'Wuthering Heights' Reviews: Modern Adaptation With First Black Heathcliff Mostly Wins Critics (VIDEO)

Wuthering Heights Film

The Huffington Post   Mallika Rao First Posted: 09/07/11 08:08 AM ET Updated: 11/07/11 05:12 AM ET

Andrea Arnold switches out the modern urban grit of her last indie darling "Red Road" for the classic rural grit of what's sure to be her next indie darling, "Wuthering Heights." So far, the critics agree there is something ingenious about Arnold's bare-bones, naturalistic take on the Gothic romance. Her decision to cast relatively unknown actors and actresses seems to have paid off too, with most critics paying kudos to the pair manning the young Heathcliff and Cathy (first-timers Shannon Beer and Solomon Glave). The biggest surprise windfall: her unorthodox Heathcliff, who for the first time in adaptation history, is black. Glowing praise aside, there's some who find it slightly too austere, too filmic and too modern for its own good.

Screen Daily: "Andrea Arnold’s adaptation of Emily Bronte’s literary classic Wuthering Heights is not a loveable film, but it is a courageous and impressive one. What makes it is also what mars it: a poetic, intensely auteurish take on the material that more than once comes between us and the story. Paradoxically, for all the explosive emotion of its source material, this is a curiously poised and dry-eyed film."

Playlist: "While BrontĆ« purists might take issue with some of Arnold’s creative decisions, they also manage to make it a radical, but entirely successful, version, one that might be her most uncompromising film yet. Arnold might misstep a little at the last with the use of a new song, ā€œThe Enemy,ā€ by Mumford & Sons, but for 99% of the running time the 2011 version of ā€œWuthering Heightsā€ is a model of how to bring a classic novel kicking and screaming into the twenty-first century." Grade: A

Variety: Andrea Arnold's first period feature and first adaptation of another writer's work is unfortunately more interesting in theory than it is to watch. Working with mostly non-professional thesps whose inexperience drains away much of the material's intrinsic passion, pic is dramatically flat and almost stylized in its austere excision of dialogue, non-source music and, strangest of all given the book's romantic rep, overt love scenes. The dragginess is due to not only Nicolas Chaudeurge's unvaried rhythms but also the monotony of some of the performances; young Glave and Beer as deliver every line in the same flat, affectless way, and although at first it's interesting to see a version of the story with so much less screaming and crying, it sort of lacks a point after a while."

Xan Brooks for The Guardian: "It pushes the story all the way back to its original 1847 incarnation and then beyond, up-river, into primordial sludge. What comes back is a beautiful rough beast of a movie, a costume drama like no other. This might not be warm, or even approachable, but it is never less than bullishly impressive. Even if the casting of a black actor as Heathcliff makes the tale more about race than class, the seething rage that drives him might just as easily have been sparked by one form of oppression as the other. What I found more of a problem was the faint stiffness and self-consciousness of the acting and the crucial lack of chemistry between the adult Heathcliff and Cathy." Score: 3/5 stars

The Telegraph: "Nature is the true star of Andrea Arnold’s Wuthering Heights, a raw and affecting adaptation that will bring a new audience to the BrontĆ« story. Windswept moors have never looked as bleak as they do here, nor as rain-sodden. Solomon Glave is a find as the young Heathcliff, wordlessly conveying the character’s pain as he suffers beatings and humiliations. A scene in which Cathy (Shannon Beer) tends his wounds after he has been whipped is extraordinarily moving. The second half is weak by comparison, as the adult Heathcliff (James Howson) returns to find Cathy married." Score: 3/5 stars

AFP: "Fierce devotion and raw passion bind together novelist Emily Bronte's well loved characters Cathy and Heathcliff, captured by Arnold through intimate, sensual hand-held camera shots and a visceral display of the forces of nature."

The Hollywood Reporter:
"So audaciously cutting-edge does it feel – which could perhaps draw comparisons with France’s reigning female auteur Claire Denis, and even Catalan experimentalist Albert Serra – that it suddenly makes Cary Fukunaga’s current (Charlotte) BrontĆ« adaptation, the solidly respectable Jane Eyre, look almost as old-fashioned as Robert Stevenson’s 1943 version starring Orson Welles and Joan Fontaine. Arnold’s only real misstep is the inclusion of a newly-commissioned, unmistakably modern sounding song by popular British neo-folk band Mumford & Sons during the final moments and over the closing credits. What Arnold doesn’t include, however, is the second half of the book. Like almost all screen adaptations, the action ends shortly after Cathy’s death."

