iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Middle-Class Americans Often Fall Down Economic Ladder: Study

Middle Class

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 09/07/11 01:55 PM ET Updated: 11/07/11 05:12 AM ET

The promise of the American dream has given many hope that they themselves could one day rise up the economic ladder. But according to a study released Tuesday, those already in financially-stable circumstances should fear falling down a few rungs too.

The study, by the Pew Charitable Trusts, found that nearly a third of Americans who were part of the middle class as teenagers in the 1970s have fallen out of it as adults. Though Pew examined only a certain demographic swath of participants, its findings suggest the relative ease with which people in the U.S. can end up in low-income, low-opportunity lifestyles -- even if they started out with a number of advantages.

Though the American middle class has been repeatedly invoked as a key factor in any economic turnaround, numerous reports have suggested that the middle class enjoys less existential security than it did a generation ago, thanks to stagnating incomes and the decline of the industrial sector.

The study stops tracking data in 2006, meaning that it remains unknown how the economic slowdown of recent years -- including a crisis in the financial system, a housing market weighed down by foreclosures, soaring unemployment and a global recession -- may have affected the likelihood that more Americans born into middle-class circumstances will tumble out of them.

The Pew study looked at Americans who were between the ages of 14 and 17 in 1979, and living at home with their parents that year. For teenagers who were part of the middle class in 1979 -- defined as the 30th through 70th percentile of income -- about 28 percent of them had fallen out of it, meaning below the 30th percentile of income, by 2006.

This kind of decline in fortunes did not affect all races and genders uniformly. Middle-class blacks, for example, stood a 37 percent chance of falling out of the middle class, compared with just a 25 percent chance for whites. And white women had a 30 percent chance of falling below the 30th-percentile line, whereas white men had only a 21 percent chance.

The researchers observed a few correlations between downward mobility and certain kids of behavior. The study notes that people who did not pursue their education past high school, who had used heroin or cocaine, who had performed poorly on standardized tests, or who had gotten divorced or never been married had a higher likelihood of falling out of the middle class.

Prolonged unemployment is taking its toll on many middle-class Americans, as they see opportunities receding and employers increasingly hiring applicants who already have jobs or who have only been out of work a short period of time.

While the U.S. economy officially climbed out of recession two years ago, growth has been painfully slow since then, and in recent months has threatened to come to a standstill. Most analysts agree that the country needs to be expanding at more than twice its current rate in order to lift the economy out of its doldrums.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The promise of the American dream has given many hope that they themselves could one day rise up the economic ladder. But according to a study released Tuesday, those already in financially-stable cir...
The promise of the American dream has given many hope that they themselves could one day rise up the economic ladder. But according to a study released Tuesday, those already in financially-stable cir...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 613
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
07:26 AM on 09/09/2011
Where does the middle class start and end?
What income brackets?
This is pretty shotgun article.
Covers a wide subject thinly.
05:16 PM on 09/10/2011
I agree. The substance of this article is lacking to say the least. Step it up HP.
photo
DivergentMary
Yin-Yang Kitties
12:20 AM on 09/09/2011
Let's think about who we are talking about. This article is about people who were 14 to 17 in 1979. That was 30+ years ago. So that means the the people who have fallen out of the middle class are now between 46 and 49.

So that means that in 2006, the subjects of the study were between 41 and 44. That's a reminder to the many people who have posted here and are lamenting the "lazy youths of today who spend all of their time playing video games."

And for those of you who are keen to blame this on Obama, please notice that the study concluded in 2006, 3 years before he took office. Shall we blame Bush for this?

No, that's just as silly as blaming Obama.

But here's what I would like to know: if 1/3 of the people who were studied dropped down lower than the middle class in 2006, what would be the percentage now in 2011?

