More

Rick Perry's Lawyers 'Read The Riot Act' To Cameron Todd Willingham Investigator

Perry

First Posted: 09/08/11 03:56 PM ET Updated: 11/08/11 05:12 AM ET

During last night's debate, I was disappointed that Brian Williams, faced with the golden opportunity to specifically cite the Cameron Todd Willingham case in his interrogation of Texas Governor and newly-minted frontrunner Rick Perry, instead opted for a more generic set of questions on the death penalty. Williams could have used an earlier debate discussion of criticism that members of the field were "anti-science" to delve into the science that indicates that Willingham did not commit the crime his prosecutors said he committed, but he did not. The wait for a reporter to ask detailed questions of Rick Perry on this matter continues!

That said, I am cheered to see Esquire magazine take up the case, and cheered further still to see the excellent Tom Junod writing about it. In Junod's newly published piece, he gets pointed:

Rick Perry is a Christian. It does us no good to ask, as Christopher Hitchens did last week, if he really believes what he says he believes; better to take him at his word, for then we can hold him to it. That is, we can see if he's a Christian not only by word, but by deed -- if he is Christian by the proclaimed standards of Christianity.

That's the prelude to the question, "But what if he signed the death warrant for an innocent man?" And on that matter, Junod brings in some important details about the pressure that Perry put on Sam Bassett, the Austin defense attorney originally appointed to chair the Texas Forensic Science Commission, which took up the Willingham case soon after it was empanelled:

In 2008, the Commission held a meeting to determine what cases to investigate, and decided to look into the complaint raised by the Innocence Project about the conviction of Todd Willingham. According to Bassett, who spoke recently to The Politics Blog, the attorney general of Texas was present at the meeting, and gave his approval to the investigation. But when the Commission hired an independent investigator to examine the arson investigation upon which Willingham's execution was predicated, Bassett says that he was called into the Governor's office and "read the riot act" by Perry's lawyers. "I was told that I did not have jurisdiction to investigate the case, which was odd, since the Attorney General was at the meeting where we decided to go ahead with the investigation."

Bassett reviewed the law that created the Commission, and decided to go ahead with the investigation despite the Governor's opposition. A year later, the independent investigator completed his investigation and found that not only did the arson investigators in the Willingham case fail to meet current scientific standards, it failed to meet the standards that were in place at the time the investigation began in 1991. Indeed, the independent investigator concluded that there was no scientific basis for Willingham's conviction, and in September 2009, Bassett moved to a hold a public hearing about the case. Days before the hearing was convened, he says he received a call from Rick Perry's spokeswoman. His term had expired, and because he "served at the governor's pleasure," he was not being reappointed. "I was told the governor had decided to 'go in a different direction,'" Bassett says.

From there, Bassett was replaced with Williamson County District Attorney John Bradley -- a political ally of Perry's. And as I've run down here, Bradley distinguished himself mainly by going to great lengths to delay and impede the commission's investigation of the Willingham execution. Perhaps the most significant move Bradley made was restructuring the commission into subcommittees, one of which (the one he appointed himself to chair) would tackle the Willingham case. By shunting the commission's work into smaller groups, Bradley managed to evade Texas' Open Meetings Act -- which only applied to meetings for which there was a set quorum of the whole. Craig Beyler, the independent investigator mentioned above, backed Bassett's contention that the commission's work had been subverted by political pressure, writing to commission coordinator Leigh Tomlin, "Sadly, the political influence which has been exercised with respect to the commission has compromised the integrity of the enterprise."

Esquire and Junod deserve your readership for keeping the light burning on this case, so go read the whole thing.

MORE:
Rick Perry, Christian: What Would Pilate Do? [The Politics Blog @ Esquire]

PREVIOUSLY, on the HUFFINGTON POST:
Rick Perry Deserves Scrutiny For His Role In The Execution Of Cameron Todd Willingham

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

During last night's debate, I was disappointed that Brian Williams, faced with the golden opportunity to specifically cite the Cameron Todd Willingham case in his interrogation of Texas Governor and n...
During last night's debate, I was disappointed that Brian Williams, faced with the golden opportunity to specifically cite the Cameron Todd Willingham case in his interrogation of Texas Governor and n...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 345
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
serialcoma 08:49 AM on 09/09/2011
Not only did Governor Perry deny Willingham’s appeal for clemency even though an expert arson investigator had rebutted all the solid evidence in the case, Perry fired investigators who were about to provide  Read More...
The fact that Perry had an innocent man executed, despite the existence of evidence that he had not killed his children, and then covered it up, appears not to be a problem for him among Texas Republicans:
Veterans of Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison’s unsuccessful 2010 primary challenge to Perry recalled being stunned at the way attacks bounced off the governor in a strongly conservative state gripped by tea party fever. Multiple former Hutchison advisers recalled asking a focus group about the charge that Perry may have presided over the execution of an innocent man – Cameron Todd Willingham – and got this response from a primary voter: “It takes balls to execute an innocent man.”
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robert horwitz
08:12 PM on 09/11/2011
I remember some years ago while Kinky Friedman was running for Governor of Texas for me one of his most memorable campaign slogans was "Vote for me I need the closet space". Perhaps Rick I don't care what I do as long as I don't get caught Perry needed the closet space more than Kinky. It seems he has far more skeletons to closet than Kinky.
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
08:01 PM on 09/11/2011
"Well, isn't that special?"