Stephanie Zacharek for Movieline:
"The earthiness of Arnold’s approach — she cowrote this adaptation with Olivia Hetreed — does amount to a degree of pretension: Her choices are so bold and definitive that you’re always aware of them as filmic choices. And in the end, I didn’t get the emotional charge from Wuthering Heights that I was waiting for, hoping for. But it’s certainly one of the thorniest and most thought-provoking films of the festival. As literary adaptations go, it’s both doggedly faithful and willfully untamed — a movie that’s hard, maybe, to love, but easy to respect."

Overall Grade: A-

"Wuthering Heights" does not currently have a U.S. release date.

WATCH clips from the movie:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CULTURE

Andrea Arnold switches out the modern urban grit of her last indie darling "Red Road" for the classic rural grit of what's sure to be her next indie darling, "Wuthering Heights." So far, the critics a...
Andrea Arnold switches out the modern urban grit of her last indie darling "Red Road" for the classic rural grit of what's sure to be her next indie darling, "Wuthering Heights." So far, the critics a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 135
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Blanc
10:44 AM on 09/14/2011
I watched the clip and realized that the film is set in the 1800s. I had hoped that the director had, in addition to making a new and interesting casting choice, had also brought the film forward in time. It's interesting to consider how the story could be done in 1930s England where class and race both matter. And if Heathcliff had been cast as Roma (Gypsy) -- well, rural feelings about the Roma were very negative, and would give plenty of dramatic intensity. Plus the book itself has hints that Heathcliff was at least part Roma, so going farther in that direction for casting would be supported by the original text.
01:17 PM on 09/14/2011
But there were biracial children in nineteenth century England, with all the attendant issues. It would be a shame to miss an opportunity to touch on them by trying to make the film closer to us in time.
02:58 PM on 09/08/2011
People who say Heathcliff's race doesn't matter should read Obama's autobiography and not just Wuthering Heights. In it he talks extensively about his upbringing as a bi-racial child and his experiences as a bi-racial man. He talks about his observations and first hand knowledge of both his racial identities and how each race views things.

He ends with a rather contemptuous remark that is basically addressed to all the white people desperate to ignore reality for fear of being called racist. Quote: "It's only white people who have suddenly decided race doesn't matter."

I'd like to hear what people think he meant by that.

Because it seems to me he's saying certain white people are akin to the real racists. For when once white people said to non-whites: 'we are superior and race is the most important thing', all that's happened now is whites are saying: 'we've changed our minds so now follow this agenda.'

Race is very important whatever white liberals think because it's very important to most non-whites.

And this Andrea Arnold clearly has a racial agenda.

Plain and simple.
standish
You're gonna need a bigger boat.
02:29 AM on 09/09/2011
That's all right dear. Put a cold compress to your head, fan some smelling salts under your nose, dab a little Jean Nate behind your ears, and lie back on your fainting couch in your trailer park and have a little nappie. You'll feel oh so much better in the morning.
08:06 PM on 09/09/2011
"It's all right dear" and the comma between "your ears" and "and lie back" is superfluous.

Also, it's either PRESS a cold compress to your head, or put a cold compress ON your head.

And you say I come from a trailer park!

