invisible planet named Kepler-19c has multiple personalities that are consistent with the data found according to co-author Daniel Fabrycky of the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC). "For instance, it could be a rocky planet on a circular 5-day orbit, or a gas-giant planet on an oblong 100-day orbit," he said.

http://newyork.ibtimes.com/articles/210906/20110908/invisible-planet-nasa-kepler-spacecraft-harvard-university.htm
03:28 PM on 09/07/2011
The Grail mission will measure the moon's gravitational field in a bid to reconstruct ... will allow scientists to infer and map the moon's gravity field.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/07/grail-lunar-probes-gravity-moon
04:05 AM on 09/07/2011
I bet this is exactly what Dominoes had in mind too -

On a serious note- should this be taken as a hint at the colonization of Moon? Just a thought..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
01:57 AM on 09/07/2011
There was once a day when machines started to take away textile jobs, back in the early 1800's.
The tech for these new machines came from some kind of research.
The luddites understandably got angry and damaged them.
However, the new machines made more jobs by making an increased demand for cheaper clothing. They also paved the way to the industrial revolution.

Now, we have research pending for new machines. (NASA is in part developing the tech).
The tea partiers and others "understandably" don't want to help fund research because they can't imagine the need for it.
New machines may displace human labor for renewable energy parts and batteries.
However, making them so cheap that they should create 500,000 sq miles of installation jobs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
03:02 AM on 09/07/2011
That is 500,000 sq mile of HUMAN installation jobs (how dare people suggest I wanted all jobs to be replaced by machines).
Which would be a million sq miles if conventional flat panels were used. That in itself could be an enviro problem because flat panel converts light into heat (IR) which, on that scale, covers about 2% of the landspace. Only 1% is needed if we use NASA's GaAs cells in concentrating dishes or freznel arrays. This is because they are twice as efficient. The highly concentrated light does not all convert to IR either and some of that is sent right back into space, thus being far less contributor to possible global warming, and definitely producing FAR less heat than its fossil fuel counterpart.
Imagine the supporting jobs too.
11:50 PM on 09/06/2011
So, I am kind of excited to see people go to the moon in my lifetime! I think that would be awesome!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martin Privat
for evil to triumph, good men need only do nothing
11:27 PM on 09/06/2011
NASA has done plenty which makes our day-to-day lives better... The American tax payer has gotten a huge return on the investment in the space program in technology, health, jobs, and the economy. Money spent on NASA has been money very well spent.

Here is a link to 25 items that NASA has brought to us: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1752963.ece
10:54 PM on 09/06/2011
A reading of the comments to this article should clue you into why it is essential to bump the Republicans and the teabagger maggots out of office, if we want to save a scrap of what made this country great. America's best qualities have always been about innovation, exploration -- seeking knowledge and truth. You will find NONE of that quality in the far right, as exhibited by the wingnut yokels who have posted here.

We may not be that happy with Obama at the moment, and he may never live up to our expectations, but I have found that ever since I was able to vote, I seem to have been voting for the "lesser of two evils". 2012 will be no different. The Republican Party is anti-science, and anti-people. They have been bought and paid for by right wing plutocrats whose interests are anathema to true Americanism. Don't buy into it. Remember that the devil you know is better than the devil you don't know.

If I were President (gee, will you teabaggers vote for me?), I'd push to increase the size of NASA's budget tenfold, and America could once again find itself at the top of human technology on this planet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martin Privat
for evil to triumph, good men need only do nothing
11:04 PM on 09/06/2011
Agreed and Fanned
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
10:09 PM on 09/06/2011
We can't afford research, rather spend the $3 on wasting electricity to tell everybody that!
Seriously, that is what's going on here. And can somebody clue me in to why they don't like science? Let me guess... They are afraid of it because it is the truth that God gave them to use but they don't want to make a better world because they are TOLD that science can not help us anymore by public opinion molders that want a dumbed down populace so that they can better control us...basically JUST AS JEFFERSON SAID!
What is wrong with these people! instead of complaining about that measly $3, they should be DEMANDING JOBS. I used to be tea party before there was any such thing (john Birch socirty) and they predicted that the pres would let China to invade us back in 1999... but they had one thing right that the TP is too scared to talk about... TRADE TARIFFS. That's the key to the solution (That and machine made jobs).
You see, anti science is pro resource depletion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
10:05 PM on 09/06/2011
Clementine Mission Part 3 (Shoemaker)

Next, if you make an assumption about the contrast in density between the lunar crust and the
underlying lunar mantle, you can calculate the thickness of the lunar crust. A global map of the
thickness of the lunar crust has been derived from the global Bouguer anomaly. This is a first-order result from the Clementine mission. The lunar crust is about 12 percent of the volume of the moon. The next step in analysis of the topographic and gravity data will be to look at variations in the strength of the lunar crust and how it has changed with time.

The Moon’s topography was accurately detailed by mapping with laser ranging system. Some 70,000 surface points were measured to a high degree of accuracy, and revealed a 13 km difference between highest and lowest points. Free-air gravity anomaly, measured by precise tracking of the spacecraft, results from varying composition and densities of moon’s surface.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
10:02 PM on 09/06/2011
Clementine Mission Part 2

That load of basalt has bowed down the crust so that there are negative anomalies
on each side. In the basin there is no flooding of basaltic lavas, no extra load on the crust.

