iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.N. Study: Austerity Measures Pushing World Economy Toward Disaster

Austerity Us Europe

First Posted: 09/06/11 01:46 PM ET Updated: 11/06/11 05:12 AM ET

GENEVA (Tom Miles) - The pursuit of austerity measures and deficit cuts is pushing the world economy toward disaster in a misguided attempt to please global financial markets, the annual report of the United Nations economic thinktank UNCTAD said on Tuesday.

The report, entitled "Post-crisis policy challenges in the world economy," savaged U.S. and European economic policies and called for wage increases, stricter regulation of financial markets, including a return to a system of managed exchange rates, and a conscious break with market-led thinking.

"The message here is very pragmatic: we need to reverse our course quickly," said UNCTAD Secretary General Supachai Panitchpakdi.

Supachai, a former head of the World Trade Organization, said the policy response to the crisis, with an emphasis on fiscal tightening, was misconceived and inept.

The report's lead author Heiner Flassbeck said the global economic situation was extremely dangerous and, without more stimulus, a decade of stagnation was the best-case scenario.

The current policies were a disaster, said Flassbeck, head of the globalization and development strategies division at the U.N. Conference on Trade and Development, and a former deputy finance minister in Germany.

"If interests rates everywhere are zero, and if governments stick to the policy of not only keeping fiscal deficits where they are but retrenching, cutting public expenditure, then we will end up in permanent recession," he said.

"Unemployment depends very much on demand. And if you have no demand then you need government to step in with a huge program for stimulating the economy. This was the U.S. scenario in the past. Now it's worse because wages are rising less than in the past so you're going to need a bigger stimulus program."

The recovery from the financial crisis was not only jobless, which was to be expected, but it was also "wageless," he said, with Americans, Japanese and Europeans -- 70 percent of the world economy -- expecting their incomes to stagnate.

In its last report a year ago, UNCTAD said a premature removal of stimulus policies might cause a deflationary spiral with attendant slumps in growth and employment around the world.

"Let's not fool ourselves. This is a realistic scenario for the whole developed world, if we do not understand the lessons now, and really quickly, because we do not have other instruments any more," Flassbeck told a news conference to launch this year's report.

"To revive the economy with a wageless recovery with diminished expectations by the private economy, by private households, what are the instruments at hand? There is nothing."

He said that even if things go well, global economic growth would slow to about 1.5 percent in 2012, less than half the U.N. forecast of 3.1 percent growth for this year.

HERD MENTALITY

The report put much of the blame for the crisis on deregulation of financial markets, which it said invited destabilizing "herd behavior" by speculators, and allowed an over-concentration of banking activities.

"What we've seen in the past and we never learn is that countries seem to have excessive belief in the financial markets. And we've seen time and again that financial markets are not very sound in their judgment," said Supachai.

"But still people keep thinking that they are doing these austerity measures because they want to please the markets so that the markets give them better ratings, including the rating agencies which do not always produce the best assessment."

Flassbeck said the herd mentality was evident whenever equity markets and commodity markets all lurch in tandem on the same day, an effect that could not conceivably be caused by real swings in demand. But the world was ignoring it, he said.

"If the G20 negotiations were not confidential I would tell you that it's ignored even there," he said.

A November summit of the 20 biggest economies would reach "extremely weak" conclusions on tackling the crisis and would underestimate the influence of financial markets, he said.

"We have three areas where the G20 wanted to be strong. The first is the coordination of economic policy: nothing. The second is commodities speculation: more or less nothing; and the third is international global monetary order: nothing. So that's the result of nine months deliberation by the G20."

The U.N. report said the world should introduce a system of rules-based floating exchange rates, which would kill off distorting "carry trades" in which investors borrow currencies with low interest rates to buy higher-yielding currencies.

The system would be based on divergences between the consumer prices or interest rates applicable to different currencies, and unlike the defunct Bretton Woods system, it would cater for continual adjustments in exchange rates.