Christ maybe you've got a little bit to much Jean Nate between your ears!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jennifer Hagan
Expat Mother of two living in France.
02:57 AM on 09/09/2011
I don't know if she has a racial agenda of if she envisioned Heathcliff as a Black man with his struggles he had. The struggles Heathcliff had were similar to that of many Blacks during that period. Heathcliff was a street urchin. He was found by Catherine's father who was a doctor and brought him home with him. He raised him with Catherine and her brother as his own child and loved him. However, Bronte makes reference to his origins by saying he was a dark gypsy. He was ostracized by society, even Catherine, the woman he loved had contempt for him in a way. They often talked about how low he was. He was abused later by the brother and thrown away by Catherine to marry Linton. She married Linton to bring up Heathcliff from his status. So, I think she has a racial agenda. She is showing what oppression, abuse, mistreatment and exclusion can do to a person. It can destroy that person, as it did with Heathcliff and make them become pure rage. Have you read the book?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rock Jocelyn
08:57 AM on 09/08/2011
I really thought that was Effie making a weird face. Super bummed it isn't. Why isn't she everywhere?
08:22 AM on 09/08/2011
Modern adaptions are always going to be different from the originals. So why don't the complaining geezers stop going on about a liberal media. This hardly ever occurs, and even when it does, there have been several cases where white people have played black roles, too. It was the same with William Shakespeare's Romeo & Juliet 1996 film adaptation. Racial diversity is something unique to our time and this should be reflected in *modern* adaptations.
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
08:18 AM on 09/11/2011
If religious ding bats can make G-zus fair-skinned and blue-eyed, why not?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Albany Kid
From the 518 to the 651
02:42 AM on 09/08/2011
Not bad. However, I'm still waiting for a "Gone With the Wind" adaptation featuring a Black Rhett Butler. Now *that* would be bold!
09:24 AM on 09/08/2011
You realize, of course, that a black Rhett Butler touching, let alone kissing a white woman would have been grounds for him being lynched in the south up until at least the sixties. Reversing things don’t automatically produce ideas that are actually compelling or funny. Be a real devils advocate; how about a Rhett Butler who was a strong, closeted (or not so much) lesbian?
Many women disguised themselves as men during that period to fight in wars and make money. A black person in the south during the civil war wouldn’t have had much freedom to move about, a woman in ā€˜men’s clothing’ would make more sense. Scarlet might well have found a woman who had the strength of will and character to disguise herself and become successful attractive, even if she didn’t initially know she was a woman. Good art makes inspired leaps that encourage you to think or dream. If you chose not to be inspired, that’s your choice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Albany Kid
From the 518 to the 651
10:00 AM on 09/08/2011
I agree; a lesbian or transgender Rhett would be very interesting. That's a very creative slant. :)

Your point about a Black Rhett is well taken. However, I think that a Black Rhett who was light enough to "pass" would be somewhat intriguing.
standish
You're gonna need a bigger boat.
02:31 AM on 09/09/2011
How about Denzel Washington as Rhett and Marcus Bachmann as Prissy? Works for me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Albany Kid
From the 518 to the 651
03:35 PM on 09/11/2011
LMAO!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wilray
50,000 Screaming Fans (Ignore that other number)
12:13 AM on 09/08/2011
Heathcliff was White ... Heathcliff was Black ... Heathcliff was a Gypsy.

Wrong.

I have it on good authority that Heathcliff was an orange tabby.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GaryNOVA
Fear My Micro-bio!!!!!!!!
12:10 AM on 09/08/2011
This is absolute BS. Heathcliff was clearly orange.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wilray
50,000 Screaming Fans (Ignore that other number)
02:39 AM on 09/08/2011
I swear I hadn't seen your post until after I made my post. Clearly we were thinking along the same lines at just about the same time. You are fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wwoody
Retired fishing for the truth.
08:52 PM on 09/07/2011
Wuthering Heights the 1939 version with Sir Laurence Olivier,Merle Oberon ..truly an Immortal classic..two hours and four handkerchief long. in my opinion is one of the greatest love story ever.
Heathcliff was a Gypsy in the book an also in the movie.
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
08:29 AM on 09/11/2011
Except the 1939 film sidesteps the book: Heathcliffe returned embittered and waged emotional war on every woman who crossed his path, without mercy or regret.

There is a stunning 2009 British miniseries version that played on Masterpiece Theater, which played out the unforgiving, unrepentant and indiscriminate wrath of Heathcliffe. Actor Tom Hardy is barely recognizable in the role of Heathcliffe, he embodies it so thoroughly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wwoody
Retired fishing for the truth.
02:36 PM on 09/11/2011
Thank you, I'm looking forward in watching it. and thank you once again for your insight. Fan and favorite to you.
08:52 PM on 09/07/2011
The real question is why call this drama an adaptation of Wuthering Heights? It's set in a modern period with modern language, modern sensibilities....I don't expect anyone who sees it would think; this is like Wuthering Heights if it wasn't for the names.
And the black man/white woman thing doesn't break new ground, it's been gleefully shoved down white men's throats many times by a liberal media over the years.
A Japanese Heathcliff and Nigerian Kathy, now that's breaking new ground.
Still can't wait for the Mexican Charlie Chan or the Chinese Shaft; 'who's the yellow private dick that's a sex machine to all the chicks....'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Droid Noir
Graphic Designer, Writer.
10:46 PM on 09/07/2011
You have a point there.
photo
eletryxx
squiggly lightning bolt
01:08 AM on 09/08/2011
Shakespeare counts as "a liberal media?"
07:39 PM on 09/07/2011
For all the people who say Heathcliff was ā€œblackā€ in the novel:

Heathcliff was a gypsy.
Black could have been applied to every person that was not the cultural norm of "white."
For example: men and women of a dark complexion from Barcelona to Naples to Constantinople would have been considered ā€œblackā€ in 19th century rural England.

