iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Yahoo Firing Leaves 17 Female CEOs In Top 500 S&P-Tracked Companies

First Posted: 09/07/11 05:58 PM ET Updated: 11/07/11 05:12 AM ET

Carol Bartz

BOSTON (Scott Malone) - For advocates of gender equality, this week's ouster of two of Corporate America's most powerful women served as a reminder of how little progress U.S. companies have made in promoting women to executive positions.

In particular, Yahoo Inc's decision to fire Chief Executive Carol Bartz -- by phone, no less -- pointed out how few women had made it to the top of companies tracked in the Standard & Poor's 500 index.

That roster dropped to 17, a little more than 3 percent of the total, after Bartz's exit. The news came late on Tuesday, the same day that Bank of America Corp removed Sallie Krawcheck as head of its global wealth and investment management business.

"While the ouster of a number of top Wall Street women cannot necessarily be tied directly to the glass ceiling or sexism per se, the numbers aren't good," said Deborah Ancona, a professor of organization studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Sloan School of Management. "Women fill a minority of top leadership positions in corporate America."

While women represent about half of the nation's white-collar workers, their numbers thin as one looks up the organizational chart. They represent just 14.4 percent of executive officers at Fortune 500 companies, according to data from Catalyst, a nonprofit organization that advocates for women in business.

The number of women at the top of S&P 500 companies has inched up over the past decade, from five in 2001 to 18 at the end of 2010, according to data from executive search firm Spencer Stuart.

"If you want to call that progress, I think that's pretty bad," said Deborah Soon, a senior vice president at Catalyst. "That's an 'F,' quite frankly."

SMALL CLUB, LINGERING BARRIERS

Just two of the 30 iconic U.S. companies on the widely watched Dow Jones industrials average currently have women at the helm: DuPont Co, which named Ellen Kullman CEO in 2009, and Kraft Foods Inc, whichIrene Rosenfeld has headed since 2006.

A third Dow company, Hewlett-Packard Co, is currently run by a man but has had two women at its helm: Carly Fiorina from 1999 through 2005, and Cathie Lesjak, who served as interim CEO from August through October 2010.

While it is not in the Dow, PepsiCo Inc also has a woman at the helm -- Indra Nooyi.

Academics and advocates attribute the limited number of women in top jobs to subtle forms of sexism -- one where a male contender for a job might question whether a female rival's performance would be hurt by family responsibilities.

"Often an issue comes up at the peer level, where men are competing against women. There might still be some subtle glass-ceiling barriers," said Jeff Sonnenfeld, senior associate dean at the Yale University School of Management.

Women also have a harder time finding "sponsors," informal mentors who both advise them on career choices and advocate their cause when opportunities for advancement or high-profile assignments arise, said Catalyst's Soon.

If there is a bright spot in the firings this week, observers said, it is that they show women executives are held to the same performance standards as their male counterparts -- once they get into CEO-level jobs.

"I don't think they are given any more time than male CEOs ... you are beholden to your shareholders and you have to make things happen," said John Challenger, CEO of Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc, a consulting company that helps laid-off executives find jobs.

But that does nothing to mask the fact that few women make it to the corner office, he acknowledged

"When each one of these CEOs leaves, it's like a wound almost," Challenger said. "It's like someone's leaving that's just got there, that in many ways by her success or failure sets the stage for others to come, because there just are not that many."

(Reporting by Scott Malone; additional reporting by Mike Tarsala in New York and Svea Herbst-Bayliss in Boston; editing by John Wallace)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
BOSTON (Scott Malone) - For advocates of gender equality, this week's ouster of two of Corporate America's most powerful women served as a reminder of how little progress U.S. companies have made ...
BOSTON (Scott Malone) - For advocates of gender equality, this week's ouster of two of Corporate America's most powerful women served as a reminder of how little progress U.S. companies have made ...
Filed by Harry Bradford  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
NightflyLester
Raconteur, Media Gadfly, Philanthropist
07:43 PM on 09/08/2011
Sorry, I don't buy the premise. It was pretty clear under Bartz's leadership Yahoo waned. With respect to Ms. Krawcheck, it's been my observation that in the field of finance if you're making the firm cash hand over fist, race, gender, nationality, religion, moral conviction or if you're even born on this planet is of little interest.
04:35 PM on 09/08/2011
Manka Bros. has just offered Carol Bartz a job...

http://mankabros.com/blogs/chairman/2011/09/08/manka-bros-would-like-to-offer-carol-bartz-a-job/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nighthawksc
Still living on occupied land - USA
12:12 PM on 09/08/2011
Here we go! Is there one man out there that didn't know this was coming? Unfairness of women in the workplace. Well, maybe we should try to make it fair. Since this recession has been labeled a mansession and most of the jobs lost are by men. We should require that one man be hired by every company in the U.S. for every woman hired. This will be fair and we all know that women will be in favor of this new law because they are in favor or "FAIRNESS" in the job market. Right ?
08:36 AM on 09/08/2011
Women don't get CEO jobs because so far every one of them so far has SUCKED!

And once you hire them they become "sacred cows". If you fire them you are automatically accused of Gender Bias and Sexism just like in this news story and then they play the Female Victim Card and all the Feminists get their pant in a bunch.