The remarkable thing is that when the spacecraft flew over the Mendel-Rydberg Basin with 6000 kilometers relief—a big hole in the moon—the spacecraft hardly noticed it.

There was very little deflection of the orbit. That is an important statement: it means that
there must be dense rocks from the lunar interior that have been lifted up under the center of the basin. The material that has been lifted up has a higher density than the average lunar crust; the excess mass in this dense material just about compensates for the missing mass in the hole at the lunar surface. And we find this to be true for essentially every large basin on the moon. The large holes in the lunar surface are compensated by dense material that has welled up from deeper in the moon.

You can calculate the missing volume in a given basin from the topographic data, and if you know the density of the crust you can calculate the missing mass and can make a correction to the observed gravity. By making this correction from the topography and adding that correction to the free-air gravity anomaly, we get what is called the Bouguer gravity anomaly which reflects variations in the density in the moon’s material subsurface.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
09:55 PM on 09/06/2011
Clementine Mission Part 1 by Eugene Shoemanker

What you see on a color-coded, shaded relief map is a huge range of elevation with more than 13 kilometers difference from the high points to the low. Clearly visible is the largest preserved giant impact crater that we know of in the solar system. It’s called the South Pole-Aitken Basin; it was recognized from scarps seen in earlier photography taken by satellite, but we had no idea of its shape. The floor lies at an average depth of 12 kilometers relative to the rim. It’s 2500 kilometers in diameter—in contrast to the radius of the moon which is only 1740 kilometers.

When you know both the topography and the gravity you can learn some basic new things about the structure of the moon. We measured the gravity by very accurate tracking of the spacecraft. Small accelerations of the spacecraft along its orbit, reflects variations in the gravitational tug of the nearby parts of the moon below.

It is possible from the LIDAR data to compare the topography going over two large impact basins, the Orientale Basin and next to it the Mendel-Rydberg Basin, with the gravitational acceleration of the spacecraft as it flew over them. The Orientale Basin, at its lowest part, is flooded with basaltic lavas which are reflected by a bump in the gravity called a free-air anomaly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
09:47 PM on 09/06/2011
What's wrong with all you anti NASA people... Have you been being brainwashed lately? Is Faux telling everyone that we don't need science (anymore because we're all going to collapse anyways).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
10:45 PM on 09/06/2011
Re-arranging the deck chairs in favor of cutting the budget for the Department of War and giving it to NASA would be money better spent. The military defense contractors will still get their cut since NASA uses them for everything from hardware, software to delivering tacos and diapers. The DoW will lose nothing since we have the possibility of more employed (raising their stock value) and home grown mission pride. I say if we're going to waste money lets get at least a small return on the investment with NASA.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cgala
09:44 PM on 09/06/2011
nasa is irrelevant and should be disbanded,we have telescopes that can see whats on the moon and beneath it too,and our telescopes can see farther than nasa can ever imagine they will ever go,get rid of them,they are a relic from the 60's and save our money we need it here on earth to pass out to the mexicans and thier offrspring
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
10:35 PM on 09/06/2011
"and our telescopes can see farther than nasa can ever imagine".

Are you a complete m0r)n? Who do you think runs the telescopes?
10:59 PM on 09/06/2011
I agree that the comment is amazingly ill-informed, but it is true that NASA does not run most ground-based telescopes. They were, at one point, told that it was not their mission to do so.

The poster being (implicitly) right on this point is similar to a stopped clock being right twice a day, though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
12:07 AM on 09/07/2011
UNCLE SPOOKY DUDE OF COURSE.

BTW, Jimboy, I'm disappointed; you've foregone the "TEA LEAVES predictive ACC pattern computer model" in favor of "astrology".
Ah well, it's can't be any worse
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martin Privat
for evil to triumph, good men need only do nothing
11:07 PM on 09/06/2011
Yeah we should just cede space to the Russians and the Chinese. Is backward thinking a requirement for being a Republican?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cgala
09:39 PM on 09/06/2011
THIS GOVERMENT IS GOING TO SPEND BILLIONS UPON BILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO GO SOMEWHERE WE HAVE ALREADY BEEN JUST TO CONFIRM WHAT WAS CONFIRMED 40 YEARS AGO......THERE IS NOTHING THERE....THESE GUYS AT NASA WILL DO ANYTHING TO TRY AND STAY EMPLOYED AND STILL BE RELEVANT....NO ONE CARES ABOUT WHATS ON THE MOON BOYS,WE NEED OUR BILLIONS IN TAX DOLLARS DOWN HERE ON EARTH
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
09:43 PM on 09/06/2011
That's just a drop in a bucket full of holes...
10:20 PM on 09/06/2011
Not billions upon billions.

And the money is spent on earth.

Step away from the caps lock.
09:09 PM on 09/06/2011
Why doesn't NASA visit the Continental USA on Planet Earth and measure the gravity of our problems here. WE IN DEBT & HEADING FOR BANKRUPTCY AND PRONTO.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martin Privat
for evil to triumph, good men need only do nothing
11:11 PM on 09/06/2011
Yes but as we are finding out your Austerity measures actually hurt the economy not help it, which just makes our debt issues that much more worse. Here have a read: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/22/us-un-austerity-idUSTRE75L4JS20110622