I'll wager that since 2008, the numbers have climbed even higher, and the reasons might be more numerous than the cited "people who did not pursue their education past high school, who had used heroin or cocaine, who had performed poorly on standardized tests, or who had gotten divorced or never been married."
05:18 PM on 09/10/2011
The numbers now are staggering. I hope they re-write this article and include some current stats. C'mon writers......
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Draekia
Open-minded thinker and traveller
08:05 PM on 09/12/2011
Someone has to do the study first... If they did, then I second your post, if not, well, there's nothing for thEm to go on aside from conjecture.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smcircle
If we don't stand up for us who will?
05:56 PM on 09/08/2011
Much of what Congress does in our name is not done for our benefit. There lies the problem. It is for whom they do it all for that should raise our suspicions. We need to bring America back to how our founding fathers intended it. American Democracy was a great experiment and we are failing big time and we the people are letting it happen. It needs to be done peacefully and with ideas that will reform our government so it does benefit us. I have a suggestion but it will require enough non wealthy to demand it of Congress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smcircle
If we don't stand up for us who will?
05:46 PM on 09/08/2011
I do agree that politicians in general seem to be working toward eliminating the middle class and returning to a reality that existed since not long after and before the middle ages- that being a "very small wealthy and ruling class" and the "huge rest of us". With all our elected do how can we not think this way? I also agree if we aren't among the biggest of tax payers WE DO NOT MATTER. But so much of what is an obstacle created by our so-called representatives are still over come-able. Well, at least while there is still a chance. We can't just wait around for things to get better and we definitely cannot wait for our reps to turn things around. I suppose an old ancient Greek could say it better than I can and I am not speaking violently. “Saying you'll be happy when things change in your experience is like saying you'll smile when your reflection in the mirror smiles first”. ~ Elias".
05:14 PM on 09/08/2011
The republicans decided decades ago that the middle class was an obstacle to their plans so have been undermining it ever since. If you aren't like the Koch brothers who can afford lobbyists you don't count. The French have more upward mobility than the USA does but then they don't have republicans so our hands are tied behind our backs and not a fair fight.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smcircle
If we don't stand up for us who will?
06:03 PM on 09/08/2011
It is not only the Republicans. If Congressional representatives want the support of their parties the next time they run they have to vote how they are told. Much of how they vote, either side of the aisle, surely doesn't benefit their respective constituents way to often. If it does sometime benefit us that is either a coincidence or done with that attitude of "well, I guess we have to allow the little guy smile once in a while".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timma
nihil habentes omnia posidentes
03:07 PM on 09/08/2011
...a painful and succinct reminder that "American exceptionalism" has vaporized...
02:12 PM on 09/08/2011
Wouldn't it be nice if the politicans and corporations got together and looked for ways to make it easier for us-instead of more difficult.
What this is-is punishment-we did not create de-regulation-nor do we have unlimited amts of capital they can tax-and put us in debt for.
The problem was created by them-as many times they could have created regulation to help us instead of criminalize us.
Imagine if everyone had a living wage job, just maybe the debt would be paid down a lot quicker than the austerity measures they want to punish the people who do not take out sub-prime loans and such.
The debt system they created to enrich the elite is what is making the whole economy collapse.
05:17 PM on 09/08/2011
But then it wouldn't be all about them and then next thing you know republicanism would disappear. That's wont be happening without a revolution.. Are you ready yet?
01:28 PM on 09/08/2011
In future, especially if someone like Perry is President, many more will be falling out of middle class than climbing into it. Reasons why: Republicans with help from Democrats, made it too easy for corps to send well-paying/benefits jobs out of country; divorce rate soared, with too many kids being raised by single mothers, lessening kids future opportunities; college and other post high school education costs sky-rocketed, either taking away chance for post high school training or causing graduates to go deep into debt; deregulation - Repugs & Dems cooperated in it - gave Banks, Wall Street, Corporations free rein to con/steal money with impunity; taxes lowered on the Rich, and reckless, endless wars fought without being paid for; benefits and perks for Politicians turned them into this country's Royalty. No going back; no hope. Get ready for PERMANENT standard of living in America from now on. We are officially a banana republic with small Elite Ruling Class holding all the power & wealth, huge class of very poor and working poor with no access to education and medical care. Sad.
photo
Arthur Spooner
Conservative govnmt is organized hypocrisy
12:25 PM on 09/08/2011
Hartmann has a good piece on this issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKMCsIp-9Ww&feature=uploademail
09:02 AM on 09/08/2011
Reading comprehension on this board is so poor.

This is not a story about the middle class having it worse. Its not about Reaganomics. Its a story about who falls out of the middle class -- whatever the middle class makes and however well its doing. It basically shows that the people that start middle class and fall out are ones who make poor life decisions. That's on them, not on society, the rich or any government or politician. The people falling out of the middle class had good opportunities and they blew them (or chose different values). But for every person that falls out of the middle class (by this definition) there is another person that rises into the middle class. That's how it works when you define middle class by percentage of the overall population (30% - 70%).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamenta
There are other human values besides greed.
02:39 PM on 09/08/2011
This is an absurd argument. Suppose we use Brian's argument on the populace in the Feudal era. By Brian's reasoning - a good majority of what he would like to call "middle class" - would have been serfs then.