(Editing by Stephen Nisbet)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
GENEVA (Tom Miles) - The pursuit of austerity measures and deficit cuts is pushing the world economy toward disaster in a misguided attempt to please global financial markets, the annual report o...
GENEVA (Tom Miles) - The pursuit of austerity measures and deficit cuts is pushing the world economy toward disaster in a misguided attempt to please global financial markets, the annual report o...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,654
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Botany5000
09:40 AM on 09/08/2011
Would a UN study say anything else!?!
Their sheer concern is that countries,,,U.S. will cut their funding and their lavish life style.
photo
Bryan Boru
Engineer, Libertarian
03:25 AM on 09/08/2011
Of course the UN doesn't want austerity, because austerity will mean less money for them. A lot less.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bgraceg
10:41 PM on 09/07/2011
An important article and well said. Also we should look back to measures taken the depression in the 1930's, and some of the misguided measures the US took that actually deepened and lengthened it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Botany5000
09:40 AM on 09/08/2011
Like all the ones we are doing again, like deficit spending?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thawalkingman
If your CAPS lock is on your brain is off.
08:34 PM on 09/07/2011
What we are seeing us the single greatest theft in history. The wealthiest have looked at our world with cold calculating eyes and they see a grim future.

The wealthiest know that every inch of the culture of consumption is unsustainable. They knew it fifty years ago but now with India and China joining in the rich know our fairy tale cannot last.

So the richest and most powerful are set on accumulating as much as they can before the inevitable economic and population contraction that is coming.

The wealthy in every country are ransacking social programs in the name of 'austerity'. They are raking in money from every vulnerable demographic but their target is the middle class.

We are living in a historic sprint to the finish. But, there won't be a celebration when the race has been won. We have long lived beyond our means economically and environmentally now the bill is coming due. The wealthy are just farsighted enough to prepare, and they don't care that their 'preparation' hurries the arrival of the calamity they fear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nanette755
"The highest result of education is tolerance."
07:42 PM on 09/07/2011
This man writes in reason, the reality of what has to be done and it is not just this nation that is in peril of a permnent recession, and the TP party and (re)publicans dump on it as unreasonable. Like it is a Robin Hood idea rather than sound economic principle.
06:34 PM on 09/07/2011
No problem can be solved on the same level of consciousness that created it.- Einstein

But what if the few in charge have no conscious?- Me
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
Evil requires the sanction of the victim -Ayn Rand
06:22 PM on 09/07/2011
The problem with liberals is that they believe Government is some abstract entity that is flush with cash.

They think that stimulus plans generate wealth because they don't account for the fact that there is a negative effect that is equal or greater. The money used in a stimulus is taken OUT of the private sector where it STIMULATES the economy. Net effect? At best, zero.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whitemellon
06:38 PM on 09/07/2011
Who's decision was it to bail out the banks. Was it a Liberal or a consertive?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nanette755
"The highest result of education is tolerance."
07:38 PM on 09/07/2011
THAT, known as TARP, was Bush and Cheney.
10:06 PM on 09/07/2011
The money is not taken out of the private sector. The money is created out of thin air. If people didn't park their money in bonds they'd park it somewhere else, they wouldn't spend it. If there aren't enough people to buy bonds the Fed can buy them.
photo
DismayedRepub
300Mm/s Not just common sense, it’s the law
12:17 AM on 09/08/2011
Ex Nihilo is bad, very inflationary. The poor won't be able to buy food and starve to death.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
Evil requires the sanction of the victim -Ayn Rand
06:18 PM on 09/07/2011
Income inequality in a free market is a very healthy symptom. The more you try to force equality the more impoverished the people will be a whole.

Make us all perfectly equal and we will be digging out roots to eat like they do in North Korea.
10:07 PM on 09/07/2011
The more equal 50s to 70s period had more rapid economic growth. How can you explain this?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bgraceg
10:43 PM on 09/07/2011
If this is true, why are the countries that have the greatest income inequality (Pakistan for example), have the lowest quality of life overall?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
Evil requires the sanction of the victim -Ayn Rand
06:14 PM on 09/07/2011
"and a conscious break with market-led thinking."