The film:

I really hope this version is good.
Why is it that this novel never translates well to the screen?
As Bronte material goes, it’s not Agnes Grey after all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wintersoldier7020
The FanGirls Are Pissed
08:06 PM on 09/07/2011
There's always a person like you that must clarify that someone isn't black. It could be Cleopatra, Hannibal or Healthcliff ....what's up with that? I'm not black so don't say I have a racial agenda...just an observation.
09:28 PM on 09/07/2011
My comments about Heathcliff:

1. I don’t care what race you may or may not be or what hang-ups you may or may not have.
2. You are projecting your assumptions on my comment. ā€œJust an observation.ā€
3. My point is: it is totally false to claim the character of Heathcliff is ā€œblackā€ in the modern sense of someone of African ancestry.
4. Heathcliff is, in his literary and historical context, of Eastern European linage.
5. It is just false (or ignorant) to claim otherwise.

To use someone from your own comment: Cleopatra.

1. She is an African Queen (geographically) and a Greek-Egyptian Queen (culturally).
2. She does have linage to Egyptian pharaohs (however small it is).
3. Her majority racial make-up is, in all historical probability given the culture and incestuous nature of Egyptian royalty, Greek.

This has nothing to do with the character of Heathcliff. No matter what your projections and assumptions on my thoughts are. I only wish the movie is a good adaptation. In my opinion, there has been no good adaption of Wuthering Heights on film, ever.
medialv2
I love Capitalism!
06:39 PM on 09/07/2011
I can't wait for the all asian/white/fillipino remake of Roots.
08:10 PM on 09/07/2011
"Here lies Kunte Suarez"
TimTim17
Liberals are always on the right side of history.
02:04 PM on 09/08/2011
Most of the African slave trade went to Latin America (about 90% of it, compared with 5% to the United States), so that would work actually.
09:32 AM on 09/08/2011
You think no Asian-speaking filmmaker has ever chronicled the history of his or her culture (there are many different Asian cultures to chose from)? And I seem to recall white people in this country making many fictionalized versions of their history, starting before the film Birth Of A Nation and proceeding on after that.
05:31 PM on 09/07/2011
For some reason I've never been able to get into "Wuthering Heights" as much as some Gothic romances. The main character's destructive, self-indulgent love affair alienates them somewhat for me. None of this has anything to do with Heathcliff being cast black. I couldn't care less about that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
balmora
Liberals = feel good solutions that don't work
04:17 PM on 09/07/2011
You can call me a Brontƫ purists, but I do have to take issue with what I consider a terrible miscasting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini68
04:35 PM on 09/07/2011
Because the actor is black?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
balmora
Liberals = feel good solutions that don't work
04:57 PM on 09/07/2011
Because he wasn't black in the original story. When considering the time and setting of the story you realize that Heathcliff couldn't have been black without adding an whole new dimension to things. They should have cast somebody that looked like a gypsy. That would have been right for the role.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jennifer Hagan
Expat Mother of two living in France.
04:35 PM on 09/12/2011
It is an interpretation of literature. For example, you can take the book Therese Raquin from Zola. Now, Therese in nearly every film that has been made of the movie, has been cast as a blond haired woman. Simone Signoret and Kate Nelligan were both cast as her. But in the book, Therese was the daughter of a ship captain and a Algerian woman. It depends on how the person who directs the film wants to interprete it. His race changing makes it more interesting. there have been so many adaptations of this film, I was finally glad to see something different. Isn't that what art is? The interpretation of something in your eyes. Fundamentally the story doesn't change. Heathcliff is abused and mistreated and monsters turn the man into a monster. I think this illustrates the point just as much as if he were not Black.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patrick Fogarty
12:49 PM on 09/07/2011
Beauty is as beauty does . Could not think of anything that would make the story better except what Andrea Arnold has done . Wish I could see it .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dahpunkster
author, cartoonist people watcher
12:09 PM on 09/07/2011
read the book