~ the Church Lady
11:41 AM on 09/11/2011
Guilt and innocence are minor 'technicalities' for far too many... even Justice Scalia, of the U.S. Supreme Court, opined that actual innocence was irrelevant, if the trial was procedurally 'fair.'

The people who cheered are the ascendant authoritarian theofascist contingent of the Republican Party... simple, deliberately-ignorant people who believe that killing is justice... even when it's not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wonderYrednow
¿Y read backwards?
01:14 AM on 09/12/2011
The worst SCOTUS in more than a century!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Moore
Afraid of clowns
12:30 PM on 09/10/2011
I would think the Willingham contoversy is the biggest albatross around Parry's neck right now. This should be asked about by everyone interviewing this man. I know Fox News won't, but anyone else should. Pundits were saying his statements about SS being a Ponzi scheme would do him in. On the contrary, that appeals to his base. But does his base want a guy who abused his position of authority and the bureacracy of big government to stifle the truth coming out? We'll have to wait and see.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DMSmith
08:03 PM on 09/11/2011
Yes. They do. Didn't you see the wild applause at the last debate when the number of people executed in Texas was stated? It was truly sickening.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:40 PM on 09/09/2011
Dear Jason Linkins - You touched on a very significant point in your piece regarding how employees of corporate-owned media who pretend to be journalists and reporters fall well short of that description almost to the point they are a hollow mockery.

Brian Williams no doubt was doing what he was told much the same as the folks who had an opportunity to ask Vice President Cheney important questions while he was parading around hawking his book and failed to do so.

Corporate-owned media has become virtually USELESS as a source of reliable information and news.

Once the blogs are shut down there will be scant actual information available.
photo
lemmyk73
Foxy Shazam!
03:14 PM on 09/09/2011
It is amazing that suddenly people assume Willingham was innocent.


Linkins- this whole thing reeks of what the right wing media did to Obama. Is this your payback or something?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fredday
Nyak Nyak Nyak
04:43 PM on 09/09/2011
Please w i pe the drool from your face.
07:35 PM on 09/09/2011
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/09/07/090907fa_fact_grann?currentPage=1

It makes for a very sad, very compelling read.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wonderYrednow
¿Y read backwards?
01:16 AM on 09/12/2011
Republics think it's a good thing when they can kill a criminal, even when he's not a criminal.
01:35 PM on 09/09/2011
The defense and the claims that this guy was innocent baffle me. Lacking evidence that a fire was an arson doesn't mean it wasn't an arson. Other evidence suggested that it was. Like the refrigerator being moved in front of the backdoor. Like the fact that he was found outside of the house with a wall of fire in the front door. What father flees the house with his kids still inside? Then simply stands there while the fire gets thicker in the front door? Also his wife at the time, now ex-wife has testified that he admitted to her that he killed them. To this day she stands by that story. Yet we are to believe that this man isn't guilty because the fire investigators didn't follow proper protocol? During the trial the defense's own fire detective concluded that it was arson.

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/state/headlines/20101006-Ex-wife-says-Cameron-Todd-Willingham-6640.ece