Sure, go ahead, borrow trillions more and watch what happens when nobody wants to lend you money.

How idiotic.
10:00 PM on 09/07/2011
The Fed can buy the bonds. That's what's going on in Japan where their central bank has bought up so many Japanese bonds so as to permit their 250% debt to GDP ratio and 1% interest on 10 year bonds.
photo
DismayedRepub
300Mm/s Not just common sense, it’s the law
12:10 AM on 09/08/2011
What happens to prices when the FED starts pumping the money supply like that? If you think QE1&2 haven’t caused prices to rise due to inflation you must have someone that goes out to buy groceries for you.

I wouldn’t want to emulate Japan. They have been hurting pretty bad since their markets crashed in 1990. We’re turning Japanese, yes, I really think so.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/bill_emmott/article7000839.ece
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
06:10 PM on 09/07/2011
The lights are on, and the party's over. For decades on end, all the fiscal insanity worldwide is the root cause, not austerity.
10:00 PM on 09/07/2011
Why is the party over? Why should people stop making things?
photo
DismayedRepub
300Mm/s Not just common sense, it’s the law
04:10 PM on 09/07/2011
It sounds like they want inflation. There is disaster down that road too.
10:01 PM on 09/07/2011
When there's too much debt in the system inflation may be the best alternative.
photo
DismayedRepub
300Mm/s Not just common sense, it’s the law
11:37 PM on 09/07/2011
The people that hold your debt (Chinese) will get pissed because you’re paying them back with dollars that are worth much less than the dollars they lent you. It is the Stealth default and it will be just as bad in their eyes then if you simply didn’t pay. Do you think things are bad now? What happens to the public debt when we have to pay 5% interest or more on it?
03:15 PM on 09/07/2011
Who could have predicted that with rising unemployment, falling consumer demand and decreased business investment that reducing Government spending would create a negative economic result? Any examination of the GDP equation is very difficult for those not skilled in the calculus of multi variable formulae. However when the inputs are all negative the end result is a given. So it is with the Teapublican whiz kids. Noting that the only positive was the input by Government their rush to slay the golden goose had an immediate negative result.

Now with the stimulus at an end only the failed Bush tax cuts and equally stupid Obama tax cut are in effect. These are once again displaying their false ideological non-worth as job growth has stopped and GDP growth has fallen by 80%. These deficit creating economic piranha are consuming potential resources at a rate of $450 billion per year and delivering a comatose economy. Worse still are the economic lead boots of wars and bloated military/security spending. These represent another $450 billion per year in economic hemorrhaging.

The Teapublicans are correct in their assessment that we are broke. The reason for this is their tax cuts, useless wars and corrupted security spending. It is only after this triumvirate of toxic policies are reversed that the resources required to repair a broken economy will be available.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
Evil requires the sanction of the victim -Ayn Rand
06:13 PM on 09/07/2011
The stimulus did nothing, now that it has ended the economy is going south again.

For those of you who are "skilled" in the calculus, try this one:

For every government worker that is one less productive person in the economy and one more burden for a private sector worker to finance. If bigger government were the solution then hire 50 million people to work for government. You'll kill the private sector within weeks. Why? Simple math. Every private worker has to support the government employee out of his/her earnings. Make the ratio too large and it becomes unsustainable. We have reached that point.

Raising taxes doesn't generate wealth, it impoverishes everyone.