All this makes them Toxic to hire. Feminists are their own worst enemies.!
photo
laaambchop
Cheerfulness is a sign of wisdom
09:56 AM on 09/08/2011
lol, did feminists write this article?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mondayboy
Rebel with a cause
06:11 AM on 09/08/2011
I'd like to see how many black people are CEOs in those 500 tracked companies. Also, how many Asians are CEOs and how many of them are hispanic?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nighthawksc
Still living on occupied land - USA
12:17 PM on 09/08/2011
and how many are Native American?
05:49 PM on 09/08/2011
We should not rest until this is corrected. C'mon folks, get a life. Companies that want to win could care less who's in charge.
12:33 AM on 09/08/2011
The consequences of equal treatment includes equal firing. Too much emphasis in America on making sure the picture looks a certain way, when it should be about substance, not stats. If the person is qualified or unqualified, gender shouldn't matter -- or else it WOULD be gender discrimination.
12:04 AM on 09/08/2011
Not like she billed herself as a big feminist but I have to wonder if she would have been fired in the same manner if she were a man.

As for the job, she either cut it or didn't. I guess she didn't
photo
abhorson
in favor of legalized bar fighting
04:38 AM on 09/08/2011
she probably would have been called in an office... with two or three guys from the "board" and told, "you ran the fu**ing company in the ground, you SOB, I told you I was gonna have your skin. You have no imagination, were a lousy a** negotiator and if it was up to me you'd never work again...here's your severance package ... if you don't like it sue us"
photo
laaambchop
Cheerfulness is a sign of wisdom
09:58 AM on 09/08/2011
Some companies fire via a mass email. I don't see why being canned over the phone is such a big deal. Beats being walked out.
11:03 AM on 09/08/2011
Just seems like poor etiquette.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:34 PM on 09/07/2011
Who cares?
holyghostie
Spiritus est qui vivificat
08:56 PM on 09/07/2011
It reminds me that being a lousy executive is a cross-gender trait.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mondayboy
Rebel with a cause
07:58 PM on 09/07/2011
Sallie Krawcheck sucks. She was over-hyped at Sanford Bernstein and turned into a golden girl (with very substance I might add). Then she used that hype to land a position in Citigroup - and slowly she was exposed as a know nothing. She got fired and then desperate BofA hired her. She's a disaster as most of these over-hyped Wall Street types are. In her case, I don't think it is about gender inequality - she just blows.
03:34 AM on 09/08/2011
There are a lot of incompetent men at that level, and they are either still in their jobs or get released with huge severance packages.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mondayboy
Rebel with a cause
06:09 AM on 09/08/2011
You don't think Sallie will get a HUGE severance package?
InLosAngeles
Speaking Truth to Groupthink
07:20 AM on 09/08/2011
What was her severance package details?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leorangerie
07:38 PM on 09/07/2011
Gender equality? Maybe we start with CEO competence first, then harp on gender equality. This CEO was at the helm with declining revenues EVERY QUARTER of her term. You might find a better example with whom to ignite this discussion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DomainDiva
Aviation SaaS Entrepreneur and Technical SME
06:46 PM on 09/07/2011
Quit the stupidity. Why this woman was even hired is a mystery to me. She had no ideas going in and obviously was not the leader she needed to be to bring about the changes in attitude at Yahoo. Give me one year, I'll turn that bad boy around.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Comicoffee
real analysis paired with a hefty dose of sarcasm
07:28 PM on 09/07/2011
I totally agree that she was the wrong person for the job from the beginning. That being said, it is disturbing how many people will view her performance as somehow representative of how women in general perform in leadership positions. It's not fair. When a male CEO whiffs, nobody says "see, this is what happen when you put a man in charge..."
12:04 AM on 09/08/2011
Apply
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DomainDiva
Aviation SaaS Entrepreneur and Technical SME
08:25 AM on 09/08/2011
I applied Wednesday morning after the announcement on CNBC.
06:24 PM on 09/07/2011
Just about the biggest growth industry , and most profitable industry, on the planet - Internet search advertising. Ten + year head start on the competition and can't make any money on it while two college kids half her age make a $300 billion dollar company from nothing Google even tried to sell their software to Yahoo before starting their own company. . Meanwhile, let the companies biggest asset somehow mysteriously disappear in China without even noticing and turn down offers to buy the company at prices a couple times higher than what it is now.

Well, she could always START a fortune 500 company like the CEO of Google did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
06:16 PM on 09/07/2011
Cue the violin, please.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reno Fickler
Head Lifeguard/Dead Sea Marina
06:00 PM on 09/07/2011
Men and women are different. Maybe you've noticed. Women don't seem to possess that 'go-for-the-throat' mentality required in big business. I liken it to NASCAR racing. Danica is about to get the best equipment and team possible. Her performance will have a LARGE influence on the viability of females competing in that arena. THAT will certainly get the men's attention.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DomainDiva
Aviation SaaS Entrepreneur and Technical SME
06:48 PM on 09/07/2011
I clawed my way up on the aircraft maintenance hangar floor. How afraid do you think I am? :)
12:07 AM on 09/08/2011
Actually if you do a study of jails and prisons you will that women inmates are considered much more dangerous than men inmates because they go for the throat. Women typically (not all) strike out of passion. Men (typically) view it as a game.