So what is really at play here? I get that people don't like the death penalty. I don't get turning cold blooded killers who kill their own children into martyrs.
02:10 PM on 09/09/2011
Before you comment you might want to update yourself on the facts.
02:29 PM on 09/09/2011
My comments were concerning those facts. Is their evidence out there that proves that the man wasn't guilty? Please point me to it because I haven't seen it. I can believe that an investigator working for the state can overzealously try to convict someone. It is hard to believe that that is the case in this circumstance because the defense's fire expert reached the same conclusion. There was other evidence pointing towards guilt as well, which I mentioned before. So where is the evidence that proves that the man wasn't guilty? What is described only seems to cast doubt on a very small part of what was used to convict him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tazzie
02:50 PM on 09/09/2011
I've noticed people who support Perry and his ilk have developed a chronic willful allergy to fact that don't fit their narratives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tazzie
02:54 PM on 09/09/2011
Would you want a member of your family to face the death penalty when there is still reasonable doubt? What is the motivation of the investigators and the scientists who have reviewed the case to lie? Arson investigation has greatly changed in the last 10 years alone. We all like to believe we'd run into a burning building to save someone but the chances are not many do.
03:45 PM on 09/09/2011
There seems to be a wide spread effort to overturn cases when the evidence doesn't exonerate the person. In a perfect world we would know who did it and they could face whatever punishment we feel that they deserve. We don't live in that world though. Our citizens get lots of protections from potentially false accusations. It wasn't just the arson evidence that convicted this guy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
freedomsxm
01:08 PM on 09/09/2011
It's truly sad when the biggest applause of the GOP debate came when it was mention how many people have been executed in Texas since Rick Perry has been Governor...?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Moore
Afraid of clowns
12:24 PM on 09/10/2011
Yeah, I have to admit, that was surprising and weird. Right wing bloodlust I guess.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Scott
All I ask is that you make sense
12:45 PM on 09/09/2011
If you are a "Christian" and believe in killing innocent people for crimes they did not commit, then you are a hypocrite, pure and simple.
I do not understand why somebody would oppose abortion, but support killing innocent people who have done nothing wrong. Such people are "Christian" in name only. Have fun in Hell, sinners!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jody Dobis
12:18 PM on 09/09/2011
And he wants to be our latex (President) salesman? We have really reached the bottom of the barrel if Perry is taken serious. Palin may be a joke but this guy is dangerous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thetalkdiva
11:42 AM on 09/09/2011
Everybody talkin' about heaven aint going there!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wonderYrednow
¿Y read backwards?
01:27 AM on 09/12/2011
If there is such, that is such truth.
photo
homer winslow
Truth in Beauty, Beauty in Truth
11:08 AM on 09/09/2011
If Perry is a Christian, I am the freaking Pope!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
10:27 PM on 09/11/2011
This is what passes for Christianity today...Nut cases claiming the Statue of Liberty is a demonic idol, the Prime Minister of Japan slept with the sun demon, Catholicism is a "Godless cult", and a group that wants to change the Constitution: “to reflect Biblical truth on which it was founded.”.

Then there are the prosperity gospels, that dismiss the poor as not their problem....

They pray so that others can see them, they proclaim their faith on street corners, in mega-churches, on TV....

Yet fail in every aspect of the teachings by the guy they named their religion after.
photo
dfranz
With Liberty and Justice for all
11:00 AM on 09/09/2011
Perry isn't cognitive enough to realize that many in this country do not live in Texas and are uncomfortable with his cowboy hang em high attitude. The fact that he is incapable of accepting any responsibility for possible executing an innocent man tells me this man has no moral compass and that his Christian prayers are as fake as he is.
photo
PatA
Pink is a 4 letter word
12:32 PM on 09/09/2011
Perry made wear the "cloak of the western shoot 'em up Texas" but it has already started wearing thin. "You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool them all of the time". Do I have that right?

I grew up on a ranch (and live on it now at age 68) and my daddy must be spinning in his grave hearing people use the word "cowboy" when describing some politician from Texas. Daddy was a real cowboy in the truest sense of the word. He and my mother were Republicans and they always believed the party would return to it's origins, that is until their last years. They died in their 90s and felt great disappointment that the party had not turned back around before they died.

I am a photographer and studied with the late and great Douglas Kent Hall. We photographed cowboys all over the southwest and any one of them, on any given day, could have kicked Perry's as s with both hands tied behind them. They were real working people...not a KEN "cutout doll of a cowboy".

Mr. Perry, you ain't no cowboy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MontanaSouth
Montanan in Tucson
06:40 PM on 09/09/2011
As Molly Ivins would say: All hat, no cattle. I have met a few working cowboys in my days and I agree completely - Perry isn't one. No amount of down home talkin" is going to help him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
john hodgson
Dump your TEA in a River and have a Party
02:13 PM on 09/11/2011
If they Voted Republican, they still supported them.
10:56 AM on 09/09/2011
I'm a white, aging voter and I watched in horror as those in my "peer" group cheered the deaths of their fellow humans.

I am not against the death penalty, I am against bad law, bad convictions, and bad "lawyering" as evidenced in some Texas trials...(lawyers sleeping at a trial, etc.)

What I saw at the GOP debate was not very far removed from old Roman citizens cheering as innocent and guilty alike were slaughtered for their viewing pleasure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coco123
Left Coast Lefty.
11:25 AM on 09/09/2011
I too, was horrified by the applause when the number of humans Perry had executed was discussed. I was not prepared for that reaction at all, it was barbaric.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Moore
Afraid of clowns
12:27 PM on 09/10/2011
I think it was like when the alien reptiles in 'V' finallly tear their human skins off to show everyone they are indeed alien reptiles.
10:38 AM on 09/09/2011
And as of next tuesday another most likely innocent man - Steven Michael Woods (see link) - is going to be executed under Perry´s watch and he won´t care one bit

http://saveaninnocentlife.net/Home.php
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gidster
Not so much Liberal as I am anti evil.
10:32 PM on 09/11/2011
Texans will never admit to a mistake....They just can't be wrong.