The problem is the liberal spending mania, a 100% increase in spending in just 10 years! (2000-2010). And your answer is to increase taxes 100%? We will go broke pretty fast with that solution. The minute you raise taxes politicians increase spending. When is the last time you saw a tax increase actually applied to the deficit?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Olderandwiser55
getting older and wiser....
06:31 PM on 09/07/2011
The problem is you don't see where the money's going. Why does the Postmaster general make over $800,000 a year? And "needs" to lay off people. It's not austerity, they just spend the money elsewhere.
07:52 PM on 09/07/2011
"The stimulus did nothing, now that it has ended the economy is going south again"

well it did something if the economy is going south now that it's ended

obviously based on your own comment it has sustained the economy and prevented it from sliding into the abyss.....while it lasted of course

I understand the reluctance to spend when the debt is already so high, but honestly, based on history, based on economics, there is no way to come out of this unless the government spends. There just isn't, period. However the important question is what to spend the money on.

One example.....Infrastructure. The government could invest billions nationwide into improving infrastructure......roads, bridges, etc. that are already in much need of repairs and replacement. The money will need to be spent on it eventually and it literally puts thousands and thousands of people back to work. The money goes directly to the private sector via contracts and the government doesn't get any bigger. There are hundreds of examples like this, the government investing directly into the private sector, but this time the return is guaranteed in the form of JOBS

once the economy stables a bit then we can have a big discussion on debt reduction.....be it cuts or tax hikes or a combination of both
02:29 PM on 09/07/2011
We're going to have to ship a few million tea party hacks to Sri Lanka to get anything productive going in this country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
celeritas
diligentia vis celeritas
12:35 PM on 09/07/2011
When the U.S. Sneezes the world catches a cold. This adage is more crucial today than yesterday. Whatever direction the U.S. takes to fix it's economy other countries try to anticipate so as not to be left out when the new U.S. model is adopted. And it appears the world believes the ignorant republicans have won the argument. Good luck my fellow Americans.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:07 PM on 09/07/2011
From 2006...

http://www.morganstanley.com/views/gef/archive/2006/20060303-Fri.html
Morgan Stanley - Global Economic Forum

"Stephen Roach (New York)

Billed as the great equalizer between the rich and the poor, globalization has been anything but. An increasingly integrated global economy is facing the strains of widening income disparities -- within countries and across countries. This has given rise to a new and rapidly expanding underclass that is redefining the political landscape. The growing risks of protectionism are an outgrowth of this ominous trend.

It wasn’t supposed to be this way. Globalization has long been portrayed as the rising tide that lifts all boats. The surprise is in the tide -- a rapid surge of IT-enabled connectivity that has pushed the global labor arbitrage quickly up the value chain. Only the elite at the upper end of the occupational hierarchy have been spared the pressures of an increasingly brutal wage compression. The rich are, indeed, getting richer but the rest of the workforce is not. This spells mounting disparities in the income distribution -- for developed and developing countries, alike.

The United States and China exemplify the full range of pressures bearing down on the income distribution. With per capita income of $38,000 and $1,700, respectively, the US and China are at opposite ends of the global income spectrum. Yet both countries have extreme disparities in the internal mix of their respective income distributions. This can be seen in their so-called Gini coefficients..."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:31 PM on 09/07/2011
"...A Gini Index reading of “0” represents perfect equality, with each segment of the income distribution accounting for a proportionate share of total income. Conversely, a reading of “100” represents perfect inequality, with the bulk of a nation’s overall personal income being concentrated at the upper end of the distribution spectrum. In other words, the higher the Gini Index, the more unequal the income distribution. The latest Gini Index readings for the US (41) and China (45) are among the highest of all the major economies in the world -- pointing to a much greater incidence of inequality than in economies with more homogeneous distributions of income, such as Japan (25), Europe (32), and even India (33).

While the US and China suffer from similar degrees of income inequality, they have arrived at this point through very different means. In the case of the US, there is nothing new about elevated readings of income inequality. America’s Gini coefficient has been on the rise for over 35 years -- moving up from about 35 in 1970 to over 40 today. What is new is how America’s income distribution has become more unequal in a period of rapidly rising productivity growth -- a development that has been accompanied by an extraordinary bout of real wage stagnation over the past four years.."