What Brian refuses to acknowledge here is you have a relatively few ridiculously rich individuals - who now control 9.5 pieces of the wealth pie - and you have the rest of the populace with the bread crumbs - and he and his right-wing friends (supported by the billionaires and Wallstreet) want you and I to believe that "bread crumbs" is a perfectly acceptable "middle class" definition and having a better distribution of wealth - is a non sequiter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smcircle
If we don't stand up for us who will?
06:38 PM on 09/08/2011
This is true. It is a "Let them eat cake" attitude from the people with the bucks and power. But this article is not about this. It is about so many who are not taking their own personal responsibilities seriously. It is tough but we can't give up. Who would have won the race if the tortoise gave up even though the rabbit was so much more powerful and faster than he is. Serfs then or middle class now or whatever you call us we have to know we can if there is a point to trying. I believe "stagnating incomes and the decline of the industrial sector" was by design and that hurts but there has to be ways of over coming this before it is too late. We can start by all of us making those running for office totally believe they have one shot and if they do not do what is for our benefit they wont ever get elected again. And we do this as we would raising children, by being consistent in our always follow through practices. We must always be consistent with this. Otherwise “We The People” do not stand a chance.
09:33 AM on 09/09/2011
Dude, its not how I define "middle class," its how the article defines middle class. You are right though. Even the lower middle class have it so much better now than people have throughout history. Our lower middle class' lives are so much better than even the rich back in the feudal era. Medicine is better. Technology is better. Comfort is better. We have our business and progress to thank for that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smcircle
If we don't stand up for us who will?
06:21 PM on 09/08/2011
I read the article so I have to agree it is not about the middle class having it worse, not that you need my agreement. We are our decisions so we can't blame it all on the additional obstacles our elected officials throw at us. Reaganomics, or any form of 'trickle down', will not work for anyone outside the wealthy and powerful but this too is not here in this article. However, this article does remind me of something. My mommy told me I can't blame my failures on her. Sorry Sigmund. :-))).
photo
FirstGame72
The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters
08:16 AM on 09/08/2011
Did it ever occure to anyone that our government and economy stink because we as a people stink?
Or is it easier to swallow that we are a nation of 299 million victims?
Never mind I think I know which of those two people will choose.
07:24 AM on 09/09/2011
THE US has fallen behind the rest of the world in many categories.
So we are in fact mediocre .
Most folks have no control over large events.
We are the victims of policy decisions by a tiny minority.
The banking debacle was perpetrated by how many people?
Decision to invade IRAQ?
Policy has results.
Most bad for the average AMErican.
photo
FirstGame72
The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters
08:00 AM on 09/09/2011
Just as I suspected, you chose victimhood.
Imagine if our ancestors had thought the same way as you one hundred years ago? Why we'd all still be working seven days a week. What, do you think the robber barons and their stooges in goverment gave us weekends off out of the goodness of their hearts?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdbond
07:46 AM on 09/08/2011
R..e..a..gno.mics has created a new class, class of working poor. By the way, I am not blaming any party. Exact policies have been supported by both parties, what we call crony capitalism. As long as we could borrow or feds could print money, no one "noticed". Now money has all dried up and...
photo
FirstGame72
The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters
08:14 AM on 09/08/2011
Except 11 years ago the economy was booming along with unemployment at 4% and the government running a surplus.
What happend? The American people spoke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
02:33 PM on 09/08/2011
What happened? They wanted a President they could have a beer with and chose Bush. The rest is blunder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Squirdlock
03:57 PM on 09/08/2011
George W. Bush happened.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdbond
07:44 AM on 09/08/2011
O did it! He was planning all this since 1970!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
First Blast
res ad triarios venit
07:32 AM on 09/08/2011
The middle class is more than just money. An illiterate boor who makes 200k a year is less middle class than a masters in philosophy making 35k.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
07:08 AM on 09/08/2011
This is nothing new.
It has been true for decades.
In spite of all the Horatio Alger mythology,
You are much likely to end life poorer than your parents were.
This nation does not reward hard work anymore.
photo
FirstGame72
The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters
08:18 AM on 09/08/2011
The key word in there of course is "anymore."
Why don't we ever ask why things worked in this country between 1940 and 1970 and attempt to understand and repeat that winning strategy?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
02:35 PM on 09/08/2011
The "Job Creators" make more money this way.
photo
DivergentMary
Yin-Yang Kitties
12:27 AM on 09/09/2011
Higher income taxes on the wealthy, for starters. Remember that the rates were 91% during Eisenhower's Presidency in the '50s and into the '60s, and 70% during Nixon's Presidency. Even during Reagan's Presidency for most of his years the rate was about 50%.

So the Republicans in Congress are now having fits over the idea of going back to the Clinton era taxes (39%) on the wealthy. It would be funny if it weren't so tragic.
07:18 AM on 09/09/2011
I dont believe most folks wind up worse off than their parents.
Every generation ,with normal abilities,builds on the previous one.
Better education,better prospects.Better skill set.
I dont know anyone who has skidded down economically without some good reason.
I dont think that is the norm.